Life and Letters of Charles Darwin - Volume 2

Darwin, Charles

• Publisher: pubOne.info
• Year: 2010
• ISBN:
  9782819937524
• Topic: Literature
• Subtopic: Classics
• Index: Literature

pubOne.info present you this new edition. [Under the date of October 1st, 1859, in my father's Diary occurs the entry: "e;Finished proofs (thirteen months and ten days) of Abstract on 'Origin of Species'; 1250 copies printed. The first edition was published on November 24th, and all copies sold first day.

C.D.

CHARLES DARWIN TO C. LYELL.

Down, [January 4th? 1860].

…I have had a brief note from Keyserling (Joint author with Murchison of the 'Geology of Russia, ' 1845. ), but not worth sending you. He believes in change of species, grants that natural selection explains well adaptation of form, but thinks species change too regularly, as if by some chemical law, for natural selection to be the sole cause of change. I can hardly understand his brief note, but this is I think the upshot.

…I will send A. Murray's paper whenever published. (The late Andrew Murray wrote two papers on the 'Origin' in the Proc. R. Soc. Edin. 1860. The one referred to here is dated January 16, 1860. The following is quoted from page 6 of the separate copy: “But the second, and, as it appears to me, by much the most important phase of reversion to type (and which is practically, if not altogether ignored by Mr. Darwin), is the instinctive inclination which induces individuals of the same species by preference to intercross with those possessing the qualities which they themselves want, so as to preserve the purity or equilibrium of the breed…It is trite to a proverb, that tall men marry little women…a man of genius marries a fool…and we are told that this is the result of the charm of contrast, or of qualities admired in others because we do not possess them. I do not so explain it. I imagine it is the effort of nature to preserve the typical medium of the race. ”) It includes speculations (which he perhaps will modify) so rash, and without a single fact in support, that had I advanced them he or other reviewers would have hit me very hard. I am sorry to say that I have no “consolatory view” on the dignity of man. I am content that man will probably advance, and care not much whether we are looked at as mere savages in a remotely distant future. Many thanks for your last note.

Yours affectionately,

C. DARWIN.

I have received, in a Manchester newspaper, rather a good squib, showing that I have proved “might is right, ” and therefore that Napoleon is right, and every cheating tradesman is also right.

CHARLES DARWIN TO W. B. CARPENTER.

Down, January 6th [1860]?

My dear Carpenter,

I have just read your excellent article in the 'National. ' It will do great good; especially if it becomes known as your production. It seems to me to give an excellently clear account of Mr. Wallace's and my views. How capitally you turn the flanks of the theological opposers by opposing to them such men as Bentham and the more philosophical of the systematists! I thank you sincerely for the EXTREMELY honourable manner in which you mention me. I should have liked to have seen some criticisms or remarks on embryology, on which subject you are so well instructed. I do not think any candid person can read your article without being much impressed with it. The old doctrine of immutability of specific forms will surely but slowly die away. It is a shame to give you trouble, but I should be very much obliged if you could tell me where differently coloured eggs in individuals of the cuckoo have been described, and their laying in twenty- seven kinds of nests. Also do you know from your own observation that the limbs of sheep imported into the West Indies change colour? I have had detailed information about the loss of wool; but my accounts made the change slower than you describe.

With most cordial thanks and respect, believe me, my dear Carpenter, yours

very sincerely,

CH. DARWIN.

CHARLES DARWIN TO L. JENYNS. (Rev. L. Blomefield. )

Down, January 7th, 1860.

My dear Jenyns,

I am very much obliged for your letter. It is of great use and interest to me to know what impression my book produces on philosophical and instructed minds. I thank you for the kind things which you say; and you go with me much further than I expected. You will think it presumptuous, but I am convinced, IF CIRCUMSTANCES LEAD YOU TO KEEP THE SUBJECT IN MIND, that you will go further. No one has yet cast doubts on my explanation of the subordination of group to group, on homologies, embryology, and rudimentary organs; and if my explanation of these classes of facts be at all right, whole classes of organic beings must be included in one line of descent.

The imperfection of the Geological Record is one of the greatest difficulties…During the earliest period the record would be most imperfect, and this seems to me sufficient to account for our not finding intermediate forms between the classes in the same great kingdoms. It was certainly rash in me putting in my belief of the probability of all beings having descended from ONE primordial form; but as this seems yet to me probable, I am not willing to strike it out. Huxley alone supports me in this, and something could be said in its favour. With respect to man, I am very far from wishing to obtrude my belief; but I thought it dishonest to quite conceal my opinion. Of course it is open to every one to believe that man appeared by a separate miracle, though I do not myself see the necessity or probability.

Pray accept my sincere thanks for your kind note. Your going some way with me gives me great confidence that I am not very wrong. For a very long time I halted half way; but I do not believe that any enquiring mind will rest half-way. People will have to reject all or admit all; by ALL I mean only the members of each great kingdom.

