1. All about character
The fiction writer can go anywhere, be anyone, travel in an instant to the other side of the world or even to another planet. But the writing must have weight. The words on the page must have substance, or the reader will not believe that they actually convey the reality of anyone at any time. Fiction explores its realities through the probing and exposition of character, so one of the first steps for a writer is to think about how to create believable characters.
All about character
We read fiction to enter a new world; and we write it to create one. Fiction is a way of exploring reality through invention. Letās start, logically enough, with ways of establishing the characters who are going to tell us the story.
must know
Where to begin?
Start writing wherever the interest is greatest; always try to write out of passionate concern, since this tends to produce the best prose. It does not matter whether or not this will end up as āthe beginningā. When the beginning must finally be composed (often towards the end of the writing process, in fact) it needs to be striking, succinct and enticing. Remember: it is on the basis of this that the reader will or will not proceed.
Beginnings
The beginning of any work of fiction is an announcement. In a sense it is even an annunciation. A curious unknown creature enters the room of our life and changes the narrative tone of everything. Thatās what any ānew beginningā, any story or novel, does inside the room of our minds. A door opens and a different voice is heard for the first time. Everything suddenly changes. Our new world has arrived.
For this reason, the beginning of any piece of fictional writing is crucial. Its achievement ā or lack of it ā will decide whether we are to continue or not. This entry into our lives, this sudden consciousness of an unknown voice, an unfamiliar story, a different account of things, is asking for our time. So what does it offer in return? Let us look at a few famous openings and see what they put before us.
Here is the beginning of Herman Melvilleās Moby Dick:
Call me Ishmael. Some years ago ā never mind how long precisely ā having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see the watery part of the world. It is a way I have of driving off the spleen, and regulating the circulation. Whenever I find myself growing grim about the mouth; whenever I find myself involuntarily pausing before coffin warehouses, and bringing up the rear of every funeral I meet; and especially whenever my hypos get such an upper hand of me, that it requires a strong moral principle to prevent me from deliberately stepping into the street, and methodically knocking peopleās hats off ā then, I account it high time to get to sea as soon as I can.
Ishmael wants us to be on first-name terms. The very first sentence of the book is an invitation to intimacy. But note how much information we are given in this opening; see how much we find out about Ishmael without being subjected to any lists:
⢠Ishmael is a restless soul.
⢠He is evidently not a rich man.
⢠He has no family ties to hold him to a particular place.
⢠He is ironic, about himself and others.
The combination of melancholy and his āhyposā suggests a temperament we might nowadays call manic-depressive. And the urgency of his tone suggests a trenchant mind.
The economy of means employed to convey all this biographical data so rapidly, and without employing any type of catalogue, deserves study. This is writing of a high standard, as can be seen by the swiftness with which it relocates us from our daily reality into the fictional one.
now you do it
Inciting incidents
Stories often begin with an āinciting incidentā ā for example, Pip is accosted by Magwitch in the marshes at the beginning of Great Expectations and from this meeting, the story develops. Write a list of six of your own ideas for inciting incidents.
Now contrast this with a very different opening:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
This is the famous first sentence of Jane Austenās Pride and Prejudice. We might consider the differences. Firstly this is not first-person, but third-person. This voice is distanced from the fray it is about to describe; it seems detached and ironic. It is obviously the omniscient narrator of the classic realist novel, and the choice of language reflects that dispassionate, God-like orientation. āIt is a truth universally acknowledgedā really means that you and I, dear reader, know how human beings prefer to justify their actions by invoking universal principles, when what is really in play is the most individual of motivations. There is just as much of a conspiracy of tone here as there is in Moby Dick, but where one is urgent, demotic, street-wise, the other is Olympian in its stately knowingness. Here we see the contrast between the first- and third-person narrative voice at its most extreme. Let us look at another famous opening (that of Dickensā Great Expectations) and see what skills the writer is employing:
My fatherās family name being Pirrip, and my christian name Philip, my infant tongue could make of both names nothing longer or more explicit than Pip. So I called myself Pip, and came to be called Pip.
