Athens: A Palimpsest of Perspectives
Journalist Nikos Vatopoulos takes us on a walk to explore the buildings and different eras of Athens, a city of many faces – both ethnic and architectural – in which change is the only constant.
NIKOS VATOPOULOS
Translated by Konstantine Matsoukas
NIKOS VATOPOULOS graduated in sociology from the Deree American College in Athens and specialised in European studies at the University of Reading, UK. Since 1988 he has worked for the Greek newspaper Kathimerini, writing mainly about Athens; between 2007 and 2014 he was editor of the Art and Culture section. His books include Facing Athens (Potamos Publications, 2008) and Walking in Athens (Metaichmio, 2019), a selection of articles from his Sunday column. As well as being a journalist, Nikos Vatopoulos is also a photographer and organises walking tours focusing on the architecture of Athens.
There are times when I feel like a traveller of old standing awestruck before ancient ruins, the allure of which has beguiled me from a young age. I would try to capture the sense of glory and loss in a way that was almost existential. When I was young, in the first decades after the Second World War, although Athens did have many abandoned buildings, the ‘ruins’ referred more to the fragments of an ancient past, lost in time under layers of successive generations, rather than to the debris of a more recent urban landscape.
I was born in Athens at a time when everything was changing. The new world was emerging at breakneck speed and any comment in praise of the near past possessed an aura of romantic naivety. The idea of a new, modern Greece reborn after the disastrous 1940s was irresistible, intoxicating and, despite mistakes and blunders, has pretty much survived into the first years of the twenty-first century.
I have taken photographs of Athens ever since I was an adolescent, when, still at school, I would take note of its old houses at intersections or squeezed between six-storey apartment blocks. I photographed them – maybe artlessly – but in the spirit of a collector gathering prized possessions. There was a bond there. But, because of the economic crisis, daily life in Athens started to change around 2010, and I felt myself changing alongside it, aging with my city, experiencing its transformations like a sore on my body or as if the greying of my hair were suddenly accelerating. I opened my eyes and saw my city anew. The buildings that were modern in the 1960s, now I saw them as aged as I was. I started regarding the keepers of old Athens with different eyes. Found in the centre but in much greater concentrations in the suburbs, the ruins of the noble city stood like mummified royalty. They became my new and much-loved friends.
Street by street, I started to record them. The residential areas, which have played a part in Greek life since the nineteenth century, were full of houses that felt unwanted. They had survived the successive waves of demolition, mainly after 1955, that had transformed the look and scale of the city. It would be overly simplistic to suggest that the lack of care given to these early-twentieth-century homes, with their trademark Athenian style, was purely a result of the economic crisis. That is only part of the story. These abandoned homes of old Athens are in the state they are in also as a result of years of lack of appreciation as well as legal complications and issues around inheritance. Although many have been granted preservation orders and are under the legal protection of the state, they stand there in ruins. Several have collapsed. They are a spectacular and dramatic sight.
I wonder if those who visit Athens and know about the city mainly through their imaginations, through literature and dreams rather than through experience, pay attention to such buildings. For Greeks, including me and most of my generation, the idea of a modern Athens is one that combines triumph and grief. Generations of Athenians grew up with the sense that this city had paid the price for its post-war prosperity with the loss of that sense of scale and harmony that were the mark of Athens up to around 1955–1960, despite the great social inequalities and contradictions found there. Those born after 1970 have embraced the notion of a thwarted Athens.
Looking over the city from its historic hills, the Acropolis or Lycabettus, one realises just how big Athens is. Fortunately, the population has stabilised since 1990 – although it is impossible to know exact numbers because of the large number of foreign migrants. And you cannot understand contemporary Athens without taking immigration into consideration, as it has transformed life in the city. Athens had been relatively homogeneous racially up to 1990 and the arrival of the first waves of migrants, mainly from the Balkans, Poland and the former Soviet Union. More recently, and for a number of years, migrants from Asia and Africa have colonised whole areas in the centre as well as the old middle-class neighbourhoods.
To make sense of Athens – including its scattered, forgotten houses – one needs to consider the cycles of population change after 1830. The view over Athens from the Acropolis often resembles a silvery-white sea of densely packed buildings, most constructed after 1950. In one sense, Athens is a triumph of cubist modernism or the vindication of Le Corbusier on a grand scale. Visitors need to give Athens time if they are to understand it. With its very particular profile, it is one of the most impressive examples of urban experimentation anywhere in Europe. Although it would be easy to interpret its post-war spread as a reflection of the population’s mass convergence on the city, that view is restrictive. Athens was reborn in the 1830s in a climate of European romanticism during the period of the birth of nations. Greece is a young state, the same age as Belgium, but older than Italy, Germany or any of the Balkan countries.
