Reflecting on a 50 year university career, Distinguished Professor Arthur Bochner, former President of the National Communication Association, discloses a lived history, both academic and personal, that has paralleled many of the paradigm shifts in the human sciences inspired by the turn toward narrative. He shows how the human sciencesāespecially in his own areas of interpersonal, family, and communication theoryāhave evolved from sciences directed toward prediction and control to interpretive ones focused on the search for meaning through qualitative, narrative, and ethnographic modes of inquiry. He outlines the theoretical contributions of such luminaries as Bateson, Laing, Goffman, Henry, Gergen, and Richardson in this transformation. Using diverse forms of narration, Bochner seamlessly layers theory and story, interweaving his professional and personal life with the social and historical contexts in which they developed.
Frequently asked questions
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on āCancel Subscriptionā - itās as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youāve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoās features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youāll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weāve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Coming to Narrative by Arthur P Bochner in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Lingue e linguistica & Studi sulla comunicazione. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
I donāt seek to tell the best story. I seek to tell a story that once was. I seek to fill a place that once had meaning with meaning again
Bonnie Rough, āWriting Lost Storiesā (2007)
āIām Ray Tucker. Iāll be your PhD advisor, at least temporarily,ā the professor says, motioning me into his office. āCome in and sit down here next to my desk.ā
Heās wearing a gray suit and narrow, maroon tie, and his slick black hair is combed straight back off his forehead from ear to ear. Immediately Iām conscious of my ratty-looking jeans and T-shirt. My long, unkempt hair covers my forehead in the front and crawls down my neck in the back. I sit, crossing my legs tightly to prevent them from shaking.
āIām honored to meet you,ā I say. āI thought Iād stop by to introduce myself while Iām in town.ā
āIām glad you did, so we can get acquainted and get you ready for your first term.ā
He has a broad, handsome face, a grin both inviting and natural. I appreciate his effort to relax me, but it doesnāt soften my edginess. His strong voice resonates with self-confidence, and when he speaks he looks directly into my eyes as if heās trying to look through me. I think about what one of my graduate student cohorts at Syracuse had told me: āTuckerās the professor youāll want to study with at Bowling Green. His dissertation at Northwestern was directed by Donald Campbell, who wrote the definitive book on experimental design. Heās one of the top empiricists in the field.ā He also warned that āTucker has no tolerance for bullshit. Heās a quick study and very demanding.ā
āWhat course will you be teaching in the fall?ā I ask.
āIām offering Communication Theory,ā he responds. āIāve just finished a sabbatical at Harvard, where I was introduced to cybernetics and systems theory [Bertalanffy, 1969; J. Miller, 1978; Weiner, 1954]. I want my class to dig into these areas.ā
Iāve never heard of systems theory or cybernetics. I donāt want to expose my ignorance, but I better say something. āThat sounds interesting,ā I mumble, hoping he doesnāt ask me precisely what I think is interesting about these topics.
āSo you think you may want to take my course?ā
āYes, I do.ā I say, assuming no is not an option.
āIām glad to hear that, Art, but a little surprised too,ā he says, flickering an inviting smile my way. āI saw where you had coached the debate team at Syracuse University, and I know that department is strong in rhetoric and public address.ā His comment makes me aware that heās already checked into my background. I worry what that could mean: Doesnāt he want me to take his class? His cheerful grin contradicts the challenge implied by his words. Maybe I should follow his lead, be frank and direct
āI did take mostly rhetoric and public address courses at Syracuse,ā I admit, āand I did well in those courses, but Iām thinking of going in a different direction for my PhD.ā
āWhy?ā
āFrankly, Iām tired of studying dead orators, which is mostly what we did in rhetoric and public address courses. Rhetorical criticism was challenging, but I never felt as though I cared enough about the speakers or the issues. They seemed important to my professors, but they didnāt speak to my life.ā Iām startled by my own words. Iāve just dismissed the vast majority of what I had studied during my masterās degree.
āYou mean public address didnāt touch you where you live?ā
āThatās right, it didnāt,ā I acknowledge, wondering precisely what he means.
