WE HAVE COME A LONG WAY
As we enter a food store, full of extraordinary produce from all over the world that we can take home in our cars, do we give a thought as to how much more difficult that process was only a few generations back?
Life for Homo sapiens has undergone fundamental transformations, from hunting and gathering subsistence to todayâs hi-tech lifestyles. Developments include the establishment of agriculture, the growth of large settlements and the expansion of trade over ever-increasing distances â typically accompanied by exploitation, conflict and war.
Many jobs were extremely dangerous in bygone eras, when neither health and safety nor reasonable working hours were considered relevant and, as a result, life expectancies were correspondingly shorter. What doctors could do to cure the sick and wounded in the past was limited compared to the extraordinary medical knowledge of today.
In 1800s Great Britain, increasingly sophisticated agrarian economies paved the way for the Industrial Revolution. Rapid migration from rural to urban environments ensued, giving rise to unprecedented challenges, such as overcrowded housing, slums and poor sanitation in towns and cities.
The scourge of cholera was one of the biggest health problems in London until its source was identified and analysed by physician John Snow in 1854; this led to the installation of clean water systems across the developed world.
The direction of urban planning was transformed by pioneering work in the 19th and 20th centuries that produced new systems and choices for mobility. Philanthropic movements recognised the extreme social problems resulting from exploitative labour practices, and the poor health suffered by those living in woefully unhygienic conditions. One response was to fund the provision of (generally) well-built urban housing. Another was to propose new kinds of settlement where people could live and work in greener, healthier environments.
In the early phases of such initiatives, these settlements were intended to be accessed by public transport, primarily trains and underground railways. In 1898, Ebenezer Howard established the Garden City Movement, which offered oppressed employees and their families a better chance in life. This, and the rise of suburbia, was made possible by growing rail transport networks. Almost a century later, in the 1970s, this concept still played a large part in the marketing of Londonâs Tube system, which invited residents to âCome to Ruislip, where the air is fine, itâs only half-an-hour on the Piccadilly Lineâ.2
As settlements grew, transport became of increasing importance â the rail network being only one development of many. In 1890s London and New York the authorities were also struggling to dispose of vast quantities of manure left by tens of thousands of carriage horses. One remedy was the âhorseless carriageâ â the early automobile. This would become the dominant force in 20th-century urban planning.
In terms of medical advancement, by the mid-20th century the UK started to benefit from spectacular improvements in medicine, whereby many previously fatal conditions became curable, and healthcare became widely accessible thanks to the establishment of the NHS in 1948. Progress was also made with better housing conditions, availability of healthier food and a raft of social reforms, including health and safety at work, that improved peopleâs quality of life.
But since the latter part of the 20th century, along with a well-deserved sense of achievement for these magnificent medical advances, there is also growing awareness that the amount we consume, and the ease of the lives we lead, create health problems of a different complexion. Many of these are attributable to lifestyles that have arisen as a consequence of the way our cities are planned.
SOME PROBLEMS ARE NOT NEW
The introductory pages of the 1945 County of London Plan, under the heading âWhat is Wrongâ (written as a statement rather than as a question), announces in emotive terms: âThe [London Plan] Report lists four defects: Traffic congestion, depressed housing, inadequacy and maldistribution of open spaces and, finally, the jumble of houses and industry. An additional fifth defect is the continued sprawl of London ribboning along the roads, straggling over the Home Counties and suburbanising the whole of the surrounding country towns.â3 The case is reinforced by the caption of an aerial view of a mixed-use neighbourhood describing it as the âmuddled use of landâ.
Prepared whilst WW2 was coming to an end, this fascinating document reflects Modernismâs hallmark optimism for a rational, scientific future. In that climate it is unsurprising that âthe jumble of houses and industryâ and âmuddled use of landâ would be regarded as one of the many âdefectsâ in need of rationalisation.
Subsequent experience has given us a more nuanced understanding of industry, separating out the uses that can be hazardous whilst allowing the integration of âpeople-friendlyâ forms of employment whose proximity to residential areas contributes to what we would now regard as an entirely positive âjumbleâ of uses.
This County of London Plan, that inspired mid 20th-century Modernism in architecture and urban planning in the UK, treated the car as an icon for the Machine Age. Speed was the attraction, and creating the conditions for the car to be used at speed was what preoccupied the planners. Anything that might get in the way of the speeding car was to be banished from the road: âFast cars must be able to move fast and be segregated from lorries and buses⌠However perfect the roads themselves may be, if they are interrupted by crossings â or crossroads â they will not be able to fulfil their function.â4
This is a prescient description of what we have long-since called a motorway. Next to the heading: âThe Problem of Speed is relatively new to the town planner; it dates from the advent of the motor carâ is a charming diagram showing that pedestrians move at 3 mph, horse-drawn carriages at 5 mph, bicycles at 8 mph and cars at 60 mph.5 The 60 mph remains accurate enough in terms of motorway driving but traffic in cities has always averaged circa 10 mph which reinforces the idea that cities may not be the ideal places for cars âto fulfil their functionâ.
To repeat the statement âWhat is Wrongâ, three quarters of a century later, the most obvious âdefectâ is that the innumerable benefits offered by the private car have become so ingrained in our habits and consciousness that it is hard to distinguish the circumstances under which they cease to be an asset and start to be a liability. The extracts quoted above show that certain problems were already a major cause for concern in the 1940s; a salutary reminder of how long society has been grappling, unsuccessfully, with this challenge.
In the same way that the 1940s catered to the icon of the automobile, it is of the utmost importance that planners and designers now work towards adapting existing places and creating new ones that allow people the best opportunity to âfulfil their functionâ â of leading their lives in environments planned to maximise health and wellbeing.