![Pleasures Taken](https://img.perlego.com/book-covers/2051411/9781000323764_300_450.webp)
eBook - ePub
Pleasures Taken
Performances of Sexuality and Loss in Victorian Photographs
Carol Mavor
This is a test
- 176 Seiten
- English
- ePUB (handyfreundlich)
- Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Pleasures Taken
Performances of Sexuality and Loss in Victorian Photographs
Carol Mavor
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
Lewis Carroll's photographs of young girls, Julia Margaret Cameron's photographs of Madonnas and the photographs of Hannah Cullwick, "maid of all work", pictured in masquerade - Carol Mavor addresses the erotic possibilities of these images, exploring not ony the sexualities of the girls, maids and Madonnas, but the pleasures taken - by the viewer, the photographer, the model - in imagining these sexualities.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Pleasures Taken als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Pleasures Taken von Carol Mavor im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Art & Photography. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
Information
CHAPTER I Dream-Rushes: Lewis Carroll's Photographs of Little Girls
On March twenty-fifth, 1863, Lewis Carroll (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, 1832-98) composed a list of 107 namesâgirls âphotographed or to be photographed.â The girls are grouped under their Christian names, all the Alices together, all the Agneses together, and all the Beatrices together, all in alphabetical order. He also notes many of their dates of birth (that telltale sign of a girlâs true girlishness). Carrollâs is a poem of girlhood that rolls off the tongue, like a catalog of Victorian flowers. His prose from the twenty-fifth of March is not unlike one of Humbert Humbertâs most cherished poems, Lolitaâs class list, a poem that Humbert took the pains to memorize by heart:
A poem, a poem, forsooth! So strange and sweet was it to discover this âHaze, Doloresâ (she!) [Lolitaâs full name] in its special bower of names, with its bodyguard of rosesâa fairy princess between her two maids of honor. I am trying to analyze the spine-thrill of delight that it gives me, this name among all of the others. What is it that excites me almost to tears (hot, opalescent, thick tears that poets and lovers shed)? What is it? The tender anonymity of this name with the formal veil (âDoloresâ) and that abstract transposition of first name and surname, which is like a pair of new pale gloves or a mask?1
Very few critics have been willing to touch the little girls Carroll photographed. The subject makes them understandably uneasy. When they do touch upon the topic of his curious photographs, they tend to read not the pictures themselves, or the situation of the girl of the period, but rather Carroll. They want to make it clear that Carroll was not a Humbert Humbert.
Helmut Gernsheim, for instance, who was the first to seriously acknowledge the pictures as important to the history of photography and who has written the definitive book on Carrollâs photographs, clearly seeks to minimize conflict when confronting the troubling images: âBeautiful little girls had a strange fascination for Lewis Carroll. This curious relationship, . . . may be described as innocent love.â2 Similarly, Morton Cohen, the man responsible for publishing the long-lost nude photographs taken by Carroll, argues that Carroll was âdrawn naturally to them; he revelled in their unaffected innocence, their unsophisticated, unsocialized simplicity; he worshiped their fresh, pure unspoiled beautyâ and was âfar from being James Joyceâs âLewd Carrollâ or having anything in common with Vladimir Nabokovâs Humbert Humbert.â3
Cohenâs emphasis on purity, innocence, and simplicity is peculiar when one considers what Carroll suggested about childhood in his own letters and diaries and in the Alice books themselves. Many of Carrollâs letters revel in the sadistic desires of children, as Carroll-as-child takes sides with all of the girl-children of the world, battering his auditor with questions as only children (usually) do.4 Likewise, Alice may try to be polite in Wonderland, but she is downright rude when she goes through the Looking Glass, and Carroll even refers to Alice as âMaliceâ in a letter to one of his child-friends. James Kincaid points out the maliciousness of children and the impossibility of valuing innocence: â[In the Alice books] there is often present a deeper and more ironic view that questions the value of human innocence altogether and sees the sophisticated and sad corruption of adults as preferable to the cruel selfishness of children.â5 The success of Kincaidâs useful analysis is not all that surprising; the literary texts on Carroll are generally more satisfactory than those that focus on the photographs. Although the difference between the critical texts is partly due to different emphases within respective disciplines and factions, it is also a matter of confronting the nonfictional Alicesâthe real Alice Pleasance Liddell and all of her successors. Critics such as Cohen try to veil the obvious sexuality that Carroll captured on the photographic plates. Even more than the stories, the pictures âquestion the value of human innocenceââboth Carrollâs and his modelsâ.
