![Aspects of European History 1494-1789](https://img.perlego.com/book-covers/1606413/9781134972265_300_450.webp)
eBook - ePub
Aspects of European History 1494-1789
Stephen J. Lee
This is a test
- 314 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Aspects of European History 1494-1789
Stephen J. Lee
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
First published in 1984. Lee's book takes an analytical approach to a wide range of topics in early modern European history, from the Renaissance to the French Revolution, showing a variety of methods that can be used to present a theme or argument in an essay or exam.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Aspects of European History 1494-1789 by Stephen J. Lee in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in History & World History. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
1
Renaissance Humanism
Humanism was a basic source of inspiration for all the cultural changes of the Renaissance, heavily influencing literature, history, painting, sculpture and political ideas.
Humanist scholars devoted themselves to the studia humanitatis by examining the texts of antiquity with renewed interest. Although classical works had some influence on medieval thought, they had acquired an extensive superstructure which scholars from the fourteenth century onwards set about dismantling. Increasing emphasis was laid on understanding the classics in their original form, and this was inevitably accompanied by an insistence on grammatical precision and stylistic purity. A particularly important development was the revival of Greek. This language, which had virtually disappeared from the West during the Middle Ages, spread during the fifteenth century not, as is often supposed, with the flight of scholars from the East after the Turkish capture of Constantinople in 1453, but as a result of invitations extended to Byzantine scholars like Manuel Chrysoloras to lecture in Florence and Rome in the 1390s. A widespread search for Roman and Greek manuscripts followed. By the end of the fifteenth century interest had reached dramatic proportions, with 27 principal editions of Greek works published between 1494 and 1515. Meanwhile, various humanist circles had been established, the most important of these being the Platonic Academy in Florence (1439). At times their members were excessively concerned with detail and produced commentaries on the classics rather than works of originality. Leonardo da Vinci, himself excluded from the inner sanctum of humanist study, observed bitterly of the members of the Platonic Academy: âThey go about puffed up and pompous in fine raiment and bejewelled, not from the fruits of their own labours, but from those of others.â But, although the humanists were often, in Leonardo's words, âtrumpeters and reciters of the works of othersâ, they performed a service of inestimable value for the arts either by opening the renaissance world to the influence of little known Greek and Roman writers or by reâexamining, in the original, works which had already had an impact on the Middle Ages.
The result was the emergence of humanism as a broader intellectual influence which was more significant than the sum of its humanist parts. Following the maxim of the Greek, Protagoras, that âman is the measure of all thingsâ, it focused attention on the nature, achievements and potential of humanity rather than on the power and mystery of divinity. It was not necessary to be a member of a humanist academy to be influenced by humanism. Painters expressed it when they represented the human figure with greater accuracy and grace, made possible by a more extensive anatomical knowledge. Architects incorporated it into the circular and domed structures so characteristic of Italy in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Writers emphasized it through introspective analysis of the emotional and rational sides of man's nature. Historians reflected it in their conception of the past, which underwent a radical change in the fifteenth century. Medieval scholars had regarded their world as existing on a higher plane than antiquity, suffused with the glow of Christianity and solidly based on political institutions and social structures which were permanent because they had divine authorization. Antiquity, by contrast, had been insecure and unenlightened, certainly until the Christian faith had established itself in the Roman Empire. By the fifteenth century, however, humanist historians had permanently reversed the entire emphasis. The medieval world was now associated with a superstition and barbarism that choked the more positive achievements of antiquity; the Middle Ages had been superseded by a better era. This value judgement was assiduously spread by writers like Conrad Celtis, who congratulated his fellow Germans on âhaving cast off your vile barbarityâ,1 and Rabelais, who wrote: âOut of the thick Gothic night our eyes are opened to the glorious torch of the sun.â2
Geographically, humanism originated in Italy, spreading through the peninsula from its original centre in Florence. During the last decade of the fifteenth century and the beginning of the sixteenth, its influence had permeated much of Europe beyond the Alps. This was the result of the extensive contacts between northern and southern Europe by which new ideas could be readily transmitted. Italian ecclesiastical legates, diplomats, traders and professors travelled to the north, and there was a corresponding flow from France, Germany and England into Italy. Italian humanism gradually combined with autochthonous intellectual developments to produce regional and national variations, the main exponents of which were Lefèvre d'Etaples and BudÊ in France, Agricola, Celtis, Reuchlin and von Hutten in Germany, Ximenes in Spain, Colet and More in England, and, most significantly of all, Erasmus.
