The Noah Code

Coding for Origins Truth

Mark D Rose

• Editore: Genesis Alive LLC
• Anno: 2015
• ISBN:
  9780996066518
• Argomento: Theologie & Religion
• Categoria: Bibeln

Description

The Flood of Noah was a true event impacting the spiritual, historical and scientific realms of mankind. The Noah Code promises to shed new interpretive light on the Genesis account from both the Bible and science. Covering a number of late-breaking yet little known discoveries, this work promises to be an enlightening read and a challenge to modern origins thought.

Overview

From the Himalayas to the Andes, and South Africa to Antarctica, scientists agree that the remains of a past cataclysm are found everywhere. In this new book, The Noah Code, author Mark Rose sets out to reveal the truth about these finds and much more. A compilation of over 35 years of study and field research, Rose logically and honestly set the record straight about the Flood as recorded in Genesis in easy to understand terms. His conclusions are shocking.

Noah Code speaks a new and exciting message into the Flood account as recorded in Genesis. This volume provides a concise overview of the original Hebrew text, and further seeks to unravel the true character of this man called Noah. For those of faith, Noah Code provides a refreshing look at evidence a century missing, as well as shocking late breaking finds from science. For the curious or skeptic, the volume will likely shake their faith in institutional science and geology, bringing new respect for views once thought religious or scientifically backward. The appendix boasts an excellent compilation of evidence both new and old, including contributions by the founders of science such as Cuvier, Woodworth, Dana, Howorth and even Darwin. Included are scientific finds of modern times, sure to lift many an eyebrow.

Back Cover Matter

Scriptural Insights from The Noah Code

• The word 'Covenant' is first used by God speaking with Noah, its actual meaning cleansing and contract
• Scholars maintain that Noah departed the ark Easter Sunday, approx. 2400BC
• The Ark built with human hands is an image of 'mansions, ' the new built by Christ the 'carpenter, ' in heaven ready to receive new tenants

Highlights from Science found in The Noah Code

• In 2014, a mineral called 'ringwoodite' was located beneath the earths crust, containing a volume of water equal to three of today's oceans
• New evidence from genetics clearly show a population anomaly occurred near the date of Noah's Flood, suggesting that only a few families repopulated earth
• One fossil deposit in South Africa contains the remains of billions of animals, buried in water deposited strata miles deep extending for 200, 000 square miles
• Early archaeologists identified a clear event horizon showing an extinction layer of man and animals in flood deposits, later occupied by people who were gentile, agrarian, herdsmen and used art. Noah Code documents these finds and much more!

1

Preliminary Evidence of Providence

Fig. 1 The “Very Good” First Earth

TO put the subject of Creation, Noah, and the flood in perspective, we shall first take a short tour through the subject of origins from a biblical standpoint. First, materialists tell us the earth self-formed billions of years ago after a mass of gas and dust self-collected in space. Further, they propose these loose particles assembled into all the perfect spheres of our solar system, creating the special planet we inhabit today. After these sphere -forming events, the substances supposedly self-sorted again, forming the oceans, rivers, lakes, and land masses we observe and enjoy now, all by unguided means.

Like the earth, evolution also claims life self-formed from dead chemicals. This theory suggests life of every variety sprang forth by chemical accidents over great eons of time. All agree these biochemical agents had no prior existence. The simplest life form (the evolutionist tells us) is the bacteria, presently known to be entirely complex and far from simple, along the way somehow activating into a living thing. The evolutionist also claims (without any outside assistance) that life bloomed into the plethora of forms we see today completely by accident. Moreover, they claim the origin of DNA and its coding came about by random means, the common mechanism proposed being time and unexplainable chemistry—time capable of creating anything biological or material without guidance.

