This is a test
- 118 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
The Serial Podcast and Storytelling in the Digital Age
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
This volume analyzes the Serial podcast, situating it in the trajectory of other popular crime narratives and contemporary cultural theory. Contributors focus on topics such as the ethics of the use of fiction techniques in investigative journalism, the epistemological overlay of postmodern indeterminacy, and the audience's prolific activity in social media, examining the competing narrative strategies of the narrators, characters, and the audience. Other topics considered include the multiplication of narratives and the longing for closure, how our minds work as we experience true crime narratives, and what critical race theory can teach us about the program's strategies.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access The Serial Podcast and Storytelling in the Digital Age by Ellen McCracken in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Computer Science & Digital Media. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
1
The Ethics of Serialized True Crime
Fictionality in Serial Season One
On its website, Serial claims to tell
one storyâa true storyâover the course of a season. Each season, we follow a plot and characters wherever they take us. We wonât know what happens at the end until we get there, not long before you get there with us. Each week we bring you the next chapter in the story, so itâs important to listen to the episodes in order.
(âAbout Serialâ)
Serialâs audience is thus primed to expect a story with characters and a plot, for which it is important to listen in order, serially. A plot and charactersâfor true crime? Sarah Koenig doesnât chronicle characters; she chronicles peopleâand the tension between these two categories produces one of the ethical dilemmas at the heart of Serial.
Starting in October 2014, Serial distributed twelve approximately weekly podcasts during its first season. Throughout these episodes, Koenig re-covers the case of Hae Min Leeâs murder on January 13, 1999, for which Haeâs seventeen-year-old ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was convicted (Koenig âThe Alibiâ). Adnanâs acquaintance, Jay, testified in court that Adnan killed Hae in anger over their breakup; Jay claimed to have helped Adnan bury Haeâs body. Witnesses contradict each other, evidence seems to have been missing or overlooked, and Koenig presents the competence of Adnanâs defense lawyer as dubious.
The podcast, which is sometimes monotonously pedantic about the details of the years-old case it chronicles, was unexpectedly popular: CNN estimated that the podcast had been downloaded forty million times as of December 23, 2014 (Roberts). As its title suggests, Serialâs success is due in no small part to its serial storytelling strategies. The podcast elucidates the capacities of serial form to attract and maintain a dedicated, and even obsessed, audience. The reception of the first season is partially captured in a dedicated discussion forum, called a subreddit, on the website Reddit. Fans speculate on the Serial subreddit, sometimes further investigating the leads that Koenig provided. Yet the subreddit runs into trouble when fans discover how easy it is to access the full names and social media accounts of the persons involved in the case. Even as the subreddit, like its host website Reddit, has policy against âdoxingââproviding personal information and documents about people who wish to remain privateâthis policy is difficult to enforce in an online forum regularly flooded with contributions.
When fannish curiosity crosses into violating the privacy of witnesses in the present day, it becomes emphatically clear that Serial is dealing not with characters but with people whose real lives many years after the crime are invaded by the fandom Serial cultivates. Serial, therefore, fulfills the potential of its serial narrative formâa form that first realized its potency in the Victorian period, when true crime was serially narrated to similarly obsessive effects. When This American Life serialized Serial, it did not seem prepared for the consequences. But given the history of serial entertainment, perhaps it should have been.
In the following, I compare Serial to serialized true crime in the nineteenth century in order to demonstrate the capacities of serialized narrative to produce an invested and even obsessed audience who plays between fact, speculation, fictionality, and fictionalization. The boundaries between fiction and nonfiction are not absolute, as I will show through how the Elstree murder case of 1823 promiscuously passed between the newspapers, the stage, and the tourist trap. Serial unleashes the positive and negative ethical potentialities of serial form. Inspiring a dedicated fandom, Serial links episodes to each other through the curiosity of speculation. When the pod-castâs fans continue that speculation beyond idle chatter online and desire to continue the story by investigating it themselves, then the ethical ramifications of seriality are amplified for the podcast. While Serial has the potential to help exonerate a man, the enthusiastic fandom also risks treating the nonfictional as if it were fictional by relating to real people as if they were characters.
