Parking Management for Smart Growth

Richard W. Willson

• Publisher: Island Press
• Year: 2015
• ISBN:
  9781610914857
• Topic: Architecture
• Subtopic: Architecture General

The average parking space requires approximately 300 square feet of asphalt. That's the size of a studio apartment in New York or enough room to hold 10 bicycles. Space devoted to parking in growing urban and suburban areas is highly contested—not only from other uses from housing to parklets, but between drivers who feel entitled to easy access. Without parking management, parking is a free-for-all—a competitive sport—with arbitrary winners and losers. Historically drivers have been the overall winners in having free or low-cost parking, while an oversupply of parking has created a hostile environment for pedestrians.In the last 50 years, parking management has grown from a minor aspect of local policy and regulation to a central position in the provision of transportation access. The higher densities, tight land supplies, mixed land uses, environmental and social concerns, and alternative transportation modes of Smart Growth demand a different approach—actively managed parking.This book offers a set of tools and a method for strategic parking management so that communities can better use parking resources and avoid overbuilding parking. It explores new opportunities for making the most from every parking space in a sharing economy and taking advantage of new digital parking tools to increase user interaction and satisfaction. Examples are provided of successful approaches for parking management—from Pasadena to London. At its essence, the book provides a path forward for strategic parking management in a new era of tighter parking supplies.

CHAPTER 1

Introduction: What Is a Parking Space Worth?

Parking can be a useful and user-friendly aspect of the land use and transportation system if it is treated as a valuable community asset. This book shows how to strategically manage parking resources and, in the process, make parking stakeholders happier and communities more sustainable and prosperous. In downtowns, the parking management agenda is to better use scarce and expensive parking resources with sophisticated shared parking arrangements, real-time parking guidance, and dynamic parking pricing. Parking management allows downtowns to reduce the total parking inventory while growing and prospering. In suburban areas, where parking is generously supplied, the parking management agenda is to introduce parking controls, parking pricing, and sharing arrangements so that current oversupplies of parking can be more fully used and also serve new development, slowing or stopping the growth of parking supply. Since the number of parking spaces in the United States exceeds the number of cars by a factor of more than three, strategic parking management can forestall building new parking for decades to come, saving the money and land for better uses, including parks, urban agriculture, child development centers, affordable housing, and tax-producing commercial spaces. Strategic parking management supports sustainable development.

On the surface (pun intended), the parking space is mundane. It sits passively, is often unsightly, and performs one function—storing a vehicle. Worse, it is empty much of the time. Residential parking is underused during the day when people are at work, and workplace parking is underused in the evening when people are at home. Yet parking is a central issue in community development and a big part of the daily lives of city administrators, residents, employers, employees, and retailers. Disparate stakeholders who agree on nothing else unite in their dissatisfaction with parking. For many, a free parking space is a right, and it should be available directly in front of their destination. So, while the parking space is passive, the opportunity and excitement lies in how it is used. Recognizing the importance of the “sharing” economy, in which technology facilitates frictionless sharing of resources rather than ownership, provides a model for parking management opportunities. Downtown curb parking (on-street surface parking in the public right-of-way), for example, has always had qualities of the sharing economy—it is collectively owned, managed for efficient use, and used by many different people over the course of the day. The question is: how can sharing economy concepts make better use of existing parking?

The “worth” of a seemingly generic parking space varies. Some spaces serve dozens of parkers per day, whereas others are seldom or never used. A never-used parking space is worthless—in the sense of not serving any transportation purpose. At the same time, that parking space has onetime and ongoing costs for land, construction, administration, and maintenance. A recent estimate placed the annualized capital and operating cost of one space at $854 for a suburban surface lot, $2,522 for an urban three-level structure, and $4,363 for an underground central business district (CBD) space (Nelson\Nygaard and Dyett & Bhatia 2012). Parking also has opportunity costs, such as other forgone uses for that land or building area, and negative externalities, including polluted storm water runoff, heat island effects, and negative design impacts. Strategic parking management reduces the number of worthless spaces so that less total parking can provide the desired land use and transportation benefits.

Parking spaces have standard size characteristics, but the worth of each space depends on how it is used. Table 1-1 shows a variety of parking conditions, ranging from a parking space that is almost never used to a parking space that is used many times per day, most days of the week, and most months of the year. It adopts a metric of destination person-trips per space per year, which accounts for the days used per year, the arrivals per day, and the number of persons in each vehicle. For example, a shared parking space in a mixed-use district serves office workers during weekdays, shoppers on weekday evenings and weekends, and residents overnight. Such a shared space provides more value than a parking space at a sports and entertainment venue, which is used only on event days. Figure 1-1 shows a parking lot at Angel Stadium of Anaheim, in Anaheim, California. The lot is used only during baseball games and other events, and the spaces in the foreground may be used only when the venue is full. The major league baseball season includes eighty-one regular home games, and given that not all of the games sell out, the spaces in the foreground of the picture are used on even fewer days per year. Even when they are used, they are used for less than one quarter of the day. The rest of the time, this valuable land, located in the heart of Orange County, provides no economic or social use.

