Now in its second edition, The French Revolution: Faith, Desire, and Politics has been updated to include a discussion about how the actions by soldiers and citizen-soldiers shaped the course of the Revolution, as well as the daily lives and concerns of everyday French people.
Throughout the study, Shusterman highlights the crucial role that religion and sexuality played in determining the shape of the Revolution and examines key themes such as: the impact of the crown's war debts on the fall of the Old Regime, the organization of citizen militias in 1789, and their eventual transformation into France's National Guard. This edition has been revised to include a fresh analysis of classic nineteenth-century accounts of the Revolution, including those by Jules Michelet, Jean JaurĂšs, and Edgar Quinet. It also explores the lives of the people who lived through the French Revolution and uncovers the messages about gender, sex, religion, and faith which surrounded them, concerns which did not exist outside of the events of the Revolution.
With a brief chronology of the Revolution and a guide to further reading, this book is an invaluable resource for students of the French Revolution, women and gender, and the history of Catholicism.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist The French Revolution als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu The French Revolution von Noah Shusterman im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus History & European History. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
The France that stood on the verge of revolution in the 1780s did not know that it was standing on the verge of revolution. Nor did it know, in the way that we do now, what a revolution entails. Many of Franceâs inhabitants knew that some things were changing, about which they were concerned or not, happy or not; and there were things that were not changing, about which they were concerned or not, happy or not. By the standards of eighteenth-century Europe France was a large kingdom, and it was not expected that reforms that pleased one group would please others, nor was it expected that traditions that favored one group would enjoy the approval of the rest of society. And make no mistakeâcountless traditions existed designed to benefit certain parts of the kingdom, traditions that the holders had to defend jealously. Among the most notable at the time was the relative tax exemption for members of the nobility. But while that tax exemption was a prime example of the nature of privilege that the wealthiest members of French society enjoyed, it grew as much out of the fractured nature of French laws and regulations as it did out of the long tradition of social inequality. Different towns had different rights, depending largely on how long they had been part of the kingdom. Different neighborhoodsâparticularly in Parisâhad different regulations concerning who could work at what job and how much they could expect to be paid. Peasants in some regions paid much lower taxes than peasants in other regions. But do not expect the origins or causes of the Revolution to come from the most downtrodden of the peasants, or the most poorly paid of the workers. The most privileged could feel threatened when those privileges were attackedâand, moreover, they tended to have more resources with which to defend them.
Eighteenth-century France was far more than just the hexagon, however. The French crown ruled over a large number of colonies, from North and South America to parts of India to Africa. Its most lucrative colonies were in the Caribbean, where the economy was based on sugar cultivation, and where enslaved Africans made up the majority of the population. Not everyone in the hexagon was happy about the existence of slavery in the colonies, but under the monarchy the debates over ending slavery were little more than discussions between intellectuals; the crown had no desire to end slavery, and the local elites in the colonies had little interest in any such reforms.
Map 1.1 The provinces of Old Regime France. Many of Franceâs provinces traced their history to a time before they were part of the kingdom of France.
Map 1.2 The dioceses of Old Regime France. Note the many small dioceses in southern France, and the lack of correspondence between these boundaries and the provincial boundaries inMap 1.1.
Paris was Franceâs largest city, and had been for quite some time. Sitting astride the Seine River, roughly equidistant from the Atlantic Ocean and Franceâs northwest borders, Paris had a population of roughly 600,000 people in 1789. Paris had been Franceâs capital and the home of its kings throughout most of French history. During the seventeenth century King Louis XIV moved the royal court to the nearby town of Versailles, to be away from Parisâs crowds and the dangers he felt they posed. Versailles did not replace Paris as Franceâs center of gravity, however; Paris remained not only Franceâs largest city, but its most commercially and intellectually dynamic city.
For all of its diversity, France was still a Catholic kingdom, and it is hard to overemphasize the importance of Catholicism not only in shaping the kingdom that entered the Revolution, but also in influencing the shape that Revolution would take. Because of this importance, it is worth explaining something about what âCatholic kingdomâ means in this context. It does not mean that there were no non-Catholics in France. There were significant populations of Protestants, particularly Huguenots, who made up as much as 2 percent of the population. The city of NĂźmes had a large Huguenot population, although French Protestantism had become largely rural by the eighteenth century. Relations between Protestant communities and their Catholic neighbors were not the deadly rivalries they had been in the sixteenth century, but tensions remained in many areas where the two religions lived in proximity with each other. Legally, Protestantism was forbidden in France (with the exception of Alsace, which had a noteworthy Lutheran population). There had been a fair amount of government repression of Protestantism during the first half of the eighteenth century, but by the second half of the century such policies had lost most of their public support. A 1787 edict gave Huguenots more rightsâincluding a legal right to marryâalthough it did not grant Huguenots the right to practice their religion publicly.
