Part 1
Background
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 Utility of social media
As an emerging technology with nearly limitless boundaries and possibilities, social media has given users unprecedented engagement with brands, companies, and other users. It is possible â common even â to reach an unlimited audience with the click of a mouse or the use of a Smartphone. However, although most users will have an idea of what social media means to them (e.g. the ability to contact friends or make new connections), in order to locate social media within the law it is necessary in this first chapter to consider the types of social media that individuals use every day and how it is defined by the law. Without doing so it would be impossible to go on and apply the areas of law that social media affects in a meaningful way, or understand why the law has developed or the deficiencies in the law that have been presented due to a misunderstanding as to what the law is seeking to achieve.
1.1.2 Background to the development of social media
The potential for computer networking to facilitate newly improved forms of computer-mediated social interaction was initially suggested during the infancy of the internet.1 Efforts to support social networks via computer-mediated communication were made in many early online services, including Usenet,2 ARPANET, LISTSERV, and bulletin board services. Many prototypical features of social networking sites (SNSs) were also present in online services such as America Online, Prodigy, CompuServe, ChatNet, and The WELL.3 Early social networking on the World Wide Web began in the form of generalized online communities such as Theglobe.com (1995),4 Geocities (1994), and Tripod.com (1995).
The early communities focused on âbringing people togetherâ to interact with each other through chat rooms, and encouraged users to share personal information and ideas via personal web pages by providing easy-to-use publishing tools and free or inexpensive web space. However, other communities, such as wwwÂ.clÂassÂmatÂes.ÂcomÂ, took a different approach by simply having people link to each other via email addresses.
By the late 1990s, the nature of the sites began to change. User profiles became increasingly important as user demand for the ability to compile lists of connections, often referred to as âfriendsâ, increased. The use of profiles with user data allowed users to search for and connect with other users with similar interests or shared connections. As user demand for such features increased, sites developed increasingly sophisticated offerings that allowed users to find and manage friends.5 In 1997, the ânext generationâ social networking sites began to flourish with the introduction of sites such as SixDegrees.com.
The third generation of networking sites began in the early 2000s. Makeoutclub was introduced in 2000, with Hub Culture and Friendster following in 2002.6 Facebook was first introduced (in 2004) as a Harvard social networking site.7
Such sites soon became part of usersâ internet consumption, and by 2005, it was reported that MySpace was getting more page views than Google. Facebook8 became the largest social networking site in the world9 in early 2009.10
1.2 What is âsocial mediaâ and a âsocial networkâ
1.2.1 History
Owing to the explosion of Web 2.0 and the increasing sophistication of technologies that can be used to access web content, users both produce and consume significant quantities of multimedia content. Moreover, this behaviour when combined with social networking (i.e. communication between users through online communities) has formed a new internet era where multimedia content sharing through social networking sites is an everyday practice. More than 200 social networking sites of worldwide impact are known today and this number is growing fast. Many of the existing top websites are either pure social networking sites or offer some social networking capabilities.11
A social networking service is a platform to build social networks or social relations among people who, for example, share interests, activities, backgrounds or real-life connections. A social network service consists of a representation of each user (often a profile), his or her social links, and a variety of additional services. Most social network services are web-based and provide means for users to interact over the internet, such as email and messaging. The service usually allows individuals to create a public profile, to create a list of users with whom to share connection, and view and cross the connections within the system.12 In recent years, social networking sites have become increasingly varied and they now commonly incorporate new information and communication tools, such as mobile connectivity, photo/video/sharing, and blogging.13 Online community services are sometimes considered to be social networking sites, though in a broader sense, social networking site usually means an individual-centred service, whereas online community services are group-centred. Social networking sites allow users to share ideas, pictures, posts, activities, events, and interests with people in their network.
1.2.2 Social interaction
Social media has arguably changed the way in which we entertain ourselves and as a result the way in which individuals conduct their daily lives. Social networking is one of the primary reasons that many people have become avid internet users. In 2014, the number of active mobile phones will exceed 7 billion. However, as noted by the US Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence in 2011, âthough the term âsocial networkingâ tends to conjure up immediate visions of Facebook and Twitter, the origins of the term are far less humble. In the era before the existence of the internet, social networking was the process of conventional human interaction that took place in key locations like schools, marketplaces, religious centres, and sports events.â14
It has been suggested by research conducted by Ellison, Steinfield, and Lampe that online social networking sites support both the maintenance of existing social ties and the formation of new connections.15 Much of the early research on online communities assumed that individuals using these systems would be connecting with others outside their pre-existing social group or location, liberating them to form communities around shared interests, as opposed to shared geography.16 The early research was predicated on an assumption that when online and offline social networks overlapped, the directionality was online to offline â online connections resulted in face-to-face meetings. Parks and Floyd (1996) report that one-third of their respondents later met their online correspondents face-to-face and that this implied that online relationships rarely stayed there.17
It is suggested that next-generation social networking sites have significantly changed the way in which individuals communicate with other and that the shift from online to offline as suggested by early research does not necessarily correlate with how modern social networking occurs. Although this earl...