Part 1
Contexts for small-scale research
Learning lives and professional roles
Chapter 1
Approaches to small-scale enquiry and research in primary schools
Kimberly Safford and Roger Hancock
Personal enquiry in professional contexts
The term āaction researchā was coined by Kurt Lewin in 1944. It is a form of enquiry which can involve research with ā rather than āonā ā others. It is now recognised as a significant means of academic and professional development for school staff, and a way of better understanding school routines and practices which may sometimes be taken for granted (see, for example, Shakir-Costa and Haddad, 2009; Taylor et al., 2006). The accounts in this Reader cover a large territory in educational enquiry, but chapters have a clear unifying aspect: they all arise from questions, concerns, puzzles or problems encountered by practitioners who then carried out enquiries āat the chalk faceā in and around school settings to better understand what they practice and experience.
The enquiries gathered here are evidence of the many opportunities practitioners have for investigations into childrenās learning and school life. These opportunities are sometimes because a concern or problem emerges from a specific child or a group of children (Chapter 18 on including children with ADHD in mainstream schools); other enquiries involve collaboration between school staff and outside researchers (Chapter 5 on homeāschool knowledge exchange activities). In other cases, school staff create participatory enquiries, where children and adults work together on shared projects (Chapter 14, What language do you speak at home?). Enquiries can explore the links between childrenās experiences in school and outside school (Chapter 9 on children and television gender roles; Chapter 28 on childrenās online writing). They can examine school practices and effective pedagogies (Chapter 15, Achieving successful homeāschool links with refugees). They may reflect collective aims for professional development (Chapter 17 on including disabled children in school playgrounds) and small steps in understanding one child who frustrates or fascinates (Chapter 20 on individual management plans). All of these focuses for learning ā in and around school, in personal and professional contexts, with groups and individuals ā are opportunities where, through enquiry, adults who work with children can develop what Nancy Martin has called āconscious competence ā a heightened awareness of what you doā.
If I set out to find an answer to some classroom matter, I am a learner; but in engaging in this enquiry, I am initiating a small piece of research: I am both learner and researcher ā two sides of the same coin.
(Nancy Martin 1987: 204)
The small-scale enquiries that we bring together here can be seen as forms of personalised learning which place āthe self in researchā (Conteh et al., 2005). In the same way that we acknowledge different starting points for childrenās development and understanding, enquiry-based learning takes account of adultsā different starting points, histories, careers, roles and learning pathways. Throughout this Reader we suggest the notions of enquiry, investigation or āresearchā therefore have a dual meaning: enquiry into childrenās learning, and enquiry into further adult understanding and learning.
Approaches and methodologies
Stenhouse (1981) defined research as āsystematic enquiry, made publicā. This perspective of what ācountsā as research enables school staff to consider small, even idiosyncratic features of childrenās learning and behaviour. According to Walter Humes of the University of Strathclyde (2001), in small-scale research based on personal and professional experience āmethodological purity is an illusionā. Enquiries need to take place in active, unpredictable places (classrooms and schools) and rely chiefly on observational and behavioural data, particularly language data. They may be seen to lack the rigour of a scientific investigation, of course, but they are not usually set up in ways which endeavour to follow scientific methods. Such investigations usually have a short time frame and must take place within day-to-day routines. Results may not be generalizable or replicable, because small-scale inquiries tend to be studies of single instances or cases; conclusions may be subjective, because data is gathered and evaluated by those who are intimately involved in a particular process or context.
Such research however can contribute significantly to the practice and knowledge of the enquirers and of others within the focus of the study. The ālearner-researcherā role (as Nancy Martin earlier characterised practice-based enquiry) highlights deeply personal as well as professional dimensions of development. Interpretations of data will reflect specific local circumstances and individuals, and are unlikely to make grand claims. In small-scale workplace enquiry, issues of size and subjectivity, validity and reliability are approached and defined differently to what John Furlong of the British Educational Research Association (BERA) characterised as the āBig Scienceā model of research, as Table 1.1 below indicates.
