This is a test
- 200 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Outreach 2019 Resource of the Year (Theology/Biblical Studies) This handy, accessible introduction to reading theology helps readers engage doctrine critically and charitably. It serves as a primer to theological texts, offering practical guidelines for assessing theology and equipping the next generation of pastors and theologians to read theological literature wisely--even when they might disagree with it. An ideal theology textbook, it is especially well suited for students reading theological literature and discussing doctrine for the first time.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access How to Read Theology by Anizor, Uche in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Theology & Religion & Christian Theology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Topic
Theology & ReligionSubtopic
Christian TheologyPart 1
On Reading
Charitably
1
Enemies of Love
The Challenge of Reading Theology Charitably
To read with intelligent charity. . . . To read lovingly because of and in the name of Jesus Christ, who is the author and guarantor of love.
âAlan Jacobs, A Theology of Reading
In his final lectures, Karl Barth sums up a lifetime of theological work, memorably describing his vocation in this way: âEvangelical theology is concerned with Immanuel, God with us! Having this God for its object, it can be nothing else but the most thankful and happy science.â1 Those who know the God of the gospel should need no convincing that theologyâthe contemplation of this Godâhas great value and is a source of great joy. Yet if we are honest, we recognize that as much as theology is the âhappy scienceâ in theory, many do not experience it as such. For example, Helmut Thielicke, in his famous Little Exercise for Young Theologians, locates the source of unhappiness primarily in the theological student. In a chapter titled âUnhappy Experience with a Theologianâs Homecoming,â he recounts the story of a young seminarian who returns home âhorribly changedâ after his first semester of formal training. The simple and passionate faith he once had was replaced by hubris resulting from the new and fascinating ideas he has learned. After three semesters he becomes effectively useless for ministry in the church, being unable to condescend to the level of the average layperson. âThe inner muscular strength of a lively young Christian,â Thielicke concludes, âis horribly squeezed to death in a formal armor of abstract ideas.â2 Pride, immaturity, inexperienceâthese can convert a happy science into a somewhat suspect discipline. For while the young theologian found some form of joy in theological study, the desired beneficiaries of his learning experienced his joy as misery.
One response to this unhappy state of affairs could be to ignore the supposed cacophony of erudite voicesâthat is, the study of theologyâin favor of the simple melody of Scripture alone. But that option is not available to us. In fact, the happy science must be carried out by theological students of all stripes in learned dialogue with theologians of the past and present. That is, we must read theology. Indeed, Barth points out that theological study must consist of at least two conversations: a primary and a secondary. The first involves the student directly engaging with Scripture to discern what God is saying to her and her community in her time. Of the secondary conversation Barth writes, âThe student must permit himself indirectly to be given the necessary directions and admonitions for the journey toward the answer which he seeks. Such secondary instructions are gained from theologians of the past, the recent past, and from his immediate antecedentsâthrough examination of their biblical exegesis and dogmatics and their historical and practical inquiries. . . . No one, however, should ever confuse this secondary conversation with the primary one, lest he lose the forest for the trees.â3
We come to know God as we converse with fellow readers of the Bible. Yet this is precisely where another set of problems emerges, not so much for church members (as in Thielickeâs tale) as for the practitioners themselves. As a seminary student it was not uncommon for me to encounter a theological text and have absolutely no clue what to make of it. There was a strangeness to it, and it was not always evident how I could profit from it on my journey of faith seeking understanding. This sometimes resulted in frustration: with my professor for assigning such difficult and âunclearâ readings, with the writer for being obscure or âunbiblical,â and with myself for being dull and âmissing something.â My situation is not unique. I remember giving a brief lecture on liberation theology to upper-year Bible and theology majors where the students repeatedly asked, âSo what?â They were uncertain how these black, feminist, and Latin American theologians could possibly be helpful to them, especially considering that (in their eyes) these theologians offered nothing discernibly biblical, or at least exegetical, in their formulations. Why spend time studying them? A fine question, I think, but somewhat misguided. On the one hand, the students were correct to assume that some writers are better guides into Scripture and the knowledge of God than others. On the other hand, they incorrectly assumed that if the textâs value was not self-evident and immediately experienced, the theology had little worth. In light of these concerns, if we are to read theology, how might we engage it profitably?
