1 Introduction
The genesis of the book
The genesis of the book can be traced to a telephone call from Gordon Steven to David Preece, during late 1992. At the time Gordon was working for Bass Taverns, and was about to become a leading member of the Change Team which the company was establishing; David Preece was (and, indeed, still is) a lecturer at the University of Portsmouth. It went something like this (after the usual pleasantries):
GORDON: Dave, I think you might be interested in getting involved in researching a change initiative which is about to begin in the company. Iâm on the Change Team, and you would be able to work with me as the project develops⌠DAVID: Youâve got my interest, please tell me more. GORDON: Well, itâs very early days at the moment, but it looks like BPR (Business Process Re-engineering), organizational restructuring, technical change and quality management will be all part of it. DAVID: What sort of access will I have?
GORDON: Well, of course, you would get excellent access through me and other people I know, and it will definitely be necessary to spend a lot of time in the pubs, interviewing managers and other staff. DAVID: Count me in (draught Bass had always been one of my favourite beers in the Midlands).
The third member of the research team, Valerie Steven, was quickly enrolled for her expertise in Employee Resourcing/Development and Gender and Organizations. And the first meeting of what we later came to call the âPINT (People, Innovation and Technology) Groupâ took place at the Wheel, Oadby, shortly thereafter. We have more to say towards the end of the chapter about the research design and methodology which emerged, but it is important to provide first of all an overview of the book and its theoretical orientation and focus.
Core concerns and themes
This is a book about organizational change. Connected to an overview and analysis of this phenomenon, it also has things to report and say about such matters as management and managing, organizational restructuring, teamworking, gender and management, technical change, performance and change management. The core themes which run through the book (and which are reflected in the bookâs title and the âtopicâ examples just provided) relate to the management (the meaning and nature of management and managing are discussed in chapter 4) of change and its reception and outcomes. This needs unpacking. We take a âprocessual- contextualâ approach (discussed in detail in chapter 5, along with an overview and evaluation of other perspectives on organizational change) to the analysis of change, in that the starting point (which, of course, is always somewhat arbitraryâorganizations and organizational contexts are always changing) is an examination of the sector within which the company is located, and how it has been changing during the 1990s. It will be shown in the early chapters that certain developmentsâsome of a radical nature, some of a more incremental natureâoverlaid upon each other during this period and played a significant role in âtriggeringâ the emergence of a concern on the part of managers about the ability of the organization to respond effectively, given, especially, the short time-scales for change and restructuring which had in effect been imposed. This led to the recognition that it would be necessary to initiate a search for and examination of suitable responses, which in turn implied a requirement for the allocation of resources to undertake this work, that is, the formation of a change team which brought together the necessary expertise (supplemented by external expertise in the form of a company of management consultants). It was also recognized that there had to be a frontend loading of resources.
In order to appreciate the nature and implications of this organizational change in Bass Taverns, it is necessary first of all to outline the external contextual changes which took place over the time period we are considering (1989 to late 1996), for they, and especially the DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) Beer Orders of 1989, played a major part in triggering what fairly quickly emerged as a radical organizational response on the part of Bass PLC and Bass Taverns. Following this, in chapter 3, we then describe the company as it was at the point at which possibilities for change were being consideredâif for no other reason than this was the organizational configuration (structure, working practices, culture, job designs, etc.) which would need to be addressed by senior managers and the change agents. Chapter 6 discusses in some detail the emergence of a change strategy within Bass Taverns, the various projects and trials which got under way, and the Change Team itself and how it went about its work and addressed the problems it faced. It concludes with a review of the implications of change for the hostelries, and the pub managers in particular, and some observations on the politics of change. Chapter 7 considers the organizational restructuring options which were identified and assessed, the one which was chosenâand why it was chosen, moving on to look at the reaction of senior management to the restructuring model and some of the associated political behaviour; it concludes with an overview of the launch of the New Retailing Initiative (NRI), which had emerged out of the pilot trials. By this time it had become clear to some senior Bass Taverns managers and Change Team members that one important implication of the radical nature of the changes now developing in embryonic form, was that the existing organization structure would need to be reviewed in order to assess its âfitâ with the former: in brief, would it support and underpin the changes, or would it get in the way of them and act as a âcarrierâ of the âold ways of workingâ? This implied an examination of alternative ways of structuring the company and their relative merits and disadvantages with respect to supporting and facilitating the ânew regimeâ which was emerging from the pilot studies.