Paris and Bordeaux also had significant Jewish communities, as did Alsace. None of these communities were particularly largeâthere were perhaps 40,000 Jews in France in 1789âthough, as one historian has recently noted, Jews did exercise a fascination among thinkers beyond their numbers.1 The Jewish communities in Paris and Bordeaux were relatively wealthy and integrated into the local societies. The Alsatian Jews were mostly rural, spoke Yiddish, and were less integrated with the surrounding population. Though Judaism was tolerated, Jews themselves were prohibited from many trades and from owning land.
The term âCatholic nationâ also does not mean that everyone who was not Protestant or Jewish was a believing and practicing Catholic. Many people, while not necessarily declared atheists or unbelievers, were increasingly removed from the beliefs of Catholicism. That does not, however, mean that they had given up all of the customs and practices that had evolved along with Catholicism. Some religious holidays were the occasions for festivities in which all people took part, no matter their beliefs.
For millions of French people, the Catholic Church shaped not only their faith but also their social livesâtheir âpatterns of social interaction,â to use an academic term. Peasants who spent most of their time on their farms were most likely to see neighbors on Sundays and on religious holidays, whether at church in the morning or, for men, later that day at the tavern. While bishops and priests often complained about the proximity of taverns to churches, most parishioners saw no contradiction between morning mass and afternoon libations. It is not a given that the prevalence of Catholicism represented a deep piety. The historian John McManners notes that
there is difficulty in disentangling religion and custom, for this was a social order in which human relationships evolved and secular business was transacted within a religious cadre; often, one can only guess at the relevance of the religious reference in the minds of ordinary people.2
Here, we are up against the limits of the historical craft; practices, such as church attendance, are easier to document than the thoughts going through the heads of those who attended.
The Catholic Church had official control over the religious life of French Catholics, but that control was not always as easy to enforce as the church would have liked. For one thing, there were a number of divisions within French Catholicism. The French church did have a long tradition of autonomy from the pope, a tradition known as Gallicanism. Almost all French Catholics were part of the Gallican Church, although here belonging or not belonging depended on where one lived, not on the nature of oneâs beliefs. But it was not always clear what Gallicanism meant in practice. While the pope had only limited authority over French Catholics, there was no one man who played the role of âFrench pope.â
By the eighteenth century, the leaders of the Gallican Church spent much of their time dealing with internal divisions. Sometimes this was because of the frequent quarrels between the high clergyâthe archbishops and bishops of Franceâand the lower clergy, which included the 60,000 or so parish priests who brought the church into all but the smallest villages. At other times, the divisions revolved around the battles between the Jesuits, a well-established religious order with strong ties to Rome, and the Jansenists, a loosely structured movement that favored a more rigorous, ascetic form of Catholicism. The Jansenist movement had begun in the seventeenth century. Around the turn of the eighteenth century French Jansenism had run afoul of both the king and the pope, both of whom set out to destroy the movement. Neither succeeded: Jansenism survived through the eighteenth century, at least until most of its energy was diverted to more political issues by the 1780s. Jansenism even outlasted the Jesuits in France, who were expelled from the kingdom in the 1760s. The pressure on Jansenists from both Rome and Versailles would shape the movement, though. As hostility to Jansenism became a requirement for anyone the king might appoint as bishop, Jansenism became more hostile to the episcopacy and more supportive of the lower clergy.
