![Being Human in God's World](https://img.perlego.com/book-covers/2051093/9781493404421_300_450.webp)
eBook - ePub
Being Human in God's World
An Old Testament Theology of Humanity
McConville, J. Gordon
This is a test
- 240 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Being Human in God's World
An Old Testament Theology of Humanity
McConville, J. Gordon
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
A Biblical Perspective on What It Means to Be Human This major work by a widely respected Old Testament scholar and theologian unpacks a biblical perspective on fundamental questions of what it means to be human. J.Gordon McConville explores how a biblical view of humanity provides a foundation for Christian reflection on ethics, economics, politics, and church life and practice. The book shows that the Old Testament's view of humanity as "earthed" and "embodied" plays an essential part in a well-rounded Christian theology and spirituality, and applies the theological concept of the "image of God" to all areas of human existence.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Being Human in God's World est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Being Human in God's World par McConville, J. Gordon en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans TeologĂa y religiĂłn et Estudios bĂblicos. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sous-sujet
Estudios bĂblicos1
Humanity in the Image of God (Imago Dei)
As I indicated in the preceding chapter, the concept of the human being created in the âimage of Godâ has a certain claim to precedence in a study of the Old Testamentâs view of humanity. It is often observed that the formula recurs very little after its famous use in Genesis 1. This elusiveness, together with uncertainties about its precise meaning in that chapter, makes it precarious to rest an Old Testament anthropology entirely on it. This point is made at length by David Kelsey in his two-volume theological anthropology,1 where he claims that Genesis 1:26 cannot be used to structure a theological anthropology systematically. There is indeed no âsingle plot or narrative logicâ to a biblical anthropology; rather, the canon has multiple plots and is âsystematically unsystematic.â2 In particular, he is unconvinced by renderings of a single, unifying eschatological narrative of the canon in which the âimageâ is lost, only to be restored through Christ at the end.3
This basic theological position coheres well with my understanding of the role of the âimageâ in Old Testament anthropology. Rather than assume at the outset that the âimage of Godâ is the key to unlocking the Old Testamentâs understanding of the human situation, I propose to consider how far we can understand it in its context, then look for ways in which it might shed light on other facets of the Old Testamentâs portrayal of humanity, or indeed have light shed back upon it. This in turn should feed into our broader theological understanding. With John Goldingay, I think that âthe expression [âimage of Godâ] is a stimulus to reflection as much as a deposit of reflection.â4
The âImage of Godâ in the Context of Genesis 1:1â2:4a
We begin, however, by considering the âimageâ in its context. This brings its own challenges. Kelseyâs position, outlined above, rests partly on his belief that the chances of finding firm ground in the exegesis of Genesis 1:26â28 are too slight to allow the text to be used much for theology. For him, the phrase âis so problematic and controversial that the most careful and influential exegeses seem to cancel each other out.â5 Goldingay is hardly less pessimistic: âNeither the expression itself nor the immediate context spells out the phraseâs meaning, and answers to the question [wherein lay Godâs image in humanity] commonly reflect the prejudgments of the circles where they are propounded.â6 We have been warned! Even so, Genesis 1 must be understood somehow, even if only to weigh it carefully as part of the Old Testamentâs wider testimony.
Let us observe, then, how the âimageâ takes its place within that first great biblical statement about the creator and the creation and how they relate (Gen. 1:1â2:4a). I offer here a short account of its features, all widely observed, in order to situate verses 26â28 in a discourse and to illustrate the issues for interpretation. It is a highly structured passage. Most obviously it divides Godâs creative activity into the work of six days, followed by a day of rest. This structuring system is underlined by the repetition of certain phrases: âand God said,â âlet there be . . . and there was,â âand God made,â and âGod saw that it was good.â The seven-day pattern has been analyzed to show how carefully crafted the composition is. In a time-honored and widely followed analysis, the six days are paired, so that days 1â3 correspond to days 4â6 respectively, as the general to the particular. Thus light is created on the first day and the sun, moon, and stars on the fourth. In this structure, the seventh day, with its Sabbath rest, stands outside the pattern and may be seen as a culmination of the whole.7 In an alternative structure, the fourth day is understood as a midpoint. The effect of this is to throw some weight onto the theme of worship, since the fourth day portrays the heavenly bodies not as the objects of worship that they almost universally were in the ancient Near East but simply as parts of the one Godâs creative work.8 These two patterns, which can be regarded as overlapping, have in common that they portray the creation of all things within a context of the worship of the one God who made everything, in the one case by focusing on the Sabbath, which was a vital part of Israelâs worship (cf. Exod. 20:8â11), and in the other by means of a repudiation of the worship of anything other than the God of Israel.
