1 Machiavelliâs Playbook
âSince it is my intention to say something which will be of practical use⊠I have thought it proper to represent things as they are in real truth, rather than as they are imagined.â
âMachiavelli, The Prince (Chapter XV)
Machiavelli wrote The Prince for women in the workplace. Granted, he himself might be pretty surprised to hear thisâhe wasnât exactly a champion of gender equalityâbut he writes, in the beginning of The Prince, that there are two kinds of princes: those who inherit their kingdoms and those who take control of a kingdom through conquest. For a prince who inherits his kingdom, Machiavelli writes, things are generally pretty cushy: the people are used to him, âhis subjects will be naturally well disposed towards him,â and for him to lose his position, he really has to screw up (Chapter II, MPE). You can think of college-educated white men as the inheriting princes of the workplace, and Machiavelli did not write The Prince for them.
The conquering prince, on the other hand, is in a very tricky position and âdifficulties aboundâ (Chapter III, DTE): He just took over a new land, things are in flux, and everyone is skeptical of himâlike, âWait, who is this guy weâre suddenly supposed to be taking orders from?â
It is for the conquering prince that Machiavelli wrote his most famous work. As women in the workplace, we are the conquering princes. Women have arrived in the American workplace! We are getting the degrees and weâre in all the industries and weâre rising through the ranks! This is good news and a real and substantial victory, but the workplace is still new territory for us. Change is incredibly hard. The patriarchy is not going quietly, and if the data is telling us anything, itâs that we need to change our tactics.
As luck would have it, The Prince is a brilliant tactical guide for how to gain and hold power over a newly conquered land. It is not a book about war (although Machiavelli is generally very enthusiastic about war); itâs a book for what to do after you win the war (the aprĂšs war, if you will): You got the degree! The job! The big assignment you never thought youâd get! Itâs yours! Now what? How do you keep the gains? How do you grow them?
Machiavelliâs Big Break
Machiavelli himself was a bit of a new prince. Nobody is quite sure how he got his first government job, but everybody agrees it was a total coup. Machiavelli was hired as a low-level diplomat when he was twenty-nine, and he was very far from a shoo-in for the position. He was not from the ârightâ family. His father was trained as a lawyer but had gone bankrupt, lost his license, and was reduced to trying to scratch out a living from his property. That didnât go so well: He was always in terrible debt, and NiccolĂČ and his family grew up in near poverty. However, Machiavelliâs father loved literature, history, and learning. There are even stories of him trading chunks of land for books. One thing is sure: Machiavelli Sr. spent some of the money he did have educating his son in what seems to have been a pretty over-the-top way, considering the familyâs situation. NiccolĂČ Machiavelli got a full, classical education and was instilled with a deep and lifelong love of history and literature. That may have been what helped get him his job. Still, Machiavelliâs spotty family history was a drag on him his entire career. Nobody worked harder than Machiavelli. He was, by all accounts, brilliant at his job, a tireless worker, and well-liked by his colleagues. But he was held back from a bunch of promotions and high-profile assignments because he simply didnât have the pedigree.
The Power Principle
Power is an interesting concept. Although it is the main focus of Machiavelliâs book, he never explicitly defines it. So what is it? What is this thing Machiavelli is obsessing over?
Power doesnât exactly have the best reputation. Say the word and it conjures up images of men in expensive suits behind giant desks, screwing over investors; General Patton barking at a bunch of faceless troops that America will not tolerate a loser; the Eye of Sauron crushing little Frodo. Power has become, I think, synonymous with the ability to force people to do things. If someone is described as being power hungry or drunk on power, it is not a compliment (at least, not for most people. Maybe for Sauron).
I donât think âpowerâ in the way we commonly think of it is what most women want: The ability to crush underlings is not a life goal for most well-adjusted people. But that does not mean women arenât interested in power. I think what women want in the workplace has a lot more to do with the original meaning of the word. Its original Anglo-French root, poeir, means âto be able.â I think thatâs a very useful definition. Power means being able to do things, to have agency and be the masters of our own fates. Women in the workplace want to be able.
