1.1 What is this book about?
Finland and the Finnish school system have aroused worldwide interest since Finnish studentsâ success in international student comparisons (e.g., Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA) (Lavonen & Laaksonen, 2009; VĂ€lijĂ€rvi, 2014; VĂ€lijĂ€rvi et al., 2007). One reason behind the success is the Finnish research-based teacher training (e.g., Jakku-Sihvonen & Niemi, 2006) and continuous interest in studentsâ success and well-being (e.g., Howell, 2009; Salmela & Uusiautti, 2015). Recently, Finnish university education was also noticed in the news when comparing graduates from different countries (OECD, 2016). It turned out that when, for example, comparing graduatesâ literacy skills, none of the countries (e.g., Japan and Finland) in the top places made much of an appearance in conventional university rankings (see BBC News, October 20, 2016).
Finlandâs education system is based on the idea of equal access to every level of education (e.g., Rinne, Kivirauma, & Simola, 2002). Finnish university education is free for every Finnish student who passes the application tests. Basically, the same success expectations concern university students, too, but at the university level, the changing world has also changed the elements of success because prompt study processes and high levels of graduation have become a lifeline for universities not only in Finland but also across the world. Teachers and students have to struggle between these demands and expectations amongst which high-quality learning and profound studying can even take a backseat (cf., FitzSimmons, 2014). Educators have asked how to have students pass courses quicker and more efficiently while still taking care of their well-being. This book provides research-based answers to these questions.
According to positive psychological understanding, satisfaction and well-being are important factors of efficient graduation and quality outcomes in studies regardless of education level (Langford et al., 2014; Pajares, 2001; Seligman et al., 2009). Therefore, universities should be worried about studentsâ satisfaction and pay attention to their perceptions of the elements in education that enhance or hinder their study success. These phenomena are discussed in The Psychology of Study Success in Universities. The book provides a multidimensional picture of the student-related factors and teaching that may best enhance study success. The book gives voice to both graduate students and PhD students from Finland and compares findings in the light of international well-being theories and studies on university-level study success.
By âsuccess in studiesâ, we refer to a two-dimensional process that consists of the fluent study process during which students flourish, study in a balanced manner, get support, and show high levels of well-being and of successful study outcomes, that is, good grades, fast graduation, and satisfaction with studies. The theoretical foundation of the book is based on positive psychological theories and research, and thus the book offers quite a wide introduction of international studies in the field. The themes in the book are also discussed from the practical perspective through various student data from Finland. The purpose is to provide an extensive analysis on study success in universities for researchers, teachers, educators, professors, and other academics primarily. This kind of book will be interesting for postgraduate students, too, who are performing their doctoral studies; they are future researchers in the field.
The Psychology of Study Success in Universities focuses first on students and their resources â what inspires them in studies, what slows down their study processes, and what kinds of experiences they have on successful studies. Similarly, success in university studies sets great expectations to university teachersâ and lecturersâ teaching and supervision work. However, teaching in universities is quite concrete, and studentsâ hopes are very practical as well. Good teaching and successful study processes are secured by immediate and caring interaction, flexible and student-centred teaching and supervision, and interdisciplinary collaboration among teachers. Finally, the book describes study success as a multidimensional concept that covers successful outcomes and a successful study process as well. The latter refers to important well-being elements in the academic community that are frequently put aside when outlining new plans of efficiency.
Although the research data the book is based on have been obtained in Finland, the findings and general discussion are relevant to researchers, teachers, and students everywhere. Study success is important, and the fundamental resources from the positive psychological viewpoint are somewhat universal. However, the book is interesting also because student mobility is greater than ever, and universities get more and more students from, for example, Africa, Asia, India, and South America. These students, too, need information about the nature of university studies in general, including their demandingness and effort. It is important to provide new research-based, innovative ideas of how to be successful â not just in undergraduate but also in doctoral studies.
The book is divided into parts with approximately three chapters. The chapters following the Introduction provide their own perspective on the phenomenon of study success. They are wide and profound explorations into the success factors first from the studentsâ perspective followed by teaching and teachersâ perspective. The final chapter then illustrates the phenomenon in general.
The Introduction introduces the current productivity expectations of graduations and study processes in universities today. The introductory part also provides a discussion of the bookâs distinctive contribution. In addition, it highlights the demands sets on university teaching, also providing the teachersâ viewpoint. Because the purpose of the book is to discuss success in studies, the Introduction also includes the basic definition of positive psychological approach in the book. How is well-being in students and teachers connected with success, and why is it important to discuss them simultaneously? In addition, the Introduction contains introductions of the studies, data, and data analyses on which the book is based.
The second part discusses study success from the student perspective. It answers questions of what successful, fast-graduating masters are made of, how students perceive the smoothness of their study processes, and what kinds of factors may slow down their progress and hinder success in studies. To develop university education, it is crucial to hear studentsâ voices and know what exactly they appreciate and, on the other hand, would like to develop in university studies. The first chapter highlights the success factors in mastersâ studies, and the second chapter complements the discussion with PhD studentsâ viewpoints. Finally, the third chapter summarises special resources that university students need during their studies to get good grades and maintain their personal well-being.
