This is a test
- 256 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
The Environmental Tradition in English Literature
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Drawing upon the English literary tradition for new perspectives and paradigms, this collection presents a broad range of theoretical and historical approaches to ecocriticism. The first section of the volume offers different theoretical frameworks for ecocritical work, encompassing a range of socio-political, post-modern and multi-disciplinary approaches. In the second section, contributors explore the ways in which ecocriticism allows us to re-think literary history.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access The Environmental Tradition in English Literature by John Parham in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & Literary Criticism for Comparative Literature. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
PART ONE
Theoretical Approaches
Chapter 1
After Organic Communityâ: Ecocriticism, Nature, and Human Nature1
Tensions in ecological thinking between âdeep greenâ and âanthropocentricâ approaches, and between âred-greenâ and âneither left nor rightâ politics, make it impossible to speak as if there were a single green perspective. Is the green project primarily a cultural initiative, seeking to develop a fuller awareness of ânatureâ in the belief that our eco-destructive ways are to be imputed to our impoverished environmental consciousness? Or is it a critique of political economy, rejecting on ecological grounds the âPrometheanâ and productivist aspects of socialism, but arguing that a sustainable society will have to be a non-capitalist society? Green politics is the place where these two perspectives collide, and may perhaps coalesce.2
Analogous tensions arise in critical approaches to representations of the natural world. Critics may see art as a means to deepen our apprehension of ânatureâ; or they may emphasize how ânatureâ, as discursive term or as material space and place, is always implicated in social relations. The first ânature-endorsingâ approach will take texts at their own valuation as records of landscapes and natural processes, seeing in this their relevance for what Lawrence Buell calls âenvironmentalist praxisâ.3 Critics of a more ânature-scepticalâ turn will interrogate the uses to which ânatureâ is being put in the text: what kinds of social relations, what differentiations between subjects, they will ask, are being proposed here?4
Raymond Williams, who always foregrounded social and economic questions when he wrote of ânatureâ, may well be seen as the first British Ă«cocritic, given the central importance in his work of The Country and the City and the sympathy for ecopolitics evident in his late (1983) book Towards 2000 (discussed below by Dominic Head in chapter 2). Ecocritics in the United States, focused more on âwildernessâ than on the populated rural landscape, and indifferent or hostile to the Marxist influences that have been so important in British cultural and literary studies, may perhaps stay mainly on the ânature-endorsingâ path which it would seem that most of them have followed up till now.
However, no one, in Britain or in North America, will regard themselves as an âecocriticâ unless they feel some sense of the power of the best writing about nature to delight and instruct. Here, I argue that ecocriticism should accommodate both this immediate response, and the more deconstructive analysis which may complicate its pleasures by locating them within a divided culture. I shall insist upon the social construction of human aesthetic sensibilities. However, this must not be taken to deny the materiality of the natural world to which we may be educated to respond. To be sure, nature can only ever be represented discursively â in art and science, philosophy and criticism â but nature writing in its various kinds is a record of what cannot be entirely reduced to the discourses of culture. We need a critical map that will respect these distinct levels: material nature, cultural discourses and interventions, and the social relations which partly determine these cultural forms. Arguing for and trying to exemplify this approach, I begin with Wordsworth, and two of his critics; I end with Hardy; in-between, I consider the LeaviĆĄite ideal of Organic communityâ. (My discussions are necessarily succinct and allusive, and I make no pretence of engaging with the specialist literature on any of these authors here.) My contention, in the chapter as a whole, is that ecocriticism, like green politics, must be centrally concerned with the historical development of âhuman natureâ!
âTintern Abbeyâ and the Kendal and Windermere Railway
For thou art with me, here, upon the banks
Of this fair river; thpu, my dearest friend,
My dear, dear Friend; and in thy voice I catch
The language of my former heart, and read
My former pleasures in the shooting lights
Of thy wild eyes. Oh! yet a little while
May I behold in thee what I was once,
My dear, dear Sister! ...
Therefore let the moon
Shine on thee in thy solitary walk;
And let the misty mountain winds be free
To blow against thee: and in after years,
When these wild ecstasies shall be matured
Into a sober pleasure, when thy mind
Shall be a mansion for all lovely forms,
Thy memory be as a dwelling-place
For all sweet sounds and harmonies; Oh! then,
If solitude, or fear, or pain, or grief
Should be thy portion, with what healing thoughts
Of tender joy wilt thou remember me
And these my exhortations!
(Wordsworth, from âTintern Abbeyâ)
[A] vivid perception of romantic scenery is neither inherent in mankind, nor a necessary consequence of even a comprehensive education. It is benignly ordained that green fields, clear blue skies ... and all the ordinary varieties of rural nature, should find an easy way to the affections of all men ... But a taste beyond this, however desirable it may be that every one should possess it, is not to be implanted at once; it must be gradually developed both in nations and individuals. Rocks and mountains, torrents and wide-spread waters, and all those features of nature which go to the composition of such scenes as this part of England is distinguished for, cannot, in their finer relations to the human mind, be comprehended, or even very imperfectly conceived, without processes of culture or opportunities of observation in some degree habitual.
