Sunshine and Shadow
Thomas Martin Wheeler
Editorâs introduction
Sunshine and Shadow appeared in weekly instalments in the Northern Star between 31 March 1849 and 5 January 1850. Its author was the Chartist administrator and schoolteacher Thomas Martin Wheeler (1811-62). Some brief biographical details will show that Wheeler was well qualified for writing a historical review of Chartismâs progress.1
Wheeler was born in south London, the son of a publican and wheelwright. From this respectable artisan background he went to school in Stoke Newington, and was later apprenticed to his uncle in Banbury, a haberdasher and woolcomber.2 Some of this experience is echoed in the early career of his hero Arthur Morton, who is also apprenticed to an uncle. Wheeler soon left this trade, however, and embarked on a restless early manhood. He trained as a baker, tried his hand at gardening and spent several years wandering around the southern counties of England as an itinerant artisan. Eventually he settled in London and simultaneously became a teacher and a stalwart activist in metropolitan radicalism.3 He rose quickly into the ranks of Chartist officialdom. Like Thomas Cooper and other Chartist intellectuals he achieved a measure of social mobility through self-education and political service to radicalism. His schoolroom soon became a political venue for meetings. He became the London correspondent of the Northern Star in 1840, a Chartist lecturer, and a member and later secretary of the Executive of the National Charter Association. He was therefore at the hub of Chartismâs national organization and policy decisions. In 1845 he helped OâConnor formulate the Chartist Land Plan. He joined the Society of Fraternal Democrats, and in March 1846 he demonstrated his internationalist credentials in an address to the Friends of Poland. He is reported to have said, âthere is more glory in dying in defence of our countryâs rights and liberties than in a whole life of mean and truckling subserviancyâ.4 Later that year he resigned his post as secretary to the Charter Association to take up a new position as secretary to the Chartist Land Company. The Land Company was an intiative aimed at resettling poor, urban labourers on the land. The company purchased land out of weekly subscriptions and built fine cottages in generous allotments (many of these buildings survive to the present day). As a reward for his administrative work Wheeler was provided with the freehold of a cottage in the settlement called OâConnorville (built at Heronsgate, now part of Rickmansworth, near London). He resigned his post in July 1847, but this did not mark the end of Wheelerâs activism. He participated in the National Convention in March and April 1848, where he argued that the Kennington Common demonstration on April 10 should go ahead despite government opposition. Wheeler moved:
That they should issue a proclamation, declaring their determination to hold the meeting on Monday next, notwithstanding the foolish proclamation of the Government, and notice of the police.5
On the great day itself Wheeler rode in the delegatesâ carriage alongside OâConnor, Ernest Jones and George Julian Harney. After the failure of the petition he retired to his pastoral retreat and spade husbandry. The break from official duties gave him time to write. In March 1849 the Northern Star published the first episode of the 37 weekly âcommunionsâ which would make up Sunshine and Shadow. With this achievement behind him, Wheeler resurfaced in âlateâ Chartism. He was elected to the National Convention in 1851 and worked hard to sustain the National Charter Executive. He wrote for Reynoldsâs Political Instructor (1849-50) and helped Ernest Jones set up the Peopleâs Paper in 1852. His last Chartist publication was a very brief life of OâConnor written to accompany the funeral oration delivered at OâConnorâs burial in 1855.6 Wheeler ended his days working for the Friend-in-Need Life Assurance Company.
An indication of Wheelerâs aspiration to become a writer as well as an activist can be seen in a short series of articles he wrote for the Northern Star in early 1848. These form an account of a walking tour between several Chartist settlements.7 The style of the pieces owes much to Cobbettâs Rural Rides, interspersing topographical observations with historical and political disquisitions on the decline of the yeomanry and the rottenness of modernity. The major difference between Wheeler and Cobbett, however, is that Wheeler can look to the Chartist settlements as the Utopian solution to this problem. Sentimental nostalgia for the Saxon past is counterbalanced by equally sentimental praise for the Paradise Regained of the Chartist Land Plan. As a resident at OâConnorville, Wheeler constructs himself as the living proof that social relations have been restored to their ânatural stateâ. The settlements are the reincarnation of that lost cottage economy so beloved by Cobbett, but they are also beacons of hope and social transformation. When Wheeler notes that Lowbands is fertile in misletoe and OâConnorville in holly, he waxes lyrical about the symbolic value of these crops:
Lowbands and OâConnorville â the misletoe and the holly â like them, may be green and flourishing amidst the decay and rottenness by which they are surrounded â like them may they, not only in Christmas season, but in every season, throw a gleam of joy and mirth around, and reciprocally unite and twine with each other.8
An oscillation between Quixotic emotionalism and radical diatribe is a hallmark of Wheelerâs style.