Cohen argues that Carroll was not of the stern evangelical tradition that informed the rearing of many children but, rather, inherited his approach to the child from romantic forebears, who âassumed that the child came into this world innocent and pure.â6 For Carroll (according to Cohen), the child, especially the female child, was divine, pure, good. Moments of Cohenâs analysis are convincing, but he is unreasonably insistent upon washing out any contradictions. At the heart of the argument is not Carroll but Cohenâs own desire to form a general theory of Carrollâs sexuality. Cohen is interested in presenting Carroll as ârepressedâ by Victorian culture, and therefore innocent: âOnly as a repressed human being could he have lived his paradoxical life and worshipped the young girls with a clear, Christian conscience.â7 What Cohen fails to see is how he in turn is repressed by our own society, and how this repression governs his reading of Carroll.
Confronted by the taboo combination of child and sexuality, such critics refuse to âsee.â In Foucauldian terms, participants in the tradition of modern sexual discourse feel the need to discuss sex in a way âthat would not derive from morality alone but from rationality.â8 Thus while Carroll himself could lead a double-double life as photographer and clergyman, mathematician/logician and author of nonsense, Cohen forms a rational discourse that blocks our way to confronting the contradictions that the pictures play out. In the discussion of evangelical versus romantic, the difficulty actually lives with the depiction of the girls; like most observers of Carrollâs pictures, Cohen renders the models as silent and even invisible, solving Carrollâs problem by denying the childrenâs sexuality. In Cohenâs words, âVictorian parents who shared Dodgsonâs views allowed their innocent offspring to romp about in warm weather without any clothes on, particularly at the seaside, and were quite accustomed to seeing nude âsexlessâ children used as objects of decoration in book illustrations and greeting cards.â9 The telltale words here are âused,â âobjects,â and âdecoration.â (And is there no difference between playing on the beach and sitting nude before a man and his lens in his studio?) But the larger question still remains: Why do we have to insist that children have no sexuality? In pronouncing Carrollâs romanticism, Cohen reveals himself to be a latter-day evangelical, trying to protect his own children (his lifeâs work on Carroll) from falling into evil ways. Ironically, whereas Cohen remarks critically of evangelical children that they âcould hardly be thought to have any freedom . . . these children had to be transmogrified from wicked things into beings of goodness and godliness,â Cohenâs âchildrenâ also lack the freedom of displaying sexuality.10
The word âsexuality,â indeed, was born at the dawn of the nineteenth century (in 1800) and originally referred only to biology; it was crystallized into its current meaning in 1879, when J. Matthews Duncan used the term to mean (as defined in the Oxford English Dictionary) a âpossession of sexual powers, or capability of sexual feelings.â11 Duncan reminded his readers that âin removing the ovaries you do not necessarily destroy sexuality in a womanââa distinction between sexuality and reproduction that Sigmund Freud also drew (in âThe Sexual Life of Human Beingsâ), this time with specific references to children:12
To suppose that children have no sexual lifeâsexual excitations and needs and a kind of satisfactionâbut suddenly acquire it between the ages of twelve and fourteen, would (quite apart from any observations) be as improbable, and indeed senseless, biologically as to suppose that they brought no genitals with them into the world and only grew them at the time of puberty. What does awaken in them at this time is the reproductive function, which makes use for its purposes of physical and mental material already present. You are committing the error of confusing sexuality and reproduction and by doing so you are blocking your path to an understanding of sexuality.13
Problematic as Freudâs readings are, and problematic as it is to use his work in any kind of historical analysis (particularly one outside of his own period and culture), he nonetheless remains useful to a discussion like the one at handâin part, as art historian Griselda Pollock has pointed out, because he gave us a language in which to talk about sexuality.14 In particular, we may use this language to talk about sexualityâs connection to theories of difference, which, as we shall see, become especially relevant to Carrollâs photographs of little girls. Freud not only accelerated the discourse on male and female sexual difference but also acknowledged both that children are sexual and that they are sexual in a way different from adults. According to him, childhood sexuality is an âinstinctâ that has been tamed by the time we reach adulthood. To be sure, Freud is essentializing children, and he exacerbates this problem (again in âThe Sexual Life of Human Beingsâ) when he equates the childâs sexuality with that of the âprimitive,â the âpervert,â and so on. But what is salvageable for our purposes is that Freud alerts us to the ways in which we have been educated into thinking that children are pure, asexual, and innocent, and to how âanyone who describes them otherwise can be charged with being an infamous blasphemer against the tender and sacred feelings of mankind.â 15 I am proposing to be blasphemous: to acknowledge the sexuality of children (and of the Victorian girl at that) while making every attempt not to project our oppressive desires onto their bodiesâan impossible goal, of course.
