1 Mellifluous music in early Western Christianity
Carol Harrison
A description of how the Jews of Minorca were coerced to convert to Christianity might not seem promising material for a paper on music in early Western Christianity, but the account of the 4th-century bishop of Minorca, Severus, of how the Jews on the island were led to embrace Christianity is in fact very revealing.1 This was largely due to the manner in which they were coerced: what happened in Minorca following the arrival on the island of the relics of St Stephen, during an eight-day period in 418, sometime before the beginning of Lent, was not an inquisition with trials and tortures but what I would like to call a mellifluous assault on the senses: the Jews on Minorca were indeed physically assaulted to convert, but through what Severus believed to be the miraculous workings of divine grace upon their bodily senses: their sight, hearing, taste, touch, and smell. In the course of his work Severus carefully, almost systematically, takes each sense in turn, in order to demonstrate how individual Jews were converted to Christianity by their sensory experience of divine presence.
Hearing and seeing are treated first and occupy the first two-thirds of the treatise, but it is hearing that predominates (or maybe that is because I was listening out for it). Severusâ Jews overhear, mishear (to providential effect), turn a deaf ear, are alternately terrorised or seduced by hearing, and have their minds and hearts converted by outward sounds, by inward words, and by their response to what they have heard. Music has a key role here, and it is one which I hope will allow me to highlight some of the key features of what little we know of the nature and role of music in late antique Christianity for our further discussion.
At two significant points in the treatise the psalms are sung with what Severus describes as an âuncanny sweetnessâ (mira suauitate psallentes) (11.4) or a âwondrous sweetnessâ (mira iucunditate decantabat) (13.1â2).2 The first instance occurs when Theodorus, the head of the Synagogue, dreams that he is warned not to enter the Synagogue by a man who tells him there is a Lion inside. When he peers into the building he is met, not by a Lion but simply by the sight, or more importantly, the sound, of monks (one presumes Christian monks) singing the psalms with âuncanny sweetnessâ. Theodorusâ reaction might at first seem odd: he is overcome by a âgreat ⌠and deadly terrorâ (11.5) and immediately flees in fear. What is happening here? Severus explains that Theodorusâ encounter with the mellifluous chants of the monks was for him â presumably as an unbeliever â a terrifying encounter with the Lion. It soon becomes clear that the aforesaid Lion is the âLion of the tribe of Judah, the root of Davidâ (Rev. 5:5), in other words, Christ. So the sweet singing of the psalms conveys the presence of Christ, who, for an unbeliever, is an object of terror â a sort of Rilkean terror of the beautiful: âFor beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror which we are barely able to endure, and it amazes us, because it serenely disdains to destroy usâ.3
In the second instance, it is not the singing of the psalms by Christian monks which is described but rather the singing of the psalms by Jews. This episode is intriguing for a number of reasons: firstly, the psalm is described by Severus as a âhymn to Christâ sung in âabundance of joyâ by Christians who are processing to the Jewish Synagogue for a debate (13.1â2); secondly, the âwondrous sweetnessâ of the Jewsâ singing, as they pick up the tune and join in, is a clear echo of the âuncanny sweetnessâ of the Christian monksâ; thirdly, it suggests that Jews in Minorca not only spoke Latin but that Jews and Christians used chants which were either identical or similar enough for one to join in with the other.4 What is happening here? Bradbury suggests that the Jews joined in, in order to turn the meaning of the psalm verse against the Christians: âTheir memory has perished with a crash and the Lord endures foreverâ (Psa. 9:7â8). That may well be the case, but the âwondrous sweetnessâ of their singing is a clear indication that there is more than that going on here. As we have seen, and as subsequent miracles associated with tasting and smelling sweetness clearly confirm, âsweetnessâ is Severusâ shorthand for the presence of God, of Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, which works to bring reluctant Jews to conversion â so perhaps the Jewsâ mellifluous contribution to the psalm singing is also an indication of the incipient working of God to bring about their full participation as Christians. From very early on, the act of singing had been used by the early Christians as a metaphor for harmonious relations and as a means to achieve that unity, both within the individual soul as well as among individuals.5 At the very least then, what we have here is an audible demonstration of the common tradition, texts and typology which Jews and Christians shared and which were the grounds for Jewish conversion.
A later episode might add weight to this interpretation: when the Jews (mistakenly, it turns out) hear the rumour that their leader, Theodorus, has converted to Christianity (a misunderstanding Severus attributes to divine providence), they react, as Theodorus did in his dream, by fleeing: not just that, Severus tells us that they, like Theodorus before them, are fleeing from âthe terrible lion ⌠who from the site of the synagogue, as had been revealed to Theodorus, had unleashed through the monks the roar by which He put fear in our resisting enemiesâ (16.10). So the monksâ singing â the sweetness of the presence of Christ, the Lion of Judah â is heard as a frightening roar by resistant Jews, who promptly flee, pursued by the lion. Equally significant, however, is the fact that, left alone in the very Synagogue where he had had his dream, after all his fellow Jews have fled, Theodorus himself peers around once again, but this time he misses his former anxiety and terror and hears, not the roaring of the Lion, but only its name and the monks still singing their psalms (16.11). Theodorus is on the cusp of conversion; his ears are becoming attuned to Christ as he appears in the psalms, and the Lion is no longer heard as a wild beast but as Christ, the Lion of Judah.
