Psychology

Individual Behavior and Group Behavior

Individual behavior refers to the actions, thoughts, and feelings of a single person, influenced by their personality, attitudes, and motivations. Group behavior, on the other hand, involves the interactions and dynamics among individuals within a collective setting, such as a team or community. Both individual and group behavior are studied to understand social dynamics, decision-making, and interpersonal relationships.

Written by Perlego with AI-assistance

8 Key excerpts on "Individual Behavior and Group Behavior"

  • Science And Human Behavior
    • B.F Skinner(Author)
    • 2012(Publication Date)
    • Free Press
      (Publisher)

    SECTION IV

    THE BEHAVIOR OF PEOPLE IN GROUPS

    Passage contains an image

    CHAPTER XIX

    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR

    Social behavior may be defined as the behavior of two or more people with respect to one another or in concert with respect to a common environment. It is often argued that this is different from individual behavior and that there are “social situations” and “social forces” which cannot be described in the language of natural science. A special discipline called “social science” is said to be required because of this apparent break in the continuity of nature. There are, of course, many facts—concerning governments, wars, migrations, economic conditions, cultural practices, and so on—which would never present themselves for study if people did not gather together and behave in groups, but whether the basic data are fundamentally different is still a question. We are interested here in the methods of the natural sciences as we see them at work in physics, chemistry, and biology, and as we have so far applied them in the field of behavior. How far will they carry us in the study of the behavior of groups?
    Many generalizations at the level of the group need not refer to behavior at all. There is an old law in economics, called Gresham’s Law, which states that bad money drives good money out of circulation. If we can agree as to what money is, whether it is good or bad, and when it is in circulation, we can express this general principle without making specific reference to the use of money by individuals. Similar generalizations are found in sociology, cultural anthropology, linguistics, and history. But a “social law” must be generated by the behavior of individuals. It is always an individual who behaves, and he behaves with the same body and according to the same processes as in a nonsocial situation. If an individual possessing two pieces of money, one good and one bad, tends to spend the bad and save the good—a tendency which may be explained in terms of reinforcing contingencies—and if this is true of a large number of people, the phenomenon described by Gresham’s Law arises. The individual behavior explains the group phenomenon. Many economists feel the need for some such explanation of all economic law, although there are others who would accept the higher level of description as valid in its own right.
  • Mind, Self, and Society
    eBook - ePub

    Mind, Self, and Society

    The Definitive Edition

    [1.2]   No very sharp line can be drawn between social psychology and individual psychology. Social psychology is especially interested in the effect which the social group has in the determination of the experience and conduct of the individual member. If we abandon the conception of a substantive soul endowed with the self of the individual at birth, then we may regard the development of the individual’s self, and of his self-consciousness within the field of his experience, as the social psychologist’s special interest. There are, then, certain phases of psychology which are interested in studying the relation of the individual organism to the social group to which it belongs, and these phases constitute social psychology as a branch of general psychology. Thus, in the study of the experience and behavior of the individual organism or self in its dependence upon the social group to which it belongs, we find a definition of the field of social psychology.
    [1.3]   While minds and selves are essentially social products, products or phenomena of the social side of human experience, the physiological mechanism underlying experience is far from irrelevant—indeed is indispensable—to their genesis and existence; for individual experience and behavior is, of course, physiologically basic to social experience and behavior: the processes and mechanisms of the latter (including those which are essential to the origin and existence of minds and selves) are dependent physiologically upon the processes and mechanisms of the former, and upon the social functioning of these. Individual psychology, nevertheless, definitely abstracts certain factors from the situation with which social psychology deals more nearly in its concrete totality. We shall approach this latter field from a behavioristic point of view.
    [1.4]   The common psychological standpoint which is represented by behaviorism is found in John B. Watson. The behaviorism which we shall make use of is more adequate than that of which Watson makes use. Behaviorism in this wider sense is simply an approach to the study of the experience of the individual from the point of view of his conduct, particularly, but not exclusively, the conduct as it is observable by others. Historically, behaviorism entered psychology through the door of animal psychology. There it was found to be impossible to use what is termed introspection. One cannot appeal to the animal’s introspection, but must study the animal in terms of external conduct. Earlier animal psychology added an inferential reference to consciousness, and even undertook to find the point in conduct at which consciousness appears. This inference had, perhaps, varying degrees of probability, but it was one which could not be tested experimentally. It could be then simply dropped as far as science was concerned. It was not necessary for the study of the conduct of the individual animal. Having taken that behavioristic standpoint for the lower animals, it was possible to carry it over to the human animal.
  • Psychology in Organizations

