Part I
Environment for Children
Chapter 1
Design by Adults: Experience by Children
Environment and Child Development
Does environment affect child development? Does it influence what children learn, the values they acquire, and the path they will choose through adult life? Can childhood experiences inculcate environmental responsibility?
Everybody knows children need love. This affects everything. Itâs critical for healthy psychological, social and bodily development â even influencing brain and nerves.1 In fact, without love, children develop brains up to 30 per cent smaller than those who grow up enveloped in it.2 But this is human, social environment. What about physical environment? This also influences brain development. From environmental experiences, the brain learns how it âneedsâ to develop.3 What other developmental, educational and motivational influences do buildings and places have? Do they affect childrenâs â and subsequently, adultsâ â health? Their physical, mental and moral development? Their social and environmental awareness?
If so, this places great responsibilities on everyone who designs, alters and administers places. It also raises questions. How should places for children be? Will adult design criteria produce appropriate environments for children? If sunbathing isnât healthy for babies, what else do we need to look at in different ways?
Places as Exploratoria
Children and adults view the world differently.4 Buildings are designed by adults. But many, perhaps most, are used by children. When adults design buildings, practicality, energy-conservation, aesthetics and economy have major shaping influences. These are undeniably important â but have nothing to do with childrenâs experience.
Adult experience centres on how we use places; we know what they are for. For children, itâs more about what places âsayâ, how they meet and experience them. To them, the world is still fresh â one big sensory exploratorium. Hence railings and walls arenât for excluding trespassers, but for rattling sticks or bouncing balls. Paula Lillard distinguishes these approaches: âchildren use the environment to improve themselves; adults use themselves to improve the environment. Children work for the sake of process; adults work to achieve an end resultâ.5 This means places â for adults â are for pre-defined purposes; but to children, they offer opportunities for things to do. This is a critical distinction.
Adults live (mostly) in a world of material facts â âknownâ and unchanging. For children, the ârealâ world is often servant to an imaginary world. Even single rooms, gardens or behind-the-shed forgotten places can be whole palettes of mood, whole geographies of mountains and jungles, harbours and shops â places to live out fantasy through action.
Walls are for walking along
Experience and Learning
How do children progress from a fantasy-shaped world to a fact-based one? How do they learn? Piaget considered that knowledge doesnât develop as a linear progression, but as a relationship-network, dynamically interweaving connected elements. Perception, action, interaction with others and reflection develop, modify and consolidate it.6 Abstract knowledge doesnât last. Cerebral knowledge unsupported by experience is unsustainable. Much that children learn intellectually, they compartmentalize as nothing to do with life. Not surprisingly, everybody understands things more quickly, more deeply, more multifacetedly and more meaningfully by experiencing them. In fact, until children are six years old, they only learn through experience â by doing â never through commands.7 They discover, understand and appreciate the world around them by active investigation.8 This âintuitiveâ learning is whole-body and multisensory.9 As child psychologist Anita Olds observes, children âlive continuously in the here and now, feasting upon nuances of color, light, sound, odor, touch, texture, volume, movement, form and rhythm around themâ.10 (This persists into adolescence; how many teenagers do homework before the last minute?)
Innately compelled to learn about the world, children seek out concrete experiences. If these hold together â such as kitchens smelling, sounding, feeling and looking cosy â they can recognize connections and build a mental âwholeâ from experiential âpartsâ. Contradictory experiences â such as luxuriously soft, bouncy furniture in âformal-behaviour-onlyâ rooms, or âleatherâ smelling of PVC, are confusing. Confusion reduces confidence. Educationally, as plastic things can look very different but feel identical to touch, they imply knowledge from different senses have no meaningful relationship. Fragmentary, non-related knowledge weakens interest, so is thought to contribute to low attention span.11 In this age, plastic is barely avoidable. So, unfortunately is attention-deficiency. Sensory inconsistency is, of course, only one contributor amongst many probable causes.
Whereas adults already âunderstandâ things, children are still exploring the relationships between sensory messages. This makes them naturally creative. Sense-rich environments, by providing experience-experiments and imagination-opportunities of which we adults canât conceive, further creativity development.12 In design, exuberant decoration can appeal to our sense of richness, but does it overburden children by excess? Does the decoration reinforce or confuse? Conversely, purely visual minimalism has a refined clarity and calm that can feed the soul. For adults, it can be an appealing aesthetic. But, if it doesnât feed the senses, can it nourish children? Sterile buildings are actively harmful. These say soul-state doesnât matter. They deserve no place near children.
Experience of Place
Children and adults also experience places differently. Their mood-world is more differentiated than ours. We easily categorize rooms as single-mood places: living room, bedroom, kitchen, classroom, gymnasium ⌠For children, one room can comprise five distinct places: four corners and a centre.
As lower eye-level shrinks spatial boundaries, childrenâs space differs from that of adults. Smaller relative scale, reach and range make places (small, when revisited as an adult) feel huge. Their spatial consciousness is also different. Adults navigate within a Cartesian spatial grid. This organizes our spatial experience, and lets us think causally. Small children interact with space more through life-energy than prethought-out rational intention. In mid-childhood, their actions are mostly led by emotions. Only at the threshold of adulthood can they fully steer their life, and respond to space, through thinking.
Different Thinking: Different Learning: Different Needs
Much conventional education focuses on intellectual development. But what about emotional development? Psychology often treats thought and feeling as opposites. Although, like Freud, Piaget separated their development, he recognized that whole understanding depends on a balance between emotional and intellectual comprehension.13 Vygotskij observed that significance â hence meaning â is inseparable from feelings. He considered consciousness to be a dialogue of diverse mental forms, with feeling and thinking inextricably interlinked, but thought to be only a monologue to the world.14
Is there only one type of intelligence? Howard Gardner postulates seven: logical/ mathematical, linguistic, musical, spatial, bodily/kinaesthetic, self-knowledge and social.15 Different aspects of environment feed these different intelligences. Energy-conscious design, for instance, demonstrates causality. Spatial and kinaesthetic sensations are inseparable from experience of place. Architecture can both feed sense-of-self and help build society. Form-and space-language, harmony, melody, tempo and rhythm are its means.
These many intelligences raise questions about what it means to be human. Machines excel at logical intelligence. Theyâll soon be better at this than humans. (Theyâre already better at rememberi...