1Vows and children in the Hebrew Bible
Heath D. Dewrell
Vows were an important aspect of religious life in ancient Israel, as well as in the broader Northwest Semitic world. In the Hebrew Bible, vows appear in virtually every major genre of biblical literature. In narrative, characters make vows to God (Gen 28:20; 31:13; Judg 11:30; 1 Sam 1:11; 2 Sam 15:7â8; Jonah 1:6). Several biblical âlawsâ are devoted to vows (Lev 7:16; 22:21â25; Num 6:1â21; 15:1â10; 30:1â15; Deut 23:18). Vows frequently appear in the Psalms (22:26 [Eng 22:25]; 50:14; 56:13 [Eng 56:12]; 61:6, 9 [Eng 61:5, 8]; 65:2 [Eng 65:1]; 66:13; 76:12 [Eng 76:11]; 116:14, 18; 132:2). In their oracles, the Hebrew prophets address vows (Isa 19:21; Jer 44:25â26; Nah 2:1; Mal 1:14). Vows even appear as topics of discussion in the usually less ritually focused âwisdomâ literature of the Hebrew Bible (Job 22:27; Prov 31:2; Ecc 5:3â4 [Eng 5:4â5]). Outside the Hebrew Bible, âvowsâ appear in texts written in Old Aramaic (KAI 201); Official Aramaic (Sam 15); Palmyrene (PAT 1677); Phoenician (KAI 18); Punic (KAI 88; 103); and Ugaritic (on which, see below).1
In his seminal study of ancient Near Eastern vows, Tony W. Cartledge defines a vow (Hebrew neder/nÄder) as âa conditional promise, made within the context of petitionary prayer, that the individual will give to God some gift or service in return for Godâs willingness to hear and answer [oneâs] prayer.â2 Further, as Jacques Berlinerblau observes, vows do not appear to have required the mediation of a priest, or even a shrine, and thus provide a window into âpopular religious practice.â While some of the laws of the Torah attempt to regulate and standardise vows (Lev 7:16; 22:21â25; Num 6:1â21; 15:1â10; 30:1â15; Deut 23:18), it appears that, in practice, it was entirely up to the individual what to promise, what to request, and when and in what manner to fulfill a vow. Unlike many aspects of the Israelite cult, vows were not restricted to certain genders or classes of people. Anyone could make a vow. Thus, vows provide the historian of the Israelite religion with an uncommon glimpse into the way in which individuals directly interacted with their god(s).3
Another interesting aspect of vows is their nakedly transactional nature. While there are indications that the intended result of firstfruit offerings, for example, was a bountiful harvest, the transactional nature of these offerings is not explicitly stated. Firstfruit offerings are never presented as optional or conditional; they were owed to Yahweh as his share of the harvest (Exod 23:19; 34:26; Deut 18:4). While in practice firstfruit offerings could be conceived of as being of a do ut des (âI give so that you will giveâ) variety, the transaction is masked as an unconditional gift offered to Yahweh, to which Yahweh in turn freely responds with divine blessings. In no way, however, do firstfruit offerings obligate Yahweh to act. In the case of a vow, on the other hand, the promised item is only delivered to the god(s) after the god or goddess has done her or his part. As George Foote Moore observed over a century ago, vows are not even of the do ut des variety; they are instead more accurately dabo si dederis (âI will give if you will giveâ) offerings.4 If the deity fails to deliver, then the supplicant is none the worse for having made the vow.
Thus, vows represent both one of the most unmediated aspects of the Israelite cult, in that no cultic functionary is necessary to intercede between the individual who makes the vow and his or her god, and one of the most explicit in terms of its intended purpose and function. In contrast to other sorts of offerings, which tend to draw on relationship language, a vow assumes that the deity can be convinced to act via the promise of a gift (a less pious writer might even say âbribedâ) and does nothing to soften or disguise this practical reality. It is entirely comprehensible, then, that vows often appear in the context of crises, especially crises of a personal nature. When all else has failed, one has little to lose by promising the gods some extravagant gift should they deign to intervene. It is likewise no surprise that vows often involved the most personal of objectsâchildren. While in theory one could make a vow regarding nearly any desired thing, children and vows appear in conjunction with one another in some especially interesting ways. In some cases, individuals requested children from the gods and vowed some precious object in return. In other cases, a person may promise to offer one child in exchange for more children. In still others, a person may vow a child in exchange for some other material benefit. The essay below will sketch the variety of ways in which children and vows intersect in Northwest Semitic societies, especially focusing on the religious practice of ancient Israel as attested in the Hebrew Bible.
