Betrayal in Berlin
eBook - ePub

Betrayal in Berlin

The True Story of the Cold War's Most Audacious Espionage Operation

Steve Vogel

  1. 544 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Betrayal in Berlin

The True Story of the Cold War's Most Audacious Espionage Operation

Steve Vogel

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

"A riveting and vivid account.... A remarkable story.... It reads like a Hollywood screenplay."— Foreign Affairs

The astonishing true story of the Berlin Tunnel, one of the West's greatest espionage operations of the Cold War—and the dangerous Soviet mole who betrayed it. Its code name was "Operation Gold, " a wildly audacious CIA plan to construct a clandestine tunnel into East Berlin to tap into critical KGB and Soviet military telecommunication lines. The tunnel, crossing the border between the American and Soviet sectors, would have to be 1, 500 feet (the length of the Empire State Building) with state-of-the-art equipment, built and operated literally under the feet of their Cold War adversaries. Success would provide the CIA and the British Secret Intelligence Service access to a vast treasure of intelligence. Exposure might spark a dangerous confrontation with the Soviets. Yet as the Allies were burrowing into the German soil, a traitor, code-named Agent Diamond by his Soviet handlers, was burrowing into the operation itself...

Betrayal in Berlin is Steve Vogel's heart pounding account of the operation. He vividly recreates post-war Berlin, a scarred, shadowy snake pit with thousands of spies and innumerable cover stories. It is also the most vivid account of George Blake, perhaps the most damaging mole of the Cold War. Drawing upon years of archival research, secret documents, and rare interviews with Blake himself, Vogel has crafted a true-life spy story as thrilling as the novels of John le CarrĂŠ and Len Deighton.

Betrayal in Berlin includes 24 photos and two maps.