    1

    ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR PSYCHOLOGY

     
    Humans are social animals. No one who reads this book lives entirely alone, remote from the influence of society and other people. We each seek out contact with others, in the knowledge that this has the capacity to enrich our lives in different ways. This contact usually appears to be natural and uncomplicated, but most of it is highly structured. It is regulated, coordinated and managed. This is partly because much of our day-to-day activity involves dealing with people who are acting as members of organizations. As well as this, a great deal of our own behaviour is determined by our place within an organization. Today you may encounter a shop assistant, a bus driver, a lecturer, a newsreader, a politician, and you may also act, and be treated by others, as a student, a teammate or a fellow worker. Precisely because these sorts of interactions are aspects of organizational behaviour, they are – at least to some extent – purposeful, predictable and meaningful.
    Understanding the psychological underpinnings of individuals’ behaviour in organizations is a particular focus for researchers in two subdisciplines: organizational psychology and social psychology. Among other things, both fields examine and attempt to understand the mental states and processes associated with behaviour in structured social groups and systems. This chapter discusses in more detail what organizations are and how they have been studied by organizational and social psychologists, before going on to outline how the social psychology of organizational life will be examined in this book.
    A central question that provides a backdrop to the issues addressed in this chapter, and in the book as a whole, is how we should understand the contribution that groups make both to the psychology of individuals within organizations and to the functioning of organizations as a whole. Do groups detract from individual motivation and performance or do they augment it? Do groups introduce error and bias into judgement and decision making or are they sources of validation and validity? Are individual products and behaviour superior to group output and collective action? More importantly, when and why
  • The Sciences Of Man In The Making
    eBook - ePub
    • Edwin A. Kirkpatrick(Author)
    • 2013(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
    HAPTER X

    BEHAVIOUR IN RELATION TO OTHERS, OR SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

    THE NEED FOR A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

    THE concept of general psychology is of an organism reacting to the physical environment, and improving in doing so by practice. Individual psychology not only recognizes differences in human organisms but emphasizes the truth that, in reacting in his special way, each individual builds a self whose parts are so organized that what is done in response to a situation is not wholly determined by either the situation or the sense and motor apparatus responding, but by the personality of the actor. Social psychology shows that there is also a social determiner of conduct. It no longer assumes a general “ social mind ” of which each individual mind is a part, but emphasizes the truth that the individual is directed and moulded by companions and by the customs and institutions of the group of which he is a part. These influences are shown to have more to do with determining behaviour than bodily structure or physical environment. Realization of the importance of personal and cultural influences in human behaviour has led to the present deep interest in social psychology, which is concerned with these interrelations.

    THE EFFECTS OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF ONE UPON ANOTHER

    A hungry individual animal or man, when food is perceived, responds to the situation in a positive and active way. Another individual, also hungry, observes the response perhaps before he has observed the food, and is then influenced by the two stimuli to more vigorous action than the first one, who had the food stimulus only. As the second approaches and begins taking food, both become more active in getting it than would be the case if each was alone, especially if the amount is limited. If one interferes with the other’s attempt to get a portion the natural reaction is one of anger, which usually calls forth a similar response with further interference of each with the other, and increase in vigour of struggle. For a time, perhaps, the food is neglected while each tries to match the aggressive behaviour of the other by more effective responses of a similar kind.
  • Essentials of Social Psychology
    eBook - ePub

    Essentials of Social Psychology

    An Indian Perspective

    • Shubhra Mangal, Shashi Mangal(Authors)
    • 2022(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
  • It tells us that our thoughts, feelings and actions are influenced with the interactions and presence of others and vice versa. Proceeding further, it acquaints us with the way these are influenced in the presence of others in one or the other social situations. In other words, thus, social psychology may be found to look at human behavior as influenced by other people and the social context in which this occurs.
  • For influencing and affecting our feelings, thoughts and actions, the actual presence of others is not essential. It can happen also with their imagined and implied presence such as when watching television or following internalized cultural norms.
  • Social psychology provides a scientific explanation of what, how and why people think, feel and behave the way they do with others, influence them and have interactions and relationships with them in one or the other social situations.
  • It helps us in understanding and explaining the manner in which our thoughts, feelings and actions influence others or get influenced in the presence/interactions with others. Apart from the ongoing behavior of others, social experiences preserved in our memory, and the attitudes formed out of these experiences, and physical factors also influence our behavior towards others.
    Social Psychology
    An applied branch of the subject psychology that deals with the scientific study of the behavior of individuals in a social context enabling us to get an explanation of the nature and causes of their thoughts, feelings and behaving with others in one or the other social situations.
  • In this way, what is available in the form of social as well as other variables to us in our social environment at one or the other time, proves quite significant in influencing our bent of mind (in terms of our attitudes, perceptions and motives) and our actions and behavior at that time and also in future in the similar encounters. By highlighting all such things, social psychology tries to bring out all the factors that lead us to behave in a given way in the presence of others, and look at the conditions under which certain types of behavior/actions and feelings occur.
  • Social Identifications
    eBook - ePub

    Social Identifications

    A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes

    • Dominic Abrams, Michael A. Hogg(Authors)
    • 2006(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
    2