Venus of Oxford
Carrollâs first reference to photographing a nude child is in a diary entry dated May 11, 1867: âMrs. L. brought Beatrice, and I took a photograph of the two; and several of Beatrice alone, âsans habilement [sic].ââ16 Beatrice Hatch was one of Carrollâs favorite models, along with her sister Evelyn; both were at ease in what Carroll has referred to as their âprimitive dress.â Of the four nude images that have been rediscovered, we are most surprised by the image of Evelyn Hatch (c. 1878, fig. 3).17 She catches our eye and confronts us with her own gaze (not unlike Manetâs Olympia, 1863) as she lies before us sprawled as a tiny odalisque. As childwoman, posed like a courtesan, Evelyn reminds us also of Titianâs Venus of Uibino (1538)ânot only in her pose but also in the treatment of the photograph, which gives it its Venetianesque quality. It is a portmanteau of a ârealâ photograph and layers of opalescent colors. Precious Evelyn has been âprinted on emulsion on a curved piece of glass, with oil highlights applied to the back surface. Beneath it is a second piece of curved glass painted in oil.â18 Curved glass, caressed with paint, all taboo: this âpaintographâ is worthy of serious fetishization.19 Evelynâs body glows in a flesh-colored light that gives way to a surrealistically painted marsh of golden moss-greens. Evelyn, stuck in an everlasting sunset, which is strangely muted by the peculiar pink-yellows that shine below the rather ominous dark violet light, is a modern little Venus of Oxford.
Evelyn is also part animal. Her eyes, mildly vampirish, shine like a foxâs at night. A closer look reveals tiny highlights that have been painted on the picto-glass, as if her eyes were marbles. Her face, painted darker than the rest of her pure girl-body, indeed gives the sense that Evelyn, like Aliceâs pig-baby, is part animal and part child. Nina Auerbach has also equated Evelyn with animality, specifically a kind of animal sexuality. In the current Carroll scholarship, Auerbachâs is the only discussion that confronts this image:
![](https://book-extracts.perlego.com/2051411/images/fig00007-plgo-compressed.webp)
Figure 3. Lewis Carroll, Portrait of Evelyn Hatch, c. 1878. (The Rosenbach Museum and Library, Philadelphia and The Executors of the C. L. Dodgson Estate)
Some embarrassed viewers have tried to see no sexuality in these photographs, but it seems to me needlessly apologetic to deny the eroticism of t...
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Cover
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Dedication
- Contents
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- CHAPTER I DREAM-RUSHES
- CHAPTER II TO MAKE MARY
- CHAPTER III TOUCHING NETHERPLACES
- CONCLUSION
- NOTES
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- INDEX
Zitierstile fĂŒr Pleasures Taken
APA 6 Citation
Mavor, C. (2020). Pleasures Taken (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/2051411/pleasures-taken-performances-of-sexuality-and-loss-in-victorian-photographs-pdf (Original work published 2020)
Chicago Citation
Mavor, Carol. (2020) 2020. Pleasures Taken. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/2051411/pleasures-taken-performances-of-sexuality-and-loss-in-victorian-photographs-pdf.
Harvard Citation
Mavor, C. (2020) Pleasures Taken. 1st edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/2051411/pleasures-taken-performances-of-sexuality-and-loss-in-victorian-photographs-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
Mavor, Carol. Pleasures Taken. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, 2020. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.