Chapter One
From Bethlehem to Baptism
Childhood and Family in Ancient Judea and Galilee
Most scholars and popular authors who write on Jesus and the New Testament take one of three approaches: (1) they spend a majority of the time analyzing the literary and textual nuances of the Gospels in order to better understand how the texts were created and redacted; (2) they analyze the deeds and sayings of Jesus using scholarly methods of historical criticism in order to determine what the Jesus of history actually said and did; and (3) they discuss how the teachings of Jesus can help people in their spiritual and faith journeys (i.e., âdevotional literatureâ). I too am interested in these approaches to Jesus studies; however, as a social scientist I tend to be most interested in the social and cultural contexts of Jesusâ life and of the Gospels. Regarding Jesusâ childhood and upbringing, for example, what were the general living conditions for a boy in the Greco-Roman world in the first century CE, and specifically for a Jewish boy living in Galilee? How did Jewish boys relate to their parents? How were they educated? What types of struggles and challenges did they face?
In most cultures, boys generally like to play, explore, throw rocks, and catch bugs. While the primary sources (see Introduction) are not focused on these sorts of daily-life activities, they do provide some insights that help illuminate the lifestyle of Galilean families. In this chapter we examine several aspects of childhood and young adulthood in first-century Galilee. We also explore ideas of washing and purity in order to better contextualize the immersion activities of John the Baptist and the baptism of Jesus. The material in this chapter will help foster both a better contextualization of the social setting of first-century Judea and Galilee and a greater appreciation for what the boy Jesus would have experienced during his childhood and early adult years before his ministry.
Villages and Houses
The region of Galilee during Jesusâ lifetime contained hundreds of villages. According to the first-century Jewish historian Josephus, 204 villages peppered the Galilean landscape. Only a small number of these settlements, perhaps just Sepphoris and Tiberias, were larger than about twenty acres. Sepphoris, the administrative capital of Galilee, may have been as large as 150 acres. Based on several archaeological surveys, a large majority of the villages were between only two and a half acres and ten acres in size. For example, Capernaum, Cana, and Nazareth were probably only five to ten acres in size, the latter containing fifty houses maximum. Accounting for living quarters, estimated persons per household, space for livestock, space for a threshing floor, and crop land, the population was about one hundred inhabitants per acre. This means that most people in first-century Judea and Galilee lived in villages ranging from a few hundred to one thousand inhabitants. Unlike the few larger cities that contained border walls, marketplaces, aqueducts, theaters, stadiums, hippodromes, paved roads, and even sewer systems, these smaller villages contained only a few modest commercial buildings, presses for oil and wine, a small water cistern, narrow and unpaved roads, and a cemetery. As a child, Jesus may have seen the contrast in lifestyles between the villages and cities, since Sepphoris was only about three and a half miles from Nazareth.
Extensive research on Palestinian houses in antiquity by Israeli archaeologist and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Yizhar Hirschfeld has revealed that most peasant dwellings in villages were on average 2,500â3,000 square feet, including both a courtyard and space for animals. These stone structures were flat-roofed and had one to two rooms. Ceilings were quite low at about five and a half feet high. People typically accessed the upper level by ladders. Most walls were typically plastered and the floors were dirt surfaces. Some extended families built houses that shared a central, open-air courtyard. In the hot months, people usually slept on bedrolls in the courtyard or on the roof. Families experienced little privacy in this style of dwelling. Depending on the region and landscape, many houses were built on top of small caves, which were used to store food and keep animals in at night.
The narratives concerning the birth of Jesus and the elements present in the Gospels allow us to examine this event in relation to our focus on housing and peasant life. In what type of house was Jesus born? What was the social setting of his birth? Where were Josephâs and Maryâs families during Jesusâ birth? Partial answers to these questions are offered in the Gospels, early Christian tradition, and archaeology. Later Christian interpretation places Jesusâ birth in a wooden stable somewhere away from an âinn.â Most depictions of the episode in cinema and art suggest that Mary and Joseph arrived in Bethlehem at night when Mary was nine months pregnant. She was ready to deliver, but inhospitable Jews (as many Christians portray them) would not give up their rooms, and so Jesus was born in a stable surrounded by animals. The Gospels, however, mention none of this. First, it is unlikely that Joseph and Mary traveled alone all the way from Galilee to Bethlehem in just the nick of time for Mary to deliver Jesus. Travelers, especially the young and vulnerable like Joseph and Mary, journeyed in caravans for protection against bandits and other dangers. Moreover, we would expect Joseph and Mary to arrive in Bethlehem well before the arrival of Jesus. This fits with Lukeâs account, which states that Mary was already in Bethlehem for some time: âwhile they were there, the time came for her to deliver her childâ (Luke 2:6; emphasis added). Most likely, Joseph and Mary lodged with family while in Bethlehemâat least based on material in Luke, which claims that everyone participated in the legal registration in âtheir own townsâ (Luke 2:3). Thus, Mary and Joseph would have certainly had family connections in the region.
And as far as Jesus being born in a stable, the Gospel of Matthew states that the magi (wise men) came to a house (oikos) to visit the baby Jesus (2:11). Even if the magi arrived several days, weeks, or even months after Jesusâ birth, the fact that a house was available to Mary in Bethlehem suggests that Jesus was probably born in similar circumstances, surrounded by friends and family. But what about Lukeâs language that Jesus was âlaid in a manger, because there was no room for them in the innâ (2:7)? The word âinn,â or kataluma in Greek, as Luke uses it, does not suggest what we think of as ...