Of course, for most of recorded history, being a woman has largely been defined by not being able: not being able to own property, vote, smoke cigarettes, get an education, drive, practice most professions, travel alone, live alone, or participate in government. In literature and on-screen, when women werenât being locked in towers, married off to secure some political alliance, or manic-pixie-drifting through some guyâs hero journey, they were home waiting for their husbands/fathers/brothers/boyfriends/baby daddies to come back. Women werenât where the action was. Women waited. Any power women had was confined to martyr-like virtue or a whisper in the ear of a man who actually did have power; see Lady Macbeth, Scheherazade, Medea, Ophelia, Cleopatra, Penelope. Even today, women tend to fit into these roles. Take the hit TV series Game of Thrones, which seemed, for years, to be a narrative all about strong women seizing power. The show systematically destroyed every powerful woman in the last few episodes of the show. Most offensively, Khaleesi Daenerys Targaryenâbreaker of chains, mother of dragonsâwho, after commanding armies, traversing continents, raising actual dragons, outsmarting wizards and kings, and striding naked out of multiple burning buildings, went crazy when her boyfriend dumped her. She went so crazy, her lousy boyfriend was forced to kill her and hand the kingdom over to a white guy from a good family. These are the stories we take in all our lives. Itâs no wonder the world has issues with women in power.
Just look at the difference in how we use the words prince and princess. If a man is a prince, he is a model citizen, a cut above the rest, and everybody wants a piece of him. If a woman is a princess, she is difficult, entitled, demanding, and you soooo donât want to be in her bridal party.
What Is Standing Between Us and Power?
What is the difference between the inheriting prince and a new prince? A little bit of historical precedent and a sweet family crest, but mostly itâs a story. In fact, the main obstacle between women and power is not a sexist manager or an oppressive organization or even the dreaded patriarchy. It is a story of our own worth.
The story is, quite simply, that women are less valuable than men are. Dr. Cecilia L. Ridgeway is a Stanford University sociologist and author of Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter? She says women, by and large, are considered to be âlow-statusâ and menâcollege-educated white men, specificallyâare considered to be âhigh-status.â High-status people typically âset the agendaâ: They talk a lot, make decisions, and have strong opinions. Low-status people follow the agenda: They listen a lot, execute orders, and make sure high-status people have the support and resources they needâthey are essentially the Igors and Renfields to the high-status Dr. Frankensteins and Count Draculas.
Leaders are, by definition, high-status. So when women are in leadership positions, it often does not sit well with people. Imagine if you saw a twelve-year-old scolding her parents or the office intern started laying out his vision for the company to the CEO; those are low-status people behaving in a high-status way, and it can stir up strong emotions in people, like shock, resentment, and outrage. Those are the emotions many people feel about women in leadership roles, even if they donât want to feel that way.
But this is good news! Weâre not fighting anything real. We are not dealing with a lack of brains or ability or skill or work ethic. (Studies show basically everybody agrees on that.) The truth is, women already have everything they need to thrive and rise in the workplace, and the workplace will be better for it. All we have to do now is make that happen. And to do that, we need to tell a new story.
There are a bunch of things working in womenâs favor. First, stories change all the time. (Sixty years ago, cigarettes were good for you, marijuana was bad for you, and women didnât enjoy sex.) Also, workplaces are full of people with the best of intentions, who are ready to make changes, and who want an equal, more diverse workplace. But stories can also be formidable, because they are woven into our identities. We use stories to make sense of things, and letting go of them can make the world seem frightening and chaotic. In a way, people are fighting for their lives when theyâre fighting for their stories. Our stories, as David Foster Wallace pointed out, are the water we swim in.
Machiavelli Feels Your Pain
Machiavelli, incidentally, was no stranger to the awesome power of stories. In fact, when a story changed, he lost everything.
Machiavelli thrived in his job as a diplomat. For about fifteen years he was sent all over Italy and much of Western Europe to represent Florentine interests. Popes and kings knew his name; he worked on projects with Leonardo da Vinci; and he was involved in international affairs at all the highest levels. He had properties all over Tuscany, a devoted wife, six kids, and adoring friends. He was a true power player. But when he was forty-three, Machiavelliâs luck ran out in a big way. The powerful Medici family seized control of Florence and, as a high-ranking member of the fallen republic, Machiavelli was stripped of his job and his money, accused of conspiracy, and thrown in jail with âshackles clawing into my anklesâ and âlice so big and fat they seem like butterflies.â He was tortured and interrogated for weeks, and was incredibly lucky not to have been killed. But the Medicis let him live, let him out, and ran him out of town.
It was in exile that Machiavelli wrote The Prince.
They say the Bedouins sang songs about water because they had no water. NiccolĂČ Machiavelli wrote about power because, at the time he wrote The Prince, he had none. He had lost everything.
Machiavelli wrote The Prince in a tiny rural village outside Florence where his family owned a small, scruffy tavern and brothelâfar from the social elites and levers of power he so loved. He spent his nights poring over ancient texts, studying the great kings and warriors of history: men who had conquered nations and created stable, prosperous kingdoms. Machiavelli confided to a close correspondent that these historical figures felt like his friends and seemed more real to him than the actual humans around him, most of whom were farmers, low-level merchants, and prostitutes. He so revered these historical figures that he would dress up in formal clothes before sitting down to do his readings, which he did alone in a small stone apartment attached to the tavern.
