ECPPM 2021 - eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction

Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Product & Process Modelling (ECPPM 2021), 5-7 May 2021, Moscow, Russia

Vitaly Semenov, Raimar J Scherer, Vitaly Semenov, Raimar J Scherer

• Publisher: CRC Press
• Year: 2021
• ISBN:
  9781000413373
• Edition: 1
• Topic: Computer Science
• Subtopic: Databases
• Index: Computer Science

eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction 2021 collects the papers presented at the 13th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling (ECPPM 2021, Moscow, 5-7 May 2021). The contributions cover a wide spectrum of thematic areas that hold great promise towards the advancement of research and technological development targeted at the digitalization of the AEC/FM (Architecture, Engineering, Construction and Facilities Management) domains. High quality contributions are devoted to critically important problems that arise, including:

• Information and Knowledge Management
• Semantic Web and Linked Data
• Communication and Collaboration Technologies
• Software Interoperability
• BIM Servers and Product Lifecycle Management Systems
• Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical Systems
• Sensors and Internet of Things
• Big Data
• Artificial and Augmented Intelligence in AEC
• Construction Management
• 5D/nD Modelling and Planning
• Building Performance Simulation
• Contract, Cost and Risk Management
• Safety and Quality
• Sustainable Buildings and Urban Environments
• Smart Buildings and Cities
• BIM Standardization, Implementation and Adoption
• Regulatory and Legal Aspects
• BIM Education and Training
• Industrialized Production, Smart Products and Services

Over the past quarter century, the biennial ECPPM conference series, as the oldest BIM conference, has provided researchers and practitioners with a unique platform to present and discuss the latest developments regarding emerging BIM technologies and complementary issues for their adoption in the AEC/FM industry.

Models, methods and tools for design, engineering, construction and maintenance

Polyhedral space partitioning as an alternative to component assembly

V. Galishnikova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

W. Huhnt

Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

DOI 10.1201/9781003191476-19

ABSTRACT: Building information models are conventionally assembled from individually constructed components. For communication and collaboration, data are mapped to the model using standards like the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). The specification of the topology of a component is shape-dependent. Interoperability of software systems of different vendors has not been achieved with the IFC concept. Polyhedral space partitioning is proposed as an alternate approach to the solution of the interoperability problem. Some fundamental features of the approach are presented in this paper. Unbounded space is partitioned by splitting one component at a time. Polygons and dihedral cycles suffice to model the topology. Collisions and gaps are detected by testing only the component that is being split. Handling of the geometric user surface is simple because the topology is treated by a hidden core model. The model structure supports semantic expansion for physical, functional, economic, social, administrative and other applications.

1 Introduction

Building Information Modeling (BIM) is becoming more and more the state of the art in AEC projects. Software tools such as Autodesk Revit, Allplan or ArchiCAD are examples for modeling tools used in daily practice. Different kinds of information are specified; the most relevant kinds are semantics and geometry. Semantics are terms which classify components such as beam, slab, column, door or stairway including terms to name properties and values for properties. This paper focuses on geometry.

Software companies usually do not publish details of their implementations. This is true to data structures and algorithms. Contrary to this, theoretical approaches are published and taught at universities all over the world. The most frequently used theories are based on boundary representations (BRep) or Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG). In addition, the shape of components can be described by parameters (Mäntylä 1988).

Existing modeling tools map their internal data onto standardized models for data transfer between different software tools. The most frequently used standard are the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) (IFC 2020a).

The IFC concept, its implementation and its widespread application have contributed very significantly to the benefits of BIM for AEC. Some of the initial expectations associated with the introduction of the concept did, however, not materialize. When IFC was first presented, one of the main targets was to achieve interoperability between the products of different vendors by standardization.

Unfortunately, this goal has not been achieved. In the place of interoperable systems of independent vendors, we observe acquisition and integration of specialized systems into large general purpose products. Interoperability is mainly limited to the product spectrum of each of the major vendors, complemented by selected strategic partnerships. The disadvantages of this situation are obvious. There may be important commercial reasons for the observed development, but the essential reasons lie much deeper in the IFC concept itself, as discussed below.

IFC are based on ISO standard 10303 and use the above mentioned theoretical approaches for boundary representation of shapes, constructive solid geometry or parametric modeling, treating topology as a property defined for specific shapes as standardized e.g. in the IfcTopologyResource (IFC 2020b).

The most important prerequisite for the interoperability of two systems in the field of geometry is the unhindered transfer of topology between the systems, because topology defines the neighborhood relations of their objects. It is not sufficient to transfer the internal topology of each individual object. A much more difficult task is the transfer of the topological relations between a large number of independent objects of many different classes with a wealth of shapes. The IFC concept does not handle the complexity of this problem adequately at present (Huhnt & Galishnikova 2018).

The authors of this paper are convinced that space partitioning can handle topology much more efficiently than component assembly. A main target of polyhedral space partitioning is to solve the topology aspect of the interoperability problem with a shape-free generalized topology treating all objects as one coherent topological system independent of standardization.

A fundamental feature of existing and broadly used approaches is the construction of models by assembly of individually constructed components. Considerable precautions must be taken to avoid collisions and unintended gaps between the objects of a model with serious consequences for the construction process. There is a fundamental difference between the assembly of components by positioning in space and defining objects by the partitioning of space itself. If an object is added to an existing set of objects, it must be tested against each of these objects to avoid collisions and gaps. Ingenious methods have been devised to reduce the scope and effort of this task, but the basic problem persists (Kraft 2014). If space is partitioned by splitting one object at a time, the checking can be restricted to the object that is being split. Very significant gains in simplicity, accuracy and efficiency are achieved.

Partitioning of space is not a new concept (Mäntylä 1988). Orthogonal space partitions with quadtrees and octrees are well known, as are binary space partitions with half-spaces utilizing BSP-trees. If it is sufficient to bound objects with bounding volumes, then axis-aligned bounding boxes AABB or oriented bounding boxes OBB and related concepts can be employed (Ottmann & Widmayer 2002). While these concepts have many important and successful applications, for example for collision detection in computer games, they are not suitable to describe explicitly the complex polyhedral character of buildings which are only in part rectangular and possess many concave and multiply connected spaces. Other concepts of partitioning have therefore been investigated specifically for constructed facilities.

This paper presents first studies by the authors of an alternate approach to space partitioning. The general introduction in section 1 is followed by a review of the state of the art in section 2 and a presentation in section 3 of alternate concepts which distinguish the approach of the authors from the state of the art approaches. Section 3.1 treats differences between partitions of bounded and unbounded space. Reasons for the separation of the partition model into a user and a core model are given in section 3.2. The user specification of a partition is presented in section 3.3, its automated mapping to the core model in section 3.4. Section 3.5 illustrates navigation in the partition model. In section 3.6 the basic model is expanded to models with enhanced semantics. The paper ends with conclusions and an outlook in section 4.

2 State of the Art

The ...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Half Title
• Title Page
• Copyright Page
• Table of contents
• Preface
• Editor(s) Biography
• Organisation
• ICT impacts on BIM standardization, regulation policy and legislative processes
• Key aspects of data integration and management
• Models, methods and tools for design, engineering, construction and maintenance
• Applications of artificial intelligence
• Digital twins and cyber-physical systems
• Photogrammetry, laser scanning and point clouds
• City and building information modelling
• Environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability
• BIM education and training
• Organizational, perceptual and technological issues of BIM adoption
• Author index