I give Pirrip as my fatherās family name, on the authority of his tombstone and my sister ā Mrs. joe Gargery, who married the blacksmith. As I never saw my father or my mother, and never saw any likeness of either of them (for their days were long before the days of photographs), my first fancies regarding what they were like, were unreasonably derived from their tombstones. The shape of the letters on my fatherās, gave me an odd idea that he was a square, stout, dark man, with curly black hair. From the character and turn of the inscription, āAlso Georgiana Wife of the Above,ā I drew a childish conclusion that my mother was freckled and sickly. To five little stone lozenges, each about afoot and a half long, which were sacred to the memory of five little brothers of mine ā who gave up trying to get a living exceedingly early in that universal struggle ā I am indebted for a belief I religiously entertained that they had all been born on their back with their hands in their trousers-pockets, and had never taken them out in this state of existence.
This is brilliant in conveying the vividness and not necessarily rational movements of a childās mind; the way that an image is immediately transformed into a representative reality. But this is not a childās language, something indicated by the employment of the give-away adjective āchildishā.
We are supplied with a great deal of information obliquely. If Pipās parents lived before the possibilities of photography then they must have died before the 1840s, when photography first started to become popular. If Pip can talk of his brothers giving up trying to get a living in that āuniversal struggleā, then we should pick up an echo. The phrase āuniversal struggle for existenceā was used in Chapter Three of Charles Darwinās Origin of Species, published in 1859. Great Expectations began serial publication in 1860. This is childhood recollected with a very adult syntax and vocabulary. Compare it with another novelās opening:
now you do it
The narrative voice
The most radical way to utterly change the nature of a piece of fiction, even if the plot remains exactly the same, is to change the voice. Try writing a story in first-person then changing the pronouns and verbs to make it third-person. The results can be fresh and interesting.
Once upon a time and a very good time it was there was a moocow coming down along the road and this moocow that was coming down along the road met a nicens little boy named baby tuckoo.ā¦
must know
An announcement
The tone of the opening announces a world. The voice we hear on the page, and the type of voice (first-person; third-person) tell us whose company we will be keeping. The opening of any piece of fiction should never be hesitant.
What the beginning of James Joyceās Portrait of the Artist As A Young Man does is to try to situate us linguistically inside the mind of the child. In fact, all five chapters of that pioneering work of what we call the Modern Movement reflect stylistically the stages of Stephen Dedalusās mind as he grows through his Catholic childhood and education to adulthood and apostasy, an apostasy adopted in the name of art. What is being subverted here is the knowing, authorial tone that can look back upon childhood and re-create it from a position of linguistic and stylistic superiority.
What all four of these openings show us is how a skilled writer announces a world, a consciousness, a textual identity, which lets the reader know that we have crossed the line between the world and the book. The book, while we are inside it, is the world. Every choice of vocabulary, syntax, intonation, even punctuation, will either make that world convincing or fail to do so.
Coleridge spoke of the āwilling suspension of disbeliefā that we must volunteer as readers or spectators if we are to enter the world of a work of art. Such a suspension can only be earned by the accomplishment of the writing. We learn how to do this by studying the serious achievements of those who have gone before.
The beginning, then, is the announcement of a new world, the world of the book or story. It should make its announcement as economically and potently as possible. Many publishers only read the first page of a manuscript. They know by then whether or not they have been invited into a convincing world.
The meaning of character
Let us keep reminding ourselves what fiction is.
Fiction is the exploration of reality in words by means of the invention and portrayal of character. It can be many other things too, but it will not be fiction without this pervasive sense of the reality of character.
So why do we have to say both invention and portrayal? A novel or story can be based entirely on historical characters, but unless there is a degree of invention, if only in conveying the psychology of these characters, then it will be some sort of historical writing, not fiction. It can be obsessed with place, but unless convincing characters appear convincingly within that place, it will be classified as travel writing, or geography, or topography. Fiction can and often does have a large documentary element; but it cannot afford to be entirely documentary, or it loses its āfictivenessā.
We cannot look for long at fiction of any sort without discussing character. Fiction explores its realities through the probing and exposition of character. Let us think of what we call a historical ...