My dear Jenyns, yours most sincerely,

C. DARWIN.

CHARLES DARWIN TO C. LYELL.

Down, January 10th [1860].

…It is perfectly true that I owe nearly all the corrections (The second edition of 3000 copies of the 'Origin' was published on January 7th. ) to you, and several verbal ones to you and others; I am heartily glad you approve of them, as yet only two things have annoyed me; those confounded millions (This refers to the passage in the 'Origin of Species' (2nd edition, page 285), in which the lapse of time implied by the denudation of the Weald is discussed. The discussion closes with the sentence: “So that it is not improbable that a longer period than 300 million years has elapsed since the latter part of the Secondary period. ” This passage is omitted in the later editions of the 'Origin, ' against the advice of some of his friends, as appears from the pencil notes in my father's copy of the second edition. ) of years (not that I think it is probably wrong), and my not having (by inadvertance) mentioned Wallace towards the close of the book in the summary, not that any one has noticed this to me. I have now put in Wallace's name at page 484 in a conspicuous place. I cannot refer you to tables of mortality of children, etc. etc. I have notes somewhere, but I have not the LEAST idea where to hunt, and my notes would now be old. I shall be truly glad to read carefully any MS. on man, and give my opinion. You used to caution me to be cautious about man. I suspect I shall have to return the caution a hundred fold! Yours will, no doubt, be a grand discussion; but it will horrify the world at first more than my whole volume; although by the sentence (page 489, new edition (First edition, page 488. )) I show that I believe man is in the same predicament with other animals. It is, in fact, impossible to doubt it. I have thought (only vaguely) on man. With respect to the races, one of my best chances of truth has broken down from the impossibility of getting facts. I have one good speculative line, but a man must have entire credence in Natural Selection before he will even listen to it. Psychologically, I have done scarcely anything. Unless, indeed, expression of countenance can be included, and on that subject I have collected a good many facts, and speculated, but I do not suppose I shall ever publish, but it is an uncommonly curious subject. By the way, I sent off a lot of questions the day before yesterday to Tierra del Fuego on expression! I suspect (for I have never read it) that Spencer's 'Psychology' has a bearing on Psychology as we should look at it. By all means read the Preface, in about 20 pages, of Hensleigh Wedgwood's new Dictionary on the first origin of Language; Erasmus would lend it. I agree about Carpenter, a very good article, but with not much original…Andrew Murray has criticised, in an address to the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, the notice in the 'Linnean Journal, ' and “has disposed of” the whole theory by an ingenious difficulty, which I was very stupid not to have thought of; for I express surprise at more and analogous cases not being known. The difficulty is, that amongst the blind insects of the caves in distant parts of the world there are some of the same genus, and yet the genus is not found out of the caves or living in the free world. I have little doubt that, like the fish Amblyopsis, and like Proteus in Europe, these insects are “wrecks of ancient life, ” or “living fossils, ” saved from competition and extermination. But that formerly SEEING insects of the same genus roamed over the whole area in which the cases are included.

Farewell, yours affectionately,

C. DARWIN.

P. S. — OUR ancestor was an animal which breathed water, had a swim bladder, a great swimming tail, an imperfect skull, and undoubtedly was an hermaphrodite!

Here is a pleasant genealogy for mankind.

CHARLES DARWIN TO C. LYELL.

Down, January 14th [1860].

…I shall be much interested in reading your man discussion, and will give my opinion carefully, whatever that may be worth; but I have so long looked at you as the type of cautious scientific judgment (to my mind one of the highest and most useful qualities), that I suspect my opinion will be superfluous. It makes me laugh to think what a joke it will be if I have to caution you, after your cautions on the same subject to me!

I will order Owen's book ('Classification of the Mammalia, ' 1859. ); I am very glad to hear Huxley's opinion on his classification of man; without having due knowledge, it seemed to me from the very first absurd; all classifications founded on single characters I believe have failed.

…What a grand, immense benefit you conferred on me by getting Murray to publish my book. I never till to-day realised that it was getting widely distributed; for in a letter from a lady to-day to E. , she says she heard a man enquiring for it at the RAILWAY STATION! ! ! at Waterloo Bridge; and the bookseller said that he had none till the new edition was out. The bookseller said he had not read it, but had heard it was a very remarkable book! ! ! …

CHARLES DARWIN TO J. D. HOOKER.

Down, 14th [January, 1860].

