Alcohol: no ordinary commodity
Alcohol has always played a central role in a variety of different cultural practices. It has been consumed for intoxication purposes (to get drunk), but has also been used for medicinal, symbolic and ritualistic purposes. Despite alcoholâs ubiquitous presence in our supermarkets, bars and restaurants, and on our television screens, Babor et al. (2010: 11) argue that alcohol is âno ordinary commodityâ. Although it is bought by consumers regularly, much like other grocery items, it is a drug consumed primarily for its intoxicating rather than nutritional properties. Alcohol, or ethanol (the molecule CH3âCH2âOH) is similar to other drugs in this respect. Although it might be taken in various forms and flavours, ethanol is ingested ânot for the molecules under that description, but for the molecules because of what they doâ (Flanagan 2011: 273). Its universal appeal, its raison dâĂȘtre, lies with (like other drugs) its psychoactive properties; its ability to change the way we feel or bring about an altered state. It does this by directly changing the chemical state of our brains. Alcohol is a drug that has both depressive and stimulating effects. Alcohol stimulates because it activates the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor and depresses because it also releases noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Consequently, alcohol can relieve anxiety, help with sleep and relaxation, but can also improve sociability, lower inhibitions and lead to a loss of control. There may be many reasons why human beings as a species are so preoccupied with changing mood, but Davenport-Hines (2002: xiv) suggests that âthe use of drugs often reflects other sets of human ideals: human perfectibility, the yearning for a perfect moment, the peace that comes from oblivionâ. In a more theistic account, Carl Jungâs letter to Bill Wilson, the co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), interpreted one of his patientsâ desire for alcohol, or more precisely the desire for its effect, in the following way: âHis craving for alcohol was the equivalent, on a low level, of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with Godâ (cited in Flanagan 2013: 80). The corollary of the transformative property of alcohol and other drugs is their power to harm individuals and communities.
The most obvious negative effects of alcohol â getting drunk and losing control â mean that along with its history of production and consumption, it has a history of opposition. According to Nicholls (2009: 2):
Drink has always existed both as an activity and a set of questions: questions about the rights and wrongs of intoxication, about the role of government in regulating free trade, about the limits of personal freedom, about gender, class, taste and health.
Contemporary concerns about alcohol consumption are nothing new. Different governments or organizations in various countries at different times have, for religious, moral, health, economic and other motives, attempted to paternalistically influence their citizensâ alcohol consumption. Legislation, education, moralizing and prohibition have all been used at various times with different levels of success. For example, in the UK, during the Industrial Revolution, alcohol played a significant role in class relations. In terms of crude class control, âthe industrialists exploited the cultural power of alcohol to the fullest extentâ by paying the workers in company-owned public houses (Pritchard 2006: 305). Consequently, the men would spend their meagre wages on beer, further exacerbating their reliance on the âcompanyâ. Both the expenditure and the drunkenness would aggravate the already difficult social conditions prevalent at that time. Temperance movements began to emerge to combat the invidious threat of alcohol in order to protect both the souls of the workers and the well-being of their families. Ironically, at the time, drinking beer (fairly weak in comparison to todayâs standards) had advantages. Water purity was poor and cholera was relatively common. The brewing process purified water and it was often safer to drink beer. More recently, the ever-present threat of drink was described by Asquith, the British Prime Minister before the First World War, as âa greater threat than Austria and Germany combinedâ (Nicholls 2009: 1). 1 In the USA, the Volstead Act of 1919 marked the start of a period of prohibition where the manufacture, sale and transportation (but not the consumption) of alcohol became illegal. 2 In addition to the well-known, and arguably infamous, prohibition period in the USA, various forms of restriction and control of alcohol endure. The production and sale of alcohol continues to be regulated to a greater or lesser degree in most countries. A key difference between alcohol and other marketable products, and the reason it is subject to restrictions, is based on the growing evidence which shows âthat alcohol intoxication, alcohol dependence, and the toxic effects of alcohol on various organ systems are key mechanisms linking alcohol consumption to a wide range of adverse consequencesâ (Babor et al. 2010: 11).
Despite the numerous problems associated with alcohol, there is an enormous appetite for it and paternalistic attempts to control its use are divisive, controversial and unpopular. Opinions are often polarized, with ânannyâ killjoy moralizers on one side and the liberal open minded on the other. Nicholls (2009: 251) argues that, historically:
The public discourse on drink has often been characterised by elements of moral panic: over-identification of problematic behaviours with âdeviantâ social groups, the use of media pressure to effect policy changes, and the tendency to articulate broader social anxieties through an attack on public drunkenness.