āWell, if itās any consolation, I felt the same way when I was in graduate school. At Northwestern, they made me take a number of courses that werenāt meaningful to me. I recall complaining to my advisor about it.ā
āWhat did he say?ā
āHe told me to find something that mattered to me and devote myself to it. Thatās what got me through the highs and lows of my PhD program. So I give the same advice to my students. I tell them to find something theyāre passionate about.ā He pauses and then looks me in the eyes again. āHow about you, Art? What do you really care about?ā
So much for casual conversation. No beating round the bush for Ray Tucker. Our first conversation, and he wants to know what really matters to me. The question he posed would haunt me for a long time: What did I care about? Why was I here? How did I get to this place at this time?
Narrative Inheritance
My father emigrated from Eastern Europe in 1920, one of more than two million Jews who came to America in the first quarter of the twentieth century (see Cohen and Soyer, 2008; Howe, 1976). When he arrived with his father and two brothers at Ellis Island, Dad was eleven years old, penniless, and spoke no English. His fatherāmy grandfatherāwent to work as a huckster, peddling fruits and vegetables by horse and buggy. Already poor in āthe old country,ā my fatherās family confronted new forms of cultural and social impoverishment. Stigmatized by the Yiddish jargon he spoke, the odd clothing he wore, and the dirty home environment in which he lived, my father internalized deep-seated feelings of inferiority and social awkwardness that he never overcame.
A childhood of deprivation, humiliation, and discrimination took its toll. I recall stories my father told about being easily deceived and tricked by classmates. āāGreenhorn, greenhorn,ā they would tease, and in the winter theyād throw snowballs and make fun of me,ā he told me. āGreenhornā was used derogatorily to refer to immigrants who couldnāt speak English (Cohen and Soyer, 2008). āWe were considered ignorant, uncultured, and gullible.ā
There was more than a grain of truth to one of my fatherās favorite little jingles: āWhen I was young and in my prime I wasnāt worth a single dime.ā At school he felt like an outsider; at home he was pressured to grow up fast and help support a family of seven riddled in poverty. āWhen I turned sixteen, my father insisted that I get a job and bring some money into the family,ā he told me. āI dropped out of high school after tenth grade and started working full time. I learned quickly that companies like Heinz and Westinghouse wouldnāt hire Jews. I had to lie on applications in order to pass as gentile at work. I lost my job at Westinghouse because I called in sick over the High Holy Days. When I came back, they fired me for no other reason but being Jewish.ā
I was born in July 1945, about the same time that news began to spread about what the Allies were finding in the European countryside: wagons full of corpses in Dachau; half-dead and sick survivors in the small camp at Buchenwald; hundreds of dead bodies lined up in front of the ruined buildings at Nordhausen; open mass graves at Bergen-Belsen (Brink, 2000; Caplan, 2009). The extent of the Nazisā extermination camps, their solution to āthe Jewish problem,ā boggled the mind. It took a personās breath away even to imagine such sadistic and coldblooded acts of brutality and evil.
Though he rarely spoke in detail about his childhood or about the Holocaust, my father taught us that hatred and persecution of Jews was common and widespread. As the son of working-class, Jewish parents, growing up in the aftermath of the Holocaust, I heard countless stories of unbearable suffering, poverty, and sacrifice. As a youngster, these stories baffled me. I felt terrible about how much suffering the people of my fatherās generation and the Jews in the Holocaust had endured, and I had no doubt that Jewish people had been persecuted for centuries. Nevertheless, the schools I attended were populated mainly by Jewish children, and we lived in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood that was protected for the most part from any explicit exposure to anti-Semitism. Ironically, as one of the poorest families in the neighborhood and one of the few headed by a father who worked with his handsāmy father was a self-employed sign painterāwe felt singled out and looked down upon not only by Gentiles but also by the wealthier Jewish people who surrounded us. In retrospect, I see now that āgreenhornsā like my father were doubly persecuted. They were not only ostracized by a mainstream culture that felt threatened by a scale of poverty never seen before in America but also by the middle-class, assimilated Jews who saw the impoverished Jewish immigrants as an embarrassment and worried that these uncultured immigrants would inspire a new wave of anti-Semitism (Baum, Hyman, and Michel, 1976).