The third part introduces success in university studies from teachersâ viewpoints. It continues the theme from the Introduction by explaining how the approach of caring teacherhood may enhance both studentsâ study success and teachersâ well-being. The first chapter discusses the elements of caring teacherhood in general. The second chapter introduces viewpoints to positive teaching as well as caring online teaching practices. After that, the resources of supervision of mastersâ and PhD theses by focusing on the description of the nodes and strides of successful supervision are introduced. How to provide critical but encouraging feedback during the supervision process and how to support students with diverging motivation to complete their theses successfully? Among others, these are the questions this part answers. Finally, the last chapter in Part 3 points out the invaluable resource of teachersâ and professorsâ collaboration, caring atmosphere, and mutual support that make the cornerstone of a healthy academic community with high levels of well-being â and that reflects on the studentsâ well-being as well.
The fourth part concludes the book by highlighting the key points that connect success and well-being in university studies. The first chapter explains the meaning of engagement and optimism â how they both are needed to persevere in studies and to reach the valuable achievement of graduation and how their emergence in students can be supported by the university community. The second chapter continues by discussing the meaning of love for learning and how this positive state or attitude to studies can become not only an important success factor but also enhance well-being. The last chapter introduces the concept of study success as a two-dimensional phenomenon. On the one hand, success is about the outcomes â passing courses, high grades, and finally graduation â but on the other hand, and as the earlier parts of the book have shown, it is also about the study process. The final argument is, therefore, that there cannot be true success in studies without a smooth, caring study process in which well-being is appreciated as much as the numeric goals of the student; teachers; and, in the end, the university as well.
1.2 The expectation of success and prompt graduation
Today, efficiency requirements and productivity expectations have a great influence on studies in colleges and universities. More and more doctors are graduating, and basic degrees, such as masterâs degrees, should be performed faster. Universities are expected to take action to enhance fast graduation (Carter & House II, 2010; Ensigna, 2010). Apparently, the governments would like to see the youth applying for studies fast, making their decisions about study places quickly, and performing their studies promptly and thus entering the work market as young as possible (Pennington, 2004).
On the other hand, requirements of more and more efficient use of teaching resources and large study groups can make university studies more difficult (Kokkelenberg, Dillon, & Christy, 2008). Resources should be secured and calculated so that students can design their own individualized study plans. Or is the number of students the deciding factor (Bedard & Kuhn, 2008)?
How can the smoothness of university studies be enhanced from the studentsâ point of view? University teachers and curricula have an important role in this process but, eventually, the demands are targeted at students themselves. They should be able to finish their studies quickly yet with high scores.
Universities do have various programs to support studentsâ progress (Glocker, 2011; Groen, Jakubson, Ehrenberg, Condie, & Liu, 2008; Nutting, 2014). The efficiency of these programs has also been evaluated in studies (Ward & Vargas, 2011). Indeed, more attention has been paid to, for example, student tutoring (Elbaum, Vaughn, Tejero Hughes, & Watson Moody, 2000; Graesser, Chipman, Haynes, & Olney, 2005; MÀÀttĂ€, 2012, 2015). Although university lecturersâ and professorsâ work focuses on research, from the studentsâ perspective, quality teaching that is based on research is fundamental to the success of their study paths (Parker, 2008). Likewise, teachers learn, too, constantly when teaching and lecturing and supporting studentsâ studies (Gibbs & Coffey, 2004). Actually, teachers may have the determining role in the smoothness of university studies (Bambrick-Santoya, 2014; Bell & Robinson, 2004; Lee & Cho, 2014; Uusiautti & MÀÀttĂ€, 2013a).
Numerous studies have outlined the features of teaching that enhance the smoothness of studentsâ studies the best (DePillis & Johnson, 2015; Uusiautti & MÀÀttĂ€, 2013b; ĂĂ€relĂ€, MÀÀttĂ€, & Uusiautti, 2016). Research has focused on, for example, the importance of a positive study atmosphere (Shahidi & Sobhani, 2015), the level of face-to-face teaching (Symonds, 2014), the supervision of masterâs theses (Chongyi, 2004), the significance of the first study year (Keup & Barefoot, 2005; Schellenberg & Bailis, 2015), and the level of interaction between the teaching personnel and students (Bowman & Akcaoglu, 2014; MÀÀttĂ€, 2015). Study evaluation practices are also important and can promote learning and increase motivation if evaluations are constructive (GonzĂĄlez, Jareño, & LĂłpez, 2015).
Furthermore, peer evaluations and peer support can enhance studies (e.g., Hamer, Purchase, Luxton-Reilly, & Denny, 2015; Ludemann & McMakin, 2014; Wierstra, Kanselaar, Van Der Linden, & Lodeewijks, 1999; Topping, 1998) when we realize that the criticism and evaluations do not have to be crippling (Woodward-Kron, 2002). Writing skills development is crucial for study success (Butler & Britt, 2011; Cho, Schunn, & Charney, 2006; MÀÀttÀ, 2012). Naturally, multiform teaching and digitalization have provided new means to make studying even more efficient (e.g., Blocher, De Montes, Willis, & Tucker, 2002; Gillani & Eynon, 2014; Hannan, 2005; Howland & Wedman, 2004; Ramos et al., 2015). In all, it is important to make teaching more varied and multiform (Cheng, 2011).
Often, students are expected to perform more and better, which means that the idea of good learning can be shadowed by criticism (Stellmack, Keenan, Sandidge, Sippl, & Konheim-Kalkstein, 2012). Studentsâ motivation becomes tested (Reiss, 2012), which can result in their dropping out of education (Cortes, Mostert, & Els, 2014; Stratton, OâToole, & Wetzel,...