Like most general movements, humanism assumed different shapes, two of which were especially pronounced. The first was Christian humanism, in which the new learning was synthesized with basic Christian belief. Sometimes, although not always, this was officially sanctioned by the Church; several Popes were classical scholars, and Leo X thought that ânothing more excellent or useful has been given by the Creator to mankindâif we except only the knowledge and true worship of Himselfâ than these studiesâ.3 The second type, particularly strong in Italian politics, was the more obviously secular humanism which exerted a powerful influence on historians.
Christian humanism was undoubtedly the mainstream of renaissance thought, for the rediscovery of man did not necessarily mean the abandonment of God. Humanism had a considerable capacity for idealism and its search for ultimate perfection used human knowledge and skills in a manner which was often religious. This was apparent in the growth of neo-Platonism, the spread of Biblical study and criticism of medieval theology, and the strong leaning towards Christianity in the arts.
Neo-Platonism emerged in fifteenthâcentury Italy. At first it was a philosophical movement, deriving inspiration from Plato's Republic and Laws, and contrasting sharply with the medieval form of theology and philosophy known as Scholasticism. The medieval Church had itself used certain classical concepts to construct an impregnable system of doctrine and political thought. Beginning with Aristotle's assumption that âman is naturally a political and social animalâ, St Thomas Aquinas (1235â74) had developed a hierarchical structure of authority and of the obligations involved in man's relationship with God and with his ruler. This had been followed by a system of philosophical reasoning which by the fourteenth century had become so elaborate and tortuous that fundamental questions were often submerged by trivia. Neo-Platonism was an attempt to bypass the entire edifice of Scholasticism and to return to the ideas of Plato in their pure form. Since the hold of Christianity was so powerful, however, neoâPlatonism rapidly assumed a religious tone, although it was not usually sanctioned by the Church. As developed by Pico and Ficino, neo-Platonism encouraged man to see and understand more clearly the different aspects of Creation, human and inanimate, in their idealized as well as actual form. This required successive degrees of contemplation and the full use of all the faculties, the driving force being, in Pico's words, âthe intellectual desire for ideal beautyâ.4 The emphasis was on man's striving to see God, the source of perfection, by developing the gifts which he had been given. Pico believed that âGod the Father endowed man, from birth, with the seeds of every possibility and every life.â This was something of a departure from the traditional view of man, vitiated by original sin as a result of the Fall.
Christian humanism also developed in northern Europe, taking the form of biblical research and sustained attacks on Scholasticism. Italian scholars had established a precedent in their accurate and detailed study of a wide variety of classical texts. By the beginning of the sixteenth century the same attention was being given to the scriptures, particularly by Colet, Lefèvre d'Etaples and Erasmus. They believed that classical learning, applied to biblical study, could provide a greater harmony between faith and intellect, reinforcing the effects of neo-Platonism by a solid return to scriptural directives. The northern humanists let forth a blast of satirical invective against the Scholastics. Erasmus complained in his Praise of Folly: âThen there are the theologians, a remarkably supercilious and touchy lot They are fortified ⌠with an army of schoolmen's [Scholastic] definitions, conclusions and corollaries, and propositions both explicit and implicit.â5 Ulrich von Hutten's Letters to Obscure Men contained requests to eminent (and fictitious) theologians for advice on a whole series of âfiddle faddlesâ, a reference to the intricacies of Scholastic thought.
The artists of the Renaissance benefited from the humanist influence which greatly enhanced accuracy and realism. Their aims were not, however, purely representational. Leonardo da Vinci wrote, in his Treatise on Painting: âThe good painter has two principal things to paint: that is, man and the intention of his mind.â6 Artists used the religious theme as the most popular vehicle for their idealism. Typical subjects included the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, the Ascension and, above all, the Madonna and Child. The last featured in the work of Lorenzo Costa, Signorelli, Francesco Cossa, Masaccio, Leonardo, Raphael, Correggio, Giorgione, Titian, Veronese, Bellini and Carlo Crivelli. Old Testament themes were also popular, the best examples being in the paintings and sculptures of Michelangelo, intricate in their workmanship, accurate in their observation and idealized in their conception. The religious synthesis with humanism is apparent in the Creation of Adam on the roof of the Sistine Chapel, where Adam is created in God's image, but God is an idealized version of man.
