Learn cross-curricular content
In order to understand the content of cross-curricular teaching, young children need ā just as they have always needed ā plenty of opportunities for talk. These are provided through the sort of good infant practice long recognized as valuable opportunities for activity and interaction, such as:
⢠learning corners and role-play areas, preferably linked to the subject-matter concerned, in which they can engage in imaginative play (this may sometimes be enhanced by adult involvement in the childrenās play, expanding vocabulary and ideas);
⢠outings, excursions, visits and other opportunities to find out about the wider world through experience and talk to a range of adults;
⢠active engagement in learning whenever possible: making, doing, experimenting, learning through play;
⢠plenty of āprops and promptsā for learning ā for instance, relevant items to look at, touch and talk about while you are teaching or sharing a text, and opportunities for āShow and Tellā;
⢠opportunities to āexperienceā factual information with the teacherās direction in drama lessons and through specific drama activities like hot-seating;
⢠using puppets to act out what they have learned, and to āspeak throughā when explaining something (shy children often find it much easier to talk to a puppet or soft toy than to the class, and may also be able to respond on a puppetās behalf when they find it difficult to speak up themselves);
⢠storytelling sessions ā listening to adults telling stories, which can of course be true stories, and having opportunities to tell them themselves;
⢠responding to ideas through music, movement, art and craft.
Without such opportunities for active, motivating learning, young children are unlikely to develop the ideas, concepts, vocabulary and excitement about what they have learned that underpins good writing. With so much attention these days to āpencil and paperā work it is sometimes tempting to think that this type of practice is a waste of valuable time. In fact, it is the bedrock of literacy.
Experience has shown that certain speaking and listening activities sit particularly comfortably with the different text types we use for cross-curricular writing, as shown in the boxes. These activities reflect the underlying structures of thought upon which the text types depend, and thus link to the planning skeletons described in the next section.