History of Serial Form
The media culture that emerged in the late eighteenth century through the nineteenth century saw the proliferation of print entertainment in a variety of forms. Newspapers, periodicals, broadsides, novels in parts, and novels in volumeâall of these forms became easier to produce, cheaper, and thus more accessible to a growing population of print consumers throughout the nineteenth century. The century consequently saw the rise of mass entertainment. The masses consumed entertainment voraciously, and the boundaries between news and fiction were porous. Within this context, serial reading unfolded as a practice that fundamentally affected the reception of real and fictional events.
The logic of seriality perpetuates the idea that there is always more to discover, and this impression carries across both nonfictional and fictional uses of serialization. Indeed, the contrast between factual news and fictional entertainment is not so clear-cut. Mark W. Turner explains that the ânatural state of being for periodicals is change and movement, and newspapers and periodicals rely, to a greater or lesser degree, on the ânewâ and on the very modern concept of advancement, of moving forward, of futurityâ (184). News signals change and enforce the sense that audiences must inform themselves regularly in order to stay up to date. News, premised on novelty, is topical, relevantâtherefore, definitions of what constitutes news vary widely by publication and intended audience (âNewsâ). While news items like speeches in parliament, natural disasters, or the current price of corn may seem straightforwardly factual, the reporting of sensational murders blurred the line between fact, speculation, and fabrication in ways that reveals the interdependence of journalistic serial narratives and fictional serial narratives.
Scholars of serial narrative have long recognized that serial reading produces a number of specific effects. While William Warner posits that a âpleasure-seeking ethosâ is âendemic to serial entertainmentsâ (64), other scholars have suggested that serialization preys upon anxiety in order to drive further consumption. According to Wolfgang Iser, enforced temporal delay leads to deeper imaginative engagement (qtd. in Allen 39). This deeper imaginative engagement allows readers to spend more time speculating and imagining the unresolved story. Rob Allen further suggests that the success of an installment of a serialized narrative is âmeasured not by readerly satisfaction but readerly desire. The satisfied reader is not sufficient; it is the reader who is insatiable for more that the serial requiresâ (40). Sean OâSullivan also finds that satisfaction is âantithetical to the structure and attractions of seriality as a practice,â as serial narratives tend to operate against containment. In fact, Serialâs fans confirm the effect of anxiety and desire when they write of their distress in reaction to Episode 6. Redditor ctznmatt writes, âIâm even more confused and distressed than I was last week. And itâs not even Thursday yet for meâ (Episode 6 Discussion).1 Redditor gordanshumway2 agrees: âDistressed is the perfect wordâ (âEpisode 6 Discussionâ).
Serialization, then, unleashes the considerable power of a desiring, anxious, and invested audience in stories that continually defer closure. This combination is particularly volatile when united with the serial narration of true crime, as the nineteenth century taught us. Victorians routinely sought more of horrific crime stories. They read about murders in newspapers and broadsides, they bought serialized novelizations of the crime, and they attended dramatizations. More than this, what historian Judith Flanders has called âmurder sight-seeingâ was a common pastime (3). Victorians traipsed through crime scenes to look at the dead bodies and steal keep-sakes from the scene; they eagerly attended hangings and visited funerals. In 1827, Thomas de Quincey described nineteenth-century audiences: âThe world in general ⌠are very bloody-minded; and all they want in a murder is a copious effusion of bloodâ (qtd. in Flanders 19).
The genre of true crime, in the nineteenth century and today, centrally concerns questions of contested guilt, typically in the context of a legal case. Thus, true-crime narratives cultivate audience speculation. This speculation reconfigures the past as participants interrogate degrees of probability regarding the evidence of the case. This interrogation of historical possibilities powerfully resembles participation in fictional worlds in that both depend upon imaginative invention in relation to a constellation of foregoing evidence.2 The most salient difference is that, while wholly fictional narratives remain fully in the realm of the imaginary, legal interrogation of the past potentially impinges upon the actual world. Legal decisions about what probably happened in the past, regardless of whether it actually happened, have real-world, material consequences for real-world people. True-crime narratives, then, draw upon a common resource with fictionâspeculationâbut they do so with very different consequences, as true-crime narratives intend to be received as nonfictional. Indeed, it is not always clear that audiences assiduously differentiate between the real and the imaginaryâeither in the nineteenth century or in the twenty-first.