Architecture also displayed for all to see the revised connection between God and man. Two views of the proportions of the Renaissance church illustrate the emphasis on the human and the divine. Nikolaus Pevsner explains that in the elongated medieval cathedral âthe prime function ⌠had been to lead the faithful to the altarâ. In the renaissance church, however, with its new circular shape, this was no longer possible, for âthe building has its full effect only when it is looked at from one focal pointâ, the central altar. Thus man enjoys âthe beauty that surrounds him and the glorious sensation of being the centre of this beautyâ.7 The circle, indeed, had a mystic significance. The renaissance architect, Andrea Palladio, put forward another explanation for its use. The church would be âenclosed by one circumference only, in which is to be found neither beginning nor end, and the one is indistinguishable from the other; its parts correspond to each other and all of them participate in the shape of the whole; and moreover every part being equally distant from the centre, such a building demonstrates extremely well the unity, the infinite essence, the uniformity and the justice of Godâ.4 To a Christian humanist, especially a neo-Platonist, would not these two views be entirely reconcilable?
A more distinctively secular type of humanism developed in Italy during the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries.
One of the forms which it took has been described as âcivicâ humanism, or the replacement of asceticism by active involvement in civic affairs as the most worthwhile of human endeavours. Many humanists were appointed as leading officials in town governments and chanceries, a situation openly applauded by Palmieri (1406â75) in his De vita civile. Others became extensively involved in business transactions, accumulating considerable wealth and property. Such activities, it was argued, enhanced the human potential for achievement, whereas poverty, traditionally regarded as a Christian virtue, stunted the complete development of the personality.
Civic humanism, in turn, contributed to a fundamental revision of the approach to historical study. No longer was history regarded merely as an illustrative adjunct to theology; the efforts of Leonardo Bruni and Flavio Biondo in the fifteenth century, together with those of Machiavelli and Guicciardini in the early sixteenth, enabled it to emerge as a discipline within its own right. The emphasis was switched from exemplifying divine direction of human affairs to providing narrative accounts of human political developments, devoid of divine planning or intervention. The study of the past, particularly the classical past, could also be used to make deductions about the feasibility of present political actions. Machiavelli, for example, observed that âfor intellectual training the prince should read history, studying the actions of eminent men to see how they conducted themselves during war and to discover the reasons for their victories or their defeats, so that he can avoid the latter and imitate the former. Above all, he should read history so that he can do what eminent men have done before him.â8
The influences of humanism which showed particularly strongly in Machiavelli's works were the considerable debt to classical writers like Livy, a belief in the importance of public life, and an uncompromisingly secular approach to history and statecraft. He brought all his knowledge to bear on examining the political chaos in the Italy of his day, although some of the conclusions he reached were considered too extreme by most contemporary humanist scholars. He sought, in his Discourses and The Prince, to examine, by historical references, the forms of political and military action which were most likely to ensure a ruler's political survival. Openly abandoning any religious connection, he emphasized the importance of virtĂš (courage and vigour) in taking advantage of the opportunities and overcoming the obstacles presented by fortuna (the unpredictable form of change). The activity urged by Machiavelli was generally incompatible with Christianity, although not with the beliefs of the ancients. He accepted that there was âa difference between our religion and the religion of those days. For our religion ⌠leads us to ascribe less esteem to worldly honour.â Consequently, the ancients âdisplayed in their actions more ferocity than we doâ.9 In his rejection of Christian ethics as the basis of political action, Machiavelli provided reasoned justification for pragmatism. He believed, in the words for which he is most famous: âIt is a sound maxim that reprehensible actions may be justified by their effects.â10
The practical application of these principles was described in The Prince. This work, dedicated to Lorenzo deâ Medici, was expressed with simplicity and clarity, for although Machiavelli was himself a member of the Florentine Platonic School, he avoided abstruse ideas and âany other charm or superfluous decoration of the kind which many are in the habit of using to describe or adorn what they have producedâ.11 After categorizing the different types of state, Machiavelli examined the various methods of achieving power, before proceeding to offer advice on the maintenance of effective rule. The prince must, in effect, be ruthless, disposing of all opponents and establishing a powerful army. Indeed, he should excel in the art of war, for this âis all that is expected of a rulerâ.8 In diplomacy and in his relations with his subjects he must be versatile, acting âas a foxâ and breaking his word when necessary. He should cultivate the people's support by projecting virtues and qualities which he need not necessarily possess, and, in the true spirit of the Renaissance, showing âhis esteem for talent, actively encouraging able men, and paying honour to eminent craftsmenâ.12 In his final chapter Machiavelli departed from clinical analysis and launched an impassioned appeal to Lorenzo deâ Medici to liberate Italy from âforeign inundationsâ and âbarbarous tyrannyâ which âstinks in everyone's nostrilsâ.13 This pointed to his higher aim, the end of political anarchy within Italy and a return to the spirit of ancient Rome.