It quickly becomes apparent that the flight of the Jews from the roaring lion of monastic psalmody is one that precipitates them into conversion: as the Israelites were exiled from Egyptian unbelief, so Minorcaâs Jews were exiled in the wilderness from their own former unbelief (Severus is very keen on the typology of the Exodus (e.g. 20.15â16)) and one by one they, like the Israelites, encounter miraculous visions (20.14), showers of hail (20.13), pillars of fire (20.15â16), bitter water turned to sweet honey (by the presence of the wood of the cross (24.5â9)) â until the air itself grows so fragrant with the smell of honey, and the dew on the grass, that they are able to taste it and discover that it is, indeed, sweeter than honey (20.14 Cf. 24.10).
Mellifluous miracles abound, then, but the women of Minorca were made of sterner stuff. It is amusing to note that whilst their male counterparts, one by one, submit to conversion, it is the women who hold out until the bitter end (24.1). The âdeaf earsâ of the last to convert, the wife of Theodorusâ brother, Innocentius, were only converted through a veritable bombardment of prayers and hymns. As Severus puts it, drawing on Exodus imagery again, âOur army sweated until nearly the third hour in contests of hymns and prayers against Amalec, the enemy of our leader Jesusâ (Exodus 17:8â17; 27.5). Alternating prayer and psalmody is, of course, a common feature of monastic psalmody, practiced from very early on (if we follow Christopher Page) by urban house ascetics, followed by the desert fathers and Western communities such as the one in Marseilles, described by Cassian. Whether they used this practice to gradually coerce, wear down, and overcome the resistant soul is open to question, but it would not be incompatible with the monastic ideal. There are worse ways of being persuaded than being assaulted by prayers and hymns â and that, I think, is the point of Severusâ work. In this treatise music is described as one of the ways in which God acts in order to bend, break, and batter the resistant soul, and once subdued, to mend and remake it. It is experienced as wondrously and uncannily sweet, but, for the one who resists the presence of God, as also frightful and terrifying. The presence of the divine can equally occasion delight or terror â or indeed, delight and terror. Its sweetness is indeed wonderful, a matter of miracle, as it is due to the presence of God singing â or, in the case of unbelief â roaring, through it. Its very sweetness, its beauty, inspires in those who will not accept its source a terrified urge to flee. But for Severus, this very flight, like the flight of the Israelites from Egypt, is one towards, rather than away from, conversion.
What, then, can we discover about the nature and presence of music in early Western Christianity from this treatise? Its sweetness is the presence of God, the Trinity, and can work miracles in the one who hears it; it is part of Godâs multi-sensory assault on the senses in order to convert people to Himself; it is at once mellifluous and terrifying. It appears in the singing of psalms or hymns, in Church and in the streets, by monks and by lay people, Christians and Jews; combined with prayer it can overcome the most resistant of wills; it is an expression of the harmony of the soul and can unify those who perform it.
Deus creator omnium: Ambrose, Augustine and sensuous music
Severusâ mellifluous music resonates closely with the sort of music we discover if we turn from Minorca to Italy and North Africa, to Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo â two of the most influential Christian bishops and theologians of the 4th/5th century in the West. One of the earliest Christian hymns, Ambroseâs Deus Creator Omnium, appears in an early work of Augustineâs entitled On Music,6 one of a projected series he set out to write, soon after his conversion, on the seven liberal arts, clearly intending to draw on his classical education and former career as a rhetor to exercise the intellectual muscles of devout Christians such as himself and to lead them through the intellectual disciplines, from what he describes as âthe corporeal to the incorporealâ. However disconcerting it might at first appear as an account of music as we would now think of it, the De Musica is a work we cannot ignore: it is the only one devoted specifically to music by a Christian theologian in this period, and in its treatment of music as a classical discipline it lays the groundwork for what was to become a recognizable genre of Christian writing on music in later Western authors such as Boethius, Isidore of Seville, and Cassiodorus.7
Augustineâs treatment of âmusicâ in the first five books of this work is indeed precisely what his educated contemporaries, pagan as well as Christian, would expect: a meticulous, painstaking account of the conventions and technicalities of classical poetic metre or rhythm.8 It therefore reads more like a work of mathematics than music. His ancient readers would have been disconcerted, however, only at the point at which ...