In some places, these intra-church quarrels played a major role in the daily life of French Catholics. In Paris, in particular, the repeated battles between a heavily Jansenist population and an archbishop hostile to Jansenism played out for many decades; during the 1740s the archbishop went so far as to refuse last rites to Catholics who could not prove their hostility to Jansenism. These battles would do much to politicize the population of Paris and strengthen its hostility to the church hierarchy. In most of France, however, these debates had little to no effect on religious life. Catholics went to church, as they always had, and as they imagined they always would. Catholic parents baptized their children at the local church, young couples got married there, and that was where peopleâs funerals took place, before the burial in the adjacent graveyard. The church bells that rang out on these occasions gave sound to the cycle of life, just as those same bells, ringing out on holidays, gave sound to the cycle of the seasons. Springtime holidays celebrating the resurrection of Jesus occurred just as the earth was coming back to life, while fall holidays like All Saintsâ Day and the Day of the Dead came when the earthâs fertility was coming to its annual end. These mixtures of meaningsâthe âagro-liturgical calendar,â as the historian François Lebrun calls itâshow just how difficult it is to separate religious life from other aspects of life in early modern France, be they agricultural, economic, or social.3
It is important, therefore, to make a distinction between official Catholicism and the religion that people practiced. Many of the folk traditions that had arisen around various saints did not enjoy the approval of church leaders. Many of the men in the French clergy, whether parish priests in small villages or wealthy bishops, were as concerned about excessive or inappropriate celebrations as they were about those who did not attend mass at all. One priest who had just arrived at his village in southeast France found that the villagers welcomed Lent by having a newlywed bride light fires in front of peopleâs doors at night, so that the following day all of the horned animals in the village could walk through the ashes.4 In this case as in countless others, villagers saw nothing wrong with the practiceâthis was how they had always practiced their religion, and how they imagined they always would. Priests were often shocked and scandalized, seeing in these traditions not expressions of Christian faith but the remnants of paganism and superstition. There were limits, however, to the extent to which the men in the church could do anything about those traditions. A priest in a village was caught between two allegiancesâto the villagers he saw regularly, and to the church hierarchy whom he represented to those villagers. Priests had to choose their battles, and many came to accept the âsuperstitionsâ they saw around them.
For all of the Enlightenmentâs criticisms of the Catholic Church, it is best seen as an optimistic movement. The philosophes believed that men, by using their reason, could improve the society in which they lived. They also believed that the spread of knowledge would help society advance. Much of that knowledge would be spread through the written word, but there were also institutions that rose up throughout France, as well as elsewhere in Europe, designed to help spread Enlightenment. There were official academies in most French cities, where leading men (and sometimes women) could gather to discuss the ideas of the day. There were also the more informal salons in Paris, where select members of high society would gather. Those salons were often hosted by women, although not everyone appreciated the prominent role that women played there. By the end of the Old Regime a backlash had begun against these women and the influence they wielded, led in part by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a Swiss writer and philosopher. For Rousseau, men should be âactive and strong.â Women, on the other hand, should be âpassive and weak,â and concentrate on their domestic duties, leaving the world of politics to men.6
Rousseau was an extremely popular writer during the second half of the eighteenth century, though he fits oddly with the other leaders of the Enlightenment, most of whom focused on the importance of rationality. Rousseau was more sentimental. Surprisingly for modern readers, he was as popular with women as he was with menâif not more so. Though he advocated that women be restricted to domestic roles, he also emphasized how important those domestic roles were in shaping citizens. âA home whose mistress is absent,â he wrote, âis a body without a soul which soon falls into corruption.â7 Rousseauâs arguments against sending infants out to wet nurses led many educated women to start breastfeeding their children. Some recent scholars have seen a certain logic to the way that women at the time embraced Rousseau and his philosophy, despite its apparent misogyny. Still, for those writers at the time who advocated increasing womenâs rights, Rousseauâs popularity with women posed a problem. Thus the philosophe Condorcet, who in 1787 advocated giving women full rights of citizenship:
I am afraid of antagonizing women if they ever read this piece. For I speak of their rights to equality, and not of their sway over men; they may suspect me of a secret desire to diminish their power. Ever since Rousseau won their approval by declaring that women are destined only to take care of us and to torment us, I cannot hope to gain their support.8
Whether the philosophers of the Enlightenment were a cause or just a symptom, many people were moving away from the Catholic Church in the second half of the eighteenth century. Quantitative hi...
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Cover
Title
Copyright
Contents
Figures and maps
Brief chronology of the French Revolution
Introduction
1 Religious culture, popular culture: life in Old Regime France
2 The liberal Revolution of 1789 (spring 1789âspring 1790)
3 The Civil Constitution of the Clergy (summer 1790âspring 1791)
4 The kingâs flight and the decline of the French monarchy (summer 1791âsummer 1792)
5 The end of the monarchy and the September Massacres (summer 1792âfall 1792)
6 The new French republic and its rivalries (fall 1792âsummer 1793)
Shusterman, N. (2020). The French Revolution (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1683941/the-french-revolution-faith-desire-and-politics-pdf (Original work published 2020)
Chicago Citation
Shusterman, Noah. (2020) 2020. The French Revolution. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1683941/the-french-revolution-faith-desire-and-politics-pdf.
Harvard Citation
Shusterman, N. (2020) The French Revolution. 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/1683941/the-french-revolution-faith-desire-and-politics-pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
Shusterman, Noah. The French Revolution. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis, 2020. Web. 14 Oct. 2022.