Table 1.1 Differences between personal workplace enquiry and āBig Scienceā researchā
Topic | āBig Scienceā research | Personal workplace enquiry |
Goals of the research | Knowledge which advances current thinking, can be generalised and have wide impact | Understanding which helps make sense of a specific situation, can influence a local context and personal practice |
Training which the researcher requires | Background of training in a variety of research methods | Experience gained through the process of supported study and workplace enquiry |
Method of identifying the question to be studied | Extensive review of previous research (literature review) and a wish to add to this body of knowledge | Curiosity about something observed or experienced in practice; a puzzle or problem in practice |
Approach to research āinformantsā (those to be āstudiedā) | Random or representative sample; no direct relationship to researcher | Collaborative, possibly drawing upon those you know and work with |
Approach to research design and validity | Control of variables, control groups, lengthy time frame, consistency of method for collecting data | Diverse perspectives, short time fame, mixed methods which take account of individual and local circumstances |
Analysis of data | Use of quantitative and/or qualitative theoretical frameworks to identify significan statistical trends | Looking for themes or patterns which highlight practical rather than statistical relevance |
Application of results | Significance for theory building, impact on policy | Significance for personal understanding (What did I learn?) and potential developments in practice (What might I change?) |
ā Adapted from Indiana University, āClassroom Action Research Overviewā http://mypage.iusb.edu/~gmetteta/
Classroom_Action_Research.html
In his 2003 inaugural presidential address to BERA, Furlong argued for greater recognition of practitioner enquiry in educational contexts and less privileging of the āBig Scienceā model of research. A key aspect of personal enquiry in relation to this Reader is that adults who teach and support children are not detached and looking from a distance but are potentially privileged āinsiderā enquirers; this is arguably a sound researcher position or āstanceā which makes such workplace enquiries more, not less, valid for those involved.
Questions arising from experience
As we have said, enquiry-based learning begins with a query arising from practice, and all adults who teach and support childrenās learning frequently encounter such queries and puzzles:
- Why does a child find learning maths quite easy but writing and spelling quite hard?
- Why does a child behave well when working with me alone but not well when working with me in a group?
- What does a child with a physical disability think about my support in PE lessons?
Questions such as these create an instant interplay between childrenās learning and adultsā learning, where gaining an understanding of the childās experience is linked to the practitionerās personal and professional insights and capacities, for example:
- I want to find out why a child finds writing difficult because this will help me support her more effectively, and our school development plan is for improvements in writing;
- I want to learn how children decide where to play as this will enable me to plan creatively and inclusively for playground activities and resources;
- I want to better understand childrenās singing development so I can confidently lead music sessions.
Small-scale enquiries like the ones above aim of course to shed light on issues which regularly arise in day-to-day practice. As a result, they have great potential to enhance the knowledge, skills and understanding of practitioners.
It is often the nature of small-scale enquiry to be more concerned with words rather than numbers, so information from such enquiries tends to be qualitative and interpretive rather than quantitative and ācountableā. Classroom research, when reported to others, is often presented as a narrative or story, drawing upon childrenās and adultsā words and actions (see, for example, Chapter 29 by Ann Bailey and Britta Little on creativity and verbal development, and Chapter 25 by Anna Traianou on the classroom discussions and language that support childrenās learning of a scientific concept like āfrictionā). This type of account, focusing on language and behaviour, is usually created through gathering observations, interviews and collection of relevant documents such as childrenās writing or drawings, school records or classroom planning. Qualitative, interpretive research can also be carried out with photographs (see Chapter 11 by Michelle Newman and colleagues). Quantitative research, lends itself to graphic presentations (see Chapter 24 by Min Wilkie) and such countable information can also strengthen narrative, interpretive information. Small-scale enquiry can, of course, combine numerical and narrative approaches, and drawing upon a range of information enables adults to create more holistic responses to puzzles and questions which arise in classrooms.
As an example: a teacher and a teaching assistant notice that some Year 3 children always seem to prefer to stay in the classroom during playtime. They are curious about why this is so, because the school has recently refurbished and improved the playground to make it more attractive to all children. They plan a small enquiry which they can undertake in their day-to-day work. As a first step, the teaching assistant counts, over a week, how many boys and girls go outside and how many children stay inside during the morning playtime; this initial activity informs her that there is a gendered pattern to the childrenās behaviour. In the second week, the teaching assistant and the teacher make two playtime observations of what children do in the playground and in the classroom during playtime; they make notes during the observations and later discuss and write down further thoughts about what they observed. The teaching assistant then organises an informal, voluntary āfocus groupā discussion during a lunch time, inviting four children (two girls and two boys) to talk with her about their choices for playtime and she takes notes on their views. Later that afternoon, the teacher invites the whole class to complete a simple, anonymous questionnaire about their playtime likes and dislikes.
Within a short period of time the teacher and the teaching assistant have created four interesting āsetsā of information, or data: counting, observation, discussion and questionnaire. To place their information in a wider context and to compare their local experiences to other perspectives, they look on the internet for what government policy and other researchers have to say about school playgrounds and playtimes; in ...