CHAPTER 1
THE ALBUM REVIEW
INTRODUCTION
EXPERT ADVICE FROM OUR WRITERS
ANN POWERS ON DAFT PUNKâS RANDOM ACCESS MEMORIES
JIM DEROGATIS ON SIMON & GARFUNKELâS BOOKENDS
LAURIE ANDERSON ON ANIMAL COLLECTIVEâS CENTIPEDE HZ
LOU REED ON KANYE WESTâS YEEZUS
WRITING PROMPT: THE BLIND REVIEW
WRITING PROMPT: MAKE IT BETTER
INTRODUCTION
How do writers show up in their reviews? Ann Powersâ keen eye for the gender politics of rock gives her review of Daft Punkâs Random Access Memories a characteristic perspective: âThere is one glaring omission from Daft Punkâs foray into vintage pleasures. Where is the female voice representing those who truly defined that liberatory spirit?â (Sheâs just limned out the albumâs relationship to the music of the 70s, its hedonistic nature and âpromiscuous eclecticism.â) The lack of a âfeminine presence,â she concludes, makes âthe satisfactions RAM offers ⊠incomplete.â Itâs a fair and telling point. Powers identifies a shortcoming to which another reviewer might have been blind. How the critic sees and hears a record, Powersâ caveat reminds us, isnât neutral or objective, but determined by their own experience, passion, and focus.
We often learn more when we come across a knee-jerk review that strikes us the wrong way than from one we agree with, learn more not only about the record under consideration but about some aspect of our own response to music, especially if that aspect isnât yet entirely clear to us. The âDean of American Rock Critics,â Robert Christgau first published his âConsumer Guideâ capsule reviews in 1969. Theyâve served to define the nature of record reviews ever since even as they remain largely inimitable, marked by a fiery critical intelligence and an immediately identifiable style. For all the critical stances he takes that are utterly convincing however, an important aspect of reading his reviews is the way the ones you disagree with get under your skin.
His Bâ for Guided By Voicesâ Bee Thousand isnât a particularly low mark in the pre-grade-inflation reckonings of the Dean even if the grade itself doesnât entirely jibe with the damning consonance-rich sentence that caps the review: âthis is pop for pervertsâpomo smarty-pants too prudish and/or alienated to take their pleasure without a touch of pain to remind them that theyâre still alive.â
Even if youâre invested in the record or the band, those over the top áżŸpâs are fun to hear coming from the lips of the master reviewer but they tend to leave sticky traces of his spittle on your face. Taking a second to wipe them off gives you pause to think about whether or not you are a prudish, perverted pomo smarty-pants and whether thatâs why you like the record after all. Once you decide youâre not really any of those things, you become almost grateful for the fact that the critic has given you a chance to confirm what you know about yourself and the music you love.
Reading that sentence reminds me of Christgauâs early reviews of Sonic Youth. The fact that there was an audience out there which liked this stuff seemed more of a disincentive to the critic than the music itself: he sends up the preciosity of the kind of store where you can by an EP like Death Valley â69 by calling it a âshoppeâ and suggests that if you actually pay for such bootless product you might as well be sexually servicing (his language is less polite) the âBoho poseursâ in the band. Are the Boho poseurs who constitute Sonic Youth (a band that consistently received As from Christgau for much of its later career) and its fan base predecessors of the Guided by Voices listeners he imagines to be perverted pomo smarty-pants? They must be. The criticâs allergy to the image of the fawning hipster makes his eyes swell up so quickly that he canât see the music isnât postmodern or enervated at all but an example of brilliant, even lovingly rendered songs made by regular guysâOK, so one of themâs a regular guy who happens to be a geniusâwith a full-blooded love of rock and very limited recording equipment. Christgau may have identified accurately a portion of the bandâs audience in New York who lionized Guided by Voices for the wrong reasons and found this demographic as repellent as early Sonic Youth fans, but once he has these cardboard cutouts in his sights, he can only dismiss the music without really taking it in.
Iâm not dwelling on this review merely to settle scores with a famous critic about a beloved record (though thereâs that), but to suggest a couple of things that might prove useful to a writer of album reviews. First, the critic both uses and is sometimes blind to his prejudices and idealsâthe more you know about yourself and how you process what youâre writing about given that self-knowledge, the better. Second, donât write as someone who doesnât care about what you care about. Donât be hipper or more sanguine, less cranky or suspicious than you are. Show up on the page as yourself. Thereâs nothing cautious or second-guessing about Christgauâs GBV and Sonic Youth reviewsâand thatâs the pleasure of reading them: his verbal intelligence, desire to sniff out a bad deal for the âconsumer,â and concern that what heâs hearing may not be authentic are all palpably real aspects of his response to music. You, on the other hand, might be more inclined to draw out nuance than spit fireâor even praiseâso use what youâve got. And as Rob Sheffield writes about what proved to be a dead wrong review he wrote of a Radiohead album (The Bends) that became one of his favorite records by one of his favorite bands, âgetting things wrong is part of a music criticâs life ⊠Thatâs probably the most crucial advice I could give a young criticâplan on getting a lot of things wrong.â Just make sure when youâre wrong, youâre wrong on your own terms.âMW
EXPERT ADVICE FROM OUR WRITERS
With album reviews, there was a time when writers got advance albums two or three months before the general public ever heard it. So you could spend some time crafting a meaningful argument that was really unaffected by the fan reception of a record, or by the promotional campaign of that record. That landscape has changed so dramatically that writers donât have much of an advantage over anyone else. Everyone has an opinion the moment an album is leaked or released, and editors are going to (understandably) demand that their writers join that chorus as quickly as possible so their outletâs coverage doesnât feel stale. When youâre under that kind of deadline pressure, as a writer, I think itâs much harder to write something personal and meaningful and structurally sound, so readers often get something half-cooked or something that pretty much repeats the safe status quo opinion thatâs floating around out there. The democratization of this stuff is a lot better than the old âgatekeeperâ system in so many ways, but I think serious criticism is really struggling right now, because even the stalwart voices have the ability to see what everyone else is saying, and we wind up in a weird feedback loop.âCasey Jarman, Managing Editor, the Believer
