The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy
eBook - ePub

The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy

Prospects and Retrospect

Dipak Basu,Victoria W. Miroshnik

  1. English
  2. ePUB (apto para móviles)
  3. Disponible en iOS y Android
eBook - ePub

The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy

Prospects and Retrospect

Dipak Basu,Victoria W. Miroshnik

Detalles del libro
Vista previa del libro
Índice
Citas

Información del libro

Using primarily Russian sources, this book explains the political and economic aspects of nuclear power. The nuclear fuel cycle is described, from the mining of natural uranium to the ultimate power generation, and to reprocessing to produce plutonium which is essential for both electricity generation and for weapons production. Historical aspects of nuclear developments in Germany, the USA, India, China and the Soviet Union are also considered and explained. The book then proceeds to argue that Russia is more powerful today in its nuclear weapons system and delivery than ever before, and that it is precisely this which has provoked President Trump to cancel the strategic nuclear weapons reduction treaty.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cómo cancelo mi suscripción?
Simplemente, dirígete a la sección ajustes de la cuenta y haz clic en «Cancelar suscripción». Así de sencillo. Después de cancelar tu suscripción, esta permanecerá activa el tiempo restante que hayas pagado. Obtén más información aquí.
¿Cómo descargo los libros?
Por el momento, todos nuestros libros ePub adaptables a dispositivos móviles se pueden descargar a través de la aplicación. La mayor parte de nuestros PDF también se puede descargar y ya estamos trabajando para que el resto también sea descargable. Obtén más información aquí.
¿En qué se diferencian los planes de precios?
Ambos planes te permiten acceder por completo a la biblioteca y a todas las funciones de Perlego. Las únicas diferencias son el precio y el período de suscripción: con el plan anual ahorrarás en torno a un 30 % en comparación con 12 meses de un plan mensual.
¿Qué es Perlego?
Somos un servicio de suscripción de libros de texto en línea que te permite acceder a toda una biblioteca en línea por menos de lo que cuesta un libro al mes. Con más de un millón de libros sobre más de 1000 categorías, ¡tenemos todo lo que necesitas! Obtén más información aquí.
¿Perlego ofrece la función de texto a voz?
Busca el símbolo de lectura en voz alta en tu próximo libro para ver si puedes escucharlo. La herramienta de lectura en voz alta lee el texto en voz alta por ti, resaltando el texto a medida que se lee. Puedes pausarla, acelerarla y ralentizarla. Obtén más información aquí.
¿Es The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy un PDF/ePUB en línea?
Sí, puedes acceder a The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy de Dipak Basu,Victoria W. Miroshnik en formato PDF o ePUB, así como a otros libros populares de Betriebswirtschaft y Business allgemein. Tenemos más de un millón de libros disponibles en nuestro catálogo para que explores.

Información

Año
2019
ISBN
9783030270292
© The Author(s) 2019
D. Basu, V. W. MiroshnikThe Political Economy of Nuclear Energyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27029-2_1
Begin Abstract

1. Introduction

Dipak Basu1   and Victoria W. Miroshnik2
(1)
Reitaku University, Chiba, Japan
(2)
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
 
