A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF D.C.(DAVID CHARLES) STOVE AND RELATED WRITINGS
COMPILED BY JAMES FRANKLIN, ANDREW IRVINE, SCOTT CAMPBELL, AND SELMAN HALABI
A. | Books | 127 |
B. | Articles | 166 |
C. | Reviews | 198 |
D. | Letters | 203 |
E. | Obituaries, Reminiscences, and Additional Discussion | 205 |
F. | Unpublished | 209 |
Inactive internet links often may be found
archived at The Internet Archive,
www.archive.org
dp n="145" folio="126" ?dp n="146" folio="127" ?
A. BOOKS
Probability and Hume’s Inductive Scepticism.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
CONTENTS
Introduction: Object and Plan of the Book
Part One: Some Remarks on Probability
1. Chiefly on Statements of Logical Probability
Part Two: Hume’s Argument for Inductive Scepticism: Identification
2. Its Structure and Content
3. Its Suppressed Premisses
4. Its Further Interpretation and Generalization
Part Three: Hume’s Argument for Inductive Scepticism: Evaluation
5. The Falsity of Its Sceptical Conclusion
6. The Falsity of Its Deductivist Premiss
7. The Truth and Importance of Its Fallibilist Consequence
8. Our Historical Debts to Hume’s Argument for Scepticism
9. Concluding Remarks
Appendix
Index
REVIEWS
S. Blackburn, “Past Certainties and Future Possibilities,” Times Literary Supplement, 3727 (August 10, 1973), 935; discussed in J. L. Mackie and S. Blackburn, “Hume and Induction,” Times Literary Supplement, 3734 (September 28, 1973), 1133; and J. L. Mackie and S. Blackburn, “Hume and Induction,” Times Literary Supplement, 3736 (October 12, 1973), 1234; with Stove’s reply in “Hume, Induction and the Irish” (1976).
dp n="147" folio="128" ?J. Janssens, in Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 35 (1973), 646–647.
A. Flew, in Philosophical Quarterly, 24 (1974), 72–73.
I. M. Fowlie, in Philosophical Books, 15:2 (May 1974), 24–26.
I. Hinckfuss, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 52 (1974), 269–276; with Stove’s reply in “Hume, Induction and the Irish” (1976).
A. C. Michalos, in Philosophia, 4 (1974), 375–379.
J. F. Fox, in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26 (1975), 85–87.
C. A. Hooker, in Hume Studies, 1 (1975), 25–29.
D. W. Livingston, in Journal of the History of Philosophy, 13 (1975), 413–415.
M. Williams, in Philosophical Review, 84 (1975), 453–457.
E. Millstone, in Mind, 85 (1976), 297–298.
R. George, in Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1977), 203–211.
DISCUSSION AND CITATION
J. E. Adler, “Stove on Hume’s Inductive Scepticism,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1975), 167–170; with Stove’s reply in “Hume, Induction and the Irish” (1976).
S. Waterlow, “On a Proposed Refutation of Hume,” Analysis, 36 (1975), 43–46.
P. J. McGrath, “Hume’s Inductive Scepticism,” Philosophical Studies (Ireland), 24 (1976), 64–81.
J. Cassidy, “The Nature of Hume’s Inductive Scepticism: A Critical Notice,” Ratio, 19 (1977), 47–54.
B. Stroud, “Causality and the Inference from the Observed to the Unobserved: The Negative Phase,” chap. 3 in Hume (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977), 42–67.
dp n="148" folio="129" ?G. Gawlick, “Zwischen Empirismus und Skeptizismus,” Philosophische Rundschau, 26 (1979), 161–186.
W. K. Goosens, “Stove and Inductive Scepticism,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 57 (1979), 79–84.
J. Immerwahr, “A Skeptic’s Progress: Hume’s Preference for the First Enquiry,” in McGill Hume Studies, ed. D. F. Norton, N. Cap - aldi, and W. L. Robison (San Diego: Austin Hill Press, 1979), 227–238.
D. M. Armstrong, What Is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 57.
P. Engel, “Hume et le commencement de la philosophie,” Critique, 39(1983), 960–981.
K. Gemes, “A Refutation of Inductive Scepticism,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 6 1 (1983), 434–438; repr. in David Hume: Critical Assessments, vol. 2, Induction, Scepticism, ed. S. Tweyman (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), 44–48.
S. A. Grave, A History of Philosophy in Australia (St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1984), 192–193.
G. J. D. Moyal and S. Tweyman, Early Modern Philosophy: Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Politics–Essays in Honour of Robert F. McRae (Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan Books, 1986), 133.
B. Janz, “Reason, Inductive Inference, and True Religion in Hume,” Dialogue (Canada), 27 (1988), 721–726.
W. E. Morris, “Hume’s Refutation of Inductive Probabilism,” in Probability and Causality, ed. J. H. Fetzer (Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1988), 43–77.
C. Belshaw, “Scepticism and Madness,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy , 67 (1989), 447–451.
R. J. Bench, “Paradigms, Methods and the Epistemology of Speech Pathology: Some Comments on Eastwood (1988),” British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26 (1991), 235–242.
dp n="149" folio="130" ?K. R. Merrill, “Hume’s ‘Of Miracles,’ Peirce, and the Balancing of Likelihoods,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29 (1991), 85–113.
A. W. Sparkes, Talking Philosophy (London and New York: Routledge, 1991), 288.
B. Maund, “History and Philosophy of Science in Australia,” in Essays on Philosophy in Australia, ed. J. T. J. Srzednicki and D. Wood (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 1992), 243–46.
L. Cataldi Madonna, “Humes skeptisches Argument gegen die Vernunft,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 75 (1993), 179–194.
M. Levin, “Reliabilism and Induction,” Synthese, 97 (1993), 297–334.
M. Markel, “Induction, Social Constructionism, and the Form of the Science Paper,” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23 (1993), 7–22.
A. Rosenberg, “Hume and the Philosophy of Science,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hume, ed. D. F. Norton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 77.
R. Niklaus, “Voltaire and English Empiricism,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 48 (1994), 9–24.
P. J. R. Millican, “Hume’s Argument Concerning Induction: Structure and Interpretation,” in David Hume: Critical Assessments, vol. 2, Induction, Scepticism, ed. S. Tweyman (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), 91–144; repr. in Hume: General Philosophy, ed. D. W. D. Owen (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000), 165–218.
A. G. Padgett, “The Mutuality of Theology and Science: An Example from Time and Thermodynamics,” Christian Scholar’s Review, 26 (1996), 12–35; and online at www2.luthersem.edu/apadgett/mutuality.html
R. Weintraub, “The Sceptical Life,” Dialectica, 50 (1996), 225–233.
dp n="150" folio="131" ?L. Falkenstein, “Hume’s Answer to Kant,” Noûs, 32 (1998), 331–360.
R. Lantin, “Hume and the Problem of Induction,” Philosophia, 26:1–2 (1998), 105–117.
A. Mura, “Hume’s Inductive Logic,” Synthese, 115 (1998), 303–331.
J. Greco, “Agent Reliabilism,” Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 273–296.
...