With the ascendancy of neoliberalism in American culture beginning in the 1960s, the political structures governing private lives became more opaque and obscure. Neoliberal Nonfictions argues that a new style of documentary art emerged to articulate the fissures between individual experience and reality in the era of finance capitalism.
In this wide-ranging study, Daniel Worden touches on issues ranging from urban poverty and criminal justice to environmental collapse and international politics. He examines the impact of local struggles and global markets on music, from D. A. Pennebaker's infamous Dylan documentary Dont Look Back to Kendrick Lamar's breakthrough album Good Kid, M.A.A.D. City. He details the emergence of the hustler as an icon of neoliberal individualism in Jay-Z's autobiography Decoded, Alex Haley's Autobiography of Malcom X, and Hunter S. Thompson's "gonzo" journalism. He looks at how contemporary works such as Maggie Nelson's memoir The Red Parts and Taryn Simon's photography series The Innocents challenge the moral simplifications of traditional true crime writing. In his conclusion, he explores the dominance of memoir as a literary mode in the neoliberal era, particularly focusing on works by Joan Didion and Dave Eggers.
Documentary has become the aesthetic of our age, harnessing the irreconcilable distance between individual and society as a site for aesthetic experimentation across media, from journalism and photography to memoir, music, and film. Both a symptom of and a response to the emergence of economic neoliberalism, the documentary aesthetic is central to how we understand ourselves and our world today.
Frequently asked questions
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on âCancel Subscriptionâ - itâs as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youâve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Cultural Frames, Framing Culture by Daniel Worden in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & North American Literary Criticism. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
In Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Fredric Jameson famously uses the Bonaventure Hotel in Los Angeles as a metaphor for âthe incapacity of our minds, at least at present, to map the great multinational and decentered communicational network in which we find ourselves caught as individual subjects.â1 Jameson seeks to make clear that the vertiginous experience evoked by the hotelâs symmetrical towers, rounded lounges, and glassed elevators is not unique but instead an emblematic condition of postmodernism. To make this claim, he juxtaposes the Bonaventure Hotel with an account of helicopter flight from Michael Herrâs 1977 work of literary journalism about the Vietnam War, Dispatches. In his reading of Herr, Jameson argues that the bookâs lexicon, which âfuses a whole range of contemporary collective idiolects, most notably rock language and black language,â typifies the breakdown of narrative in the late twentieth century: âThis first terrible postmodernist war cannot be told in any of the traditional paradigms of the war novel or movieâindeed, that breakdown of all previous narrative paradigms is, along with the breakdown of any shared language through which a veteran might convey such an experience, among the principal subjects of the book and may be said to open up the place of a whole new reflexivity.â2 Herrâs refusal of fictional tropes gestures, in Jamesonâs account, to a proto-articulation of a âwhole new reflexivity,â later to be described as âsomething of the mystery of the new postmodernist space.â3 From our vantage point today, it seems rather clear what aesthetic form this ânew reflexivityâ has taken: documentary.