I grew up not knowing where I belonged. A child is supposed to feel at home in his family, but I didnāt. Quite often, my parents spoke Yiddish around the house, whereas the three of usāmy brother, sister, and Iānever learned more than a few Yiddish expressions. Early on, my parents tried to instill in us a moral and religious Jewish sensibility. For ten years, I attended Hebrew School four days a week (after regular school hours) and Sunday school on the weekends. There I learned to read Hebrew fluently and gained thorough exposure to Jewish traditions and history. But the progressive reforms taking hold in the secular world of the Jewish community in which we lived did not reinforce what I was taught at the Hebrew Institute about being a Jew. Many of the Jews in Squirrel Hill, where we resided, were only marginally Jewish. They didnāt go to synagogue on Saturdays, adhere to Jewish dietary restrictions, or insist on a traditional Jewish education for their children. While my parents clung stubbornly to the traditions and doctrines in which they had been raised, the majority of Jewish people in my neighborhood aligned with new forms of Jewish identity that made it easier for them to move freely and inconspicuously within the non-Jewish culture in which they were immersed. They still professed to being Jewish, but theirs was a low-profile Judaism. Eventually, my parents yielded to the pressure, abandoning any attachment to the restrictive doctrines of Orthodox Judaism.
I was comfortable identifying myself as Jewish, yet I felt alienated and different from most of the other low-profile Jewish children at Taylor Allderdice High School. They wore nicer clothes, lived in bigger and more attractive homes, and got driven to and from school in expensive new cars. At school, I felt different from the other kidsāpoorer, less at ease with myself, more Jewish. At home, I also felt out of syncāmy parents belonged to a different time and culture. My brother was five years older, and my twin sister and I too often felt more like rivals than friends. I didnāt want to be like the other kids at school, but I didnāt want to be like my parents or siblings, either.
My father passed down the despair of growing up poor, insecure, and out of place. His life revolved around workāhard, tiring, exhausting work. Ironically, working was the one pleasure heād encountered in life. He showed little interest in recreation, leisure, or play. After all, he had witnessed the consequences of anti-Semitism and endured the Great Depression. These werenāt abstract concepts; they were lived experiences etched on his body and submerged in his unconscious. In order to survive, he shut himself off from the risk of exposure to outside influences. If he felt an obligation to his children, it was to prepare us for the harsh realities of life. When he made himself available to us, which wasnāt often, he would tell stories about the hardships endured in the āold countryā and the deplorable conditions in which he and other Jewish immigrants began their lives in America.
By the time I was a senior in high school, I had heard the same family stories over and over again, and the tragic lessons of these stories had taken shape within me, however unconsciously. The moral of these stories was to be prepared to face discrimination, injustice, and suffering. Life was a problem and a struggle, not a mystery or adventure. I should expect to suffer, to fall, to face setbacks and make sacrifices. Work is what gives meaning to life. After you fall, you can rise again through hard, honest work and self-sacrifice.
I admired my fatherās ability, integrity, and self-discipline, but I didnāt want to live a life anything like his. I felt terrible about the scars he carried from his childhood and respectful of the life he had toiled to make for himself and for us. As I grew older, I realized it was important not to forget that these events had occurred and the pain and suffering my parentsā generation had endured. Fortunately, I never had to face the loneliness, isolation, and estrangement that my father must have felt at every turn. But unfortunately, this difference drove a wedge between us. There simply was no way to transform my parentsā memories into my experiences. The world I was growing up in was not the same world my parents had encountered and remembered, the one that had shaped their meanings and values. My parents, especially my father, seemed to be in a perpetual state of high anxiety, just trying to get by, waiting for the next shoe to drop. They experienced little joy and showed only marginal commitment to anything other than hard work, sacrifice, and a few remaining Jewish traditions. My father often referred to himself as someone who āworked like a slave.ā Unwittingly, he equated work with coercion and sacrifice, and he made a clear distinction between work and play even while showing a loving attachment and commitment to his work. āYou canāt play todayāyou have to work,ā he would say. In fact, I canāt recall ever seeing him in a playful or kibitzing state.
I didnāt want to be a slave to work. As a kid, I loved to play and hated to work. I enjoyed a good belly laugh and took great pleasure at using my wit to make other people laugh. Was there any work that could also be play, fun, or enjoyable? Would work always feel like a form of slavery and coercion, or could one love work as much as play? Could work be play? Must work always be riddled with contradictions? What choices were open to me?