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Betrayal in Berlin an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Betrayal in Berlin by Steve Vogel in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in History & 20th Century History. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
Mariner Books
Year
2019
ISBN
9780062449610
Part I
The Sins Inside
Chapter 1
Black Friday
It was known in intelligence lore as “Black Friday.”
Since 1943, the United States had been intercepting and decrypting secret Soviet radio communications, compiling a surprisingly comprehensive view of the USSR’s military capabilities and intentions. Painstaking work by codebreakers at the U.S. Army Security Agency headquarters at Arlington Hall in Virginia near the Pentagon was producing uniquely valuable intelligence. The secret program, code-named VENONA, would eventually help expose some of the Soviets’ most dangerous spies, including the physicist Klaus Fuchs, who was passing American atomic secrets to Moscow, and the British diplomat Donald Maclean, the first member of the later notorious Cambridge spy ring to fall under suspicion.
But in late October 1948, almost overnight and without warning, the Soviets began changing their cryptographic systems, leaving the U.S. codebreakers in the cold. One by one, in rapid succession, each of the cipher systems went dark. At the same time, just as mysteriously, Soviet military, intelligence, and diplomatic headquarters in Germany and Austria stopped using ultrahigh frequency (UHF) radio to communicate with Moscow, shifting instead to landlines, depriving the West of a valuable stream of intercepts.
U.S. intelligence spent months trying to learn what had gone wrong. Navy investigators decided it was simply a routine systems upgrade by the Soviets, but others were not so sure. Only later would the Americans learn that VENONA had been betrayed by two Soviet spies. The first was William Weisband, a gregarious and well-liked Russian-language linguist at Arlington Hall. Born in Egypt to Russian parents, Weisband had emigrated to the United States in the 1920s and was recruited by the KGB in 1934. Making the office rounds and chatting with coworkers, he had learned of the Western success in breaking the codes. And Harold “Kim” Philby, the SIS liaison in Washington, had likewise been recruited by the KGB while a student at Cambridge in the 1930s. Conveniently for the Soviets, he’d been assigned to work with the Americans on VENONA. Based on the warnings of one or likely both spies, Moscow changed its ciphers and radio operating procedures.
By some estimates, Black Friday was the worst intelligence loss in U.S. history, leaving the West almost entirely in the dark about Moscow’s military capabilities and intentions.
The United States paid the most immediate consequences in Korea. The North Korean invasion of the south in June 1950 had been an intelligence disaster, with the failure to pick up even a hint of a war launched with the approval of Soviet leader Joseph Stalin setting off alarms in Washington and London. And not only had the Central Intelligence Agency missed the start of the war, but it had been wrong about the possibility of Chinese intervention, and wrong about North Korean capabilities.
The communist aggression in Korea was seen in Western capitals as a possible prelude to a similar attack on Western Europe by the enormous Red Army force that had not been withdrawn at the conclusion of World War II and still occupied eastern Germany and Poland. The brutality of the fighting in Asia and the surprising power shown by communist forces during the first year of the conflict only added to the fear that the United States and its allies were unprepared. Unsurprisingly, with Cold War tensions escalating and Washington deprived of the flow of valuable intelligence, pressure on the CIA to supply early warning of a Soviet attack “skyrocketed,” recalled Richard Helms, the future director of the agency, then serving as chief of operations for its clandestine service.
Thus far in its young history, the CIA was proving itself thoroughly outmatched by the formidable KGB. Since the creation of the Cheka during the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, the Soviet secret police and intelligence organization had been known by many different names, but still relied on what founder Felix Dzerzhinsky called “organized terror” in pursuit of its aims.* The strengthening of the police state under Stalin made it next to impossible to recruit any spies in Russia. Getting an agent to report from inside the Kremlin “was as improbable as placing resident spies on the planet Mars,” complained Helms, a razor-sharp former wire service reporter who had served in Germany with the Office of Strategic Services, the World War II military intelligence agency that was a forerunner to the CIA.
In 1949, the CIA began parachuting Russians who had fled the USSR back into the country with the idea of establishing a network of agents to spy on military installations and the like. Almost all of the agents were arrested as soon as they landed, and of the few who did not disappear, most if not all were forced to serve as double agents by Soviet intelligence, meaning any information they sent was compromised.
