This is a test
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Rigid adherence to scientismâas opposed to a healthy respect for scienceâis all too prevalent in our world today. Rather than leading to a deeper understanding of our universe, this worldview actually undermines real science and marginalizes morality and religion.
In this book, celebrated philosopher J. P. Moreland exposes the selfdefeating nature of scientism and equips us to recognize scientism's harmful presence in different aspects of culture, emboldening our witness to biblical Christianity and arming us with strategies for the integration of faith and scienceâthe only feasible path to genuine knowledge.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Scientism and Secularism by J. P. Moreland in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Biological Sciences & Science General. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
1
The (Scientistic) Air We Breathe
I was in the middle of a nine-day stay in the hospital following the removal of a cancerous tumor in my colon on April 27, 2016. During that time, several different shifts of nurses had come and gone. On this particular day, a new nurse came to care for me and take my vital readings.
As we chatted, she asked me what I did for a living. I told her I was a philosophy professor. âWhere did you go to school?â she asked. Working backwards, I explained that my PhD in philosophy is from the University of Southern California, my MA in philosophy is from the University of California at Riverside, my ThM in theology is from Dallas Seminary, and my BS in physical chemistry is from the University of Missouri.
A puzzled look came on her face. She mused out loud that I had taken two very unrelated, divergent paths.
Before she could explain, I asked if this was what she meant: I started off in science, which deals with realityâhard factsâand conclusions that could be proved to be true. But theology and philosophy were, well, fields in which there were only private opinions or personal feelings, where no one was right or wrong, or if they were, no one could know who was right. Science was cognitive, and theology and philosophy were personal and emotional.
Looking surprised, as though I had read her mind, she acknowledged that my understanding was exactly what she had in mind.
My nurse was expressing the view called scientism. Since scientism is so pervasive todayâit is the intellectual and cultural air that we breatheâshe could not have even named the worldview she was presupposing and articulating.
What Is Scientism?
Roughly, scientism is the view that the hard sciencesâlike chemistry, biology, physics, astronomyâprovide the only genuine knowledge of reality. At the very least, this scientific knowledge is vastly superior to what we can know from any other discipline. Ethics and religion may be acceptable, but only if they are understood to be inherently subjective and regarded as private matters of opinion. According to scientism, the claim that ethical and religious conclusions can be just as factual as science, and therefore ought to be affirmed like scientific truths, may be a sign of bigotry and intolerance.
Before looking in more depth at scientismâthe view that the hard sciences alone have the intellectual authority to give us knowledge of realityâlet me show some concrete examples of it and how it is part of everyday common sense.
Scientism Illustrated
Example: Michael Kinsley
On June 25, 2001, Time magazine featured an article by journalist Michael Kinsley defending stem-cell research on human embryos. He wrote, âThese [embryos] are microscopic groupings of a few differentiated cells. There is nothing human about them, except potentialâand, if you choose to believe it, a soul.â1
Now the first thing to note about his conclusion is that it is bad science, claiming that there is nothing really âhumanâ about human embryos, which is itself a scientifically absurd statement, contradicted by all of the standard textbooks of embryology!
But thatâs not my point here. Rather, I want to draw your attention to a part of Kinsleyâs sentence that you may not have noticed. Reread it carefully and note what he presupposes: we know scientific facts about human embryos, but we only believe things about human souls. For Kinsley, belief in a soul is not an item of knowledge. In his view, there is no evidence for it. He would probably put it in the same category as a unicorn. You can believe it if you want, perhaps because someone told you that it exists or because you wish that such a creature is out there, but youâve never seen or heard or touched a unicorn and therefore it does not really count as knowledge. Kinsley undoubtedly thinks this kind of belief belongs in the pages of fantasy literature, not in the items of what we can truly know and be justified in believing. But Michael Kinsley is not advocating science. Heâs expressing scientism.
