Section III
The Fantastic and the Modern Female Experience
Fantastic People
Scott Rogers
During the second half of the nineteenth century, England witnessed a remarkable interest in spiritualism. This movement was, initially, largely dominated by male âmesmeristsâ or âmediumsâ who often worked with a female assistant or patient as a part of the performance of spiritualism. As a result, spiritualism allowed both the men and women performing it and the men and women who were attracted to it to engage in conduct that was, often, far outside traditional Georgian and Victorian norms. While the following may seem an odd fit for a collection of essays about women and the fantastic, some brief attention to the gender politics associated with late Victorian spiritualism might provide a bit of context for the ways twentieth-century writers deployed the fantastic in their art.
One of these mid-Victorian mediumsâand one whose life intersects with English art in interesting waysâwas a medium named Daniel Dunglas Home. Home was born in Scotland in 1833 and emigrated to America when he was a boy. At some point in his teens, he began to claim that he had special powers that allowed him to communicate with the dead, and by the time he was a young man, he was conducting sĂ©ances at private gatherings. After achieving a modicum of success, Home returned to Europe and took his show on the road. Claims about his supernatural abilities are indeed impressive. In his discussion of Home in After Lives: A Guide to Heaven (2009), John Casey reports that Home could
alter his body dimensions ⊠Normally five feet ten inches tall, he grows, on one occasion, to six feet six inches so that âthere was a space of four inches between his waistcoat and the waistband of his trousers. He appeared to grow also in breadth and size all overâ.
(372)
Casey also describes some of Homeâs other feats, as recorded in William Crookesâs âNotes of SĂ©ances with D. D. Home,â which had been published in Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research:
He then held his fingers up, smiled and nodded as if pleased, took up a fine cambric handkerchief belonging to Miss Douglas, folded it into his right hand and went to the fire. Here he threw off the bandage from his eyes and by means of the tongs lifted a piece of red hot charcoal from the centre and deposited it on the folded cambric ⊠Occasionally he fanned the coal to a white heat with his breath ⊠Presently he took the coal back to the fire and handed the handkerchief to Miss Douglas. A small hole about half an inch in diameter was burnt in the centre ⊠but it was not even singed anywhere else.
(103)
After a séance in 1871, Crooke claims to have witnessed Home making an accordion play even though his hands and feet were held by participants at the séance:
In this manner is was physically impossible for him to have touched the accordion with hands or feet. The lamp also gave plenty of light to allow all present seeing any movement on his part. The accordion now commenced to sound, and then played several notes and bars. Every one present expressed themselves quite convinced that this result could not possibly have been effected by Mr. Homeâs agency.
Mr. Wr. Crookes now said that the accordion was brought up to his knees and pressed against them. He put his hand down and took it by the handle. It then played in his hand, Mr. Homeâs hands and feet being held by others as before.
(113)
Other witnesses reported seeing Home levitate out a window (Casey 372). Given these feats, it is not surprising that Home sometimes performed for illustrious audiences: William Cullen Bryant, William Makepeace Thackeray, Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Anthony Trollope, Napoleon III, Conan Doyle, and many nobles. On July 23, 1855, he performed at a house in Ealing, where Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning were in attendance.
Like many people at the time, Elizabeth Barrett Browning was quite interested in spiritualism. Her interest should not be snickered at. Many respectable figures of the day found themselves keenly interested in spiritualismâan area of inquiry that was, it is important to remember, potentially a branch of empirical science. Just as alchemy had attracted such luminaries as Isaac Newton, the spiritualist movement promised to answer many of the questions Victorians had about the relationship between the world they knew and the world they hoped lay beyond.
To put it mildly, Robert Browning was extremely skeptical, believing these mediums and spiritualists to be fraudsâand often ones with motives that were sexual in nature, as these sĂ©ances encouraged physical contact either as a way of invoking a spirit or as a way of providing evidence of the presence of a spirit. During the sĂ©ance, Home reportedly contacted a child of the Brownings who had died in infancy and conjured a âheadâ out of thin air. Unfortunately for Home, the Brownings never lost a child in infancy. Robert Browning pounced on the âhead,â which he revealed to be Homeâs bare foot. Home was caught out as a fraud a number of times: he failed to fool Empress Eugenie (again using his feet); he âdematerializedâ a âsplendid row of emeralds of great value,â which were of course not returned by the âspiritsâ (Casey 374); he swindled an elderly widow of ÂŁ75,000, which resulted in a lawsuit that determined him to be a fraud and ordered him to return the money. If it were not enough that Home died, denounced by Harry Houdini âas a humbug, a pervert, and a moral degenerateââwho also âinsinuat[ed] that [he died from] syphilisâ (Casey 375)âRobert Browning published âMr. Sludge, the Mediumâ in his 1864 collection, Dramatic Personae. The poem begins with this:
NOW, donât, sir! Donât expose me!