…I heard from Lyell this morning, and he tells me a piece of news. You are a good-for-nothing man; here you are slaving yourself to death with hardly a minute to spare, and you must write a review of my book! I thought it ('Gardeners' Chronicle', 1860. Referred to above. Sir J. D. Hooker took the line of complete impartiality, so as not to commit Lindley. ) a very good one, and was so much struck with it that I sent it to Lyell. But I assumed, as a matter of course, that it was Lindley's. Now that I know it is yours, I have re-read it, and, my kind and good friend, it has warmed my heart with all the honourable and noble things you say of me and it. I was a good deal surprised at Lindley hitting on some of the remarks, but I never dreamed of you. I admired it chiefly as so well adapted to tell on the readers of the 'Gardeners' Chronicle'; but now I admired it in another spirit. Farewell, with hearty thanks…Lyell is going at man with an audacity that frightens me. It is a good joke; he used always to caution me to slip over man.

[In the “Gardeners' Chronicle”, January 21, 1860, appeared a short letter from my father which was called forth by Mr. Westwood's communication to the previous number of the journal, in which certain phenomena of cross- breeding are discussed in relation to the 'Origin of Species. ' Mr. Westwood wrote in reply (February 11) and adduced further evidence against the doctrine of descent, such as the identity of the figures of ostriches on the ancient “Egyptian records, ” with the bird as we now know it. The correspondence is hardly worth mentioning, except as one of the very few cases in which my father was enticed into anything resembling a controversy. ]

ASA GRAY TO J. D. HOOKER.

Cambridge, Mass. ,

January 5th, 1860.

My dear Hooker,

Your last letter, which reached me just before Christmas, has got mislaid during the upturnings in my study which take place at that season, and has not yet been discovered. I should be very sorry to lose it, for there were in it some botanical mems. which I had not secured…

The principal part of your letter was high laudation of Darwin's book.

Well, the book has reached me, and I finished its careful perusal four days ago; and I freely say that your laudation is not out of place.

It is done in a MASTERLY MANNER. It might well have taken twenty years to produce it. It is crammed full of most interesting matter— thoroughly digested— well expressed— close, cogent, and taken as a system it makes out a better case than I had supposed possible…

Agassiz, when I saw him last, had read but a part of it. He says it is POOR— VERY POOR! ! (entre nous). The fact [is] he is very much annoyed by it, …and I do not wonder at it. To bring all IDEAL systems within the domain of science, and give good physical or natural explanations of all his capital points, is as bad as to have Forbes take the glacier materials…and give scientific explanation of all the phenomena.

Tell Darwin all this. I will write to him when I get a chance. As I have promised, he and you shall have fair-play here…I must myself write a review of Darwin's book for 'Silliman's Journal' (the more so that I suspect Agassiz means to come out upon it) for the next (March) No. , and I am now setting about it (when I ought to be every moment working the Expl[oring] Expedition Compositae, which I know far more about). And really it is no easy job, as you may well imagine.

I doubt if I shall please you altogether. I know I shall not please Agassiz at all. I hear another reprint is in the Press, and the book will excite much attention here, and some controversy…

CHARLES DARWIN TO ASA GRAY.

Down, January 28th [1860].

My dear Gray,

Hooker has forwarded to me your letter to him; and I cannot express how deeply it has gratified me. To receive the approval of a man whom one has long sincerely respected. And whose judgment and knowledge are most universally admitted, is the highest reward an author can possibly wish for; and I thank you heartily for your most kind expressions.

I have been absent from home for a few days, and so could not earlier answer your letter to me of the 10th of January. You have been extremely kind to take so much trouble and interest about the edition. It has been a mistake of my publisher not thinking of sending over the sheets. I had entirely and utterly forgotten your offer of receiving the sheets as printed off. But I must not blame my publisher, for had I remembered your most kind offer I feel pretty sure I should not have taken advantage of it; for I never dreamed of my book being so successful with general readers; I believe I should have laughed at the idea of sending the sheets to America. (In a letter to Mr. Murray, 1860, my father wrote:— “I am amused by Asa Gray's account of the excitement my book has made amongst naturalists in the United States. Agassiz has denounced it in a newspaper, but yet in such terms that it is in fact a fine advertisement! ” This seems to refer to a lecture given before the Mercantile Library Association. )

After much consideration, and on the strong advice of Lyell and others, I have resolved to leave the present book as it is (excepting correcting errors, or here and there inserting short sentences) and to use all my strength, WHICH IS BUT LITTLE, to bring out the first part (forming a separate volume with index, etc. ) of the three volumes which will make my bigger work; so that I am very unwilling to take up ti...

