Green Jujitsu:
The Smart Way to Embed Sustainability into Your Organisation
Abstract
BUSINESS HAS RECENTLY WOKEN UP to the need to address environmental sustainability in a meaningful way. No longer is it sufficient to have an environmental policy or environmental management system â substantial changes to business practice are required. Culture change is widely regarded as the most vital and the most difficult element of this paradigm shift. The standard methods of âswitch it offâ stickers, awareness presentations and proclamations from the top have proved incapable of delivering the shift in attitudes required. Green Jujitsu is a completely different way of looking at culture change for environmental sustainability. Instead of trying to correct your colleaguesâ perceived âweaknessesâ, it focuses instead on playing to their strengths to get them truly interested and engaged. This principle is applied to the âelephant modelâ of culture change: providing clear guidance, inspiring people emotionally and altering the working environment. These techniques are illustrated with case studies from the authorâs own experience of facilitating culture change on the front line in some of the worldâs leading organisations.
About The Author
GARETH KANE is an internationally recognised environmental and sustainability expert. He has appeared as a media pundit on sustainability issues on, for example, the BBC Six OâClock News, Countryfile, The Politics Show and local radio. In 2008 The Journal newspaper named Gareth as a âRising Star, Future Leaderâ for his work on sustainability. Garethâs consultancy Terra Infirma has a client list including the BBC, BAE Systems plc, Johnson Matthey plc, the NHS and East Coast Mainline. In June 2010 the company was singled out for praise in the press by UK Environment Secretary, the Rt Hon Caroline Spelman MP. Terra Infirmaâs Green Academy online training programme has attracted participants from around the globe â from the USA to New Zealand. Gareth was elected onto Newcastle City Council in 2004. Until 2011, he was deputy Executive Member for Environment and Sustainability which culminated in Newcastle being declared the UKâs most sustainable city by Forum for the Future in 2009 and 2010. He is now opposition spokesman on Sustainability. Gareth is the author of two books on business and sustainability, most recently The Green Executive.
Introduction What Is The Biggest Barrier To Corporate Sustainability?
THIS IS A QUESTION I AM OFTEN ASKED from the floor at speaking engagements. My answer is a little trite but very true: âThe biggest barrier is only six inches wide â itâs the space between our ears.â
The root cause of much unsustainable practice is attitude â lack of priority, busy-ness, ignorance, habit, short-sightedness, despondence, fear, laziness or combinations of the above. Bad attitude seems to get worse exponentially with the size of the business â sustainable energy expert Amory Lovins has said that while âprimitiveâ animals like ants have communities which exhibit intelligence way beyond that of the sum of the individuals, the more humans you group together, the more stupid their combined behaviour1.
When we think about environmental sustainability we tend to envision shiny new technology such as solar panels and electric vehicles. However, it has been estimated that 60â70% of internal environmental improvements are dependent on getting staff to change their behaviour2. When I visit clients it is all too common to see heating and air-conditioning switched on at the same time, hosepipes left running but stuck down a drain, valuable packaged products damaged by forklift trucks and potentially green technologies like teleconferencing facilities gathering dust. And beyond that, more substantial environmental improvements such as redesigning products and greening the supply chain depend on a proper culture of sustainability integrated throughout the organisation.
Changing the culture of an organisation is one of the key management challenges. When it is done correctly, the results can be dramatic. The uptake of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Japan has led to the country leading in the motor vehicle and photographic/optical equipment sectors, despite having no natural resources and very high labour costs. One of the key planks of TQM is that quality becomes everyoneâs responsibility â it needs to be embedded into the organisation.
FIGURE 1. Sustainability maturity model.
Figure 1 shows my sustainability maturity model for organisations. The stages are largely self-explanatory and the challenge for most organisations is to make the leap from the âManagement Systemsâ level, where environmental issues are âmanagedâ in a green silo, up to âTotal Sustainabilityâ where sustainability is embedded into the organisation.
One of the biggest differences between the top two levels is making sustainability everyoneâs responsibility â just like quality under TQM. This manifests itself in the attitude of employees. I can tell very quickly which businesses âget itâ and which donât by a few conversations with staff members.
