People's life plans used to be a bit more straightforward. We were supposed to pack in some education early on in our lives, with the expectation that we would work and build a careerāmaybe even raise a familyāand then retire. Learn, earn, rest.
Futurists and experts on aging and longevity are now suggesting that we can expect to live longer and that human life spans will extend decades longer than we had anticipated. The authors of The 100-Year Life explain: āFor most of the last two hundred years there has been a steady increase in life expectancy. More precisely, the best data currently available suggests that since 1840 there has been an increase in life expectancy of three months for every year. That's two to three years of life added for every decadeā¦. And perhaps more importantly, there is no sign that the trend is levelling off.ā1
With advances in health care, medicine, and disease control as well as improvements in general living conditions, we have āfound a way to slow down the process of bodily decay that was given to us by nature,ā writes aging specialist Johannes Koettl, āa truly remarkable development that no other species has achieved before.ā2 The Global AgeWatch Index Report anticipates that by 2100, the number of people aged 80 and over will increase more than sevenfold, from 125 million to 944 million.3 Some are even suggesting that the first people to live to be 150 years old have already been born.4
Let's think about that for a moment: 150 years.
The simple extension of our life span suddenly forces us to consider the dramatic lengthening of our work lives. Will the careers of the future last 60, 80, or 100 years?
This is a very different kind of future of work.
More Than 12 Jobs in a Lifetime
Already, workers who are 55 and older are staying in the workforce at historically high rates, well into their late 60s and even 70s.5 And job transitions have become an established part of life. In the United States alone, 10,000 baby boomers will turn 65 every day from now until 2030,6 and many of them will have experienced at least 12 job changes by the time they retire.7
With this new time horizon, it becomes hard to imagine a straight line from education to work and, finally, retirement. Gone are the days of retiring at age 65 and living on a guaranteed pension from one or a few employers that defined a person's career. Rather, the number of job transitions will only increase with time, as people confront longer and more turbulent work lives.
The notion of a 100-year work life is arresting and quickly snaps our education system into sharp relief by upending so many of our working assumptions. Our default mental model has been that education is largely a one-and-done experience situated on the front end of our development through young adulthood. This perception is further reinforced by societal expectations and financial policies that suggest that higher education is for young adults.8
Cast in this new light, however, two, four, or six years of college front-loaded at the beginning of a 100-year work life suddenly seem deeply inadequate. Technology's transformation of nearly every facet of our economy means that we will all need to develop new skills and knowledge at a paceāand on a scaleānever before seen. Advancements will continue to give rise to entirely new kinds of jobs and careers, ones that we cannot even begin to name.
It's already been happening. In 2014, LinkedIn's top jobs were ones that hadn't existed five years earlierāroles like iOS/Android developer, UI/UX designer, cloud manager, big data architect, and social media intern.9 How many more as-yet unknown jobs will we hold in a 100-year work life?
The Future of Work = The Future of Learning
We are all going to have to prepare for jobs that don't even exist yet. Enter the concept of long-life learning. Through the lens of human longevity, the future of work becomes inextricably tied to the future of learning. In a 100-year work life, we may find ourselves in a state of continuous pivotsā20 to 30 job transitions might become the new normal. Ongoing skill development will become a way of life.
No matter our current station, we will all become working learners, always flexing between working and learning, or juggling both at the same timeālooping continuously in and out of learning and work and navigating more job transitions than we ever dreamed possible.
Moreover, we see how we are not artificially separated from the future of learning and work, as if it was some sort of alternate realityāfor other people, not me, at least not now. This is not a future from which we are somehow removed. The concept of long-life learning makes our mandate so much clearer: Education and training will be more important than ever, because those future workers are all of us.
Where Are the On- and Off-Ramps?
The challenge is that we can't access many on- or off-ramps in and out of learning and work today. Educators, policymakers, and funders give a lot of lip service to the concept of lifelong learning, but this talk rarely translates into action. In fact, resources and funding are often geared toward the traditional 18- to 24-year-old college-going population and less often to working adults, the growing majority of learners. There is little investment in the systems, architecture, and infrastructure needed to facilitate seamless movements in and out of learning and work.
The current system of higher education is not forgiving. Today, close to 70 percent of high school graduates go on to college, but they do not always complete their degrees.10 Instead, they āstop out.ā They take the one and only off-ramp available, are subsequently labeled ācollege dropouts,ā and are then often punished further with some student loan debt.11 In total, 36 million people in the United States made it into college; they just didn't make it through or out of college.12
For most adults, taking time off work to attend classes at a local, brick-and-mortar community college or four-year institution will not be the answer. A one-, two-, or four-year college program may be a bridge too far in terms of both the time to credential and the full cost of attendance, including the lost wages associated with attending school instead of working more hours.
We must therefore begin prototyping more flexible reskilling and upskilling pathways for the future. We will have to change our approach and put some teeth into the concept of lifelong learning, an idea that has been good in theory (decades old!) but slow to catch fire. We agree with the concept but have not been moved to change our behavior and invest in the much-needed infrastructure for continuous development and advancement.
But once we understand that that we are the ones who will be affectedāthat the future of workers is about usāthe fourth wall, or the imaginary wall between those people and us, breaks down. We will all have to harness the power of education over and over again throughout a longer work life. And we will need more on-demand pathways that tie education to economic relevanceāmore seamless ways to loop in and out of learning and work. Learn, earn, learn, earn, learn, earn.