eBook - ePub
The Unity of the Universe
D. W. Sciama
This is a test
Share book
- 256 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
The Unity of the Universe
D. W. Sciama
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Does the universe consist of independent objects, or is it a single unit? Are some of its features accidental, or can they all be explained in theoretical terms? This accessible book on cosmology addresses profound questions about the universe, and it offers elegant answers in simple, straightforward terms. Written by a distinguished cosmologist, it assumes no knowledge of physics or astronomy and illustrates its explanations with figures and compelling photos.
The first part ventures back to the early Greek astronomers, who were the first to measure the Earth's size and the distance to the sun and the moon. It also examines the latter-day discoveries of distant galaxies, achieved with giant telescopes and mathematical calculations. The second part explores modern theories, including the author's own conviction that the universe is a single unit and that the behavior of nearby matter is strongly influenced by distant regions of the universe. A student of Fred Hoyle and Paul Dirac and a teacher of Stephen Hawking, D. W. Sciama is best known for his work on general relativity and black holes. Scientific American acclaimed his survey as `an engrossing book` and `an invigorating intellectual exercise that any mature reader can enjoy.`
The first part ventures back to the early Greek astronomers, who were the first to measure the Earth's size and the distance to the sun and the moon. It also examines the latter-day discoveries of distant galaxies, achieved with giant telescopes and mathematical calculations. The second part explores modern theories, including the author's own conviction that the universe is a single unit and that the behavior of nearby matter is strongly influenced by distant regions of the universe. A student of Fred Hoyle and Paul Dirac and a teacher of Stephen Hawking, D. W. Sciama is best known for his work on general relativity and black holes. Scientific American acclaimed his survey as `an engrossing book` and `an invigorating intellectual exercise that any mature reader can enjoy.`
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is The Unity of the Universe an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access The Unity of the Universe by D. W. Sciama in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Physical Sciences & Cosmology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Topic
Physical SciencesSubtopic
CosmologyPART I
THE UNIVERSE IN OBSERVATION
INTRODUCTION
The naked eye can distinguish the earth, the sun, the moon, the comets, five planets, and six thousand stars. This was manâs picture of the universe until 1609, when Galileo first pointed a telescope at the sky. With this instrument he extended our knowledge by observing many stars which are too faint to be seen directly. Thereafter, each increase in size of telescope has revealed the existence of still fainter stars. This has prompted many people to ask the question: Will this process ever stop? Have we any chance of discovering, if not every star, at least the main outlines of the whole universe? Most astronomers believe that with the best modern telescopes they have indeed done just this.
The first reaction to this claim will perhaps be one of excitement that such a fundamental result should have been achieved in our own lifetime. Nevertheless, we must remember that often in the past fundamental scientific problems have wrongly been considered solved. The great French mathematician Lagrange, for instance, was envious of Newtonâs good fortune: âfor in his time the system of the world still remained to be discovered.â And toward the end of the nineteenth century most physicists believed that there was nothing left for them to do, except to calculate known quantities to more and more decimal places.
Are modern astronomers any more likely to be right than were their eminent predecessors? Despite the danger of saying so, they believe the answer to be âYes.â There is a special reason for believing that the twentieth-century universe is the universe; that further discoveries will add much in detail but will not alter the general picture. This reason will begin to emerge at the end of Part I, but in order to prepare for it we must go back to the early Greek astronomers, who were the first to measure the size of the earth and the distance to the sun and the moonâthus providing man with his first orientation towards the dimensions of the universe.
These early measurements, and their modern counterparts, are described in Chapter I. The subsequent chapters show how the more powerful methods introduced in the last hundred and twenty years have extended our knowledge of distances from the solar system to the stars, and from the stars to distant galaxies. This knowledge has played a key role in the elucidation of what is our goal in these chaptersâthe structure of the universe as a whole.
CHAPTER I
THE SIZE OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Ah, but a manâs reach should exceed his grasp,
Or whatâs a heaven for?
Or whatâs a heaven for?
BROWNING
Introduction
It is not surprising that it was the Greeks, with their profound understanding of geometrical principles, who were the first to devise methods of measuring the size of the earth and the distance to the sun and the moon. Indeed, their results were not superseded until the eighteenth century, when telescopes had been developed to the point where new methods could be introduced. We shall therefore begin our account of the universe in observation by going back to Greek astronomy.
Greek Times
THE SIZE OF THE EARTH. A rough estimate of the size of the earth was made by Aristotle, but we owe the first accurate value to Eratosthenes (276â194 B.C.). He found that when the sun is overhead at Aswan it is 7 degrees from the vertical in Alexandria (Fig. 1a). This simple observation suffices to determine the circumference of the earth in terms of the distance from Aswan (A) to Alexandria (B) (Fig. 1b). For since the sun is at a great distance from the earth, the angle of 7 degrees measured by Eratosthenes is very nearly the same as the angle AOB subtended by the arc AB at the center of the earth O. Now since 7 degrees is nearly one fiftieth of a complete revolution of 360 degrees, the distance between Aswan and Alexandria must be nearly one fiftieth of the circumference of the earth. Eratosthenes knew that this distance is about 500 miles, so he deduced that the circumference of the earth is about 25,000 miles. This early value differs by less than 200 miles from the one now accepted.
