Introduction
Sustainability has moved from a goal to a necessity in the urban environment. The recent focus of urban planning and urban regeneration practice has been to create sustainable, healthy and viable communities with positive neighbourhood identities. Visions of thriving, mixed-use, economically stable and socially inclusive cities with clean, green, safe neighbourhoods have been presented as the possible future of many urban areas. However, how to actually create such areas and communities is not entirely clear. Realistically, an answer to this question can only be reached using empirical evidence drawn from the functioning of an urban area and its dwellersâ experience of everyday life within it. Understanding what makes a city sustainable therefore requires a dialogue between a huge variety of researchers. Engineers, geographers, architects, planners, designers, ecologists and sociologists all conduct research in an effort to better understand the sustainable cities and communities. Multidisciplinary research can help us to analyse how sustainability of the urban environment is framed, while disciplinary knowledges can complement each other in producing a perspective of the subject. This chapter describes both the process and outcomes of developing a conceptual and methodological framework to investigate sustainable communities within a multifarious research team: combining social and physical perspectives.
Historically the social and physical infrastructures of the city have coevolved and are interdependent; yet we do not fully understand their interaction (see Hommels, 2000). On the other hand, earlier studies conducted by academics such as Martin (1972) or Hillier and Hanson (1984) suggested that the way in which the physical environment of a city or a neighbourhood is arranged forms news possibilities for the way in which people choose to live and work. However, to date, the focus of research has either been on individual perceptions and attitudes toward specific âplacesâ or on more generalized design features of urban areas. In this chapter we describe multidisciplinary research that marries these two approaches. Focusing on Clerkenwell in London, UK, as a case study of a vibrant urban community, we present a new way of thinking about contemporary urban communities. To illustrate the wide range of complex interactions between the physical, social and economic processes of the urban mechanism, our study combines quantitative analysis of Clerkenwellâs street layout (incorporating information on its usage and the historical formation and transformation of the urban fabric of the area) with qualitative information on perceptions and behaviours of city centre residents.
Background: What is a sustainable community?
The concept of a sustainable community is inherently a spatial construct, focusing on place-based communities. Sustainable communities are now central to UK developmental policy; for instance, Living Places (ODPM, 2002), Sustainable Communities Plan (ODPM, 2003) and Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development (ODPM, 2004a) all refer to this notion, presenting an intertwining of the discourses of sustainable development and sustainable communities. The governmentâs definition of a sustainable community clearly embodies the key principles of sustainable development; it states that sustainable communities are ones which:
⌠meet the diverse needs of existing and future residents, their children and other users, contribute to a high quality of life and provide opportunity and choice. They achieve this in ways that make effective use of natural resources, enhance the environment, promote social cohesion and inclusion, and strengthen economic prosperity.
(ODPM, 2004b, p. 35)
Within urban spatial policy, the government promotes that a sustainable community has seven essential, balanced and integrated components (an active and cohesive community; well run in terms of governance; is environmentally sensitive; is a well-designed built environment; is well connected; has a thriving economy; and is well serviced), which should underpin planning and design processes.
The definition of a sustainable community describes a particular âtypeâ of neighbourhood, with a well-designed built environment, a range of employment opportunities, and a certain degree of social interaction and social cohesion that facilitates social order. Nevertheless, the formation of a neighbourhood involves a socialâpsychological experience with a physical space; therefore, the defined spatial area of a neighbour hood can be seen as subject to how people use and feel about the built environment. The geographer Doreen Massey has explored and strived to explain the complexities of this relationship throughout her work (see Massey, 1994). Massey argues that a personâs development of place is an ongoing formation of social relations, interconnections and movements. Both Jacobs (1961) and Lynch (1960, 1984) have been instrumental in exploring spatial layouts and components that influence the prosperity of neighbourhood life (i.e. central points; clear flows in and out; places for people; a visual identity; shared open spaces; common eye on space; detailed design features). In particular, the street combined with the social activity that takes place on its frontage emerges as one key element of analysis in this stream of research. For Jacobs (1961), Appleyard (1981) and Sennett (1994), street layout and its properties affect the possibility and form of encounters between people. In contrast, Barton, Grant and Guise (2003) put people at the heart of creating sustainable neighbourhoods and communities. Barton suggests that while urban form can influence patterns of movement and interaction, so too can factors such as the way in which schools are designed or the existence of local associations. Barton looks at the social, economic and environmental factors that influence peopleâs quality of life and illustrates that to understand how sustainable communities can actually be achieved and maintained is a multifaceted, complex issue requiring an approach that is likewise multifaceted and complex.
A multidisciplinary research strategy
As multidisciplinary work thrives, innovative methods of data collection and measurement are slowly emerging within and between many disciplines. We outline an excellent example of how methodologies can be moulded and experimented with. VivaCity2020: Urban Sustainability for the 24 Hour City is a large multidisciplinary research project within the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Sustainable Urban Environments (SUE) consortium, aiming to develop an in-depth understanding of human behaviour in urban environments and to create new innovative tools and techniques to support sustainable design decision-making. A research strategy was developed to explore both the more experiential side of city centre living alongside the collection of quantitative data on the urban layout and form.
Example case study
An area within Clerkenwell in the London Borough of Islington, to the north-east of central London, was selected as a case study area. Clerkenwell is one of 16 wards located within the London Borough of Islington (see Figure 1.1.1). Parts of the ward (including Clerkenwell Green, the historical heart of the area) are designated as conservation areas by Islington Council, meaning that special planning policy applies to protect the diverse character of the ward. This area is residentially diverse, incorporating social housing alongside privately owned flats and houses, and is economically diverse with a variety of shops, workshops, wholesale, offices and entertainment facilities. The area was selected as an example of a diverse and viable urban neighbourhood.1
An examination of the way in which this area has evolved and been transformed throughout its history c...