(Wordsworth, Letter on the Kendal and Windermere Railway)5
Wordsworthâs poetry celebrates the power of nature to uplift, redeem, and console. His work as a whole suggests, while it also seems sometimes to deny, that a capacity to love and learn from nature is a special rather than a general disposition. In the poems, we encounter figures such as the leech gatherer of âResolution and Independenceâ who are seen as immanent within nature. The poet may present himself as lacking something that they possess, in their less complex and troubled being. However, his difference from such figures is what endows him with the capacity to meditate on his own responses, in terms shared with his educated readers. The distinction, as John Barrell puts it, is between âthe language produced by a subject who remains (it is imagined) undifferentiated from nature, and the language spoken by a subject who is imagined to have achieved an identity fully differentiated from itâ.6 In âTintern Abbeyâ (Barrell goes on to argue, in his rather relentlessly forensic reading), the speakerâs identity as a reflective poet is bound up with his status as a âpolite maleâ: he gestures towards the idea that his sister Dorothy will move, as he has done, from ecstatic, wild-eyed pleasure to a pleasure that is deeper and more contemplative, but in fact he is reassured by her position midway below him on the ladder that leads up from ânatureâ to âhis own articulate and artificial languageâ.
When, late in his life, Wordsworth attacked the proposal to build a railway joining Kendal and Windermere, he notoriously insisted that âartisans, and labourers, and the humbler classes of shopkeepersâ possessed little capacity to appreciate the beauties of the Lakes. Such people should not be tempted, by the building of the proposed line, to âramble to a distanceâ and admire those beauties. Rather, they should stay near home, where âupon a holiday, or on the Sunday, after having attended divine worship, they [may] make little excursions with their wives and children among neighbouring fieldsâ.7 Jonathan Bate, discussing Wordsworthâs position in Romantic Ecology, tries to counter the view that he is guilty of âa selfish desire to keep away artisan day trippers from Manchesterâ. Wordsworthâs objection, says Bate, is to what we now call âmass tourismâ; the poet argues that if the factory owners would âconsent to a Ten Hoursâ Bill, with little or, if possible, no diminution of wagesâ, then âthe mind [of the workers] will develope itself accordinglyâ. Rather than wishing to be â[packed] off ... for holiday entertainmentâ, these more âdevelopedâ individuals would then choose their own âexcursionsâ.8
Indeed Wordsworth does not state that there are fixed natural differences which manifest themselves in differential responses to nature. He says that a certain responsiveness to nature is acquired over time, âin nations and individualsâ9: it is, as we say today, culturally formed. This accords with the Kantian view that âa high degree of culture is requisite to the experience of this feeling [of the sublime]. Man must have a capacity for ideas, particularly for moral ideasâ.10 However, cultural tastes that may in the future be generally acquired can have, meanwhile, an exclusionary aspect; even â so Barrell suggests â a deliberately exclusionary function.11 If Manchester artisans, and by implication the urban working and lower middle class generally, need a long apprenticeship before they will be able properly to value natural scenes, then for the moment, lacking due preparation, they should stay near home.
In his autobiographical poetry, however, Wordsworth generally presents his own moral and aesthetic formation as the consequence of a direct sensuous encounter with nature. Above Tintern Abbey, wonderfully evoking the memory of such an encounter, he does not record that it was doubtless the well-established reputation of the valley among middle-class âpicturesque touristsâ which first brought him to the banks of the Wye.12 Rather, in the poemâs unfolding, his delight in nature is presented as having developed through memory and reflection, but without any formal cultural mediation, into a âsense sublime / Of something far more deeply interfusâdâ. In The Prelude, where the formative influences of literature are acknowledged, unmediated Nature nonetheless remains both the most potent and the most beneficent teacher. The child deprived of the âplaythingsâ provided by âold grandame Earthâ, and educated on literary and scientific lines, is described as a âmonster birth / Engendered by these too industrious timesâ, a prodigy whose precocious knowingness is ultimately âhollowâ.13 One impulse from a vernal woodâ, so Wordsworth declares in âThe Tables Turnedâ, can be richer in moral instruction than âbooksâ and âsagesâ.14
Claims such as these, deployed rhetorically to insist on the limitations of a purely cerebral education, seem to imply that the impulses that flow from the âvernal woodâ have a universal educative force. However, this is inconsistent with what is said in the sober prose of the âLetterâ. If âprocesses of cultureâ are a necessary preparation for the encounter with ânatureâ, then the subject who appreciates ânatureâ and benefits from its morally formative power is already a certain kind of subject, culturally and socially speaking. What artisans and labourers and humble shopkeepers require for the âdevelopmentâ of their minds is, as Wordsworth acknowledges, hard-won social and economic change, rather than the ministering âPresences of Natureâ which presided over the aesthetic and cultural formation of the already privileged boy who was to grow into the poet.15
Locally in the Lakes and internationally in attempts to promote âecotourismâ, public debate is still focused, for pressing material reasons, on the themes that concerned Wordsworth in his letters: the self-defeating exploitation of scenery for commercial gain, the effects of tourism on local ecologies and economies â and the need to educate tourists. For example, John Urry concludes his recent analysis of the impact of leisure pursuits in the Lake District by doubting whether âmuch will remain of the countrysideâ, anywhere in England, in another hundred years.16 Yet trying to preserve beautiful places is only one, relatively manageable aspect of the environmental task facing affluent societies today. These will survive only if their future economic and social development is âbased not on the expropriation of nature, but on its reconstruction and valorizationâ.17 For Europe, Romanticism is a crucial moment in the development of articulate responses to ânatureâ as a complex material, cultural object; an object of human sentiments and needs, to be apprehended in terms that go beyond its immediate usefulness. Because the capacity to value the non-human environment aesthetically is an important cultural precondition for the development of what Bate calls âan ecological ethicâ, the moment, therefore, of Romanticism rightly remains the focus of successive historical and critical revaluations.18 What I have wanted to suggest in my discussion so far is that the âprocesses of educationâ by which an ecological ethic may or may not be diffused to âeveryoneâ have been overdetermine...
Table of contents
- Cover Page
- The Environmental Tradition in English Literature
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- PART I Theoretical Approaches
- PART 2 Historical Approaches
- Index