In other words, drink, or the behaviour of certain drinkers, has been used by opponents to support stricter regulation and by supporters to back more lenient regulation. Both parties often point to the same phenomena to support their case. Folk devils â the young, working class, students, women, musicians, artists, liberals and football hooligans (visible manifestations of drunkenness) â the argument goes, have been âcreatedâ to exaggerate a problem and propound a political agenda. On the one hand, these groups (those who drink too much) provide the evidence that alcohol is bad and more control is needed, while on the other hand their behaviour is proof that the problem is a problem for them. Others are able to enjoy alcohol without these negative consequences. In other words, alcohol per se is not the problem; rather, it is the way certain people abuse or misuse alcohol that is problematic. Currently, there is a focus in the UK and elsewhere on âbinge drinkingâ among the younger generation (the latest folk devils). Young men and women, including high-profile athletes, increasingly choose to get drunk in city centre bars and clubs or holiday resorts, with very visible consequences such as violence, sexual abuse, vandalism and public disorder. Such high-profile alcohol problems can detract from, and often mask, other less obvious alcohol-related issues. While the young binge drinker, beer or shot in hand, is criticized, the middle classes binging regularly on expensive red wine escape our moral gaze because they are enjoying alcohol in a civilized way and causing no obvious harm. Alcohol-related problems, however, are not confined to the young binge drinkers. Older people are increasingly facing alcohol-related health problems, but such concerns are not as newsworthy as stories about binge drinking. 3 Alcohol can be harmful in a number of ways other than intoxication, which means that a significant proportion of drinkers are potentially at risk in one way or another. Furthermore, those who do not use alcohol can be harmed directly or indirectly by those who do.
Alcohol-related harms and risk
We now know that alcohol is overwhelmingly toxic and is affecting the physical health of millions of people. According to the World Health Organizationâs (WHO) global status report on alcohol and health in 2014, alcohol is causally implicated in more than 200 health conditions including HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis (WHO 2014). Babor et al. (2010: 16) argue that: âNo other commodity sold for ingestion, not even tobacco, has such wide-ranging adverse physical effectsâ. There are 3.3 million deaths a year (5.9% of all deaths) attributable to alcohol, and 5.1% of the global burden of disease is alcohol-related. The WHO (2014: 2) suggest that although the âconsumption of alcohol and problems related to alcohol vary widely around the world, . . . the burden of disease and death remains significant in most countriesâ. In Australia, more than 5500 lives are lost every year as a result of alcohol and more than 157 000 people are hospitalized. 4 In the UK in 2010/2011 there were 1 168 300 alcohol-related admissions to hospitals, more than double the figure in 2002/2003. 5 According to a report by leading experts in the UK entitled âHealth first: an evidenced-based alcohol strategy for the UKâ, âalcohol-related deaths in the UK have doubled from 4,023 in 1992 to 8,748 in 2011â (University of Sterling 2013: 13). In the USA, excessive alcohol consumption is responsible for the deaths of over 79 000 citizens each year (Bouchery et al. 2011). Charles Kennedy, the former leader of the Liberal Democrats parliamentary party in the UK, died recently at the age of 55 from a haemorrhage linked to alcohol abuse. 6
Many of the conditions caused by alcohol are chronic, brought about by excessive habitual use. According to Babor et al. (2010: 15), there is clear evidence that alcohol can cause cancer of the mouth, oesophagus, larynx and pharynx, and alcohol is the main cause of liver cirrhosis. In the UK, deaths from liver disease have increased by 400% since 1970, with alcohol being the primary cause. 7 These chronic health issues were thought to affect only older drinkers, but are increasingly affecting younger drinkers. Other problems include increased risk of stroke, heart disease and brain damage. Another risk associated with alcohol is dependence or addiction. There is, perhaps unsurprisingly, a correlation between high levels of engagement in alcohol consumption by the general population and the rate of alcohol dependence within that population (Rehm and Eschmann 2002 cited Babor et al. 2010: 20). Despite this correlation, the direction of causality is unclear. âDependence may perpetuate heavy drinking, or heavy drinking may contribute to the developments of dependence, or these two mechanisms may operate simultaneouslyâ (Babor et al. 2010: 20). Addiction to alcohol or other drugs is not an inevitable consequence, but is a genuine risk, particularly for those predisposed. According to Morse (2011: 176), most people who use âpotentially addicting substances do not become addicts, but between 15% and 17% doâ (I will talk more about addiction in Chapter 6).
There are also acute physical harms associated with consuming excessive amounts of alcohol in one go, or binging. Binge drinking involves consuming large quantities of alcohol in a short period of time which results in intoxication (and often bad behaviour). Binge drinking and its consequences are well publicized, and, as mentioned above, policy makers and reformers are often preoccupied with it, especially on certain occasions. Acco...