Sunshine and Shadow has not received the critical attention it deserves for two main reasons: its inaccessibility and its form. Those left-wing critics who have sought it out tend to dismiss it as a thinly veiled piece of propaganda or journalistic reportage, lacking rounded characters and a coherent plot.9 If those are the agreed requirements for good fiction then Sunshine and Shadows will certainly be deemed to be of low-grade quality. But the narrative requires a different set of reading principles, as Wheeler was writing for a Chartist audience.10
The date of composition is the first clue to the storyâs purpose, which is to take stock of Chartism after the turbulence of 1848.11 This does not mean that Wheeler merely wrote an elegy for a defeated cause, as some critics claim. Indeed, Wheeler makes impassioned pleas for renewed efforts and remobilization. But equally important was to find a narrative method that would allow him to both present and assess the movement as a historical event. As he declared at the opening of the first instalment, the âfiction department of literature has hitherto been neglected by the scribes of our body, and the opponents of our principles have been allowed to wield the power of imagination over the youth of our party, without any effort on our part to occupy that wide and fruitful fieldâ (p. 72). In order to âwield the power of imaginationâ successfully Wheeler decided to focalize a âHistory of Chartismâ through the depiction of âone of yourselves struggling against the power of adverse circumstancesâ (p. 192). In other words Wheeler proletarianized the Bildungsroman, not only in placing a working-class hero at the centre of the story, but in opening up realism to social and political analysis, and using the story to mobilize the reader. Moreover, he constructs his heroâs destiny out of the key moments in Chartismâs development. Arthur Morton does not stand apart from history but is woven into its texture, personifying its contradictions and uneven progress. Arthurâs immediate relevance is to show Chartismâs âhigh and generous inspirationsâ (p. 192) in a climate of post-1848, counterrevolutionary smears and misrepresentation.
Arthur conforms to the conventions of Bildungsroman heroism in being an orphan and underdog (we think of Oliver Twist, Jane Eyre and Alton Locke among a host of others). His uncle is a crass south of England wool-merchant, who lazily dispatches his nephew to a second-rate boarding-school. The one ray of sunshine in this experience is the friendship of Walter North, son of a wine merchant and school boxing champ (any resemblance to David Copperfield and Steerforth must be coincidental, as Dickensâs novel did not commence serialization until May 1849). The North family take Arthur in, where he falls in love with Julia North, who is both educated and like himself a âlover of libertyâ (p. 91). Class forces soon assert themselves, and Arthur is separated from the Norths geographically and socially. While he is apprenticed to a printer, Walter goes to Liverpool to take over the expanding family business. Wheeler transforms the traditional device of the wresting apart of two childhood âbrothersâ into a model of the class structure after 1832. As Arthur tramps for work in London, Walter becomes a merchant prince, âa specimen of that large and influential classâ set to âdethrone the feudal aristocracy of the realm, and monopolise the political and social power of the empireâ (p. 84). Talent and prosperity are inversely related. Arthur has a âcultivated intellectâ and a Shelleyan imagination. Walter is a philistine and so corrupted that he plots the seduction of Julia and her marriage to a West Indian island governor. Juliaâs Clarissa-like treatment provokes one of several outbursts in the story against Victorian sexual morality. Marriages of convenience are merely âlegalized prostitutionâ (p. 87). Although at other moments in the story Wheeler takes a traditionalist patriarchal line in being dismissive of womenâs public participation in the Chartist movement, his assault on bourgeois marriage and sexual hypocrisy owes much to Wollstonecraft and Godwin.12 As the plot unfolds, it is clear that Julia has more in common with the exploited working class than her own exploiting class which betrays her.
The class polarization of Arthur and Walter gathers pace as Arthur tramps to Birmingham and arrives in the middle of the Chartist ferment of 1839.13 Chartism provides his grievances with a voice and he becomes an activist and speaker. After the Bull Ring riots, which Wheeler attributes to agents provocateurs, Arthur is wrongly accused of arson and flees to Liverpool to take a boat to America. He almost seeks refuge at Walterâs house, who is now a ruthless class enemy and would have certainly turned him in to the authorities. His sexual rite de passage begins appropriately at sea. His boat sinks in a storm and he and other survivors are picked up by a ship coincidentally carrying Julia to her new estate in the Caribbean. They embark on a liaison manquĂ©. While Wheeler does not allow adultery to happen, he defends the loversâ feelings, and refutes the convention of the fallen woman:
Love in her was no crime, albeit she was the bride of another, â it was the result of feelings as pure as nature ever implanted in human breast âŠ. we produce human nature as it is â...