Part I
Reflections
Origins
1. Govinda Sah: Divine Eyes
The sky was the insipid color of skimmed milk as I poked my way through the faintly dystopian premises of an industrial park to meet Govinda Sah at his South Wimbledon studio. Surely, I thought, an artist who grew up in southeastern Nepal, not far from the foothills of the Himalayas, then lived in the Kathmandu Valley, must feel uninspired gazing out at this less than dramatic vista. From the home of the worldâs highest peaks to the penultimate stop on the Northern Line seemed a rather precipitous decline in natural wonder.
Looking out the artistâs studio window, I posed a rather cynical question to him: had he found inspiration in England precisely because of such banality? Had the dreary indignities of British winters forced him to look inwards to conjure the kinds of sublimity he once had on his doorstep? Impervious to sullen self-indulgence, Govinda refused to take the bait. With infectious enthusiasm, he insisted that there was something truly remarkable about English skies. Where I saw fog, Govinda spied clouds capable of racing across the horizon, an unusual phenomenon in the deep valleys of his homeland.
Clouds have long been a source of inspiration for Govinda. In his student years, he recalls painting en plein air in the early morning, watching the rising sun melt away the mist around Kathmandu, with molten clouds bubbling up like froth over the face of the mountains. He was just as enraptured by the cloud studies of John Constable and the stormy seascapes of J. M. W. Turner, which he saw reproduced in the art books he assiduously saved up to buy. After earning his Bachelorâs Degree in Fine Art in Nepal and an MFA in Bangladesh, he moved to London in 2007 to pursue a second MFA at Wimbledon College of Art. Stepping into Tate Britain, he realized for the first time that Turner was English. He recalls:
During his studies in London, Govindaâs disparate sources of inspiration began to coalesce into a singular vision. The insights he had gleaned from his studies of nature, both in Asia and Europe, fused organically with the images he admired from past art. Indeed, some of the appeal of Govindaâs paintings lies precisely in our inability to disentangle the two. As Ruskin observed, our mental picture of clouds is replete with âblue and white reminiscences of the old masters.â Govinda does not just paint clouds, he paints what we believe they look like, observed through the prism of the art historical past.
Yet it would be a mistake to think of Govindaâs paintings simply as skyscapes. In recent years, Govinda has become just as interested in cosmology as meteorology. While never simply illustrative, many of the paintings Govinda has produced this decade evoke the extraordinary phenomena witnessed by the Hubble Telescope. Apocalypse (2010) and Illusion and Truth (2011) blast outwards like supernovae, while Begin (2010) and Untitled (2012) crackle like nebulae, an effect he achieves through his signature process of blending acrylic and oil paintsâan anathema to most painters! At times, Govinda makes cosmological connections explicit in his titles, as in Birth of a Star (2010; Fig. 1.1). On several occasions, the artist has spoken at international conferences dedicated to exploring the intersections between art and science, and enjoyed fruitful conversations with astrophysicists.
Figure 1.1
Rather than obviating the need for artistic depiction, recent discoveries have required the imagination of artists more than ever. This was powerfully demonstrated recently when a team of scientists announced that LIGO had for the first time detected gravitational waves, as theorized by Albert Einstein, in the form of minute variances in space-time from the collision of black holes a billion light-years away. For many people, the only hope of grasping some sense of such esoteric phenomena was through the rendering of artists. One could easily imagine Govinda being tasked to depict such phenomena, and indeed his canvases with cut-away centers strikingly evoke, among other things, the nullity of black holes. But what I suspect inspires scientists the most about Govindaâs work is not how his images parallel their discoveries, but how they anticipate spectacles yet to be experienced, or even imagined.
Guided by what the painter Wassily Kandinsky called the artistâs âinner need,â Govinda imagines a cosmos of boundless possibilities. The questions he asks in his work are just as much those of the theologian as theoretical physicist. And indeed, Govinda does not see a radical difference between the two disciplines, which both pursue truth, as they understand it, at the outer reaches of human conception. âKnowledge exists outside all of us,â comments Govinda, âand for me, painting is the activity by which I reach out to discover it. The truth isnât within us: it surrounds us.â While many contemporary artists shy away from talking about truth, preferring instead to speak of culturally constructed meanings and the incertitude of signs, Govinda feels completely at home with such diction, unabashedly invoking theological concerns. His titles confirm these interests, including Illusion and Truth (2011), Salvation (2011; Fig. 1.2), Transcendence (2013), and Infinity/Depth (2018; Fig. 1.3). What is notable in these names, and even more so in conversation with the artist, is his deep yet eclectic approach to religion. He moves nimbly, without anxiety, between Western and Eastern points of reference, invoking Miltonâs epic Christian poem on the one hand, and the Buddhist concept of maya (illusion) on the other.
This equanimity owes a great deal to the religious milieu of the artistâs native country. Nepalâs 2011 census confirmed Hinduism as the faith of an overwhelming majority of Nepalis at 81.3 percent, with Buddhism at 9 percent and much smaller percentages adhering to Islam or ancestral religions. Despite these numbers, which suggest clear divisions between Hinduism and Buddhism, a strong connection with the Buddha runs across religious boundaries. Siddhartha Gautama, as the Buddha is otherwise known, is believed by many to have been born in the region, and is worshiped as a divinity by many Hindus in Nepal. Growing up, Govinda recalls, no one he knew overtly identified themselves as either Hindu or Buddhist, and if there was a difference it was best measured by a spectrum of beliefs, rather than dogmatic boundaries. The lives of his family and community were saturated with religionâwitnessed in a widespread commitment to social duties entailed by dharma, and a range of devotional practicesâbut untroubled by definitions.
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.3
Govinda remains proud o...