Starting points: what do you know already?
Beginning or student teachers come from a wide variety of starting points in terms of their academic experience, social and cultural experiences and work experiences. Added to this are their values, attitudes and beliefs about science, what it is and how it should be taught.
Academic experiences may be varied. They may include a first degree from a fairly narrow area or one with a mixture of different modules; they may include a higher degree in an even narrower area with research based on one specialist topic. Examples may be a biology student teacher with a first degree in genetics but with little or no ecology; a physics student teacher with a degree in electrical engineering but with little content in astrophysics, or a chemistry student with a degree in medicinal chemistry but little inorganic chemistry. In these examples, further subject knowledge enhancement would be required before being able to confidently teach all aspects of the specialist science.
An individualâs social and cultural experiences can often be a valuable addition to the daily interactions with teenage pupils. Personal experiences and interests, memberships of groups, travel experiences and hobbies can contribute to the positive professional relationships that occur between teachers and pupils. At one level, involvement in the clubs and societies in schools not only helps forge these positive interactions but helps the informal education of pupils: the hidden curriculum. At another level, the richness of a diversity of backgrounds and cultures can add to the overall pupil experience in school.
A student teacherâs prior work experience can provide opportunities that will enrich their science teaching, whether it be through new ideas to teaching science, approaches to organising the classroom, dealing with individuals â the so-called âlife skillsâ â or simply some of the anecdotes from work that can be used to illustrate ideas in the science laboratory. However, it is important to point out that schools and classrooms are very complex social situations and often work very differently to the workplace; it may not always be possible to simply transfer practices from the context of work to the context of school.
You will, inevitably, arrive with a number of very different views, values, beliefs and attitudes. Some of these may be based on your own education; some will be based on your views of the world, your experiences and even the ways you view learning. When you begin teacher education and training, a number of these will alter, and may even be in conflict with new experiences and change as a result. It is important to be open-minded. As you observe, reflect on and evaluate your previous ideas and current experiences, you may start to develop a personal philosophy about science teaching and learning, and your role in this.
Task 1.1.1 Starting out
Make a list of some of your skills and beliefs about science teaching and learning. These might include: subject knowledge; âtransferableâ skills such as organisation, time management and creativity; âpeople skillsâ such as empathy, diplomacy, enthusiasm, and beliefs, attitudes and values that might address the question, âwhy do I want to teach science?â
Then look at this list and consider how you can enhance these skills, and how you hope to address some of these areas during your teacher training and education.
An outline of some of the different roles of teachers can be found in Unit 1.1 of the companion volume to this book, Learning to Teach in the Secondary School(Capel et al., 2013).
Subject knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogy
There has been a certain amount of debate about the nature of subject knowledge. Teachers need to know what to teach, the content knowledge necessary. They also need to know how to teach this knowledge, the pedagogy involved. Shulman (1986) has contributed to our understanding about subject knowledge and has proposed the term pedagogicalcontent knowledge, or PCK, to refer to the practical knowledge used by teachers in classrooms. This practical knowledge is, understandably, complex as it involves the knowledge that specialist teachers possess that includes pupil misconceptions, examples, analogies and models. Added to this are the illustrations, conceptual difficulties and connections with other aspects of learning such as assessment and the curriculum (Berry, 2012). If we take the example of teaching a very simple topic such as the forces on a cyclist pedalling at a constant speed along a flat road, the teacher will need to know a number of important facts. They will need to know the content knowledge about the forces acting on the cyclist such as friction, forward motion, gravity and Newtonâs Laws. They will also need to know pupilsâ misconceptions or alternative frameworks about forces and motion, how force arrows can be drawn, balanced forces, some possible simple demonstrations or observations about Newtonâs Laws, other possible examples that can add to pupilsâ understanding, âwhat ifâ questions and even the kinds of questions that may arise in assessment tests or examinations. The PCK involved in this apparently straightforward example on forces and motion is rather more complex than it immediately appears and the teacher needs to draw on a wide range of knowledge to deal with this.
Task 1.1.2 Simple photosynthesis
List the items of PCK needed to teach a simple outline of photosynthesis, involving the production of carbohydrate and oxygen from carbon dioxide and water, using light energy.
Curriculum knowledge
Subject knowledge is not the only form of knowledge a teacher needs. They also need to know what needs to be taught, i.e. curriculum knowledge. This is further complicated by the frequency of curriculum change but change is inevitable as the curriculum is revised in response to changes in policy and evolving ideas about what kind of science needs to be taught to all pupils in the secondary age range. Curriculum change is not just something to hit the news in England; it occurs throughout the world as governments and international educators react to the need for both a scientific and technological workforce while at the same time enhancing the scientific literacy of twenty-first-century populations who need to be better informed about some of the major scientific, ethical and environmental issues facing them.
One of the biggest curriculum changes in more recent years has been the arrival of and changes to the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) with a shift towards what pupils can do, rather than what they can remember for a final examination â and recent shifts back again. The second major curriculum change is the National Curriculum and its revisions.
The National Curriculum arrived in 1989, resulting from a mixture of historical events, initiatives and a not inconsiderable degree of political influence. Although the biological, chemical and physical science content was familiar, AT1, later to be called Sc1, covered experimental and investigative work and was the first time investigations in school science were now part of a statutory curriculum. With Sc1, pupils were required to predict, carry out, analyse and evaluate investigative work in science. This type of practical work in science was a noticeable departure from the ârecipe-followingâ form of practical work that was being carried out across the country, designed to illustrate scientific phenomena and explanations.
Since 1989 there have been five versions of the National Curriculum in 1991, 1995, 2000, 2004 with another in 2013. What does this indicate? Changing criteria for the science curriculum? Different political agendas? Or the realisation that previous versions of the curriculum were in need of change? Two earlier areas of the National Curriculum were open to general criticism as far as teachers were concerned: its manageability in practice and its assessment. A third criticism relates to scientific literacy and the question: âWho is the science curricul...