1 An Introduction to Entrepreneurial Community Development
Michael W-P Fortunato and Morgan R. Clevenger
Entrepreneurship is a global phenomenonâa human behavioral process that can be observed across cultures, across geopolitical regions, and across vastly different kinds of people. While often lumped together into a singular grouping, entrepreneurs comprise a diverse group of human beingsâas diverse as the many ventures they create (Davidsson, 2009; Gartner, 1985)âfrom cutting-edge, high-tech blockbuster entrepreneurs who launch paradigm-changing products and services to lifestyle entrepreneurs who enrich their communities by sharing their passions as well as from serialpreneurs strategically launching whole portfolios of companies to the accidental entrepreneur who creates something new only to find that âsurprise!â someone is willing to pay for it! Entrepreneurship is a phenomenon that both delights and puzzles scholars and economic development practitioners. For anyone who cares about novelty, innovation, new offerings, product improvements, innovative services, solutions to common problems, and just plain old convenience, entrepreneurship represents the power to harness real resources and talent behind the spirit of ideation and the pursuit of opportunityâall while bearing the risk of financial, professional, and reputational loss. Schumpeter (1934) was the first economist to recognize the cyclical, chaotic, sometimes brutal world of entrepreneurship, defining entrepreneurs as the creative destroyers who shatter old markets in favor of newer, more innovative and relevant markets. A true pioneer of entrepreneurship scholarship, Schumpeter (1934) did more to clarify the role of the entrepreneur than any other single scholar of his time.
The story of entrepreneurship feels like a heroâs tale (Lichtenstein & Lyons, 2010) through which a brave protagonist conquers impossible odds and great perils to solve the worldâs most pressing problems, or to provide value and relief to the masses. The tale revolves around the individualâs struggle to seek opportunity at all cost and, using some ingenuity, the ability to find and reallocate resources strategically to exploit the opportunity (Shane, 2003). The âheroâs taleâ may at least partially explain why entrepreneurship is such an alluring topic for so many, and why entrepreneurial success stories frequently dominate Western media, and increasingly, global business school curricula in colleges and universities.
Entrepreneurship is fundamental to the cultural history of many nations, particularly the United States, beginning with early settlers and founding fathers (Richards & Bulkley, 2007), and later championed by immigrant classes as well (Light & Bonacich, 1991; Portes, Guarnizo, & Haller, 2002; Saxenian, 2002). Many immigrants are among the most risk-tolerant of their peers, leaving familiar surroundings with few belongings to prosper in an unknown land. Thanks to its strengthening legal protections, its burgeoning urban environments, its rich resource base, and openness to immigration, America has thus become a self-selection experiment attracting hardier risk takers from around the world, and thrusting them into an environment that embraces capitalism, self-reliance, and innovation. It is hard to imagine the course of the United Statesâ social and economic trajectory without some of the classic innovations that have emerged since the early Industrial Revolution.
This spirit has spread to other nations as well, and self-employment has long represented the most basic, historical way that individuals would bring their talents and resources to the marketplace (Aronson, 1991). Even as of this writing, âCountries such as Hungary, Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Sweden, Israel, and Italy all have higher startup rates than America doesâ (Clifton & Badal, 2014, p. 11). In developing nations across the world, entrepreneurship is increasingly seen as a path to collective prosperity and opportunities for entrepreneurship appear to be rising (Ho & Wong, 2007; NaudĂ©, 2013). Given the importance of entrepreneurs historically and globally, it is little wonder why successful entrepreneurs receive such positive attention today.