An Audacious Project on the Urge for Meaning
One day, shortly after the start of my senior year in high school, I was browsing books in the library and picked a copy of Albert Camusās The Myth of Sisyphus (1955) from the shelf. Turning to the first page, I read,
There is only one great philosophical question, suicide. Deciding whether life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question of philosophy.
Those first two sentences startled me. What makes life worth living? If this was the question fundamental to philosophy, then I wanted to be a philosopher. I felt as though Camus had seen through me, uncovering the deepest feelings and fears rumbling beneath the surface of my consciousness. Would I always feel like an outsider, unlike my parents but also different from the kids in my neighborhood with whom I grew up? In high school, I felt pressure to conform, but I never felt at ease with other kids, and my feeble attempts to fit in often ended in humiliation or shame. The social world of high school felt meaningless and alienating. I didnāt like or respect most of the other kids, so why was I trying to be like them? I didnāt want to spend the rest of my life feeling so far apart from what surrounded me, but I didnāt know what to do to feel more immersed and authentic. What made a personās life meaningful and worth living?
I decided to write my senior thesis on Camus, an audacious choice for a seventeen-year-old, but one I eagerly embraced. When I thought about Sisyphus perpetually rolling a rock up a hill, I began to understand my fatherās attachment and commitment to work in a new light. For the first time, I could appreciate the satisfaction he drew from his work. My father chose to throw himself passionately into his work in order to resist alienation, fear, and meaninglessness. Even if there was no rhyme or reason to the course of his life, he still could do something meaningful. He could work hard every day, do his bestāpaint beautiful signsāand exceed his clientsā expectations. He could keep the ball rolling up the hill.
āOne must imagine Sisyphus happy,ā wrote Camus (1955), because he continues to struggle to achieve new heights. This is what āfills oneās heart,ā a human being deciding to rise above the pointless struggles of life by accepting rather than denying his plight. āLife may be tragic and absurd,ā I wrote in my thesis, ābut it need not be faced with pessimism or misery, not if one gains awareness that life has value in its own right. Sisyphus understands the futility of his situation, yet still expresses an intense passion for life, which makes it possible to imagine him happy. He recognizes that the only real thing is human experience.ā
For Camus, all that was realāall that could be knownāwas what one could feel in his heart or touch in the world. There is no truth beyond experience. Every attempt at cosmic explanation is a threat to freedom. Sisyphus accepts the absurdity of his fate without reservations, acknowledging that the experience of living is all that can give life meaning, not some leap of faith designed to relieve him of the burdens of his own life. Sisyphus finds meaning in āthe struggle itself.ā He is not heroic but ordinary, a mythic figure representing the fate everyone must endure. His struggleāthe one we all faceāis a defiant battle against meaninglessness. We cannot know why we are here or what cosmic meaning the universe possesses. Fortunately, we donāt need answers to these questions to make our lives meaningful. It is what we create ourselves, what we experience and do, that gives meaning to our lives. As George Cotlin (2005, p. 228) observed in Existential America, āIn this world, all that defines us as human, all that connects us to humanity or to the human condition, is our willingness, no matter the odds, to stand up for something. Only by such a commitment do we push away the absurd, if only for a moment. And only by such a commitment do we escape the imposition of alienation and find human solidarity.ā
Camus gave me a framework for thinking about the connection between death and life. My only prior exposure to ideas about death and dying had come through my Hebrew education. I didnāt know what to believe. In Sunday school, my teachers taught that good Jews were God-fearing and that a Judgment Day would come, implying that the soul survives death. Beyond these lessons...
Table of contents
Cover Page
Half-Title Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Preface: On the Road to Meaning
Chapter One Drifting Toward an Academic Life: Narrative Legacies
Chapter Two Graduate Student Socialization: On Becoming a Divided Self
Chapter Three Staging a Dissertation: Entry into a Professorās Way of Life
Chapter Four Raising Consciousness and Teaching Things That Matter
Chapter Five Double Bind: Selling Out or Risking Ruin
Chapter Six Paradigms Shift: Dark Side of the Moon
Chapter Seven Taking Chances
Chapter Eight Between Obligation and Inspiration
Chapter Nine Disconnecting and Connecting
Chapter Ten Life's Forward Momentum
Chapter Eleven A Twist of Fate
Chapter Twelve Healing a Divided Self: Narrative Means to Academic Ends