Herodicus the Cratetean
eBook - ePub

Herodicus the Cratetean

A Study in Anti-Platonic Tradition

  1. 176 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Herodicus the Cratetean

A Study in Anti-Platonic Tradition

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

Originally published in 1941. Herodicus was a Greek physician of the fifth century BC, and a native of Selymbria. The first use of therapeutic exercise for the treatment of disease and maintenance of health is credited to him, and he is believed to have been one of the tutors of Hippocates.

Frequently asked questions

Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Herodicus the Cratetean by Ingemar During in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in History & Ancient History. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2019
ISBN
9780429627323
Edition
1

II. THE ESSAY
FNRimages

Introduction.

In Athenaeus 215 F we read the following words:
FNRimages
FNRimages
FNRimages
. It is the merit of C. Schmidt1 to have seen that the words
FNRimages
., which Casaubon could not understand, belong not to the protasis but to the whole sentence,2 and that the anti-platonic calumnia in these chapters is taken from Herodicus and his pamphlet
FNRimages
.3
The question may however be raised, if we really have to do with a literary work in the emphatic sense of the word, that is to say a well-disposed collection of material, composed and discussed with a certain aim in view. Now, of course, »disposition » did not mean the same to the ancient Greeks as to us. It is a well-known fact that ancient literary works, some speeches of Isocrates excepted, are very badly disposed throughout. Perhaps the external form and internal composition of literary works were never so eagerly studied and treated as by the ancient Greeks, but in spite of all their brilliant theories the practical results were rather deficient. External, purely material conditions may have rendered a clear arrangement of the subject-matter difficult; the forms of publishing the works,
FNRimages
, had the same effect. What though we lower our pretensions, yet even thus the remains of Herodicus’ essay may hardly be said to form anything like a coherent work. It is probable that it consisted of loosely sketched miscellanies, a collection of articles inserted in his work
FNRimages
. Athenaeus never saw the original work. I have tried to show below1 that he possibly found these excerpts in the
FNRimages
of Phavorinus, and to what extent the latter in his turn excerpted earlier works of the same kind, for instance Didymus, can only be guessed at, never proved. The consequence is that we must be very cautious in our conclusions. When I call Herodicus’
FNRimages
an ‘essay’ or a ‘work’, I do so with the reservation that this is a convenient way of keeping together these scattered remnants.
What they have in common is the harsh anti-platonic tendency. The animosity against Plato has its root in the Homerolatry of the Pergamene school of grammar, but there are no traces of it in the fragments left of Crates’ work.2 The doctrine of the school taught that Homer was the source of all knowledge, and as Plato had expelled Homer from his Ideal State — Herodicus stresses this twice and after him Heraclitus in the
FNRimages
— he had, in the eyes of a fanatic disciple of the school, committed an unpardonable offence. It is not likely that Herodicus speaks on behalf of Crates, he is his partisan. In the same w...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Half Title
  3. Title Page
  4. Copyright Page
  5. Original Title Page
  6. Original Copyright Page
  7. Table of Contents
  8. I. An Epigram
  9. II. The Essay Πϱὸς τὸν Φιλοσωκράτην
  10. III. The Treatise Πεϱὶ Συμποσίων
  11. IV. The Κωμῳδούμενοι and the other writings
  12. V. The Anti-Platonic Tradition