Just this once! This was the first and only time, Iâll swear,â
Look at me,âsee, I kneel,âthe only time,
I swear, I ever cheated,âyes, by the soul
Of Her who hearsâ(your sainted mother, sir!)
All, except this last accident, was truthâ
This little kind of slip!âand even this,
It was your own wine, sir, the good champagne,
(I took it for Catawba, youâre so kind)
Which put the folly in my head!
(Browning 1â10)
In the poem, Browning transforms Home from a respected medium to an embarrassment, a charlatan, and a fraud who eventually admits âWhatever put such folly in my head, / I know ât was wicked of meâ (Browning 33â34). Just as Home had attempted to transform himself into something extraordinary due to his connection with the supernatural, Browning reveals him to be, in fact, extraordinarily humanâand ultimately it is Homeâs basic humanity that undergirds his appeal. He was a huckster who preyed upon the desires of his audience to know what lay âbehind the veil,â as Tennyson put it in In Memoriam (1849)âa poem which, itself, attempts to follow its subject somehow beyond the human and into the afterlife, only to fail to find any reassurance or certainty beyond simple insistence that such an afterlife exists (section 56 line 28).
Home was of course one of many famous mediums operating in England in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. From the âmesmeric sĂ©ance[s]â of Franz Anton Mesmer to the mediumship of Gladys Osborne Leonard, the spiritualist movement of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was âthe occasion for contests over authority in science, medicine, and intellectual lifeâ (Winter 1, 4). Spiritualists were of course not exclusively men; women played key roles in the history of the spiritualist movement, often serving as the subject of the mesmerist. As Amy Lehman explains in Victorian Women and the Theater of Trance (2009), there are deep connections between the performance of mesmerism and the Victorian attempt to treat it as a new form of science, and women were often the subjects of mesmeric treatment:
A woman performing in a trance state in the Victorian era might be found in a number of different contexts: as a professional medium, a Spiritualist trance speaker, or as the medical subject of scientific experiments on the effects of mesmerism or hypnotism. In all of these cases, she appeared to enter into an altered state of consciousness in which she could access and manifest esoteric wisdom, spiritual entities, or even normally hidden aspects of her own personality.
(2)
Even Charles Dickensâno doubt attracted to the theatricality of itâtook up mesmerism in the 1840s to provide relief to Madame De la Rue, who suffered from âconvulsions of the limbs, headaches, insomnia, and neurasthenic symptoms including catalepsyâ (Lehman 35). One such subject, Elizabeth OâKey, a young woman under mesmeric treatment by a Dr. John Elliotson, was the subject of a long report in The Lancet. This report led Lehman to draw a remarkably incisive conclusion about the theater of mesmerism (and by extension many other forms of spiritualism): the performance of mesmerism allowed both those being mesmerized and those in attendance to break sharply with social or sexual mores. Women performing these entrancements were âable to assert and express [themselves] with unusual freedom, through characters which were either aspects of her own personalityâ or entirely other (Lehman 48).
One modernist medium, Gladys Osborne Leonard, appeared to adhere to the legacy of traditional Victorian standards of female conduct. Her biographer, Susy Smith, describes her as perfectly in keeping with such standards of behavior and demeanor. She was âquiet and tranquil, forthright, simple and direct. She is gracious, with a native dignity and kindliness ⊠[She is] poised, wise, and serene âŠâ (Smith 22). In her youth, she claimed to have access to a spirit named âFedaâ in the afterlife: âFeda told them that she was to be Gladysâ spirit control. She also said she was Gladysâ great-great-grandmother, a Hindu by birth, who had been raised by a Scottish family until the age of thirteenâ (Smith 19). Smith (an incredibly credulous biographer) admits that there exists some âquestion of Fedaâs real nature,â but explains that although âThe idea of losing her identity in trance was repugnant to Gladysâ the two eventually
began a long âassociationâ of a most unusual nature. The Feda personality and Gladys were friends; sometimes they seemed almost rivals, sparring for the use of the body known as Gladys Osborne Leonard. But they were never able to communicate with each other except with the assistance of a sitter who would relay their messages.