Chapter 8 is the location where we have placed the bulk of our primary data relating to what the retailing staff thought about the changes, or ânew ways of workingâ; âretail staff here meaning the public house managers (LHMs) themselves, their immediate managers, and the specialist financial controllers in the regions. The discussion and analysis is structured around a review of our data in terms of the different, key, aspects of the changesâteamworking, empowerment, new roles and relationships, technological change, etc. There was (and is!) a significant and interesting power dimension to many, if not all, of these changes, and so we also discuss this matter in chapter 8. We also have something to say about change and senior (that is, Head Office/Board) management, for the change here was pretty dramatic. Of course, there is an important gender dimension to organizations, change and management/managing, and so we present and analyse data relating to this at various points throughout the book, but especially in chapter 8. Chapter 9 provides an evaluation of the financial and economic success or âoutcomesâ of the change programme. In the concluding chapter which follows, we return to re-examine the key themes and issues raised in earlier chapters in the light of the subsequent presentation of our findings and analyses with regard to the changing nature and experience of work in the contexts of radical outer contextual change and the implementation of a radical internal response, focusing mainly (but by no means exclusively) upon those employees who had the key responsibilityâand opportunityâto âmake or breakâ the NRI: the pub managers.
Having provided a glimpse of the main themes and issues addressed in the book, the next section will outline the research design and methodology which was adopted. This is followed by an outline of the structure of the rest of the book
Methodology
The primary data upon which we report in the book was gathered over a five-year time period, beginning early in 1992. We have benefited from having a range of expertise and jobs within the authorship team of three people, as referred to at the beginning of the chapter. Because of Gordon Stevenâs senior position in the company, and his extensive experience of working in both the company and the sector over a long period of time, and, not least, his appointment to a leading role in the Change Team at a very early stage of the initiation of the change programme, we had the benefit of excellent access to a wide range of people within the company, from Board level to bar staff. As Linstead has observed, âManagers are constantly embedded in fruitful research settings in their own everyday working lives, yet they only very infrequently take advantage of this situation. They find it difficult to interrogate that which surrounds them. Similarly, they all have ethnographic skills to some extent and all are capableâwith the right supportâof developing themâŚâ (1996:25) and, later, âThere is no extensive tradition of sociological participant observation in management research. Where the participation is total the involvement with management is usually partial, and where the involvement with management is total the participation is partialâ (1996:31). We believe the primary data and analysis of the present book will prove to be an exception to this rule.
We took an early decision when writing this book to confine ourselves to reporting upon managersâ workâthis is, after all, a book about âManaging for Bassââas they themselves have discussed it with us, and as we have observed managerial activity in operation. Collecting the data has involved us all in visiting public houses throughout the UK, from the north of Scotland to the south coast of England, and from Liverpool to Sheffield, including, of course, various places in between, not least London. In the process we have interviewed, observed and surveyed, both individually and sometimes collectively (for example, through attendance at Focus Groups and Team Meetings), a wide cross-section of managers, from senior Head Office and support staff to regional Retail Directors and specialists, Retail Business Managers, and, above all else, the Licensed House Managers themselves. Within the confines of the present book it is only possible, unfortunately, to present and report upon a fraction of this data; we hope to draw on the other data in future publications. So, for example, we have only been able to describe, let alone reproduce, report upon and analyse, a few of the questionnaire surveys. Some of the material has already been published elsewhere or presented at conferences (see, for example, Oram and Wellins 1995; Steven and Payne 1995; Preece et al. 1996a; Preece et al. 1996b; Steven et al. 1998), and this has given us the benefit of the comments of a range of readers and listeners, which we hope we have been able to take into account in the text; but for the great majority of the data, this is the first time it has been presented.
A range of research methods have been employed in gathering the data which is reported in the book. In summary terms, this consisted of (i) questionnaire surveys, (ii) interviews, (iii) focus groups, (iv) participant observation, and (v) documentary analysis. Let us briefly discuss each in turn.
Questionnaire surveys
Four main questionnaires were drafted, distributed and administered in the company by Gordon Steven, who played an important part in this process, and was advised by the two other authors of the present book. The majority of the questions, which amounted to around twenty-two in total, consisted of Likert- type scales, where respondents were asked to signal their degree of agreement with a statement by circling a box on a one-to-five scale. Each questionnaire also had two open-ended, âqualitativeâ questions, where respondents were invited to add any further information. David Preece and Valerie Steven analysed these responses, whereas the former âLikertâ questions were collated and analysed using computer software and hardware.
The first two questionnaires had the primary objective of discovering what the Licensed House Managers (LHMs), Business Administrators (BAs) and Retail Business Managers (RBMs) (or their equivalent at this time in the case of the BAs and RBMs) thought of the various restructuring âpilotsâ which were introduced into what were then two of the Bass geographic regions: Charringtons (London and South) and Sheffield. A third regionâM & B (Midlands)âacted as a control group (the pilots are described in detail in chapter 7). In each case, questionnaires were circulated to all the three categories of staff in these three regions, and the âreturned and usableâ percentage was always at least 80. The first of the âpilotâ questionnaires was distributed in October 1993, a matter of a few months after the launch of the pilots, and the second in February 1994.