To the contrary, we now know DNA is an independent entity within the cell, incorporating millions of correctly ordered chemicals in tape form. DNA is understood to be the most compact data storage system in the known universe. DNA is designed with the intent to remotely control the moment-by-moment operation of the cell machine. Further, this compound is the common denominator of all life; change the DNA in a given cell, and you change the life form, like switching programs on your computer. Compounding the problem for accidental origin, we have the cell exactly duplicating all this data and biomachinery in seconds, leaving us with only one logical solution to explain these complexities—that of intelligence, not intelligence measured by IQ, but from the brain of the creator that designed thinking in the first place, allowing man to have consciousness and comprehension of the matter.

Fig. 2 The DNA information tape, using a 3 billion letter “codon” alphabet to “code” for people

Man and all his laboratories find such operations impossible to replicate, so a new term has been coined to describe the origin of such capability: that is Super-Intelligence. The DNA and the cell mechanisms so directed must have evolved (if evolution is true) in perfect parallel for a cell to operate, a mathematical impossibility. Such makes the evolutionary explanation illogical. To defy mathematics and believe in the impossible, one must embrace a faith that these things occurred by chance, without any assistance. In support of creation by a deity, we must not forget that DNA instructional commands use the same language convention in all living things and have so since the beginning of biological time. These systems need no perfecting today, so how did evolution mindlessly form them without a succession of trial and error? The atheist maintains the DNA developed through a multiple sequence of accident and chance processes, but how and when did such processes occur, since they have never been observed changing nor become more efficient since the beginning? Cell operation is now and has always been in stasis, operating with near perfection billions of times daily. If we have an engineer and a factory, each must communicate to function. This is referred to as a language convention. A computer has a language convention (like DOS or Mac), and none of us would expect them to have come about by accidents, but this is exactly what the evolutionist asks one to believe—and not only this, but such complexity magically appeared! (Note that late-breaking research has determined that DNA actually uses two unrelated codes superimposed one on the other, called duons, allowing more data to be transcribed into a single section.¹)

For software and hardware to operate together as in computers, no one would dispute that each require intelligence acting on matter to function. One then must ask, If evolution has been so prolific in life creation, why the basic mechanisms of DNA and all other cellular components have no known ancestral precursor? We know animals change and adapt—this is called microevolution. The Creator designed DNA with variability to allow for such adaptations as the environment changes. This self-change capability has boundaries (like crossbreeding) and is an amazing design feature, not the result of chance. Gene variability is incapable of transitioning a worm into a trilobite or an ape into a man. Each kind employs a separate DNA program. By experience, accidents make nothing; this law also holds true concerning the complex world of biologic origins as well. So on the strength of reason and logic, evolution is impossible; its a belief system based on faith not science.

Fig. 3 Man has genes equal to twenty 500 page books, completely different than apes

Chimp-Human Non-Similarity

Most everyone has heard of Australopithecus Aphaeresis, or “Lucy,” a small orangutan-type creature unearthed by Dr. Donald Johansson in the 1970s. Heralded by the media and science institutions as the last and final link between man and ape, few heard that Johansson (after intense cross-examination by his peers)² finally admitted to adding parts (knee joints)* to his box of bones, they found in a completely different location! This was vital because Lucy needed a knee and hip that was near human to be an upright walker, so factually she was a two-for-one construction. The creature also needed straight appendages (hers were curved like monkeys), shorter arms, a larger skull, a different pelvis and a hundred other changes. It turns out Lucy was simply another species of orangutan or baboon, yet made it into the papers, textbooks, museums and minds of millions as proof of evolution, the “missing-link” between ape and man.

*Late breaking news about the “Lucy” find: http://christiannews.net/2015/04/23/evolutionary-embarrassment-part-of-famous-ape-man-skeleton-actually-came-from-baboon/