Is it possible to assess the impact of humanism on sixteenth-century Europe? In its synthesis with Christianity the mainstream of humanism led, indirectly, from the Renaissance to the Reformation. Christianity, for so long assimilated into an elaborate doctrinal and intellectual structure, now became the focus of reinterpretation and argument. Neo-Platonism offered a more individual approach to religious belief than had Scholasticism. Classical research, at the same time, brought a new approach to the scriptures, calling into question many previously accepted assumptions about their precise meaning. A considerable hole was therefore knocked in the established thought of the Church, coinciding, as the next chapter will show, with serious institutional weakness. This provided the opportunity for a new generation of religious reformers to reâexamine the basis of Catholic dogma and to give renewed emphasis to the concepts of grace, faith and predestination. Humanism, therefore, made possible the rise of a more fervent and extreme form of dissent and criticism. The result, in a metaphor common to the period, was that Erasmus's egg, when hatched by Luther, produced a different breed of bird. Humanism also had some contact with the eventual revival of the Church and the beginning of the Catholic Reformation. Throughout the period of crisis the Spanish Church was strengthened by the reforms and humanist studies of Cardinal Ximenes. When it was invigorated by the fervour of mysticism and of religious orders the Spanish Church became the vanguard of the assault on Protestantism although, in the process, it lost sight of the principles of toleration and the capacity of self-criticism which were essential features of humanism.
The precise influences of humanism in its purely secular form are more difficult to establish. It is true that the Italian states experienced considerable diplomatic intrigue in the fifteenth century which was devoid of religious influences and which, many humanists believed, bore some resemblance to the problems and crises of antiquity. On the other hand, Renaissance studies in history and statecraft did not themselves secularize Italian politics; rather, they described and rationalized a process which had been occurring for centuries. Similarly, Machiavelli did not invent expediency in diplomacy, but he did examine it more scientifically than ever before, drawing attention to the full range of opportunities which it offered to the adventurous statesman. It is certain that The Prince was read by some of the leading figures of the period: W.Durant cites Charles V, Henry III and Henry IV of France, Richelieu and William of Orange, who kept a copy under his pillow. Officially, however, Machiavelli's methods were not regarded as legitimate until the eventual emergence of Realpolitik. Before the period of Cavour and Bismarck, Machiavelli was often imitated secretly, but always denounced openly; as Frederick the Great showed in the midâ eighteenth century, the more successful the imitation the louder the denunciation.
2
The Background to the Reformation
The Reformation can be defined as the open expression of dissatisfaction with the abuses within the Church, with the role of the priesthood and with the ecclesiastical hierarchy itself. At the same time, it adapted to particular regions and was connected with the process ...
Table of contents
- Front Cover
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Dedication
- Copyright
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Introduction
- 1. Renaissance Humanism
- 2 The Background to the Reformation
- 3. Political Factors in the Spread of Lutheranism in Germany Between 1517 and 1555
- 4. The Spread and Significance of Calvinism
- 5. Calvinism and the Jesuits
- 6. The Counter Reformation
- 7. The Political Development of Spain 1474â1598
- 8. The Italian Wars and the Habsburg-Valois Struggle 1494â1559
- 9. The Foreign Policy of Philip II
- 10. The Development of the Ottoman Empire to 1566
- 11. The Beginnings of Ottoman Decline 15661699
- 12. European Population Growth 1500â1800
- 13. The Holy Roman Empire 1493â1618
- 14. Issues Involved in the Thirty Yearsâ War
- 15. The Effects of the Thirty Yearsâ War on Germany
- 16. The Significance of the Treaty of Westphalia
- 17. The Spanish and Portuguese Empires
- 18. The Impact of the Spanish Empire on Spainâs Economy in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries
- 19. Sweden as a Major Power 1611â1721
- 20. The Dutch Republic in the Seventeenth Century
- 21. France During the Administration of Cardinal Richelieu
- 22. France Under Louis XIV
- 23. French Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth Century
- 24. The Reforms of the Great Elector1
- 25. The Growth of the Prussian Bureaucracy in the Eighteenth Century
- 26. Prussian Foreign Policy 1740â1786
- 27. The Reforms of Peter the Great
- 28. Russia Under Catherine the Great
- 29. Russian Foreign Policy in the Eighteenth Century
- 30. Austria Under Maria Theresa
- 31. Austria Under Joseph II
- 32. The Age of Reason
- 33. Enlightened Despotism: A General Survey
- 34. France Under the Regency and Cardinal Fleury 1715â1743
- 35. France Under Louis XV and Louis XVI
- 36. French Foreign Policy in the Eighteenth Century
- 37. The Origins of the French Revolution
- Notes
- Bibliography