Chapter One
From âwomen worthiesâ to poststructuralism? Debate and controversy in womenâs history in Britain1
June Purvis
Introduction
In 1929, the well-known English essayist and novelist Virginia Woolf lamented the fact that so few histories of women had been written:
The printed works on women that Woolf might have consulted were few, despite the fact that in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in particular, there were a number of writers researching womenâs past.3 Indeed, it was not until the 1970s that publications in womenâs history became more numerous, and since then they have proliferated into a booming publishing field. My aim in this chapter is to offer a brief overview of the development of womenâs history in Britain, from the nineteenth century to the 1990s, highlighting key concerns, debates and controversies.
Early work
It would appear that before the professionalisation of history in the nineteenth century, there were at least two main (and often overlapping) strands of womenâs historyâthe lives of âwomen worthiesâ and the biography of an individual woman, often a political or religious figure of some importance. As Natalie Zemon Davis observes, the âwomen worthiesâ tradition had a polemical purpose, namely to reveal the range of womenâs capacity, to provide exemplars for female readers, to argue from what some women had done to what âall could do, if given the chance and the educationâ.4 Not unexpectedly, this tradition often intertwined with the individual biography approach that focused much more on a woman within her society and culture, although even here the author did not necessarily seek to explain how her subjectâs sex and gender as a woman might shape her expectations and public role.5
One such prominent nineteenth-century temperance writer and lecturer was Mrs Clara Lucas Balfour, who published a number of works with titles such as Working women of the last half century: the lessons of their lives and Women worth emulating.6 In her preface to the latter, she claimed that emulation was the spirit âmost desirable to arouse in the youngâ. That which we approve and admire, she coaxed her readers, we are led to emulate: âThe sterling qualities which made a character excellent, still more than the mental powers which made it remarkable, convey lessons for instruction and encouragement that all can applyâ.7 It was with this purpose in mind that she selected various women of âwomanly worth and wisdomâ for the young of her own sex âin the hope that studious habits, intellectual pursuits, domestic industry, and sound religious principles, may be promoted and confirmed by such examplesâ.8 The women whose biographies she discussed include the scientist Mary Somerville, the astronomer Caroline Herschel, the hymn writer Charlotte Elliott, the authoress Amelia Opie and the philanthropic prison visitor Sarah Martin. What distinguished these women for Mrs Balfour was their humility and the acceptance of âtraditionalâ feminine qualities, such as self-sacrifice. Sarah Martin, for example, although a âhumble seamstressâ,9 wished to be useful to God and became a well-known prison visitor in her home town of Great Yarmouth. âAll workers in the Lordâs vineyard,â entreated Mrs Balfour, âcan emulate her self-sacrifice, her diligence, her faith, her love, and thus live blessing and blessedâ.10
Another prolific nineteenth-century writer in this genre was William H. Davenport Adams, producing books with such titles as Stories of the lives of noble women, Celebrated women travellers of the nineteenth century, and Some historic women or, biographical studies of women who have made history.11 In the latter, he claimed to bring together âa group of Celebrated Women, who might fairly be considered representative of the higher qualities of Womanhood,âsuch qualities as patriotism, religious enthusiasm, fidelity, moral courage, fortitude, devotion, and the capacity of governingâ.12 Such qualities were frequently stressed in the many biographies of well-known women, such as the upper middle-class spinster Florence Nightingale who, as Superintendent of the female nursing establishment in the Crimea War, drastically reduced the death rate of British soldiers.13 These accounts, how-ever, presented Miss Nightingale as the self-sacrificing âLady with the Lampâ, mopping the brow of sick soldiers and overcoming the barriers of her âladylikeâ status to nurse men who were her social inferiors. No mention is made of her ambition, ruthlessness and iron determination since, as Vicinus observes, such characteristics did not fit public expectations about middle-class women.14
Many of these studies were, therefore, celebratory; in addition, they rarely cited sources for assumptions or generalizations made. But other biographies of well-known women, such as the 12 volumes by Agnes and Elizabeth Strickland on the Lives of the queens of England from the Norman Conquest, first published 1840â48 and then reprinted in a widely read, cheap and popular edition in 1864â5, were based on careful research.15 As Thirsk notes, these first of the nineteenth-century women historians were at the forefront of historical research since they searched out original documents, letting them âspeak for themselvesâ.16 Working at a time before the calendaring of state papers and private archives began in the 1860s, the Strickland sisters often had to fight to gain access to such sources. Nevertheless, they were successful in their endeavours and gained entry to the State Paper Office, the British Museum and the Bodleian Library, as well as many private collections. A well-known contemporary of theirs, Mary Anne Everett Green, similarly made extensive use of primary sources. From 1849 to 1855 she published a series of volumes on the Lives of the princesses of England, dating from the Norman Conquest of 1066 to the end of Charles IIâs reign in the seventeenth century.17
Other histories about women, published in the nineteenth century, were often written by feminists active in various campaigns, such as womenâs right to higher education and to the franchise. The womenâs educational reform movement seems to have begun almost abruptly in the late 1840s and to have gathered momentum in the 1850s and 1860s, with London University, in 1878, being the first university to award women degrees on equal terms with men.18 Charlotte Carmichael Stopes, the first woman in Scotland to take a university certificate, was one of this new generation of university educated women who combined her feminist activities with a keen interest in womenâs history. She campaigned for womenâs suffrage and participation in local government, and was also a member of the Rational Dress Society that was critical of the corsets, flannel petticoats and flounced skirts that âfeminineâ Victorian ladies were supposed to wear, and advocated instead the wearing of âsensibleâ clothes.19 In 1894, Stopesâ British freewomen, their historical privileges first appeared, in which she investigated the ancient rights of women through an analysis of state papers, parliamentary writs, journals of the House of Commons, and works on law, history and archaeology.20 Two years later, another book was published by a supporter of womenâs suffrage, namely Women in English life from medieval to modern times by Georgina Hill. Hill contested the common assumption of male historians who, adopting a Whiggish interpretation of the past, suggested that âmankindâ was moving toward a better world. Thus she contended that the position of women in England âcannot be regarded as an orderly evolution. It does not show unvarying progress from age to age. In one direction there has been improvement, in another deteriorationâ.21
Hill gave some consideration to the everyday lives of âordinaryâ as opposed to âgreatâ women, a topic that began to attract the attention of academic historians in the 1890s as they researched a new field of enquiry, namely the social and economic life of the nation.22 Since working-class women as well as their menfolk had always been involved in paid work, whether as single women, wives or mothers, their contribution to the economy now came under scholarly scrutiny. At the newly established London School of Economics (LSE), for example, associated with the Fabians Sidney and Beatrice Webb, the history of women especially focused on the period 1760 to 1900 and with womenâs part in the agric...