Much deeper than the âheroismâ of entrepreneuring, there is a more layered storyâone where the hero does not always win, where excellent ideas can flounder if the conditions are poor, and where life-cycle phases of launch, growth, maturity, and decline continuously refresh and rejuvenate the economyâoften at the cost of an entrepreneurial venture failing along the way. Few people who launch businesses rise to any level of notoriety or stardom, and for many peopleâespecially in developing economiesânecessity-driven entrepreneurship can be the only real option for making a living (Bosma & Levie, 2009). Without entrepreneurs, whole economies would surely fail, starved by the domination of large bureaucracies, unsolved societal problems, and a lack of innovative progress. Research illustrates that everything from start-up rates to failure rates, high-growth to low-growth businesses, opportunistic serial ventures to the harsh realities of necessity-oriented entrepreneurship, all vary widely from place to place (see Kelley, Singer, & Herrington, 2016 for a global perspective). The reasons for these variations are broad, ranging from differences in laws, rules, cultural norms, the nature of the marketplace, access to capital and critical infrastructure, access to key markets, beliefs about the future, the ease of starting a business, and corruption and lawfulness to name a few (Kelley et al., 2016). It can be said that place, and the environmental context in which entrepreneurship occurs, is in many ways just as important as the actions of entrepreneurs themselves. In the end, it is entrepreneurs who start businesses, but the social, environmental, economic, and institutional framework of places can fundamentally influence the likelihood of entrepreneurial success or failure for entire societies.
Moreover, these individualistic, heroic entrepreneurs rarely, if ever, act alone in their journey. They are often times supported by their family, their business partners, teams, and perhaps most of all, their community. In the world of business and economics, a key feature of âplacesâ that is often overlooked in favor of an examination of market conditions is culture. There is a substantive literature on the impacts of national culture on phenomena like entrepreneurship, but a far lesser focus on the culture of localities and regions (Breazeale, Fortunato, Allen, Hustedde, & Pushkarskaya, 2015; Hustedde, 2007). At a far more localized level than nations, the unique culture of communities, based on the attributes of the local society and the unique history of place, can equally impact entrepreneurial outcomes. Wilkinson (1991) notes that, beyond the family, a personâs community is his or her first introduction to society. It follows that the norms, mores, and traditions of these communities can strongly influence the entrepreneurial spirit at a local level, and the propensity of would-be entrepreneurs to launch a venture in the first place. Along with the specific culture and history of place, local leaders from both the public and private sector often serve as the standard-bearers of the local culture. They are frequently members of influential local organizations and are especially well positioned to create pathways to entrepreneurship, or divert attention and resources away from entrepreneurs toward other projects perceived to be more valuable. The nexus between culture, history, and leadership is a recurring theme throughout this book. The analyses presented here will help to illustrate why two neighboring towns or counties with so much in common can have very different entrepreneurship and self-employment rates as a result of dynamic forces at this nexus.
All of these concepts matter to the extent that they can influence the actions or inactions of potential and existing entrepreneurs. The deliberate cultivation of a community that fosters entrepreneurial action through a supportive culture and effective local and regional leadership is this bookâs definition of entrepreneurial community development. It is a complicated term, mostly because it consists of ideas that have a multitude of definitions, conceptualizations, and interpretations that have different meanings in different fields. Entrepreneur, community, and development are ideas that are in transformation as many disciplines seek to unpack what it means to be an entrepreneur, what it means to live and work in a community, and what constitutes development and why it matters. As one author states, âEntrepreneurship remains a complex and multidimensional research objectâ (Fayolle, 2014, p. 1), but this is well established in the literature. What is less well established is how anyoneâfrom entrepreneurs to economic development professionals to researchers to local leadersâcan encourage individualistic entrepreneurs to reap the benefits of working collaboratively. These interactions (among individuals and organizations) only become more complicated as âcollaborationâ moves to âcommunity,â which includes many actors who are not entrepreneurs, but who can play a fundamental role in supporting entrepreneurship.
The book uses the term community often, but this is not a term to be taken lightly. It is not only just a collection of people nor a geographic place where people live and work. According to Theodori (2005), a community has (1) a geographic dimension (i.e., a locality), (2) human life dimension (i.e., people living there), and (3) relatively complete organization (i.e., institutions and patterns of behavior that cover the broad range of human interests) (p. 663). âEach feature is a necessary but not sufficient condition for communityâ (Theodori, 2005, p. 663), which positions community as a variable, rather than a constant. There are varying degrees to which community is present at any time, and this consideration is equally true for communities of entrepreneurs. Communities are dynamic, not static. While some elements of an effective community may be present at one time, these elements may not be sufficient to provide adequate support for entrepreneurship. Similarly, any of the social actors within a community are equally capable of creating barriers to entrepreneurship as they are supports: something that Honig and Dana (2008) call communities of disentrepreneurship. The culture and leadership found within communities, whose influence proliferates through human interaction in a particular geographic place, provides an important mechanism for understanding how communities of heightened entrepreneurship evolve over time.