    The social identity approach: context and content

    The group spirit, the idea of the group with the sentiment of devotion to the group developed in the minds of all its members, not only serves as a bond that holds the group together or even creates it, but…it renders possible truly collective volition.
    (McDougall 1921:63)
    The group spirit, involving knowledge of the group as such, some idea of the group, and some sentiment of devotion or attachment to the group, is then the essential condition of all…collective life, and of all effective collective action.
    (ibid.: 66)
    There is no psychology of groups which is not essentially and entirely a psychology of individuals. Social psychology…is a part of the psychology of the individual. (Allport 1924:4)
    To answer the question where this mental structure of the group exists, we must refer…to the individual. [It is] learned by each individual from the specific language and behaviour of other individuals. Where such continuity of social contact ceases the organized life of the group disappears. Were all the individuals in a group to perish at one time, the so-called ‘group mind’ would be abolished forever.
    (ibid: 9)
    These extracts deal with what has been called the ‘master problem’ of social psychology, namely the relationship between the individual and the group. The prototypical opposing positions are represented above by William McDougall and Floyd Allport: group behaviour is qualitatively different from individual behaviour, and the group is somehow contained in the mind of the individual group member and influences behaviour accordingly; versus , group behaviour is individual behaviour among many individuals who are in the physical presence of each other—the group is a nominal fallacy.
    In discussing intergroup behaviour and group processes we confront this controversy head on. Are groups merely aggregates of individuals in which the normal processes of interpersonal behaviour operate in the usual way but among a larger number of people, or do groups represent modes of interaction and thought which are qualitively distinct from that involved in interpersonal interaction? In the present chapter we introduce the concept of social identity
  • Introduction to Political Psychology
    • Martha L. Cottam, Elena Mastors, Thomas Preston(Authors)
    • 2022(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
    Chapter 4 The Political Psychology of Groups DOI: 10.4324/9780429244643-4 This chapter looks at Political Beings in their environment—that is, in the presence of, and as a member of, groups. Groups have a prominent role in politics. Small groups are often given the responsibility for making important political decisions, creating political policies, and generally conducting political business. Larger groups, such as the Senate, also hold a special place in politics, and are responsible for larger-scale decisions and tasks, such as passing legislation. Finally, large groups, such as states and countries, carry with them their own dynamics, especially regarding how they view each other and how they get along. Because so much political behavior is performed by groups, it behooves us to learn more about the basic processes that govern groups. Although groups are composed of individuals, group behavior cannot be understood by studying individual behavior. Obviously, understanding groups involves an understanding of the individuals who compose a group, but there are dynamics of groups that cannot be observed from examining individuals alone. Many observers (e.g., Durkheim, 1966 ; LeBon, 1960) have noted that individuals often behave quite differently when they are together compared with when they are alone. Consequently, although the workings of the Political Being’s mind are still operative, in this chapter we are interested in the impact of the sociopolitical environment on behavior. The study of groups in social psychology has a short history, with some of the first studies being conducted just before World War II (e.g., Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939 ; Newcomb, 1943 ; Sherif, 1936 ; Whyte, 1943). Nonetheless, a vast amount of information is available about group behavior, and most of it can be applied to the study of groups in political settings. In this chapter, we review a variety of information about groups
  • An Introduction to Social Psychology
    • Miles Hewstone, Wolfgang Stroebe, Klaus Jonas, Miles Hewstone, Wolfgang Stroebe, Klaus Jonas(Authors)
    • 2016(Publication Date)
    • BPS Blackwell
      (Publisher)
    Even though social psychologists are mainly interested in studying how attitudes change in response to social influence attempts (see Chapters 7 and 8), they also use attitudes to predict individual behaviour (see Chapter 6). Furthermore, within social psychology, researchers have often been interested in studying individual difference variables, such as the degree to which individuals are prone to prejudice and susceptible to Fascist ideologies (‘authoritarianism’; Adorno et al., 1950; see Chapter 14), or the degree to which individuals are oriented to situational cues or reactions of others (‘self-monitoring’; Snyder, 1974). Since there is a great deal of agreement that individual behaviour is influenced by personality traits (see Chapter 9 on aggression) as well as the social context, the two fields of personality psychology and social psychology are, in fact, difficult to separate. It is therefore not surprising that the leading social psychological journal is the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and that most American social psychologists are members of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. However, there are subtle differences in focus. Social psychologists are typically interested in personality variables as moderators. They look for the extent to which the impact of an independent variable on a dependent variable is qualified by, or depends on, the level of an individual’s score on a personality measure. For example, there is a higher correlation between attitudes and behaviour for ‘low’ than for ‘high’ self-monitors (Snyder & Kendzierski, 1982). Many of the chapters in this volume refer to such personality influences on social behaviour. Social psychologists also tend to emphasize that the impact of personality variables on social behaviour is weaker in ‘strong’ compared to ‘weak’ social situations (Mischel, 1977)
  • Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.