Chapter 1
Artemia Molecular Genetics
Roberto Marco, Rafael Garesse, JesĂșs Cruces, and Jaime Renart
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
II. Advantages and Problems of the Artemia System
III. The Genome of Artemia
A. Highly Repeated DNA
B. Intermediately Repeated DNA
1. Ribosomal RNA Genes
2. The 5S RNA-Histone Gene Complex
C. Single Copy DNA
IV. The Genomic Organization of Artemia Mitochondrial DNA
V. DNA Replication, Modification, and Repair
VI. Transcription
VII. Perspectives of Artemia Molecular Genetics
Acknowledgments
References
I. Introduction
Recombinant DNA techniques have made possible the current explosion in the field of molecular genetics.1 The studies of the sixties and early seventies, based primarily on reassociation kinetic analyses, have been superseded by the study of individual genes that can now be isolated, amplified, and manipulated in such ways that a multitude of specific questions can be addressed. The recombinant DNA revolution has also overcome problems such as scarcity of biological materials and the difficulties of in vivo labeling of nucleic acids, etc.
Although the study of Artemia molecular genetics is in early development, several reasons justify its interest. The molecular mechanisms underlying the specific properties and adaptations of Artemia can now be undertaken, such as its capabilities of surviving in extreme environments (e.g., high salt or abnormal pH) or the genetic and molecular aspects of its development. The dissociation between DNA replication and cell division from the onset of cell differentiation and morphogenesis provides an unusual situation in developing organisms. It can be understood as an extreme case of the âmidblastula transitionâ2 that normally takes place while cleavage is going on at full pace. The embryo can be easily induced to resume development and the induction of enzymatic activities or specific mRNAs can be followed with a good reference stage, namely, the encysted early gastrula in which replication, transcription, and translation are completely turned off. (See References 3â5 for previous data on the molecular biology of Artemia.)
Artemia molecular genetics can fill a gap in evolutionary and comparative biology. Crustacea have not been as extensively studied as other arthropods such as the insect Drosophila melanogaster. In this respect it is interesting to compare the sequence data available from different groups of living organisms (Table 1). The distribution is bimodal with mammals as the best studied group (5686 sequences, 6.4 Ă 106 nucleotides, 31% of the total) and bacteria (especially E. coli) as the other peak. Among invertebrates, crustaceans represent only 0.02% of the sequences (with 0.01% for Artemia). Insects, and more particularly, Drosophila have been the more extensively investigated invertebrates. The present situation of Artemia is similar to that of Arabidopsis, a plant system that has been presented as an ideal system representative of higher plants.6
Many noninsect invertebrate organisms have been occasionally studied, with nematodes and sea urchins as the best examples. For other classes of arthropods, crustaceans are not well represented, but even less are Chelicerata (0.001% of sequences in the Genebank). The evolutionary distance among these groups is quite large and comparative studies in molecular genetics will help to establish their relationships. In fact, sequence data from a primitive crustacean, such as Artemia, can help to complete the phylogenetic landscape from lower eukaryotes, (e.g., protozoa and fungi), through lower invertebrates (e.g., C. elegans), to the higher invertebrates (e.g., arthropods).
The importance of integrating information obtained from different biological systems using different experimental approaches is increasingly recognized.7 Studying the molecular biology and genetics, the biochemistry and cell biology, and the physiology and development of a particular type of organism in an integrated form and in comparison with other organisms is fundamental in understanding biological diversity. From a molecular point of view, Artemia is the best known crustacean and one of the best known aquatic organisms; thus, it can become the paradigmatic crustacean, a kind of aquatic Drosophila.
The widespread use of Artemia for aquaculture8 further increases the need for basic research on the genus, including genetic manipulation and engineering.
In this review we present the current state of the molecular knowledge of the Artemia genome. We summarize what is known about Artemia nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences and the key processes of replication and transcription. This information is discussed in the light of what it is known in other animal organisms, and will serve in a final section to discuss the perspectives about the future of research in this genus.
TABLE 1
Distribution of Sequences in Genbanka
II. Advantages and Problems of the Artemia System
Artemia presents advantages and disadvantages as an experimental system. The advantages are commercial availability, low cost of the cysts, possibility to synchronize larvae (nauplii) in the laboratory, and a relatively extensive knowledge of the organismâs biochemistry.
The major drawback for the use of Artemia in biochemical and molecular studies is the difficulty in culturing large quantities of particular life cycle stages, including germ cells, early and nondiapausing embryos, nauplii, and adults. Commercial suppliers have also not paid enough attention until recently to the genetic identity of their cysts, which sometimes are not even homogeneous.* Another disadvantage is the relative underdevelopment of classical genetic studies. The high chromosome number and variability of Artemia,9 and the logistical problems involved in keeping separate lines alive complicate the genetic manipulation and use of classical genetic techniques, although cysts can provide a simple and inexpensive way of maintaining stocks. In conclusion, although classical genetic studies are possible, the current level is rather primitive compared to other invertebrate systems, such as Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans.
Molecular work with Artemia encounters several methodological problems. The impermeability of cysts, the particulate-feeding of nauplii and adults, and the difficulty of rearing large amounts in axenic cultures leads to inefficient in vivo labeling of nucleic acids to specific activities suitable for many experiments. Proteins have been labeled in vivo (see, for instance, References 10â12), but specific activities are low. Furthermore, it is an organism with relatively high amounts of DNA per cell (approximately half that of humans), making it more expensive and tedious than most for screening procedures using molecular techniques. Another problem is the difficulty in obtaining purified nuclei fro...