The third and fourth questionnaires (referred to as the âFirst and Second National Surveysâ) were designed to find out what the LHMs, RBMs and BAs thought about the New Retailing Initiative (NRI), being the name originally given to the strategic change initiative which the company decided to introduce throughout its managed house estate, and which emerged from the pilots (again, see chapter 7 for details). These questionnaires, therefore, were distributed to all the companyâs managers who were holding the above jobs. The âreturned and usableâ percentage was again over 80. Questionnaire three went out in January 1995, and questionnaire four in December 1995. As with the pilot questionnaires, there were twenty âLikertâ-type questions, and two qualitative ones (the latter again being analysed by Valerie Steven and David Preece). A âpolicyâ decision was taken before the first questionnaire went out to ensure that the great majority of the questions were retained throughout all administrations, in order to facilitate comparisons between the results in each case from the second questionnaire. This meant in some cases that there was a slight changing of wording (for example, rather than asking respondents what they anticipated, the following questionnaire would ask them what they found under certain headings).
We have therefore collected similar data over time to give us longitudinal insight and process understanding. The response rates to the four questionnaires referred to above were very high, never being below 85 per cent. How was such a high response rate attained? We believe it had much to do with the mode of distribution, completion and collection which was used. District meetings were used as the vehicle for distributing the questionnaires, the managers being asked to send them back in envelopes which had been marked âPrivate and Confidentialâ to the university authors. The way in which this typically happened would be that in a routine district meeting a short briefing would be given about the purpose of the questionnaire by a Retail Business Manager or Retail Director. The pub managers were then given the questionnaire (usually at the end of the meeting, when they had a glass of beer in their hands) and were asked to spend five to ten minutes completing it. The questionnaires were then collected and posted back directly to the researchers.
A short questionnaire was also distributed to members of the Hospitality Retail Employersâ Group during the spring of 1996 in order to establish the percentages of female and male LHMs, Assistant LHMs and Relief LHMs in each pub retailing company represented there. Overall figures were broken down into separate figures for Scotland and England where appropriate. Following this, a sixth questionnaire (which we refer to throughout the book as âthe Gender Questionnaireâ, or âfinal questionnaireâ) was designed, administered and analysed by one of the authors in order to test whether there were any gender-related differences in the impact of, or response to, elements of the change programme, although it also focused on a broader range of issues related to career patterns, training and qualifications, attitudes to promotion, and personal motivation. This questionnaire was administered in the summer of 1996 to all LHMs in Scotland and to LHMs in the areas covered by three Retail Directors in England.
A range of statistical tests were performed on each of the collated questionnaire returns, both for each administration and across the various administrations.
Interviews
Individual interviews were conducted by David Preece and Valerie Steven with forty-two Bass Taverns managers, that is thirty-four LHMs, six RBMs, and two Retail Directors (RDs). In addition, Gordon Steven âinterviewedâ, in a somewhat more âinformalâ manner (that is to say, in the course of his employment, through casual conversations, discussions in meetings, over the telephone, etc.), countless other LHMs, RBMs, RDs, central and local specialists (such as personnel staff, surveyors, IT staff), and, not least, corporate senior managers and the other members of the Change Team.
In the case of the former more âformalâ interviews, these invariably took place in the relevant hostelries, over a pint or cup of coffee, usually in a quieter corner or room. They lasted between around one and two and a half hours, with the median being around an hour and a quarter. A portable tape-recorder was taken along, and interviewees were asked if they had any objection to it being used; in the great majority of cases they didnât. Naturally, anonymity of the interviewee was guaranteed. Following the interviews, if they hadnât been recorded, notes were written up summarizing the comments made, with observations by the interviewer and ideas as to future questions to ask, leads to follow, etc. It is important to add here that each of the authors also participated in three Focus Groups which were conducted at the time of the pilot trials. These were designed and run by Gordon Steven and some of his Change Team colleagues in order to gauge the opinions of the RBMs (or equivalent) and LHMs about the initiatives which were being run during this time period. Around ten to twelve LHMs or RBMs took part in each case (the two categories of staff being kept separate for these purposes), and the discussions were tape-recorded and transcribed, providing another rich source of data. The discussions explored what the managers thought of the key aspects of the particular trial concerned, and facilitated an âinteractiveâ mode of response to the questions posed by the member(s) of the Change Team.
Finally, in this section, it should be recorded that the authors attended several team meetings (see chapter 8 for more details about the team meetings: they usually involve either a group of five or six LHMs from a particular area, or eighteen or so LHMs from an RBMâs district, in the latter case normally with the RBM attending). The researcher adopted the role here of âlistener and recorderâ, rather than interviewerâand hence this data-collection method is more accurately categorized as âparticipant observationâ, but it is nonetheless mentioned here because the opportunity was taken in each ...