Children as the object requested
The first case in which children and vows intersect is perhaps the most obvious one: when the supplicant requests a child in exchange for some promised item. Even today in developed Western societies it is not uncommon for individuals to respond to infertility by attempting to bargain with God,5 and it is not surprising that the ancientsâmost of whom believed that supernatural beings interacted with humans in a more concrete and direct way than most modern Westerners assumeâdid so as well. Unfortunately, while it is likely that making vows in response to childlessness was a fairly common phenomenon in the ancient Near East, descriptions of such acts of personal piety do not often make their way into texts. The most explicit description of a vow made in the hope of obtaining children is preserved in the literature from Ugarit, specifically the Kirta epic. The tale opens with a report that Kirtaâs wife and children have all perished by various ghastly means. When Kirta enters his chamber and weeps, the god Ilu comes to him and asks what it is that is distressing him and what it is that he desires. Kirta rejects the idea that kingship or wealth would provide him any consolation. Instead, he cries out:
[tn.] bnm. âaqnyâ | [Allow that] I will acquire/produce children! |
[tn. θâa]rm. âamâid | [Allow that] I will multiply k[in]! |
In response, Ilu instructs Kirta to make a series of sacrifices before preparing for a journey to Udum with his armies. Once there, he is to request the hand of the daughter of a certain King Pabuliâone Hurayaâas his wife. During his journey to Udum, Kirta stops at the shrine of Athiratu at Tyre and makes the following vow:
âiâiθt. âaθrt. ᚣrm | O, as Athiratu of the Tyrians |
wâilt. ᚣdynm | and the goddess of the Sidonians exists: |
hm. Ḽry. bty | If Huraya to my house |
âiqḼ. âaĹĄârb. ÄĄlmt | I take, and I cause the lass to enter |
Ḽáşry. θnh. k!spm | my court. Double her (weight in?) silver |
âatn. w. θlθth. ḍrᚣm | I will give, and triple her (weight in?7) gold. |
While in its most literal and technical sense the vow here concerns Kirtaâs desire to marry Huraya and never explicitly mentions children, the remainder of the tale reveals that Huraya was essentially a means to the end of obtaining children. Once Kirta has married Huraya, Ilu blesses his family and Huraya bears him two sons and six daughters. This takes seven yearsâ time to accomplish. At the end of the seven years, the text makes clear that it is the children, and not merely Huraya herself, that were the desired objects of Kirtaâs vow:
mk. bĹĄbâ. ĹĄnt | Now in seven years |
bn. krt. kmhm. tdr | the sons of Kirta were like they were vowed |
apbnt. Ḽry | also the daughters of Huraya |
kmhm. | like them. |
While there has been some debate about precisely whose vow is referenced here (Kirtaâs?8 Iluâs?9), it is likely no coincidence that it is immediately following the birth of Kirtaâs last child that his vow to Athiratu reappears:
wtḍss. âaθrt | And Athiratu remembered |
ndrh. wâilt. d[plâih] | his vow. And the goddess what [he promised her?] |
Athiratu is none too pleased that Kirta neglected to fulfill his end of the bargain and strikes him with some sort of illness as a result. This illness, its ramifications, and how to overcome it serve as the driving plot device for most of the remainder of the epic (or at least what is preserved of it).
As Simon Parker perceptively observed,10 Kirtaâs vow has a nice parallel in the story of Hannahâs vow in 1 Samuel. Unlike Kirta, however, who was attempting to replace a family that he had lost, Hannah had thus far been unable to conceive a child at all. Then, during her familyâs regular pilgrimage to the shrine at Shiloh:
Here, unlike in the case of Kirta, Hannah explicitly names a child as the object that she desires. Nonetheless, there still seems to be something left unsaid. That is, the vow as stated offers no material benefit to Hannah. While Kirta promised to give gold and silver (in the form of a statue?) to Athiratu in exchange for a wife (and children), Hannah asks for a child but promises to give the child right back to Yahweh. Why go through the discomfortâand, in the ancient world, even dangerâof pregnancy and childbirth just to hand the child over?
Here, examining ancient assumptions about the female reproductive system may be of some help. The most common term for female infertility in the Hebrew Bible is âÄqÄrâ, probably cognate to ââqr, âto uproot,â11 and indicating that the womanâs womb is a place in which the manâs âseedâ cannot take root. Another semantic field used in referenc...