Dispatches opens with the abdication of objective journalistic standards: âWe knew that the uses of most information were flexible, different pieces of ground told different stories to different people.â4 What this means is not that reality has no meaning, but instead that there is, in Herrâs words, ânot much chance anymore for history to go on unselfconsciously.â5 In his reflexive prose, Herr positions himself centrally among the soldiers he interviews and travels with, often juxtaposing official narratives released by the U.S. government about the war with the messy experiences of soldiers on the ground. This juxtaposition produces the bookâs own methodological rationale, an argument for the necessity of the documentary aesthetic in the 1960s and 1970s. As Herr notes, if âconventional journalism could no more reveal this war than conventional firepower could win it,â then Herrâs focus on personal experience and emotion strives to represent the war in its reflexive, mediated complexity.6 Indeed, Herr describes his role as that of documentary storyteller: âSo we have all been compelled to make our own movies, as many movies as there are correspondents, and this one is mine.â7 By blending techniques from film into prose, Herr captures the juxtapositions that define what we can now think of as a failed precursor to the more secretive U.S. military engagements of the 1970s and 1980s. Jamesonâs negative comparison of Herrâs Dispatches to the âwar novel or movieâ only underlines what makes this reflexivity unique: in its combination of narrative breakdown, first-person experience, and vernacular language, and in its origins as long-form, impressionistic war reportage for Esquire, Dispatches is a work in the documentary aesthetic.8
That the category of âdocumentaryâ was not used by Jameson in the 1980s and early 1990s to describe postmodern aesthetics is understandable. After all, documentary was often critiqued during postmodernism as a naive, exploitative mode in photography and film.9 Similarly, its literary equivalent of the period, in which Herr was often included, the New Journalism, seemed opposed to postmodernism in its sometimes archconservative politics and in its insistence on the role of the author as a major mediating force. Yet for Jameson, Herrâs documentary prose marks something like an attempt at cognitive mapping through its collective vernacular, even if it ultimately represents less a totality than vertigo in his reading. Indeed, as Jamesonâs invocation of Herr implies but does not examine, a whole swath of documentary art from the 1960s to the present has aimed to create new modes of conceiving the relation of subject to structure, exploited to totality. Documentary artâranging from works like Herrâs Dispatches to conceptual artworks like Martha Roslerâs The Bowery in TwoInadequate Descriptive Systems (1974â75)âemerged to represent poverty, exploitation, and modes of being in the postwar United States while also using experimental modes to critique the older tradition of documentary that, as Rosler argued, âhas been much more comfortable in the company of moralism than wedded to a rhetoric or program of revolutionary politics.â10 The âmoralismâ that Rosler points out is indicative of both New Dealâera documentaryâs polemic messaging and the logic of formal purity that came to be associated with modernist aesthetics. With Rosler and others working in the documentary aesthetic, documentary art moves beyond these origins and limits. Today, documentary experiments continue in an even more prominent fashion, including celebrated literary works such as Ben Lernerâs 10:04 (2014), Claudia Rankineâs Citizen (2014), and Maggie Nelsonâs The Argonauts (2015); photography projects like Trevor Paglenâs Invisible: Covert Operations and Classified Landscapes (2010), Taryn Simonâs Paperwork and the Will of Capital (2015), and Richard Misrach and Guillermo Galindoâs Border Cantos (2016); installation art projects by Ann Hamilton and Fred Wilson; and digital documentaries like the video game Kursk (2018) by the Polish game studio Jujubee and the web-based Offshore (2013), an interactive documentary by Brenda Longfellow, Glenn Richards, and Helios Design Labs.
As Erika Balsom and Hila Peleg argue in their book Documentary across Disciplines: âContemporary documentary practices reach across media and across disciplines to form a rich site marked by imperatives at once aesthetic and political. Far from any notion of âfly-on-the-wallâ immediacy or quasi-scientific aspirations to objectivity, such practices understand documentary not as the neutral picturing of reality, but as a way of coming to terms with reality by means of working with and through images and narrative.â11 If contemporary documentary art exists in an expanded fieldâno longer defined by medium specificity or simple binaries of truth and fictionâthen it may be that documentary offers a framework for representing our immediate history and contemporary moment in a way that can make visible the structures of exploitation emblematic of the present.12 When critics like Alberto Toscano and Jeff Kinkle or Walter Benn Michaels, in very different ways, find in film and photography a renewed assertion of cognitive mapping or aesthetic autonomy, what they may be noticing is less a commitment to the concepts of totality or autonomy than it is documentary form itself. The documentary aesthetic is newly prominent today but has a history of documenting both subjective experience and structures of exploitation that coincides with the emergence of finance capitalism in the 1960s.13 Therefore many seemingly postmodern works might have different meanings if viewed as works in the documentary aesthetic.