 
Dipak Basu
End Abstract
There are two aspects of nuclear power development. The first aspect is the supply of massive amount of energy at a low cost to develop human civilization, the peaceful atom. The second aspect is the supply of, the military atom, massive amount of weapons to destroy the human civilization. This book is about understanding the relationship between developments of these two aspects of nuclear power in three perspectives: past, present, and future.
The development of nuclear energy to gain national competitive advantage started at the beginning of twentieth century and particularly during the two world wars: the World War I (WW1) and the World War II (WW2). The intensive research has been developing during the prewar years in Germany and Russia, and after revolution in 1917 in the Union of Soviet Socialistic Republics, the USSR. Later the research activities with the greatest scope and focus continued in the United States, particularly in view the fact many prominent European scientists, who migrated to the United States before and during war period, were involved in the research. Thus, it is important to note that the development of research on nuclear energy began with the creation of nuclear weapons, the impetus for the development of which was served by two world wars: the WW1 and the WW2.
The history of the expansion of nuclear power development focused on the development of the research on the creation of nuclear weapons of mass destruction. That work was carried out simultaneously worldwide by the scientists of the opposing sides—Nazi Germany under Hitler’s leadership, as well as England’s scientists led by Churchill, the United States under Roosevelt, and then Truman, and the USSR under Stalin. The research focusing on the first aspect of nuclear power development on peaceful atom to supply the massive amount of energy at a low cost to develop human civilization first in history started and successfully accomplished in the USSR under Stalin, with the creation on June 27, 1954, the fist in history of humankind, the Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) to generate electricity from nuclear energy. Thus, based on historical facts it is obvious that Russia is the pioneer of development of peaceful atom, the first aspect of nuclear power development. The USA, the UK, Germany are the pioneers of the development of the military atom, the second aspect of nuclear power development.
The idea of creating nuclear weapons as source of national competitive advantage grew out in the West in developing the concept of “air war.” As early as 1914, the famous English writer H. G. Wells in his science fiction novel “The World Set Free” (Wells 1914) predicted attack using atomic bombs. In 1918 the Italian military theorist General Giulio Douay argued that in the future war defeat to the enemy can be inflicted by strategic bombing called “carpet bombing” carried out from a safe distance for the attacking side aiming total destruction of enemy and enemy’s infrastructure.
Using these theoretical suggestions, in WW2 the German air force destroyed in 1937 the entire city of Guernica in Spain and repeated that in Stalingrad, Russia during the devastating four days August 23–27 in 1942. However, during the WW2 the idea was to create a bomb that will allow winning the war at a lower cost. Thus, the development of the super bomb, the atomic bomb, has been intensified, particularly in the UK, the USA, and Germany.
Since then, the development of the air forces has been proceeding in two directions. First: the development of air defense from perspective to increase in the range and carrying capacity of bombers, which culminated in the creation in the 1940s of strategic aviation. Second: the increase in the power of aircraft warheads capable of hitting the enemy’s strategic potential. The logical result of the second trend was the creation and testing of nuclear weapons in 1945 in the United States with dual purposes: the defeat of the Nazi Germany and Japan; the destruction of Russia, the USSR.
The United States successfully tested nuclear bomb in Japan by bombing two Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. However, the United States abandoned the idea according to the “Unthinkable” plan proposed by Churchill of launching a nuclear strike against the Soviet Russia immediately after the end of WW2 in 1945 when the retaliatory forces of the USSR were destroyed during the war, and again in the early 1950s, the most dangerous period of the Cold War. A decade later, Washington and Moscow again did not use the “window of vulnerability” to attack China, which was approaching the creation of nuclear weapons with the help of France.
It is believed, that in each case, the major world powers refused to use their military nuclear superiority, not because of fear of the nuclear retaliation, but because of the moral responsibility. For example, in his speech to parliament on March 1, 2019, President of Russia Vladimir Putin highlighted the fact that development of several new nuclear weapon systems is successfully completed with the intension to demonstrate to the world that nuclear forces are indispensable for Russia’s security. The development of latest defense system, for example, the creation of S-500, which can protect Russia from hypersonic missiles and the corresponding weapons systems in the Unites States, shows the direction of the technology. However, according to top leader of Russia, the development of strategic nuclear weapons is Russia’s only tool to inflict “predetermined damage” from potential enemy. However, Russian military doctrine never included a preventive nuclear strike or testing nuclear weapons on other countries. For the United States the situation is different, due to the presence of not only nuclear weapons, but also forward-based systems in Eurasia, nuclear allies in Europe and superiority in non-nuclear precision weapons.
The growth of world fuel and energy needs along with the substantial resource and environmental limitations of traditional energy necessitates the timely preparation of new energy technologies that can take on a substantial part of the energy requirements and stabilize the consumption of fossil fuels. Due to the accident in the Japanese nuclear power plant, the Fukushima Daiichi, confidence in the feasibility of using nuclear energy has been significantly shaken. However, despite the refusal of a number of countries of further exploitation of NPPs, a positive view in the development of world nuclear energy is noticeable, surprisingly in Japan.
Indeed, the forecasts of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global center for nuclear power cooperation, say that by 2030, up to 600 new NPPs will be built on the planet, while there are more than 436 today. The installed capacity of the global nuclear power industry currently is 390 gigawatts. If all this power were generated from coal and gas sources, then an additional 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) would be emitted annually into the atmosphere. However, according to estimates of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, all boreal forests (for example, the taiga forests located in Russia in the northern hemisphere of the planet) annually absorb only about 1 billion tons of CO2, while all the forests of the planet can absorb about 2.5 billion tons of CO2.

Reference

  1. Wells, H. G. (1914). The World Set Free. London: Macmillan.
Part IPolitical Economy of Nuclear Power
© The Author(s) 2019
D. Basu, V. W. MiroshnikThe Political Economy of Nuclear Energyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27029-2_2
Begin Abstract

2. Advantages of Nuclear Power

Dipak Basu1 and Victoria W. Miroshnik2
(1)
Reitaku University, Chiba, Japan
(2)
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Dipak Basu
End Abstract