What has become clear to me is that I, my students, and countless others face several barriers to understanding and assessing theologies well. Some of these challenges are skills-related, while others are tied to disposition. There are indeed things one needs to know and practices in which one needs to be skilled in order to read theology with understanding (and subsequent chapters will go some way in addressing those concerns). But our attitudes also influence how we read theology; they can be productive for or prohibitive to reading theology well, and for our purposes that means reading theology critically and charitably, or with âintelligent charity,â as Alan Jacobs puts it. In this chapter we will, as a spiritual exercise of sorts, reflect on some dispositional obstacles to this kind of reading, reading that befits an evangelical theologianâone concerned to honor the God of the gospel.
Obstacles to Intelligent Charity
To love God and to love oneâs neighbor as oneself is an impossible task. Moreover, how does this all-encompassing command intersect with the particular activity of reading theology? Although the meaning of Jesusâs twofold love command appears fairly straightforward, it does require some elaboration, particularly if we are to apply it to the act of reading theology.
The attempt to bring this commandment into dialogue with the reading of texts is no new thing. Augustine, applying Christâs twofold love command to the interpretation of Scripture, famously writes, âSo anyone who thinks that he has understood the divine scriptures or any part of them, but cannot by his understanding build up this double love of God and neighbour, has not yet succeeded in understanding them. Anyone who derives from them an idea which is useful for supporting this love but fails to say what the writer demonstrably meant in the passage has not made a fatal error, and is certainly not a liar.â4 The point for Augustine is that a reading of Scripture is good if it results in love for God and neighbor. Love is not primarily the disposition or driving motivation in reading but more the outcome of proper interpretation, even if the interpretation is de facto wrong. Alan Jacobs, in A Theology of Reading, extends Augustineâs inquiry into the field of literary hermeneutics, asking how Jesusâs command might shape our reading of literature. What might it look like to read with âintelligent charityâ? he queries.5 His essay is an extended theological reflection on the obstacles and challenges to, and the promise of, reading texts charitably. My concern, building on Jacobs, is to narrow the focus of such an inquiry to the field of theological literature.
Some contemporary philosophers also attempt to delineate a âprinciple of charityâ for their discipline, consisting of tenets that encourage us to, for example, understand a point of view in its strongest form, assume coherence, and attempt to resolve apparent contradictions.6 While quite helpful, these principles may not be radical enough. The love of neighbor that Jesus enjoins us to practice is a reflection of Godâs love for us, revealed in Christâs self-offering. This love involves giving oneself to another, intentionally pursuing anotherâs good with no expectation of reciprocation.7 The specific shape of this neighbor love is spelled out throughout the New Testament through positive and negative examples of what it means and does not mean to love others as ourselves. In what follows, we will examine a small sampling of New Testament passages that deal directly with love, with the aim of discerning potential obstacles to love before applying these observations to the act of reading theology. Specifically, we will look at the obstacles of pride, suspicion, favoritism, and impatienceâwhat I would call the âenemies of love.â
Enemy 1: Pride
Love . . . does not boast, it is not proud. (1 Cor. 13:4)
Pride, according to Augustine, is âan appetite for a perverse kind of elevation,â a âperverted imitation of God.â He adds, âFor pride hates a fellowship of equality under God, and wishes to impose its own dominion upon its equals, in place of Godâs rule. Therefore, it hates the just peace of God.â8 Pride is animated by a devilish desire to be great, and greatness is construed primarily as âgreater than.â Rather than enjoying the fellowship of equals, pride delights in exaltation over others, even God. Pride is opposed to hu...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue
- Part 1 On Reading Charitably
- Part 2 On Reading Critically
- Epilogue
- Index
- Back Cover