Western intelligence therefore had to rely on outdated World War II information, details garnered from the censored Soviet press, and reports from occasional defectors. A small amount of signals intelligence—the collection and analysis of communications and electronic emissions—was trickling in from the first U.S. intercept stations being constructed around the Soviet Union’s perimeter. Other than rare overflights along the periphery of Soviet territory by U.S. and British military aircraft, there was none of the overhead imagery that the U-2 and satellites would later provide. “We were simply blind,” said David Murphy, a CIA officer who would serve in Berlin.
WASHINGTON, LONDON, AND BERLIN, 1951
The Berlin tunnel was born of this desperation.
The CIA, created by the National Security Act of 1947 signed by President Harry Truman, had been given the task of centralizing and coordinating American intelligence. But its true mission was even more simply stated: “I don’t care what it does, all I want from them is twenty-four hours’ notice of a Soviet attack,” Secretary of State George C. Marshall famously declared. Given its performance, the chances of getting that warning did not seem promising.
Even before Korea, fear of Soviet aggression against the West had been escalating. Following the successful Soviet testing of atomic weapons in August 1949, a secret National Security Council report issued in April 1950, NSC-68, declared that the United States was “mortally challenged” by the Soviet Union and must intensify intelligence operations to get early warning of an attack.
If war came, Germany would be the main battleground and Berlin the likely flashpoint. The divided former German capital, deep in East German territory, was on the front line of the Cold War with the United States, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union each controlling their own zone in the city. It was the place where the Soviets and the Western Allies met most intimately—and uneasily.
Tensions in Berlin reached new heights in June 1948, when the Soviets blocked roads and rail lines leading to the Western sectors, expecting that they could force the United States and its allies to abandon the divided city. Instead, the West overcame the blockade with a magnificent airlift, flying in four thousand tons of coal, food, and other supplies daily for almost eleven months. Throughout the crisis, Washington feared that the Soviets might launch a war, but in the end, Stalin lifted the blockade in May 1949.
The North Korean invasion one year later was halfway around the globe, but it was seen by the CIA as an even more serious threat to Berlin than the blockade. “We considered it much more likely this time that the Soviets might move west,” said Peter Sichel, then chief of the CIA’s Berlin base.
Some three hundred thousand Red Army troops were positioned in eastern Germany. The United States, which had fewer than a hundred thousand troops in West Germany when the Korean War started, rushed over more forces and soon had a quarter million. But the Soviet bloc retained an overwhelming advantage among conventional forces. British intelligence calculated that the Soviets and their allies had 216 active divisions available for use in Europe, compared with 51 for NATO, the new Western alliance. Moreover, there was a danger that the Soviets would resort to a first nuclear strike because they assumed that the United States would use atomic weapons to stop the Red Army from overrunning Western Europe.
A CIA estimate in February 1951 concluded that the Soviets’ “ultimate aim” was to gain control over all of Germany and eliminate the presence of the Western powers in Berlin. If they were unable to meet these goals with political pressure, the agency reported, the Soviets might risk starting another world war. Knowing what the Soviets were up to in Berlin was thus a matter of the utmost importance, with millions of lives potentially at stake.
* * *
Perhaps no one was more frustrated by the loss of Soviet radio traffic than a pipe-smoking and genteel Virginian named Frank Rowlett. Though unknown to the American public, Rowlett was an unsung hero of World War II and one of the nation’s top codebreakers. Mild-mannered and unpretentious, with rimless glasses on his round face, he looked like the high school math teacher he had once been back home in southwest Virginia. He had arrived in Washington in 1930 as one of the original three cryptanalysts hired for the newly created Army Signal Intelligence Service by the father of modern American cryptology, William Friedman. Rowlett had confessed to his wife that he did not have the slightest idea what a cryptanalyst did. But he proved to be an inspired choice, rising to help lead the VENONA project and playing a key role in designing SIGABA, the cipher machine credited with saving thousands of American lives during World War II by protecting U.S. military communications. He also led the team trying to crack the Japanese diplomatic code, dubbed PURPLE by the Americans. With tensions in the Pacific rising sharply, Japan had in 1939 introduced a highly sophisticated cipher machine for cable traffic between Tokyo and its embassies around the world. In September 1940, after eighteen months and untold hours of analysis, Rowlett’s team discovered a critical pattern of letters that led to breaking the code. “That’s it! That’s it!” the normally unflappable Rowlett cried, jumping up and down in excitement. He sent out for bottles of Coca-Cola for the whole team. Then they got back to work. Within two days, they were deciphering their first messages. It was a triumph of grinding work and true genius.