(Smith 20)
Like other mediums, Leonardâs âspirit controlâ provided access not just allegedly to the realm of spirits, but also to essentially sanctioned alternatives to the expectations of Georgian and Victorian female behavior.
As Marlene Tromp explains in âSpirited Sexuality: Sex, Marriage, and Victorian Spiritualism,â Victorian sĂ©ances were often incredibly tactile experiences:
The darkened parlor of the séance invited and embodied the disruption of the ordinary. In this space, the linked hands of the sitters violated customary barriers of age and gender, and the intimate spaces underneath the tipping tables set the stage for more than simply spiritual stimulation. Faces and knees were caressed while the lights were out, gentlewomen submitted to be kissed by strangers, and the most private recesses of the past and present were exposed to the public eye.
(67â68)
Female mediums who had âmaterializedâ a spirit would often encourage participants to touch the spirit, or the spirit would expose parts of its body to demonstrate that it was indeed materialized. Records associated with perhaps the most famous medium of the nineteenth century, Florence Cook, allow us to see this behavior quite clearly. Cook, who operated in the 1870s, materialized a spirit named âKatie King.â King, Cook contended, was âthe spirit-world daughter of a seventeenth-century brigand turned governor of Jamaicaâ literally bodied forth into the room where the sĂ©ance was taking place (Tromp 73). Cookâs materializations were particularly sexualized. Tromp explains that Cook would lift âher white spiritual drapery to expose the nakedness of her feet underneath âŠâ (73). Cookâs feet and ankles were not the only parts of her body that she sometimes sexualized. Tromp details how Cook wore low-cut garments that exposed her neck and arms, much to the delight of her male sitters, and that she encouraged at least one sitter to examine âthis young âspiritâ womanâs bosom,â revealing, at last, that âKatie wore none of the traditional womenâs underclothingâ (73, 74). These sĂ©ances provided a relatively sanctioned framework for what are clearly wild deviations from Victorian standards of polite sexual conductâas Tromp explains, such scenes âsuggest both the level of violation made possible by the sĂ©ance and the confidence in its blamelessnessâ (74). When we consider the ways that sĂ©ances allowed participantsâand perhaps particularly womenâto explore the possibilities of female conduct that lay beyond the confines of traditional Victorian and Georgian strictures, it is unsurprising on one hand that Robert Browning would have been profoundly uncomfortable with Elizabeth Barrett Browningâs attraction to these performances and on the other, that she would have found such performances deeply attractive.
The essays contained in this section explore the myriad ways that authors deployed the fantastic as a means of exploring alternatives to traditional expectations for womenâs behavior or identities. Some accomplished this by using time travel as a means of exploring the relationship between ânormative timeâ and ânormative lives,â as Elizabeth English argues that Burdekin does in her work. Others achieved this, as Mary Clai Jones argues, by representing the revenge of a revivified Egyptian harem girl who breaks with even the supernatural stereotype of the mummy who metes out her revenge on the English to present us with one who ârefus[es] all objectification, consumption, or domesticationâ by rejecting the colonial trope that insisted that such figures could be absorbed into proper English domestic life. Some, as Jennifer Mitchell argues in her discussion of Radclyffe Hallâs âMiss Ogilvy Finds Herselfâ and Virginia Woolfâs Orlando, explored the limits of representing âqueer subjectivityâ in modern English life. Some attempted to subvert existing literary genres such as the Gothic, as Andrew Hock Soon Ng argues, in order to interrogate the material conditions in which women lived. All of these essays, in the end, explore how female bodies can be transformed or modified in ways that render them somehow more than humanâand embrace the supernatural and the fantastic as a means of exploring the boundaries of what existences were now possible for women in the modern world.
Works Cited
Browning, Robert. âMr. Sludge, the Medium.â The Poems and Plays of Robert Browning. Modern Library, 1934.
Casey, John. After Lives: A Guide to Heaven. Oxford UP, 2009.
Crooke, F. M. R. âNotes of SĂ©ances with D. D. Home.â Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, vol. 6, 1889â90, pp. 98â127.
Lehman, Amy. Victorian Women and the Theatre of Trance: Mediums, Spiritualists and Mesmerists in Performance. McFarland, 2009.
Smith, Susy. The Mediumship of Mrs. Leonard. University Books, 1964.
Tennyson, Alfred Lord. In Memoriam, edited by Erik Gray, 2nd ed., Norton, 2004....