However, this is one area where many organisations struggle â culture change is very difficult and many simply try âme-tooâ solutions such as awareness posters and environmental champions without properly thinking through what has to be done. This e-book proposes a smarter way of approaching culture change, bringing people along with you and playing to their strengths rather than trying to browbeat them into submission. There is a parallel here between boxing and jujitsu â in the former you try to overpower your opponent, in the latter you use peopleâs strengths to get them where you want them. We will be considering this analogy in more detail in Chapter 2, but first we will look at problems faced by most conventional environmental sustainability programmes.
Chapter 1
Why Sustainability Programmes Fail
Whatâs the problem?
I DIAGNOSE THE MOST COMMON BARRIERS in environmental sustainability programmes as:
- Lack of leadership: leadership is critical to any successful corporate programme arid a lack of leadership will kill off culture change programmes before they get going.
- A lack of integration: 'green' and 'sustainability' are seen as tangential issues to the mainstream business processes and are thus of secondary importance or someone else's problem.
- A misalignment of responsibility and authority: most environmental managers have lots of responsibility and precious little authority. Conversely, people who have the power to push sustainability are given no responsibility to do so.
- A lack of accountability: environmental performance is leftoutside the performance management system.
- Wishful or limited thinking: 'We've appointed energy champions. Job done.'
- Sloppy company culture in general: I find that the companies who have a poor sustainability culture usually have poor discipline, weak quality standards and messy premises.
- A lack of empowerment: 'It's more than my job's worth to turn that off.'
- Ignorance: 'If I turn up the thermostat, the office will warm more quickly.'
- Inertia: 'We've always designed our products like that,' 'That sound? That's always there. No, we don't check our compressed air system for leaks. Should we?', etc.
- Fear: 'If we try this, who'll get the blame if it goes wrong?'
You will notice that these are predominantly about attitude and culture â very rarely is the real reason money. Northern Foods have saved many millions of pounds in energy and waste costs and they say 60â70% of it was achieved through low or no-cost behavioural changes2.
I say again that the true barrier to sustainability is about six inches wide â the space between our ears. Most of the problems and solutions can be found there.
Why âswitch it offâ doesnât work
The traditional approach to behavioural change has been to slather âswitch it offâ stickers and posters over every switch, wall and machine. If culture change was that easy, you wouldnât be reading this e-book.
I once worked with a company which had A3 posters on sustainability in every hallway and foyer. Each sheet was packed with text on company policy. As an experiment I asked one workshop contingent whether they knew the companyâs definition of sustainability. No-one did. I asked if anyone had read the statement. No-one had. There was nothing in this communication to encourage anyone to read. It was a complete waste of time and effort.
So why doesnât it work?
- The injunctions to act get lost amongst the noise of the multitude of messages we are bombarded with every day.
- People generally resent being hectored and may resist as a reflex reaction.
- There's no explanation of the benefits of this action either to the individual, the business or wider society.
- Familiarity breeds contempt-you soon stop noticing the signs and posters.
- The message is usually uninspiring lifeless and dull.
At best, these programmes are launched because of a lack of imagination. At worst, they are for the ego of the originator rather than the intended audience. A prime suspect is the ubiquitous âPlease consider the impact on the environment before printing this emailâ line in email signature blocks, which is clearly there to say âI think Iâm morally superior to you.â
Institutional inertia
I have already quoted Amory Lovins saying that animals like ants have communities which exhibit intelligence way beyond that of the sum of the individuals, but the more humans you group together, the more stupid the combined behaviour (or words to that effect). As an optimist, I like to think of this phenomenon as âinstitutional inertiaâ rather than group stupidity. My definition of institutional inertia is:
The more people you get together, the harder it is to effect change.
You can see this if you go on holiday with a group of friends and try to decide which restaurant to eat at one evening. The length of time it takes to make the decision and act increases exponentially with the number of people involved. If you are a couple, youâll probably be onto your coffee before a group of eight has sat down.
When you scale this up to the organisational level a huge number of factors kick in: internal politics, factionalism, fear of failure, fear to speak up, fear of standing out, the desire to belong, tradition (aka âthe way itâs done round hereâ), formal and informal hierarchies, etc., etc. â they all add up to considerable inertia.
The challe...