The intelligence derived from the decrypted Japanese cables was code-named MAGIC, and Rowlett and his team were considered magicians. The United States was able to read Tokyo’s messages to and from the Japanese ambassador in Berlin, providing crucial intelligence on both Japanese and German intentions. But the United States failed to mount a big enough effort to break the codes used by the Japanese army and navy—at heavy cost.
On December 3, 1941, Rowlett walked into his office at the Munitions Building in Washington and found a single-page translation of a PURPLE intercept from Tokyo to the Japanese embassy in Washington waiting on his desk. He was stunned to read that Tokyo had ordered the embassy to destroy its codebooks and cipher machines. He and a colleague concluded that the order meant Japan was preparing to go to war with the United States, and they quickly reported this up the chain of command. But with no matching intelligence about any Japanese military preparations or movements, the U.S. government did not anticipate the attack on Pearl Harbor.
A decade later, Rowlett feared the United States could face a new Pearl Harbor—this one with nuclear weapons. In 1951, he was serving as technical director of operations at the Armed Forces Security Agency, predecessor to the National Security Agency. Since VENONA, he had worked closely with Bill Harvey, a former FBI G-man who was then chief of the counterintelligence staff at the CIA. On the surface, the gruff and profane Harvey was as different from the courtly, soft-spoken Rowlett as could be imagined. Harvey, who drank martinis by the quart, referred to the coffee-eschewing Rowlett behind his back as “Our Father.” But the two quickly developed a mutual respect, as well as a shared sense of urgency on the need to fill in the gaps in American intelligence.
In early 1951, Rowlett and Harvey commiserated over the lost intelligence due to the Soviets’ Black Friday shift from radio to landlines. Perhaps they could figure out a way and place to attack Soviet landlines on a scale not previously considered necessary, or even possible.
Two cities were obvious targets: Vienna and Berlin. Since Soviet and Western forces jointly occupied both cities, there might be locations where the CIA could reach landlines used by the Red Army. But when the CIA began investigating Vienna in 1951, they discovered they were late to the game: British intelligence had been tapping Soviet cables through a system of small tunnels in and around Vienna for two years. Informing the Americans of this, the Brits magnanimously offered to share the take. The CIA was duly impressed with the intelligence collected about Soviet military capabilities and intentions, and rather than pursue its own project, it agreed to join the SIS operation. “There was too much at stake to risk any overlapping effort in such a narrow field,” recalled Helms. The British also suggested that “similar opportunities might be present in the Berlin area,” according to a CIA history. That possibility intrigued Harvey and Rowlett.
Berlin held potential for an operation on a far grander scale than Vienna. It was the central circuit for communications in Eastern Europe, the hub for an enormous network of lines dating from pre–World War I imperial days, stretching to Moscow. That role had been interrupted by World War II, but long-distance telephone and telegraph lines connecting the city to the rest of Europe had been restored in 1946. Still, the Americans and British were uncertain about how much Soviet forces actually used the cables, and what the intelligence value might be.
* * *
In mid-1951, Staff D, the CIA’s new, highly secret office responsible for clandestine electronic surveillance targeting foreign communications, held exploratory talks in Washington about mounting an attack on Soviet landlines in East Germany, in particular Berlin.
Based on those discussions, the CIA base in Berlin was assigned to penetrate the East Berlin office of the East German Post and Telecommunications Ministry, which operated the telephone lines in Berlin. Neither Berlin base chief Peter Sichel nor his deputy Henry Hecksher were told anything about a tap or a tunnel—all they knew was that headquarters wanted information ...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Dedication
  4. Maps
  5. Contents
  6. Prelude
  7. Part I: The Sins Inside
  8. Part II: The Warehouse
  9. Part III: Ace in the Hole
  10. Part IV: A Nest of Spies
  11. Part V: Among Friends
  12. Epilogue
  13. Acknowledgments
  14. Note on Sources
  15. Selected Bibliography
  16. Notes
  17. Index
  18. Photo Section
  19. Also by Steve Vogel
  20. Copyright
  21. About the Publisher
Citation styles for Betrayal in Berlin

APA 6 Citation

Vogel, S. (2019). Betrayal in Berlin ([edition unavailable]). HarperCollins. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1229210/betrayal-in-berlin-the-true-story-of-the-cold-wars-most-audacious-espionage-operation-pdf (Original work published 2019)

Chicago Citation

Vogel, Steve. (2019) 2019. Betrayal in Berlin. [Edition unavailable]. HarperCollins. https://www.perlego.com/book/1229210/betrayal-in-berlin-the-true-story-of-the-cold-wars-most-audacious-espionage-operation-pdf.

Harvard Citation

Vogel, S. (2019) Betrayal in Berlin. [edition unavailable]. HarperCollins. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/1229210/betrayal-in-berlin-the-true-story-of-the-cold-wars-most-audacious-espionage-operation-pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2022).

MLA 7 Citation

Vogel, Steve. Betrayal in Berlin. [edition unavailable]. HarperCollins, 2019. Web. 14 Oct. 2022.