For example, Jeff Wallâs well-known 1982 photograph Mimic (fig. 3) would not be classified as documentary under traditional definitions, but by thinking of it as such, I hope to make the point that documentary form is a mode of artistic production today that surpasses its earlier, more rigid definitions. Mimic uses the aesthetic of a documentary genre, street photography, even though it is a posed and carefully composed photograph restaging an incident that Wall witnessed on a Vancouver street. Walter Benn Michaels has argued that this photograph represents the difference between individual feelings, ambitions, and expressions, and the economic system that, in his view, renders those sentiments irrelevant and even harmful to the pursuit of economic equality. The photograph represents an act of prejudice, a tense encounter between a white, seemingly working-class couple and an Asian man. The Asian man represents, here, a new, educated, upwardly mobile immigrant class, resented by the white man as his prospects point downward. Wallâs photograph, for Michaels, asserts its autonomy as a photograph, and in turn the photographâs form âassert[s] the autonomy of structure in relation to affect.â14 Racial difference and class difference do not correspond and are indeed in an inverse relationship in the photograph. Yet the irreducibility of prejudice to exploitation is made available through the photographâs documentary presentation, through the use of a mode of photography that we expect to represent subjective experience as evidence of a structure of exploitation.
In Michaelsâs view, Wall rejects the generic conceits of street photography. This rejection makes it all the more compelling to read the photographâs form as a refinement of documentary aesthetics, a shift away from the familiar genre of street photography and toward a more rapacious documentary aesthetic. What has led critics to think of Wallâs photograph as postmodern is how the subjective experience of prejudice, to borrow Douglas Crimpâs phrasing in his landmark essay âThe Photographic Activity of Postmodernism,â is âa function not of presence but of absence.â15 That is, the racism expressed by the photographâs white male subject represents resentment and hate but does not immediately represent the economic and racial structures that have produced that feeling. As a restaging of an experience, Mimic documents an act of prejudice that becomes, in the photograph, evidence of a shift in economic relations, as the prospects of the white working class begin to dwindle as manufacturing and industry are reconfigured under globalization. Yet the value of the photograph as documentary is that it can only represent this structural condition by representing something else, a feeling produced by exploitation but one that exceeds its cause. The personal feelings and ambitions captured in the photograph are central to the project of documentary. Emotional and personal relations are not a false front for structural analysis to topple over. The feelings of the subjects in Mimic are visible alongside the structural relations of those very subjects, and the photograph captures this tension. Just as Herrâs Dispatches places experience in relation to other, official discourses about the Vietnam War, Mimic juxtaposes feeling with structure, and in so doing it participates in the documentary aesthetic by presenting an account of the social world.
Documentary practices have expanded since the 1960s, and this expansion has been facilitated by the untethering of documentary from narrow constructions of political perspective, factuality, and medium specificity. Important documentary projects of our age cross mediaâthey include journalistic writing classed under the headings of the New Journalism, literary journalism, and submersion journalism; conceptual and archival art practices that critique the museum as an institution and seek to break down the walls that separate the museum from society; memoirs that have populated bestseller lists from the 1990s on; major works of comics nonfiction like Art Spiegelmanâs Maus (1991) and Joe Saccoâs Palestine (1996); and popular music across genres that trades in personal authenticity. Documentary produces a way of thinking of everyday lifeâs distance from social structures as a site for aesthetic experimentation amid what seem to be intractably compromised conditions. Turning everyday life, real objects, and the structures that exploit and give them meaning into art through documentary form presents the contradictions of our contemporary moment as operating through both the unprecedented ubiquity of finance capital in everyday life and a surplus of subjective experience determined by, yet sometimes in excess of, those structures.
In this chapter, I will focus on works that foreground the tensions between individuality and systems beyond individuals in ways similar to Herrâs Dispatches and Wallâs Mimic. These works cross media forms, and they are particularly in sync with neoliberal culture, as they foreground the ties between personality and economy. In D. A. Pennebakerâs documentary film Dont Look Back, Charlie Ahearnâs fictionalized film about graffiti and hip-hop culture Wild Style, Ed Piskorâs comics series Hip Hop Family Tree, and Kendrick Lamarâs album Good Kid, M.A.A.D. City, individual styles are bounced off of consumer culture, collective imaginaries, corporate exploitation, and global capitalism. These works are part of rock and hip-hop cultures, arguably the now-universal languages of our time, and they capture how experience and structures work in a negative relation under finance capitalism.