1
The challenge of authentic leadership
This above all: to thine own self be true.
Hamlet, I, iii, 78
Coaching is arguably the most powerful method for developing managersā capacity for leadership. From junior to senior managers, organisations need individuals who can shape and realise success, drawing on their ability to influence, inspire, collaborate, manage and above all, lead. The challenge of developing such qualities is that they cannot be simply learned from a textbook or workshop. If leadership is to be truly effective, managers must be authentic. Their acts of influence must be grounded in self-awareness, confidence and creativity, and their engagement with others must empower and motivate. The development of such qualities demands that managers develop their self-understanding.
Leadership coaching is uniquely placed to draw out the individual qualities of managers, and to help them to connect their talents productively to the achievement of organisational goals. Whether the goal is to strengthen interpersonal skills, to build team effectiveness, to enhance influence and impact, or to help managers to adapt quickly to a new role, it is through the reflective environment of leadership coaching that individual qualities can be most effectively nurtured. By engaging with the individual at a personal level, as well as with their skills and capabilities, coaching can take on the challenge of evoking what I describe as authentic leadership.
In this chapter I explore the challenge of authentic leadership in terms of the paradox between the personal and the organisational, and describe the overarching goal of leadership coaching as having to work with this essential paradox. I contrast authentic leadership with two other forms of leadership ā defiant leadership and compliant leadership ā and consider the significance of them in terms of the performance of managers. These different types of leadership, and the psychological factors associated with them, provide a framework for understanding the task of leadership coaching.
Against this backdrop I describe the journey of leadership coaching, and in particular the need to work with the personal as well as the practical aspects of change. I end the chapter by considering the relationship between coaching and therapy, and show that coaching is distinguished in terms of its dual emphasis on personal and organisational goals.
Figure 1 | Leadership has conflicting imperatives
THE PARADOX OF LEADERSHIP
In one respect effective leadership stems from managers being attuned with their core values, from reaching inside for the authority that comes from personal awareness and conviction. To this extent effective leadership must contain a fundamental individuality. However, in another respect, leadership is fundamentally concerned with the collective ā with others and the organisation. It focuses on the agreed purposes and strategies of the organisation and is concerned with influencing others to achieve group goals.
Effective leadership thus contains two potentially conflicting imperatives. On the one hand is the imperative for the manager to be ātrue to oneselfā, to act out of personal awareness and conviction. On the other hand is the imperative for the manager to be ātrue to the organisationā, to act in ways that meet the needs of the organisation through others. These potentially conflicting needs form the poles of a paradox ā the paradox of leadership (see Figure 1).
It could be argued that sometimes a managerās individual drives are perfectly aligned with those of the organisation, that there is no tension or paradox between the personal and the organisational. Such an idea is as appealing as that of romantic love, where the needs and desires of one person are perfectly matched to the needs and desires of another. But as we all know, this is an ideal. To sustain a real relationship takes conscious effort. In the world of real managers exerting influence in real organisations there is always a tension between managersā needs and motives and those of the organisation, or at a more immediate level, between managers and the individuals or groups they are seeking to influence.
Examples of tensions between the personal and the organisational are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 | Tensions between personal and organisational needs
Personal need/drive | Organisational need/drive |
Demonstrate ability to understand and motivate others. | Get tasks done and produce results. |
Establish a better workālife balance. | Find and keep highly committed people. |
Draw on ability to network and develop relationships. | Promote those who can think strategically. |
Make a difference to other peopleās lives. | Increase market share and profitability. |
Express passion about environmental issues. | Profit comes first ā just keep the right side of environmental lobbies. |
AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP
The most effective leadership is the result of managersā being able to sustain the tension between personal goals and those of the organisation, and finding a conscious and creative solution that can arise out of the paradox of leadership.1 It is based on matching individual expression to organisational need, and is creative in the sense that the needs neither of the individual nor of the organisation are sacrificed (see Figure 1).
Authenticity implies someone whose whole way of being, doing and relating is concordant with his or her beliefs and values. It implies a real depth of awareness about himself or herself, and a willingness and capacity to say things openly and boldly. Most of us can relate to the idea of authenticity ā the hope or experience that our talents and drives are being expressed in our work lives; that the attunement between our abilities and what we do, will yield success and appropriate rewards.
But for the manager seeking to influence others, personal authenticity is not enough. Authenticity must be connected with the need to guide others in their actions or opinions in a way that is attuned to the organisation. The success of authentic leadership is that it carries personal conviction and attunement with the organisation. Managersā efforts to influence others are more motivational, more inspirational, and more practically useful because their authentic behaviours and communications are concordant with the values and expectations of the organisation.
Figure 2 | Authentic leadership is created out of paradox
Table 2 | The creative possibilities of authentic leadership
Personal need/drive | Possibilities arising from sustaining paradox | Organisational need/drive |
Demonstrate ability to understand and motivate others. | Lead a project to show that relationship development can have a direct impact on better results. | Get tasks done and produce results. |
Establish a better workālife balance. | Form a network of part-time workers in order to provide greater flexibility and resource savings for the organisation. | Find and keep highly committed people. |
Draw on ability to network and develop relationships. | Influence senior managers to value networking and strategic thinking by showing that a strategy will be more successful if supported with buy-in gained through networking. | Promote those who can think strategically. |
Make a difference to other peopleās lives. | Understand what is most important to customers, and lead developments to meet these needs. | Increase market share and profitability. |
Express passion about environmental issues. | Lead the organisationās environmental policy and use this as an important marketing message. | Profit comes first. |
The creativity in authentic leadership is evident in the solutions that managers develop to address the tensions between personal and organisational needs. Authentic leadership does not imply making a compromise in which neither personal nor organisational goals are fully satisfied, but rather implies shaping new possibilities for individuals and for the organisation (see Table 2).
Authentic leadership is conscious leadership
The challenge of authentic leadership is that it demands awareness ā self-awareness, awareness of others and organisational awareness. Such awareness provides the basis for conscious leadership, by which managers are able to examine their motives and make conscious judgements. Furthermore, they are able to identify unhelpful defences or reactions in themselves ā perhaps a tendency to control or dominate based on a fear of failure; perhaps a fear of conflict and a desire to appease; perhaps an excessive competitiveness that leads to distrust; perhaps a tendency to be insular in such a way as to seem detached and uninspiring.
Self-awareness enables managers to identify per...