This book, therefore, has three central themes. First, the book elevates the importance of community in understanding entrepreneurial action, and specifically how culture and leadership within the community contribute to experienced entrepreneurial outcomes in real places. Second, the book seeks to move beyond static models of the community toward increasingly dynamic models that evolve over time. The book uses the term ecosystem to describe evolutionary processes of entrepreneurship developmentâan idea covered extensively in Chapter 3. Finally, the book is purposive. The ideas presented here are intended to be used by practitioners and applied researchers alike. The book seeks to uncover better ways to study entrepreneurs in a community environment and to understand better the nexus between entrepreneurs and their communities. It also draws from these ideas to present relevant, actionable strategies that anyone can use to support entrepreneurship locally, focusing on ways to leap over common cultural and leadership barriers that impede entrepreneurial action.
The themes explored in this book thus revolve around two major research and practice questions. First, if entrepreneurship rates, and the rates of entrepreneurial success, vary from place to place, what does the community contribute to this variability? Second, can the cultural and leadership dynamics of a community enhance or inhibit entrepreneurship, and if so, how can a more supportive culture and leadership style be cultivated over time?
The concepts presented emphasize multidisciplinary dimensions and a historical context perspective, with an encouragement for more researchâparticularly qualitative sharing the essence of lived experiences. In looking at levels of analysis for entrepreneurship, much has been studied at the individual, firm, national, and global levels. The unit of analysisâand admittedly most complexâis that of the community level, thus entrepreneurial communities. This topic is understudied. This book expands on the knowledge of entrepreneurial community development.
Chapter Descriptions
The chapters of this book present thinking by established scholars and practitioners with expertise in their given professions on the topic of how communities can support entrepreneurship at a local and regional level. These chapters examine different dimensions of entrepreneurship development, from entrepreneurial leadership and psychology to theoretical frameworks for understanding and examining entrepreneurial communities. In the final chapter, Chapter 10, the editors explore a reflection on the content of the book, provide opportunities for additional ideas, set forth future research directions, and summarize the entrepreneurial community development discussion. In each chapter, extra attention is given to ensure that the discussion informs both research and practice simultaneously, and recognizes the promise of a development practice informed by research, and research informed by development practice (see Flyvbjerg, 2001; Schön, 1983). Provided here is brief synopsis of each chapter.
Chapter 2: Perceptions of Entrepreneurs and Community: From Historical Roots to a Contemporary Kaleidoscope
Chapter 2 creates a backdrop for the bookâs focus on entrepreneurs and communities and examines the entrepreneur and the community in a modern context. The chapter integrates across definitions and reviews concepts that will be used throughout the rest of the book. The chapter moves beyond the view of the entrepreneur as an âagentâ working in a contextual âenvironment.â It more soundly presents the community as a group of co-actors (i.e., both individuals and organizations) with the power to enhanceâor inhibitâthe ability of the entrepreneur to succeed, right down to his or her choice to launch a business in the first place. The community is thus a field of action from which leaders and champions can emerge, including those that place a very high or low value on entrepreneurial action.
Chapter 3: Models of Entrepreneurial Community and Ecosystem Development
Chapter 3 offers a review of the literature on four frameworks that describe the contextual environment in which entrepreneurs operate: facilitating conditions, national and regional policy, entrepreneurial communities, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. The chapter integrates across the current literature, comparing and contrasting these diverse models and highlighting the contributions (and gaps) of major studies within each framework category. This integration creates a starting point for understanding which ingredients, processes, and approaches are useful for studying and/or launching an entrepreneurial community, and strengthening the local environment for entrepreneurship. The chapter ends by clarifying the role of culture and leadership within each framework and why this matters for entrepreneurship development.
Chapter 4: Understanding the Impact of Culture in Entrepreneurship
Chapter 4 describes the current research at the nexus of entrepreneurship and placeâotherwise referred to as âentrepreneurial geographies,â with a focus on an often hidden aspect of this contextual dimension: culture. The contours of this area of scholarship are highlighted, drawing out the main insight...