1
Freemasonry in Eighteenth-Century Portugal and the Architectural Projects of the Marquis of Pombal
David MartĂn LĂłpez
This essay considers the significance of the philo-masonic attitude of the influential Portuguese Enlightenment politician, the Marquis of Pombal (1699â1782), through the analysis of his urban policies and of works of art and architecture created under his rule, most of them overseen by his friend, the architect and Freemason Carlos Mardel (1696â1763).1 Despite the recent growth in research on the history of Freemasonry, there remains a bias in the academic world against the study of connections between art and Freemasonry in Europe. This bias is most evident in Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In these three countries, Freemasonry was established in the early eighteenth century, soon after the founding of the Grand Lodge of England. The roots of the resistance to studying Freemasonry and the visual arts in southern Europe can be traced back to this period, when a papal bull of 1738 condemned the fraternal order.
SebastiĂŁo JosĂ© de Carvalho e Melo, Marquis of Pombal and Count of Oeiras, has been both criticized for his affiliation with Masonry and admired for expelling the Jesuits from Portugal and Brazil.2 Without evidence, some historians have imbued Pombal with political motivations that pose difficulties for the study of this important figure in Portugalâs history. I propose to ask, what changes in our understanding of Pombal if we speculate that he was a Freemason? How can art be useful for this proposition? By analyzing his biography and examining the symbolism in several artistic and architectural projects associated with him, I will explore these questions.
Pombal was one of the principal political leaders of Portugal during the Enlightenment. After the 1755 earthquake, he was responsible for the urban transformation of Lisbon and social reforms throughout the kingdom. Earlier, Pombal had been protected by King D. JoĂŁo V (r. 1706â50) who epitomized the absolutism of the period. Portugal was enjoying a Golden Age because of the gold it acquired from its colony of Brazil, but this profit was used to finance a war against Spain rather than to improve the infrastructure of Portugal.3 Moreover, the kingâs major concerns before the great earthquake were to demonstrate extreme luxury and opulence, to maintain the Catholic religion, and to advance modern technology. With his new source of funds, D. JoĂŁo was able to move forward with these initiatives.4
JoĂŁo V resisted the practice of Freemasonry at the same time that he protected individual Masons. Masonic symbols and references abound in architecture erected during his reign. An extraordinary image, possibly a portrait of JoĂŁo V, apparently painted shortly after his reign, presents itself on the door of the meeting room in the chapter house of Elvas Cathedral, in a work that portrays the king with masonic tools, including a golden trowel (Color pl. 1). Golden trowels were frequently used in masonic rituals, such as the consecration of foundation stones. The trowel implies the cement that is a symbol of union and fraternity in Freemasonry.5 Is the painting an encrypted allegory that indicated the kingâs protection of Freemasonry in Portugal or his membership in the order? We cannot decode with certainty this royal portrait or allegory, but I will provide examples of how D. JoĂŁo V protected, either directly or indirectly, through Pombal and other politicians, many of the first Freemasons of his kingdom.
Pombal remains one of the most enigmatic personalities of the eighteenth century, and his possible adherence to Freemasonry, perhaps through initiation in London or Vienna where he served as Portuguese ambassador from 1738 to 1744 and from 1745 to 1749, respectively, has not been documented. It is not unusual that one cannot confirm Pombalâs masonic affiliation, because in the Catholic countries of the Iberian Peninsula during that period, such documentation was not kept or was destroyed by Freemasons to protect both their institutions and their reputations. Yet, as the historian JosĂ© Antonio Ferrer Benimeli warns, most of the politicians who were responsible for the expulsion of the Jesuits from Portugal, Spain, France, and Italy have been called Freemasons without any evidence to support such an identity.6 Most historians who believe in the masonic association of Pombal speculate that he was initiated in London or Vienna.7
The Freemason and historian AntĂłnio de Oliveira Marques proposes that the evidence of Pombalâs Freemasonry can be found in many artistic manifestations of masonic symbolism in works created under his administration.8 In the 1990s, Oliveira Marquesâs theory seemed risky, but now through art historical methods and new considerations of the period, one can reinforce and embrace it. This essay will demonstrate the existence of several masonic references in Pombalâs residences and in architectural projects realized under his direction.
The main façade of the residence of the Marquis of Pombal in Ăvora displays a coat of arms and a masonic reference that do not appear in any of his other residences. The coat of arms crowns the small palaceâs façade and is inscribed 1753 (Fig. 1.1). By then, Pombal had returned from Vienna and was already in the service of King D. JosĂ© I (r. 1750â77). Carved in white marble, the cartouche represents Pombalâs arms, topped by a noblemanâs armor and helmet on which stands a bird with a horseshoe in its beak. One element, although linked to a certain tradition in Portuguese heraldry, is here quite similar to an article of masonic ritual dress.9 The coat of arms is sculpted as though it were a leather apron, with its ribbon-like ties and buckle. This object could serve as an aesthetic metalanguage to communicate to the initiated the symbolic rhetoric of the masonic order, and the marquisâs identity as a Mason.
Figure 1.1 Pombal Palace, main entrance with the coat of arms of Pombal, 1753, Ăvora, Portugal. Photograph by the author.
The Symbolism of the Baixa
After the earthquake that devastated Lisbon in 1755, the Marquis of Pombal directed the urban recovery and went on to help enact social reforms in the kingdom. The disaster that took place on November 1, 1755 had continental aftershocks. The earthquake shattered Europeans not only from a sentimental and humanitarian point of view but also from symbolic and cultural ones, calling into question the Christian morality of the time.10 Nevertheless, the city needed to be rebuilt and to function. As Leonor FerrĂŁo contends, the project for rebuilding the area of Lisbon known as the Baixa was an instrument of power to demonstrate the stateâs ability to create a more hygienic modern city and to favor, as...