Machiavelliâs lack of power is painfully obvious in the opening bars of The Prince. âShould you from the height of your greatness some time turn your eyes to these humble regions,â he writes, âyou will become aware how undeservedly I have to endure the keen and unremitting malignity of Fortuneâ (Dedication, DTE). Machiavelli wrote these words to Lorenzo deâ Medici, who was, in fact, the cause of his âmalignity of Fortune.â The Prince, Machiavelliâs love letter to Florence, was also a kind of cover letter. Machiavelli was hoping the book would shine so brightly, and its ideas for Florence and Italy would resonate so deeply, Lorenzo would say, OMG, HEâS SO BRILLIANT! I DONâT CARE IF HE WORKED FOR THE OTHER SIDE, I HAVE TO HAVE THIS GUY ADVISING ME!
The Prince was Machiavelliâs Say Anything boom box moment to the powers that were. He writes, heartbreakingly, that the work represents the very best he has inside of him: âThough I deem the work unworthy of your greatness,â he writes to Lorenzo, âyet I am bold enough to hope that your courtesy will dispose you to accept it, considering that I can offer you no better gift than⊠all that in the course of so many years, and at the cost of so many hardships and dangers, I have learned, and knowâ (Dedication, DTE). This is how the great and ruthless Machiavelli begins his book: begging the man who took everything from him to pity him and let him back into the fold. The Prince! The great treatise on power! The infamous guide to being unapologetically ruthless! And it starts out in the most submissive, pathetic way imaginable. He apologizes. He flatters. He grovels. And after all of this cringe-worthy bowing and scraping he actually delivers. In The Prince, Machiavelli lays out some of the boldest, most original ideas of his day. He looks at things with an honest (if slightly cynical) eye and speaks his truthâan uncomfortable and shocking truth that shook the very foundations of humanism, which Cicero had laid down centuries before. Machiavelliâs observations were not noble or soaring. They were not inspiring or heartwarming. They did not make you feel good about human beings. But they were realâborn of the bloody, vicious feuds Machiavelli had witnessed during his life and career and had studied from centuries past. Now that is a boom box moment if ever there was one.
Except that it didnât work. It seems Lorenzo never even bothered to read the book. The Prince did get some attention, but it was mostly shock and horror at what Machiavelli had written, culminating in a threat from the all-powerful Catholic Church to excommunicate anybody who bought the book (which, I can only imagine, was very hard on sales).
On top of being broke, exiled, and unemployable, Machiavelli was now notorious and despised. He did not get his job back. He did not return to Florence in triumph, and his city and his country were not saved by him. Machiavelli was crushed by this turn of events and wrote to his friend, âI shall continue, then, among my lousy doings, without finding a man who remembers my service or who believes that I can be good for anything.â
Machiavelli went from being a power player, a patriot, and a political savant to a disgraced traitor and a villain. When a story changed, he lost everything and found himself in the same position as many women in the workplace: on the outside looking in, for reasons that had nothing to do with merit.
Machiavelli knew the powerful role stories could play in our lives all too well. So what is Machiavelliâs advice when youâre going up against a story that is holding you back?
Machiavelliâs Lesson: Donât Blink
One of Machiavelliâs main messages in The Prince is one of the simplest and also one of the most difficult: See the situation youâre in clearly. Face reality. Donât blink.
Machiavelli thought the inability (or unwillingness) to see things as they were was one of the most common pitfalls for princes. In The Prince he recounts many instances of leaders and generals who refused to look at the reality of their situation and who lost battles or kingdoms as a result. His conclusion: Fully facing reality is crucial, even for the cleverest, most prepared prince, because âthe times are more powerful than our brains.â
Itâs human to want to avoid bad things and not look at something ugly. Thereâs a reason kids lie paralyzed with terror under their comforters, convinced there is a monster under the bed, without actually ever just looking to see. Facing discrimination can feel like this: Youâve already put up with years of unfairnessâa harder time getting hired, a harder time getting promoted, lower pay, a more critical eye on your work, harassment, disrespect in all its glorious and glittering formsânot to mention the regular challenges of a workplace: endless meetings, toxic colleagues, bad managers, layoffs, crazy politics, budget cuts, your yogurt getting stolen out of the communal fridge. And now youâre supposed to focus on a big, systemic problem like discrimination? Just so you really see it in its full shittiness?
Yes.
To fight this monster, you need to know it. That is not easy. Most people will do almost anything to avoid looking and, for that reason, there is a major denial problem around gender discrimination in the workplace. Me? Se...