In addition to these observations, Gordon Wenham has drawn attention to the preponderance of the number seven in the passage: for example, the phrases âGod saw that it was goodâ and âand it was soâ each occur seven times. The phrase âAnd God saidâ occurs ten times.9 Furthermore, the passage is enclosed by statements about Godâs creation, with Genesis 2:3â4a echoing chiastically the elements of Genesis 1:1.10 These features draw attention to leading interests of the passage. The sevens echo the seven-day sabbatical structure, and perhaps in addition express something of the wholeness and orderliness of the creation. The prominence of âand God said,â together with âand it was so,â highlights the powerful, creative speech of God. And the repetition of âGod saw that it was goodâ emphasizes the divine appraisal of the created world as âgood.â
To these formal points should be added the observation that the account of the sixth day of creation is substantially longer than those of the other days. In narrative terms, the story slows down and becomes expansive, so that it is not adequate to express the structure of the passage as a neat symmetrical framework. Rather, there is a particular focus on the subject matter of the sixth day, on which God creates humans. The humans do not have this day all to themselves, however, but share it with other land creatures (Gen. 1:24â25). In distinguishing the humans from the creatures of both days 5 and 6, one must recognize similarities as well as dissimilarities. As with the humans, God speaks to the creatures of air and sea on day 5, blessing them and commanding them to âbe fruitful and multiplyâ (1:22; cf. 1:28). Humans therefore share the land with the land creatures, and with the nonhuman creatures of the air and sea the capacity both to be addressed by God and to propagate. (It is curious that the latter features occur with the creatures of sea and air, and not with the land creatures, but they are presumably not intended to be exclusive.) In terms of propagation, therefore, humans are part of a created order that is designed for reproduction, as with the vegetation on the third day.
Humanity is nevertheless distinguished from the other creatures in important ways. It is only in the case of the humans that God deliberates with himself before acting, and only the humans are said to be made âin our image and according to our likenessâ (Gen. 1:26). They are further marked out, first, by a triple use of the verb bÄrÄÊŸ rather than the more regular ÊżÄĆĂą; second, by being specified as âmale and femaleâ (v. 27; this is evidently assumed of the other creatures, since they too âmultiply,â but passed over in silence); and third, by assigning them âdominionâ over the other creatures of both the fifth and sixth days (v. 26b). The command to have dominion is then repeated and el...
Table des matiĂšres
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1. Humanity in the Image of God (Imago Dei)
- 2. âLike Godâ in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 2â3)
- 3. The Human âConstitutionâ in the Old Testament
- 4. The Situated Self
- 5. The Old Testamentâs Transformations and the âSpiritual Senseâ
- 6. Embodiments: Place and Memory
- 7. The Political Self
- 8. Male and Female
- 9. Work and Creativity
- 10. The Old Testament and Human Formation: The Psalms
- Bibliography
- Subject Index
- Author Index
- Scripture Index
- Back Cover
Normes de citation pour Being Human in God's World
APA 6 Citation
[author missing]. (2016). Being Human in Godâs World ([edition unavailable]). Baker Publishing Group. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/2051093/being-human-in-gods-world-an-old-testament-theology-of-humanity-pdf (Original work published 2016)
Chicago Citation
[author missing]. (2016) 2016. Being Human in Godâs World. [Edition unavailable]. Baker Publishing Group. https://www.perlego.com/book/2051093/being-human-in-gods-world-an-old-testament-theology-of-humanity-pdf.
Harvard Citation
[author missing] (2016) Being Human in Godâs World. [edition unavailable]. Baker Publishing Group. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/2051093/being-human-in-gods-world-an-old-testament-theology-of-humanity-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
[author missing]. Being Human in Godâs World. [edition unavailable]. Baker Publishing Group, 2016. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.