THE DISTANCE AND SIZE OF THE MOON. The first man to propose a method of measuring the distance to the moon appears to have been Aristarchus of Samos, who lived in the third century B.C. So slow was the development of science at that time, however, that his method was not used for another hundred and fifty years. It was then taken up by the great astronomer Hipparchus, who succeeded in obtaining a very accurate value. The method consists of the following steps (Fig. 2):
(i) Measurement of the angle subtended by the sun at the earthâthat is, the sunâs angular diameter (Fig. 2b). This angle is about ½ degree.
(ii) Measurement of the angular diameter of the earthâs shadow at the distance of the moon (as observed at a partial eclipse of the moon). (Fig. 2c. ) This angle is about 1 degree.
These observations suffice to determine the distance of the moon in terms of the earthâs diameter. It can be calculated by trigonometry or measured by means of the following simple geometrical construction. Draw the shadow of the earth as shown in Fig. 2d. Since the sun is very distant, the edges of the shadow meet at nearly the same angle as that subtended by the sunâthat is, ½ degree (Fig. 2a). Now draw in at the earth the angle of 1 degree determined in Step (ii). This angle must intersect the edge of the shadow at the position of the moon (Fig. 2d). We can then measure the distance of the moon in terms of the earthâs diameter.
Hipparchusâ observations imply that the distance of the moon is 30 earth diameters. Using Eratosthenesâ value for the size of the earth, Hipparchus calculated that the moon is 240,000 miles away, a result which is within 1000 miles of the correct one.2 We are here faced with a distance so much greater than any we are familiar with on earth that it is inconvenient to measure it in terms of miles. We shall use instead a modern unit, namely the time taken by light to travel the distance involved. Hipparchusâ result implies that it takes light about 1Âź seconds to reach us from the moonâso the distance to the moon is 1Âź light-seconds.
Hipparchus was now in a position to determine the diameter of the moon. He simply measured its angular diameter, which is about ½ degree. The ratio of this angle to 360 degrees leads to a value for the moonâs diameter of 2000 miles, which is a quarter of the earthâs diameter.
In passing we may comment on a fact which the reader may have already noticed: that the moonâs angular diameter is very nearly the same as the sunâs. This is a very fortunate fact for astronomers, since it means that at a total eclipse of the sun the moon is just the right size to blot it out completely. When this happens we can see the outer extensions of the sun -its coronaâwhich are too faint to be seen when the sun is shining (Plate I). Had the moonâs angular diameter been smaller than the sunâs we should not be able to see the corona at an eclipse, and solar astronomy would have lost an important source of information.
THE DISTANCE AND SIZE OF THE SUN. The first attempt to measure the distance to the sun also appears to have been made by Aristarchus. His method shows as much ingenuity as the one he suggested for measuring the distance to the moon, but it is far less accurate. It consists in measuring the angular separation between the moon and the sun at the moment of so-called âfirst quarter,â when the moon is half illuminated (Fig. 3a).
In this figure the angle EMS is one right angle, go degrees. Since the sun S is much farther away from the earth than is the moon M, the angle MES will be very nearly go degrees. Aristarchus measured this angle and obtained the value 87 degrees. It follows from this that the angle MSE is 3 degrees (since the sum of the angles of a triangle is two right angles). We can now relate the distance SE to the distance ME, as shown in Fig. 3b. Aristarchus deduced in this way that the sun is about 20 times farther from the earth than is the moon. Since Hipparchusâ value for the distance to the moon is 240,-000 miles, we see that according to Aristarchusâ measurement the distance to the sun is 4,800,000 miles, or 26 light-seconds.
From this estimate of the sunâs distance we can also determine its diameter, since its angular diameter is ½ degree. In fact, since the angular diameter of the sun is the same as that of the moon, their diameters are in the same ratio as their distances (Fig. 4). According to Aristarchus, then, the sunâs diameter is 40,000 miles.
Actually both these estimates are very bad approximations to the truth. The reason is that Aristarchusâ method is very sensitive to an error in the measurement of the angle MES.
For suppose that he had obtained a value of 89 degrees instead of 87 degreesâan error of only 2 per cent. In that case the angle ESM would be 1 degree. This is one third of the angle of 3 degrees actually obtained by Aristarchus, and it would imply that the sun is 60 times farther than the moon. Thus an error of only 2 per cent in the measured angle leads to an error of a factor 3 in the inferred distance to the sun. Aristarchusâ error was in fact greater still, since the sun is actually about 400 times farther away than the moon. But this was not discovered till much laterâAristarehusâ value was the accepted one for eighteen hundred years. Not until the eighteenth century was a better value obtained.
Modern Times
THE DISTANCE TO THE MOON. The first modern attempt to determine the distance to the moon was made by the amateur astronomer AbbĂŠ Nicholas Louis de la Caille (1713-62). He succeeded in measuring the parallax of the moon. Parallax is a very important concept in astronomy; it arises from the fact that an object looked at from different places appears to lie in different directions. In Fig. 5 the angle P is known as the parallax of the object relative to the given base line AB; it is smaller the farther away the object is. Another way of describing it is to say that it is the angle subtended by the base line at the object. Its importance to astronomy arises from the fact that, if it can be measured relative to a base line of known length, the distance to the object can be calculated by simple trigonometry.
De la Caille was able to measure the moonâs parallax relative to a base line stretching from Berlin to the Cape of Good Hope. He obtained a val...