eBook - ePub
The Bystander Effect
Understanding the Psychology of Courage and Inaction
Catherine Sanderson
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
The Bystander Effect
Understanding the Psychology of Courage and Inaction
Catherine Sanderson
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
Why do good people so often do nothing when a small intervention could make a big difference? Pioneering psychologist Catherine Sanderson demystifies the mindset of bullies and bystanders to show why courage comes at such a high cost, and how we can learn to be brave.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que The Bystander Effect est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă The Bystander Effect par Catherine Sanderson en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Psychology et Social Psychology. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
PsychologySous-sujet
Social PsychologyNotes
1. The Myth of Monsters
1. Quoted in S. L. Plous and P. G. Zimbardo, âHow social science can reduce terrorism,â Chronicle of Higher Education, September 10, 2004.
Back to text
2. S. Klebold, A Motherâs Reckoning: Living in the Aftermath of Tragedy (New York: Crown, 2016).
Back to text
3. P. G. Zimbardo, âThe human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos,â in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, ed. W. J. Arnold and D. Levine, 237â307 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1969).
Back to text
4. A. Silke, âDeindividuation, anonymity, and violence: Findings from Northern Ireland,â Journal of Social Psychology 143 (2003): 493â499.
Back to text
5. E. Diener, R. Lusk, D. DeFour, and R. Flax, âDeindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior,â Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980): 449â459.
Back to text
6. A. J. Ritchey and R. B. Ruback, âPredicting lynching atrocity: The situational norms of lynchings in Georgia,â Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44, no. 5 (2018): 619â637.
Back to text
7. Some neuroscience researchers have been criticized for making a particular statistical error, the nonindependence error, when testing their predictions. This error occurs when researchers first use one statistical test to select which data to analyze and then use a second (nonindependent) statistical test to analyze the data. Some of these statistical concerns are detailed in, for example, American Psychological Association, âP-values under question,â Psychological Science Agenda, March 2016, https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2016/03/p-values; A. Abbot, âBrain imaging studies under fire,â Nature News, January 13, 2009, https://www.nature.com/news/2009/090113/full/457245a.html.
Back to text
8. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, âWhen good people do bad things,â ScienceDaily, June 12, 2014, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140612104950.htm.
Back to text
9. M. Cikara, A. C. Jenkins, N. Dufour, and R. Saxe, âReduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm,â NeuroImage 96 (2014): 36â43.
Back to text
10. A. C. Jenkins and J. P. Mitchell, âMedial prefrontal cortex subserves diverse forms of self-reflection,â Social Neuroscience 6, no. 3 (2011): 211â218; W. M. Kelley, C. N. Macrae, C. L. Wyland, S. Caglar, S. Inati, and T. F. Heatherton, âFinding the self? An event-related fMRI study,â Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002): 785â794; C. N. Macrae, J. M. Moran, T. F. Heatherton, J. F. Banfield, and W. M. Kelley, âMedial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self,â Cerebral Cortex 14, no. 6 (2004): 647â654.
Back to text
11. Quoted in A. Trafton, âGroup mentality,â MIT Technology Review website, posted August 5, 2014, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/529791/group-mentality/.
Back to text
12. S. Milgram, âBehavioral study of obedience,â Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, no. 4 (1963): 371â378.
Back to text
13. J. M. Burger, âReplicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?â American Psychologist 64 (2009): 1â11; D. DoliĆski, T. Grzyb, M. Folwarczny, P. GrzybaĆa, K. Krzyszycha, K. Martynowska, and J. Trojanowski, âWould you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies,â Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, no. 8 (2017): 927â933.
Back to text
14. W. H. Meeus and Q. A. Raaijmakers, âAdministrative obedience: Carrying out orders to use psychologicalâadministrative violence,â European Journal of Social Psychology 16 (1986): 311â324.
Back to text
15. T. Blass, âAttribution of responsibility and trust in the Milgram obedience experiment,â Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26 (1996): 1529â1535.
Back to text
16. A. Bandura, âMoral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities,â Personality and Social Psychology Review 3, no. 3 (1999): 193â209.
Back to text
17. H. A. Tilker, âSocially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback,â Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14, no. 2 (1970): 95â100.
Back to text
18. J. M. Burger, Z. M. Girgis, and C. C. Manning, âIn their own words: Explaining obedience to authority through an examination of participantsâ comments,â Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (2011): 460â466. Two-thirds of those whose comments during the study suggested that they felt personally responsible for harming the learner stopped before giving the maximum shock, while only 12 percent of those who kept giving shocks up to the highest level ever expressed any feelings of personal responsibility.
Back to text
19. E. A. Caspar, J. F. Christensen, A. Cleeremans, and P. Haggard, âCoercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain,â Current Biology 26, no. 5 (2016): 585â592.
Back to text
20. E. Filevich, S. KĂŒhn, and P. Haggard, âThere is no free wonât: antecedent brain activity predicts decisions to inhibit,â PloS One 8, no. 2 (2013): e53053.
Back to text
21. S. D. Reicher, S. A. Haslam, and J. R. Smith, âWorking toward the experimenter: reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership,â Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 4 (2012): 315â324.
Back to text
22. L. Ross and R. E. Nisbett, The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (London: Pinter and Martin, 2011).
Back to text
23. Milgram, âBehavioral study of obedience.â
Back to text
24. M. M. Hollander, âThe repertoire of resistance: Non-compliance with directives in Milgramâs âobedienceâ experiments,â British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (2015): 425â444.
Back to text
25. F. Gino, L. D. Ordóñez, and D. Welsh, âHow unethical behavior becomes habit,â Harvard Business Review blogpost, September 4, 2014, https://hbr.org/2014/09/how-unethical-behavior-becomes-habit.
Back to text
26. D. T. Welsh, L. D. Ordóñez, D. G. Snyder, and M. S. Christian, âThe slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions,â Journal of Applied Psychology 100, no. 1 (2015): 114â127.
Back to text
27. I. Suh, J. T. Sweeney, K. Linke, and J. M. Wall, âBoiling the frog slowly: The immersion of C-suite financial executives into fraud,â Journal of Business Ethics (July 2018): 1â29.
Back to text
28. B. T. Denny, J. Fan, X. Liu, S. Guerreri, S. J. Mayson, L. Rimsky, et al., âInsula-amygdala functional connectivity is correlated with habituation to repeated nega...