The varying worth of a parking space is not well understood by policy makers and the public, and too seldom are efforts made to maximize its value. Figure 1-2 displays an illustrative estimate of the number of destination person-trips per year served by a parking space to nonhome destinations, such as retail outlets or offices. Parking spaces serving land uses that operate throughout the year, and with fast turnover, naturally serve the greatest number of trips. Parking for short-visit retail and food uses and CBD curb parking score highly, and occasionally used spaces such as a baseball stadium or the least convenient spaces at a shopping mall (which are used only a few days a year) score poorly. Figure 1-3 arrays intensity of use by level of sharing, showing the desired combination of high-intensity of use and high sharing. The arrows indicate the goal of increasing sharing and increasing intensity of use. This perspective emphasizes use value rather than seeing each space as having uniform attributes. In addition, low-use spaces are prime opportunities for shared parking since they are available much of the time. Understanding parking in terms of its use value in connecting people to trip destinations opens the door to a wide range of parking management strategies that increase efficiency and support community goals.

Table 1-1. The Differing Value of a Parking Space

A generous parking supply at every site can preclude the need to manage parking, as each development site is a self-sufficient parking “island.” If there is plenty of parking available at every site, everyone can find a space, when they want and where they want. These assumptions are embedded in zoning codes, where minimum parking requirements usually force developers to build more parking than they would if the market determined parking supply. This issue has been addressed by Shoup (2011b) and Willson (2013) but is not the focus of this book. Nonetheless, minimum parking requirements and parking management are inextricably linked. Excessive minimum parking requirements preclude the need for parking management. Conversely, minimum parking reform requires parking management to address such issues as spillover parking. Better parking management is the key to making parking requirement reform possible.

Figure 1-1. Wasted spaces at Angel Stadium of Anaheim, in Anaheim, California

Image source: Aiden Irish

The problems of overbuilt parking have been chronicled by researchers who identify negative impacts on land use, transportation systems, economic development, and social equity. Further, the land use and transportation impacts produce negative environmental outcomes, as described later in this chapter. In response, cities are reforming zoning code mandates for private developer parking by eliminating requirements (Shoup 2011b) or reforming them (Willson 2013).

In searching for a way to explain the transition from emphasizing parking supply to emphasizing parking management, I found a tagline from an early infomercial for a rotisserie cooker that says it best. The pitchman implored the audience to “Set it and forget it,” emphasizing ease of use in roasting a chicken. Frequently, public officials take a similar approach. They “set it” through high parking requirements or expensive public parking projects—and set it so high that there will never be a parking shortage—that way, they can “forget it” when it comes to parking management. “Set it and forget it” seems to have reached a new level in figure 1-4. Most cities do not leave parking signs so long that trees grow around them, but travel around your community and consider how long some parking regulations have been in effect with no change, despite the fact that land uses, demographics, travel patterns, and parking use change in a dynamic fashion. Programs to share parking, to coordinate between land uses, or to price parking are ignored. This impulse is understandable in both parking and cooking chicken—but this approach to parking lies at the center of livability problems in many communities. Seeking to “outsupply” parking use is a recipe for bad planning outcomes.

Figure 1-2. Person-trips per year, by type of parking space

Figure 1-3. Relationship of use Intensity and Sharing

Figure 1-4. “Set it and forget it” parking management

Image source: Katherine Bautista

Strategic parking management would not matter if plenty of low-cost land was available for parking construction. However, this is no longer the case in suburban areas, where land costs are higher than before, or in urban areas, where vacant land is rare, parcels are expensive, and land assembly is costly and problematic. A better course is to ensure that existing parking spaces are well used. Parking management reduces the need to build parking for future development and allows parking supply to be reduced if better uses exist for the land or building area. The latter instance occurs when on-street curb spaces are converted to parklets, bicycle corrals, sidewalks, outdoor dining, or bus lanes, and more productive land uses replace off-street surface parking. Finally, parking management improves the prospects for the development and use of alternative travel modes. For example, higher parking charges induce some travelers to walk, bicycle, use transit, or be dropped off.

This book provides a path forward for strategic parking management in a new era in which parking requirements are lessened or eliminated, under-used parking is eliminated, and multimodal transportation is improved. This era of tighter parking supplies requires strategic parking management. The book offers a set of tools and a method for strategic parking management so that communities can better use parking resources and avoid overbuilding parking. It helps stakeholders manage public and private parking resources so that the greatest benefit is gained from every parking space. Table 1-2 provides examples of the community benefits of parking management.

The benefits of strategic parking management are meaningful and extend beyond parking itself. Figure 1-5 shows a parking management strategy in the city of Los Angeles that prohibits on-street parking during rush hours to create a dedicated bus lane in the curb parking lane. Consider how many person-trips per day are accommodated with this bus lane, which speeds peak-hour bus operations, makes buses more competitive with driving, reduces bus operating costs, increases fare revenue, and moderates traffic. Consistent with the goal of efficiently using resources, the lane reverts to curb parking during off-peak hours, when cong...

Table of contents

• Cover
• About Island Press
• Title Page
• Copyright
• Dedication
• Contents
• List of Figures
• List of Tables
• Acknowledgments
• 1. Introduction: What Is a Parking Space Worth?
• 2. Parking Management Techniques
• 3. Creating a Parking Management Strategy
• 4. Managing an Integrated, Financially Sustainable Parking District (by Rick Williams)
• 5. Best Practice Tools and Strategies
• 6. Implementing Strategic Parking Management
• 7. Parking Management for Smart Growth
• References
• Island Press | Board of Directors