Table of contents

• THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF CHARLES DARWIN
• VOLUME II
• MADEIRA AND BERMUDA BIRDS NOT PECULIAR.
• ON GALAPAGOS PRODUCTIONS HAVING AMERICAN TYPE ON VIEW OF CREATION.
• “MUST YOU NOT ASSUME A PRIMEVAL CREATIVE POWER WHICH DOES NOT ACT WITH UNIFORMITY, OR HOW COULD MAN SUPERVENE?”
• THE FORMS WHICH ARE BEATEN INHERITING SOME INFERIORITY IN COMMON.
• HYBRIDISM.
• RUDIMENTARY ORGANS.
• C. DARWIN.
• C. DARWIN.
• A. SEDGWICK.
• CHAPTER 2.II.
• C.D.
• C.D.
• CHAPTER 2.III.
• C. DARWIN.
• CHAPTER 2.IV.
• WEDNESDAY MORNING:
• C. DARWIN.
• CHARLES DARWIN.
• CHAPTER 2.V.
• CHAPTER 2.VI.
• 1870 AND BEGINNING OF 1871.
• CHAPTER 2.VII.
• CH. DARWIN.
• CHARLES DARWIN.
• NURTURE.
• RELIGION.
• SCIENTIFIC TASTES.
• NATURE.
• RELIGION?
• POLITICS?
• HEALTH?
• HEIGHT, ETC?
• TEMPERAMENT?
• ENERGY OF BODY, ETC.?
• ENERGY OF MIND, ETC.?
• MEMORY?
• STUDIOUSNESS?
• INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT?
• ORIGINALITY OR ECCENTRICITY?
• SPECIAL TALENTS?
• STRONGLY MARKED MENTAL PECULIARITIES, BEARING ON SCIENTIFIC SUCCESS, AND NOT SPECIFIED ABOVE?
• CHAPTER 2.VIII.
• THE VIVISECTION QUESTION.
• CHARLES DARWIN TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES.
• CHAPTER 2.IX.
• C.D.
• MISCELLANEOUS LETTERS—1876-1882.
• QUESTIONS ON THE FACULTY OF VISUALISING.
• DIFFERENT KINDS OF IMAGERY.
• POSTSCRIPT OF A LETTER TO PROFESSOR A. AGASSIZ, MAY 5TH, 1881:—
• C.D.
• CHAPTER 2.X.
• CH. DARWIN.
• CHAPTER 2.XI.
• CHAPTER 2.XII.
• CHARLES DARWIN TO ASA GRAY. NOVEMBER 26 [1862].
• C. DARWIN.
• INSECTIVOROUS PLANTS.
• CH. DARWIN.
• CHAPTER 2.XIV.
• CHARLES DARWIN.
• BLOOM ON LEAVES AND FRUIT.
• VARIABILITY.
• GALLS.
• AGGREGATION.
• MR. TORBITT'S EXPERIMENTS ON THE POTATO-DISEASE.
• THE KEW INDEX OF PLANT-NAMES, OR 'NOMENCLATOR DARWINIANUS.'
• CHAPTER 2.XVI.
• APPENDIX I.
• JOHN LUBBOCK, NEVIL STOREY MASKELYNE, A.J. MUNDELLA, G.O. TREVELYAN, LYON PLAYFAIR, CHARLES W. DILKE, DAVID WEDDERBURN, ARTHUR RUSSEL, HORACE DAVEY, BENJAMIN ARMITAGE, RICHARD B. MARTIN, FRANCIS W. BUXTON, E.L. STANLEY, HENRY BROADHURST, JOHN BARRAN, F.J. CHEETHAM, H.S. HOLLAND, H. CAMPBELL-BANNERMAN, CHARLES BRUCE, RICHARD FORT.
• JOHN LUBBOCK.
• APPENDIX II.
• II.—LIST OF BOOKS CONTAINING CONTRIBUTIONS BY CHARLES DARWIN.
• III.—LIST OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS, INCLUDING A SELECTION OF LETTERS AND SHORT COMMUNICATIONS TO SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS.
• APPENDIX III.
• CHIEF PORTRAITS AND MEMORIALS NOT TAKEN FROM LIFE.
• CHIEF ENGRAVINGS FROM PHOTOGRAPHS.
• APPENDIX IV.
• DEGREES.
• SOCIETIES.—PROVINCIAL, COLONIAL, AND INDIAN.
• FOREIGN SOCIETIES.—AMERICA.
• AUSTRIA-HUNGARY.
• BELGIUM.
• DENMARK.
• FRANCE.
• GERMANY.
• HOLLAND.
• ITALY.
• PORTUGAL.
• RUSSIA.
• SPAIN.
• SWEDEN.
• SWITZERLAND.
• INDEX.
• BATS.
• COLOURS OF INSECTS.
• CREATIVE POWER.
• DARWIN FAMILY.
• DESCENT OF ANIMALS.
• DIAGRAMS OF DESCENT OF MAMMALS.
• DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS.
• GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.
• HYBRIDISM.
• 'INFANT, BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF AN.'
• LIZARDS.
• MODIFICATION.
• MONSTERS.
• MUSIC OF INSECTS.
• STRIPED HORSES.
• VIVISECTION.
• WOLLASTON MEDAL.
• Copyright