I listen to music as I would âin the wildâ before I approach it critically. That means listening to it regularly on headphones to and from work usually.âMatt LeMay, senior contributor, Pitchfork
I begin by listening to the disc in question several times. Even as a young sprog reading magazines like Crawdaddy! and Fusion, I could tell when the reviewer had only listened to something once, especially if I already owned and enjoyed the record. Thereâs research for record reviews, too. Most reviewers, at least the majority of those Iâve read, seem to think that the music to which theyâre listening and the accompanying liner notes are sufficient data from which to build a review. A little research, especially beyond the immediate realm of music, goes a long way towards enriching both oneâs opinion of a record and the ability to express that opinion with allure.âRichard Henderson, music writer and 33â
author
When I reviewed Oneohtrix Point Neverâs R Plus Seven, which was voted Tiny Mix Tapesâ favorite album of 2013, I already knew the album intimately, since I had listened to it many times before knowing that Iâd be writing about it. But in general, itâs crucial for me to immerse myself in the music first, then, depending on the artist, do as much research as possible by reading interviews and articles. This research is not only for fact-gathering purposes, but also to understand how meaning is created and reinforced throughout the media, how publicity might have affected how people are writing about the music in question, and whether or not any of it aligns with my personal beliefs.âMarvin Lin, Editor-in-Chief, Tiny Mix Tapes
Iâve realized that I try to make everything I write, even reviews, into some sort of narrativeâthere has to be a story or I donât know what to say. And then I just smooth it all together into a legible story.âMichael Azerrad, author, journalist and Editor-in-Chief of the Talkhouse
I wrote a 1500-word review about the Slint boxset (multiple LPs, book, and DVD) in the Wire magazine. I listened to the music, watched the film several times, and started by simply thinking about exactly what struck me as most significant about the band, their reputation, their album Spiderland and the historical gap between the time of its creation and the present. Once I had a lot of sentences more or less worked out in my head, I wrote a preliminary draft. Then I revised it many times, adding and expanding and cutting back and reshuffling certain key points. Then I sent it to the editor and we had several back-and-forth edits and changes. He wanted me to add some things and I thought about how I would do that effectively. Itâs not just about âyour voiceâ or âinspirationââto write is to work with editors, to revise, and to sometimes change your mind and your emphasis.âDrew Daniel, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Johns Hopkins University
The short form is hard for meâespecially the really short form. Like I donât know what Iâd do if I had to write one of those 200-word album reviews. I guess Iâd adapt. Short for me would be in the 2,500-word range. And even then things spill over. But I like revising and editing a lot. Those are my favorite things about writing.âBryan Charles, writer and 33â
author
When Iâm assigned an album for review, the first thing I do is contact the publicist to try and track down a promo copy of the album (if I donât have one already; sometimes my editor will provide me with a promo, or Iâll have pitched the album for review having already listened to it).
Then, I listen. A lot of people ask me how many times I try and listen to an album before reviewing it, and the truth is that there is no magic number. It really depends on how far in advance Iâm given a record; sometimes Iâll live with a promo copy of a record for months before I have to sit down and organize my thoughts about it, and in other casesâespecially with bigger, major label releasesâIâll hear an album for the first time a day or two before I have to file the review. I prefer situations between these two extremes. If you have too long to marinate on an album, you can sometimes overthink your opinion and second-guess your gut reactionâspecifically if you see a lot of people arguing about it a lot on the internet. But of course, you donât want to feel rushed, either. A lot of my favorite albums are âgrowersâ that didnât immediately grab me on first listen, but I came to appreciate them over many consecutive listens, and I try to consider this when listening and writing.
One thing I try to do consistently, though, is listen to an album Iâm reviewing in a variety of contexts. A lot of people might think of a music critic pensively listening to a record alone in a silent room and through huge, state-of-the-art headphones ⊠and true, sometimes I do that. But thatâs not the only way people listen to music, and I try to remember that when Iâm writing about a record. I want to take it out for a test-driveâto try it out in real life. I try to listen on speakers and on headphones. I try to give it a few spins (pen and notebook in hand, usually) focused specifically on the music and when Iâm playing it in the background of doing something else. Sometimes Iâll listen alone and sometimes with other people. Music filters into our lives in a variety of ways, and I try to keep this in mind when Iâm evaluating it.
Then, once I feel like Iâm ready to say what I want to say (or when my deadline is unavoidably looming), Iâll sit down at my computer and write. Usually Iâll have already jotted down some phrases or observations on a napkin, or my hand, or the notebook Iâm always carrying with me, and Iâll consult these notes if I have them, but sometimes I like to start the review as a blank slate. Even when I think I have a handle on how I feel about an album, I donât really know exactly what Iâm going to say until I sit down to write, and I think the trick is finding that uncertainty exhilarating rather than terrifying.âLindsay Zoladz, Associate Editor, Pitchfork
I would make it illegal to review a record sooner than a month after release. I think itâs impossible to have the proper perspective on a record when youâve sat with it for just a few weeksâsometimes even a few days for bigger records. There are so many reviews Iâve written that I would change almost completely because how I felt about the rec...