Peaceful Atom

The large-scale development of nuclear energy has been driven by the need for electricity as a result of rapid industrialization, exhaustion of energy reserves, and severe political instability in those countries exporting oil and gas. In addition, traditional energy supplies originating from fossil fuels harm the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.
Nuclear power, the result of energy released during the fission of heavy nuclei and the fusion of light nuclei (at least in principle), has changed the landscape that existed in the first half of the twenty-first century. Expansion of the field of application of nuclear power is primarily determined by its economic implication. Oil was expected at the beginning of the century to be depleted in 20–30 years. This did not take place; by contrast, the scale of oil production has increased enormously. The same story will be repeated with uranium.
Reducing the cost of nuclear electricity to make it sustainable will create new opportunities for electrical technology to be expanded. Since nuclear power plants of almost equal efficiency can be established anywhere in the world, electrical technology processes will be further accelerated as a result of new sources of raw materials being discovered. There will be several new technical processes that are not yet profitable for the production of electricity due to the high cost of production. For example, the prospect of reducing the cost of electricity will provide an opportunity to solve the daunting task of providing enough desalinated water for areas where water is scarce. The shortage of freshwater resources is rapidly growing and has affected both industrial and agricultural development. The first successful efforts to develop desalination technology on a large scale were taken in the former Soviet Union. Then the United States and several other countries realized the great importance of desalination technology, which will undoubtedly lead to the emergence of a new, very energy–intensive industry.
Prospects for energy supply for an extended period can no longer be associated with hydrocarbon fuel as a primary energy source. Arguments in support of such a statement are well known: fuel is not renewable, its resources are limited, and the cost of production and transportation are increasing. Energy technologies based on it cannot meet current environmental requirements. Moreover, Chernobyl and Fukushima have hardened adverse attitudes toward nuclear energy. Widely believed as the enemy of nature and ecology, is nuclear energy gradually becoming a thing of the past?
All industrial activity of humanity has a technological impact on the environment. If we compare the harmful effects of other technologies on the overall risk to human life and nature generally, then nuclear power plants (NPPs) are the safest of all. Despite the danger of production associated with radiation, during the 50 years in which atomic energy has been developed in the world fewer people have died from radiation than die daily as a result of car accidents. According to scientists the probability of dying as a result of an accident in the nuclear industry is 100 times lower than in a car accident and 1000 times smaller than from heart disease. Many fast-growing countries in Asia and Eastern Europe trying to create conditions for sustainable economic growth along with energy security and reduction of emissions of CO2 have either resumed the peaceful development of nuclear energy or will do soon.
As the need for energy increases so will the demand for nuclear fuel and its components including raw natural uranium. By 2030 the demand for natural uranium will be 98,000 tons per year if the declared global rate of growth in nuclear capacity is implemented.

Transition to New Nuclear Power Technologies

Modern atomic energy is a mature technology of industrial energy production the reliability, safety, and efficiency of which are confirmed by many years of experience in operating a large number of power plants around the world. Nuclear energy has high potential for technical and economic improvement, but its implementation is hampered as a result of the lack of adequate state support and insufficient investment attractiveness of NPP projects.
To solve the problem of energy shortages and still meet environmental requirements, the part played by nuclear energy needs to increase several times in the twenty-first century. This task can be solved if it is given the status of a national priority program involving government support and ensuring the transfer of knowledge and experience from industry veterans to the new generation of specialists.
The first nuclear reactor symbolically named “Atomic Peace” was created and successfully tested on June 26 in 1954 in the small city of Obninsk on the Protva River not far from Moscow; ever since June 26 has been considered the birthday of the “peaceful atom.” Although this is an indisputable historical fact, the United States was the first country in the world to create and test a military molecule on civilians by dropping two atomic bombs of highly destructive power on Japan. On the other hand, Russia was the first country to create a NPP and started the new era of the peaceful atom.
How does a NPP work? At any NPP three reciprocal transformations of energy forms take place: nuclear energy is converted into thermal energy, thermal energy into mechanical energy, and mechanical energy into electric energy.
It looks like this. At the base of the station is a reactor allocated a given volume into which nuclear fuel is loaded and where a controlled chain reaction takes place. Uranium-235 is divided by slow (thermal) neutrons resulting in a considerable amount of heat that is discharged from the core by a coolant, a liquid or gaseous substance passing through its volume. Water is usually used as the coolant. Metal melts in fast neutron reactors (e.g., sodium in a BN-600 reactor). The most complex transformation involves nuclear energy being transformed into thermal e...

Índice

  1. Cover
  2. Front Matter
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. Part I. Political Economy of Nuclear Power
  5. Part II. Retrospect of Nuclear Power Development
  6. Part III. Prospect of Nuclear Power Development
  7. Back Matter
Estilos de citas para The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy

APA 6 Citation

Basu, D., & Miroshnik, V. (2019). The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy ([edition unavailable]). Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/3492443/the-political-economy-of-nuclear-energy-prospects-and-retrospect-pdf (Original work published 2019)

Chicago Citation

Basu, Dipak, and Victoria Miroshnik. (2019) 2019. The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy. [Edition unavailable]. Springer International Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/3492443/the-political-economy-of-nuclear-energy-prospects-and-retrospect-pdf.

Harvard Citation

Basu, D. and Miroshnik, V. (2019) The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy. [edition unavailable]. Springer International Publishing. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/3492443/the-political-economy-of-nuclear-energy-prospects-and-retrospect-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).

MLA 7 Citation

Basu, Dipak, and Victoria Miroshnik. The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy. [edition unavailable]. Springer International Publishing, 2019. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.