A close relationship between man and ape DNA code matter has been lately advocated, comparing billions of codon sections (or letters) using a percentage factor where 1 percent of 3 billion codons equals 3 million differences—no small sum. Late reports claim the gap between man and apes is 1-1.5 percent.³ But other studies report this gap is much wider, closer to 6 percent or larger.⁴ 2014 and 2017 investigations of the human sequence conducted by Brian Thomas, Drs. Nathaniel Jeanson and Jeffery Tomkins⁵ of The Institute for Creation Research determined that early Human Genome project administrators had compared known similar gene sections, sometimes leaving out the DNA sections unique to man, throwing the results. In addition, other research showed that human DNA had contaminated the chimp samples, possibly introduced by lab technicians. Parts of these sections differing from chimps are found to be equivalent to twenty 500 page books of human-specific information. The ICR study comparing the entire human genome determined that the difference is actually around 450,000,000 codons or closer to 15-19 percent!⁶

Note the August 2015 issue of Scientific American ran an article adhering to the 1 percent Man/Ape dissimilarity figure, just in time for students entering school that year. Interestingly enough, in 2006 the same periodical published an article suggesting a gap of 6 percent, a figure that was never refuted!⁶*

A final note on DNA comparisons: a banana contains approximately 55 percent of human DNA and a cow said to have 80 percent—so much for comparisons! All man’s efforts fall short to construct even a cell of grass, and if somehow such was accomplished, we could expect the effort to cost millions and employ teams of scientists working tirelessly around the clock, thus effecting intelligence on matter, like God!

*J.R. Minkel, Human-Chimp Gene Gap Widens from Tally of Duplicate Genes, Scientific American Dec 19, 2006. “There’s a bigger genetic jump between humans and chimps than previously believed.”

Our Damsel hoping to nab a prince in the fairytale is little different than the evolutionist: in the storybook; “poof” she gets her man, but if the transformation takes 500 million years we call it “science.”

Junk DNA, Fusion and Adam and Eve

Surprisingly, the percentage of DNA that codes to create the living parts of things is quite small compared with the remainder used for other purposes. Leading evolution proponents such as standing NIH (National Institutes of Health) Director Francis Collins, Professor John C. Avise, and radical anti-creation skeptic Richard Dawkins (that propose human/ ape ancestry) argue this noncoding DNA material is unused and therefore supports evolutionary randomness, not the work of a wise creator. These evolutionists assert that the existence of such material suggests mindless eons of mutational mistakes, leaving a variety of random genetic material as “proof” of evolution and great periods of time. On the contrary, research shows “noncoding” DNA material has many important functions, and is not “junk” at all. Such has now been found to perform many important life processes, including of late-heart development!

The second argument relates to chromosomal fusion. Humans appear to have 47 chromosomes, versus 48 found ...

Indice dei contenuti

• Acknowledgments
• Introduction
• 1: Preliminary Evidence of Providence
• 2: First Earth—A World Like No Other
• 3: Why the Flood Event?
• 4: Pre-Flood Civilizations
• 5: The Noahic Covenant
• 6: The Gathering
• 7: The Door Is Shut on Man
• 8: The Waiting Is Over—It Begins
• 9: The Time of Waiting
• 10: The Epoch Ends; Life Restarts on Earth
• Appendices
• I: The True History of the World
• II: Historical Records of the Flood
• III: The Great Divide of History—Man in Europe
• IV: North American Early Man
• V: Human Artifacts in North America Potentially Related to the Flood
• VI: General Finds of Man Around the Globe
• VII: The Fossil Beds Related to the Flood
• VIII: Marine Reptiles and Whales in the Mountains
• IX: The Trilobite and Nautiloid Evolutionary Problem
• X: Investigations of the Dinosaur Fossil Beds— the “Unreported” Finds
• XI: The Alaska Dinosaurs: the Recent Finds
• XII: The Geologic Chart and Phylogenic Tree Falsified
• XIII: The Grand Canyon Event Horizon and Tyee
• XIV: Other Formations Supporting a Grand Cataclysm
• XV: The Mammoth: Index Fossil of the Flood
• XVI: The Early Earth and Ice Age in Perspective
• XVII: World Coal and Oil Deposits
• XVIII: The Question of Time: Earth and Solar System Age
• XIX: Ten Earth-Age Time Measurements
• Book Blog
• Bibliography
• New Title by Mark D. Rose
• About the Author