Looking at photographs of Athens from the mid-nineteenth century, it is hard to believe that it is the same city we see today. Most of the nineteenth-century private homes have been replaced by newer and, in many cases, better buildings, as Athens has been under construction constantly. The small, idiosyncratic, belle époque city hosted the first modern Olympic Games in 1896, a time when Greece was a small nation, poor and with inadequate infrastructure, yet with the ambition to express the spirit of the new Hellenism. Ever since that time – a period that took in the acme of the city’s urbanisation but also bankruptcy, Greek pride as well as humiliation (such as the disastrous war of 1897 against the Ottoman Empire) in an environment of pronounced nationalism – Athens continued to grow as a neoclassical capital. Today one can still see public buildings from that era but very few private homes. The shells of the houses one finds today in the city’s residential suburbs date from 1900 to 1940. The earlier city, small but with the attitude of a national capital, had adopted neoclassicism as its architectural style – a natural consequence of the 1834 declaration that Athens would become the capital of the new Greek kingdom. With young Otto – the son of Bavaria’s passionately philhellene King Ludwig I – as its first monarch the small town was organised as a modern city along clearly classicist lines. Although modest in scale, Athens exerted enormous appeal both for the Greeks of the diaspora – who saw in the new capital the cradle of the nation’s rebirth – and for the cultivated European public as a whole. The Acropolis and other monuments of classical antiquity were scattered around the nucleus of the old city over a wide area that was as yet free of construction.
ATHENS, 1841
A map by P.W. Forchhammer showing that in the mid-nineteenth century Athens was still a village with a population of only a few thousand.
Today it is hard to discern the classical landscape. However, around the 2004 Olympic Games a project was initiated for the integration of archaeological sites in central Athens, which created a pedestrianised zone around the Acropolis, and the walk from the Ancient Agora (a public space in classical Athens) to the Acropolis Museum has become one of the most celebrated in the city. The Athenian landscape is, for the most part, buried beneath the modern streets and buildings, but it emerges unexpectedly at points and elicits powerful associations. There is the enchanting profile of the ancient hills facing the Acropolis in the neighbourhood of Thissio as well as the area around the river Ilissos, which was covered over in the 1950s. These poetic interludes, with their almost pagan associations, among the trees of Attica – pine, laurel, arbutus – and the smooth rocks, the natural soil and the wildflowers in spring and autumn, are a reminder of the city that was and, mutatis mutandis, could be born again. They also offer a sharp contrast to the often smothering density of the buildings in Athens, with its narrow streets and few open spaces. Yet there, in that compact urban network, is to be found the genetic material of one of the most fascinating cases of urban rebirth in Europe.
When I walk through the city centre I see, as if on a screen, the buildings that were there fifty or sixty years ago, the ones that lent an air of real class to streets great and small. In Athens, with a few exceptions, properties and city blocks are small: Athens reflects its history of small ownership that, like small-scale businesses, accounted for most of the city’s urbanisation, at least during the long period between 1840 and 1980. Building fever was everywhere until the 2009 economic crisis, which shone a light on chronic problems in the Greek economy and in the wider society.
From the earliest days of the modern city there was a desire to create a capital worthy of the name. Numerous mansions were designed to lend Athens an air of grandeur – especially after 1870, when a concerted effort was under way to modernise Greek society. Large neoclassical buildings were gradually erected – from the university, by Danish architect Christian Hansen in 1842, to the nearby Academy of Athens (considered one of the most elegant examples of public architecture anywhere in the world), completed in the 1880s and based on plans by the architect Theophilus Hansen, Christian’s brother and the more widely acclaimed of the two in Europe. The entrance is adorned by statues of Athena and Apollo on lofty columns, and the relief work, with designs by Hansen himself, shows the level of the capital’s ambitions.
But the building of the Athens Academy is also a reminder of the international networks of ideas and people that reached nineteenth-century Athens through the interchange of ideas and synergies with the rest of Europe. The building was financed by the Greek baron, Simon Sinas, a member of the powerful Greek community in Vienna (as was Nikolaus Dumba, who financed the erection of the Wiener Musikverein). It was Sinas who engaged Theophilus Hansen, then practising as an architect in Vienna (where, among other buildings, he also designed the Austrian parliament, which resembles the Athens Academy, although it is more severe in tone). Hansen arrived in Athens with his student, Ernst Ziller, a Saxon architect who would remain in Greece, become naturalised and marry a Greek. Ziller introduced his own architectural style, a mix of neoclassicism and Renaissance, erecting approximately five hundred buildings in Greece.
All this is relevant to an understanding of contemporary Athens. Ziller had a particular aesthetic sense, using a range of references such as caryatids, Pompeiian red pigment, mannerist staircases and sphinxes in marble and clay. He imposed a distinctive style on the city and had a great many followers. Everyone knows Zill...