What type of literature are we reading when we turn to Jonah? What kinds of truth may we expect to encounter as we read the book? To respond to these questions we must consider the genre of Jonah. A superficial glance at the text shows that chapter 2 is clearly in poetic form. Immediately that simple observation suggests how we might read it. By contrast chapters 1, 3 and 4 are set out in prose. Do we therefore expect them to retell an historical event, or is the story they tell an extended parable? What kinds of truth may we encounter as we follow Jonah on his amazing journey? Are we reading an historical account of the prophetâs life written from a theological perspective? Or are we reading theological truth distilled from historical reality but expressed for us here in parable form?
History is the beginning but not the end
While the very existence of the Bible is clear testimony to significant historical realities and facts, it is plain to see that the Bible itself is much more than an ancient historical narrative spanning a period of over two thousand years. Events of history recounted in the Bible are, like all human history, mediated through the perspective of interpreters. Even inspired theological interpreters sometimes give the same historical events different significance. The significance they attribute to an event will depend on their perspective and their underlying purpose in recounting the history. For example, when telling the history of Israel and Judah the writers of 1 and 2 Kings offer a different perspective from that found in 1 and 2 Chronicles. Sometimes the storyline itself has curious differences; a notable example of this is found in their respective accounts of King Manasseh.2
It cannot be doubted that the text of the Bible is shaped by events in human history. However, the meaning of those events, for example the exodus, is disclosed by the word of God to his people, Israel. These theological disclosures lead to a writing of history in a way which transcends the actual events. Thus we see in the Scriptures theological truth being expressed in images and motifs which give flesh to abstractions and propositions. A biblical scholar has correctly said that the Bible speaks
. . . largely in images. . . The stories, the parables, the sermons of the prophets, the reflections of the wise men, the pictures of the age to come, the interpetations of past events all tend to be expressed in images which arise out of experience. They do not often arise out of abstract technical language.3
For example, the transformative story of the Israelites crossing the Red Sea is infused throughout the literature of the Old Testament. It was the key event by which the Lord God brought his people, Israel, into existence. It portrayed her as the Lordâs âfirstbornâ, as a âpriceless jewelâ in his crown, as the wife of the Lord. All manner of images were deployed as a way of expressing the Lordâs unique covenant relationship with Israel. An event, grounded in an actual human experience, became the window through which Godâs chosen people came to understand and interpret their entire history. The exodus transcended history; it became a fundamental article of faith, a reality by which the history of Godâs people came to be judged. It was the key to understanding the identity and calling of Israel. It came to be expressed by means of powerful and vibrant images which resonate with the human condition. Images such as slaves being freed to worship and serve the King of kings, slaves being the chosen people, a kingdom of priests, the ones to inherit the Promised Land, abound in this story. Such images resonate deeply with the human calling to identify the purpose and meaning of life lived in relationship to a creating and redeeming Lord.
Translating all this in terms of how we might read the book of Jonah, we need, first, to notice that the two books, Exodus and Jonah, are different. The first sets out the theological and historical framework in which Godâs people come to exist, while the second paints a picture of how Godâs people sometimes behave towards God and others. Concerning Jonah, we could say that the four chapters describe an historical event. Thus everything described, his attitude towards God, the sailors, the great fish, Ninevehâs repentance, the worm and the castor oil plant, are all factually necessary to the divine revelation. This approach is well attested from antiquity and is still followed by some commentators.4 Alternatively, we could say that in this short book the meaning of the prophetâs personal experience is being interpreted to us theologically by means of a parable.5 As an equally well-attested means of divine revelation, the parable makes use of powerful and humorous imagery in disclosing a rather unpalatable truth about Godâs people. The historical reality of Jonahâs attitudes towards the Lord and Nineveh are not in doubt; the divine disclosure of Godâs mercy towards Nineveh is not in doubt. It is the way these truths come to be expressed which gives them a wider and more enduring application. The concern is no longer with the historical Jonah, with what he said and did and when, but with the universal motifs of human disobedience in the face of Godâs call.
In particular, the book of Jonah draws out themes of the sovereign grace of the Lord God in the face of human evil. These theological truths are the glory of the book. They are not grounded in a wishful imagination, nor do they inhabit the minds of the deluded; they are grounded in the ongoing and experienced ways of the Lord God with his people through the millennia. In a sense, the book of Jonah is a little like a testimony. The nature of the profound truth conveyed concerns the relationship between the Lord God of Israel and Jonah son of Amittai. The story is told not simply as a historical memoir of a disobedient man, but as a significant way of challenging those who claim to know and love the Lord to consider all his ways. Whether we take the book as âhistory with a moralâ or as âparable grounded in experienceâ, there is no doubt about its overriding message.
In the three Gospel accounts of his allusions to Jonah, Jesus draws attention to himself as being a âsignâ to this âevil generationâ just as Jonah was a sign to Nineveh.6 He also says, âAs Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.â7 Here Jesus makes use of popular Jewish thinking in which the disobedient Jonah of the biblical text had come to be linked with a miracle of resurrection.8 Referring to both Jonah and himself suffering death, Jesus implies that it is the Son of man who will actually and literally be raised from the dead. He argues that Someone greater than Jonah is standing in the midst, yet those seeing and hearing him are blind to what they see and deaf to what they hear. Here it must be acknowledged that, for some readers, the historicity of Jesusâ resurrection implies the historicity of Jonah. For others, Jesus is making a statement about himself, the One who is greater than Jonah. Drawing on language and imagery which was familiar to his audience, he was drawing attention to himself and away from the disobedient prophet. In the event, the historicity of Jesusâ resurrection does not depend on the historicity of Jonahâs incarceration in and eventual expulsion from the belly of the great fish. It depends on the uniqueness of the Lord Jesus Christ, the extent of New Testament testimony, the consequent transformation of hundreds of thousands of human lives and the ongoing witness of the Christian church throughout the world.
That Jonah was called by God is beyond doubt, but the book in which the call of Jonah is worked out is a prophetic oracle in parable form. It is an historical fact that Godâs people were called to serve him and were often guilty of disobedience to his call. This stance does not underestimate the evidently historical dimensions of Scripture. Rather, it reflects a judgment being made on the literary genre of Jonah having a greater affinity with the art of parable than with historical writing.
Set in parable style, Jonahâs stance in regard to his call is sketched against the background of the giantesque. With the exception of his call, everything to Jonah was larger than life. His task was bigger than that of other prophets; this dove-like man was called to go alone to preach Godâs judgment to the aggressive, powerful, distant and huge city of Nineveh. His brief, eight-word sermon provokes a thoroughgoing repentance of this city from top to bottom. The fish which swallows Jonah is of monstrous size. Over against all these giants looming on Jonahâs little horizon is the lavish, immeasurable and unfathomable grace and mercy of the Lord God. But this he cannot see; Jonah is too caught up with great things.
Whether we regard the story of Jonah as history or as something else, it cannot be doubted that we have in these forty-eight verses an incomparable story. While of itself it may fascinate and intrigue, it is the magnificent articulation and portrayal of the character of God, so consonant with the teaching of the Lord Jesus Christ, which grips and absorbs us. To express these truths in the form of a parable is no diminishment of its meaning, any more than the truth offered by Jesus in his story of the prodigal son or Dives and Lazarus is lessened by their literary genre.
In searching the text for clues to the genre of Jonah we might consider evidence from the following sources.