The nineteenth century powerfully demonstrates that the speculation endemic to true crime does not stay strictly isolated to the rational consideration of evidence; instead, speculation runs over into fictionalized re-tellings and re-imaginings of the crime. The 1823 case of John Thurtell exemplifies traits of serially narrated true crimes in the period: the murder case was the first to have been âtried by newspaperâ; Thurtellâs crimes were said to have founded newspaper fortunes, and cultural memory of the case would persist into the 1840s (Flanders 20). Fictionalizations like those that derived from Thurtellâs case show that, even when the story is true, audiences relate to infamous criminals as characters.
The Elstree Murder
In the first decades of the nineteenth century, John Thurtell had failed as a cloth merchant and lost most of his money gambling (Flanders 22). He defrauded his creditors when he claimed to have been robbed of the money he owed them (Flanders 23). So, Thurtellâdeep in debtâencountered William Weare, a notorious and successful gambler who was said to have carried all his savings on his person, rumored to amount to ÂŁ2,000.
The evidence against Thurtell was fairly clear, and popular opinion during the trial was that he had murdered William Weare. Thurtell conspired with his friends Joseph Hunt and William Probert. On October 24, 1823, Thurtell invited Weare to go hunting in Hertfordshire at Probertâs cottage. On the way, Thurtell stopped and shot at Weare; as Thurtell later confessed to his accomplices, the gun misfired, and Thurtell bludgeoned Weare to death with his pistol and then slit his throat (Flanders 25). Thurtell, Hunt, and Probert first buried the body near Probertâs cottage but then moved it to a pond farther away.
For any given day during the month after Weareâs murder, the four pages of The Times consisted of two pages of advertisements, two columns of news, and the rest given over to police, trial, and magistratesâ court reports concerning the case (Flanders 27). Newspapers did not feign neutrality. The Morning Chronicle called the three men âmurderersâ before their conviction, and several newspapers printed libelous reports of other supposed murders, rapes, and heinous deeds attributed to Thurtell, Probert, and Hunt. For those who could not afford newspapers, broadsides provided updates on trial reports and included songs and poetic effusions on the subject of the murder, along with illustrations.
Two weeks before the trial was scheduled, fictionalized plays based on the murder were advertised at the Surrey and the Coburg (Flanders 30). A playbill for one of the plays touts sets that are âillustrated by CORRECT VIEWS taken on the SPOTâ and that have âTHE IDENTICAL HORSE AND GIG Alluded to by the Daily Pressâ (Flanders 33â34, emphasis original). This fetishization of the ârealâ objects of the murder in the play shows how the audienceâs fascination with what factually happened becomes entangled in fictionalizations that promise to bring the audience experientially closer to the captivating case.
Indeed, Probertâs cottage itself became a site of murder tourism where visitors would pay an entrance fee for a tour, which would conclude with purchasing souvenirsâa lucky few were able to buy a bit of the sack in which Weareâs body was carried, and others could buy a Staffordshire pottery figure or a book complete with a map of Weareâs posthumous journeys (Flanders 35). As late as 1828, Walter Scott wrote that he and his friends paid a woman to give them a tour of the cottage (Flanders 35). Flanders claims that âeverything to do with Thurtell had a commercial valueâ (43).
After Thurtellâs conviction, his character as âthe drinker of bloodâ began to disappear in public discourse to be replaced by Thurtell the gallant gentleman (Flanders 40). Such a change reveals how Thurtell was subject to the projected speculations of an audience who knew him only by reputation. It was said that forty thousand people attended Thurtellâs execution. One broadside reported that, as Thurtell stood under the scaffold, he looked to the crowd and made a slight bow. In response, every head in the crowd was uncovered, and many murmured âwhat a gentlemanâ (Flanders 40). After Thurtellâs execution, Willi...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title
- Copyright
- Contents
- Introduction: The Unending Story
- 1 The Ethics of Serialized True Crime: Fictionality in Serial Season One
- 2 Sounds Authentic: The Acoustic Construction of Serialâs Storyworld
- 3 Narrative Levels, Theory of Mind, and Sociopathy in True-Crime NarrativeâOr, How Is Serial Different from Your Average Dateline Episode?
- 4 The Serial Commodity: Rhetoric, Recombination, and Indeterminacy in the Digital Age
- 5 âWhat We Knowâ: Convicting Narratives in NPRâs Serial
- 6 The Impossible Ethics of Serial: Sarah Koenig, Foucault, Lacan
- 7 Serialâs Aspirational Aesthetics and Racial Erasure
- Contributors
- Index