Example: Marilyn vos Savant
For a long time, Marilyn vos Savant (listed in five editions of the Guinness Book of World Records as the human with the highest recorded IQ) has written a column in Parade magazine titled âAsk Marilyn,â where people submit questions and Savant provides answers. In one post, a man explains that his parents raised him in a certain religion. Now an adult, he still likes the religion, but his friends are trying to get him to rationally consider others. He wonders if Savant thinks he should consider his friendsâ arguments or just go on accepting his parentsâ religion.
Here is Savantâs response: âYouâre smarter than those friends. Religions cannot be proved true intellectually. They come from the heartâand your parentsânot the mind. In my opinion, you have behaved wisely [by not listening to your friendsâ âargumentsâ].â2
Marilyn vos Savant has no problem with this man holding to his parentsâ religious beliefsââNo harm, no foul,â she might sayâbut sheâs critical of his friends for trying to reason with him or to persuade him that other religious beliefs are more compelling or truthful or best accord with the evidence.
From reading her columns over the years, I assure you she would not say that science comes from the heart and not the mind, or that it comes from what your parents told you. Scientific claims can be proved true. But in her worldview, religious claims cannot. This is not science but scientism.
Example: Scientism in School
Scientism is found not only among those writing columns in popular magazines. It is also the required dogma in our schools, where it directly challenges Christianityâs claim to be a knowledge tradition. For example, consider the âScience Frameworkâ issued by the state of California in 1989, designed to guide its public schoolsâ science curricula. The document offered teachers advice about how to address students who expressed reservations about the theory of biological macroevolution:
At times some students may insist that certain conclusions of science cannot be true because of certain religious or philosophical beliefs they hold. . . . It is appropriate for the teacher to express in this regard, âI understand that you may have personal reservations about accepting this scientific evidence, but it is scientific knowledge about which there is no reasonable doubt among scientists in their field, and it is my responsibility to teach it because it is part of our common intellectual heritage.â3
This statementâs significance comes not so much from its promoting evolution over creation as from the picture of knowledge it presupposes: knowledge about reality comes solely from science, and empirical knowledge claims derived from the hard sciences are the only claims that deserve the backing of public institutions.
This kind of reasoning seems to imply that religious and philosophical claims are simply matters of private feeling, which, by extension, means ignoring claims at the core of ethics, political theory, and religion. Words such as conclusions, evidence, knowledge, no reasonable doubt, and intellectual heritage become associated with science, giving science the ârightâ to define reality, while words like beliefs and personal reservations are associated with nonempirical claims, framing religious beliefs as mere ungrounded opinions. Put simply, the state of California is requiring that all students abide by the dictates not merely of science, but of scientism.
Scientism Defined
We have looked briefly at some popular-level expressions, or presuppositions, of scientism, but now letâs hear from actual scholars who propose a definition. According to philosopher of science Tom Sorell, âScientism is the belief that science, especially natural science, is . . . the most valuable part of human learning . . . because it is much the most [sic] authoritative, or serious, or beneficial. Other beliefs related to this one may also b...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Newsletter Signup
- Endorsements
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and Illustrations
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The (Scientistic) Air We Breathe
- 2 Why Scientism Matters
- 3 How Scientism Changed the Universities
- 4 Scientism Is Self-R efuting
- 5 Scientism Is the Enemy of Science
- 6 Why Weak Scientism Is No Better Than Strong Scientism
- 7 The Availability of Nonscientific Knowledge
- 8 When Science Exceeds Its Reach: A Case Study
- 9 Scientism and First Philosophy
- 10 Examples of the Authority and Autonomy Theses
- 11 How Do We Explain Things?
- 12 Five Things Science Cannot In Principle Explain (But Theism Can)
- 13 Methodological Naturalism, Theistic Evolution, and Intelligent Design
- 14 The Importance of Integrating Christianity and Science
- 15 A Plan for the Integration of Christianity and Science
- One Final Plea
- Glossary
- Selected Bibliography
- Index