Modern terrorism
Events such as 9/11, the Bali bombing, the Mumbai attacks and the recent Boston bombings can easily lead to the view that terrorism is a modern-day phenomenon; yet when we look back historically, we see terrorism has been in existence for a long period of time. Terrorist acts have been designed to frighten and intimidate the many by targeting the few, and terrorism has probably existed for millennia (Miller, 2004). It is even said to have existed as far back as 66â73 ad, with reports of assassinations occurring throughout Roman history. During this period, many brutal acts were carried out in crowded places, designed to create the same type of fear and reactions that modern-day terrorists attempt to produce, such as elements of political unrest (Gearson, 2002). By examining terrorism through the ages we add to our understanding of the concept, motives and rationale behind terrorist acts.
There is little difference between historical and modern-day terrorism: all suicide attacks or assassination attempts come with a degree of what is termed âpsychological toxicityâ (Dougall et al, 2005, p. 28), as the âmany are intimidated by the actions of a fewâ. Relatively recent events such as the Bali attacks in 2002 and 2005, the Madrid train bombings in March 20041 and the Mumbai attacks in November 20082 share a commonality in that they targeted, killed and injured many people, and instilled fear in the rest of the population. The attacks involved few operatives and were random and unexpected in nature, with the perpetrators all claiming to be members of radical Islamic groups. Despite what the popular press would have its readers believe, Islamic terrorism is only one of many forms of terrorism: other forms include suicide terrorism, economic terrorism, domestic terrorism, international terrorism and bio-terrorism. As modern terrorism appears to have many aims and facets, it is difficult to define, and many definitions can be found.
On close examination, three main characteristics emerge which are common to all definitions: the intention to cause death or serious injury, particularly to non-combatant civilians; the intention to cause damage to infrastructure and property; and a desire to intimidate a government or population (Michael and Scolnick, 2006; Sheppard, 2009). Consideration of the Madrid train bombings, the London underground and bus bombings3 and the Mumbai attacks reveals all of these aims were achieved, and to great effect.
Global terrorist attacks
In recent years, terrorist attacks have occurred in numerous countries across the globe. Between 1994 and 2003 there were 32 terrorist attacks in 39 countries, resulting in 3,299 deaths (Wilson and Thomson, 2005). The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) from 2002 to 2011 highlights that global terrorism significantly and steadily increased, particularly in the 2005 to 2007 period. This increase is demonstrated by examining the terrorist incidents which occurred in just one year, 2011, in which 4,564 global incidents resulted in 7,473 deaths and 13,961 injuries. These attacks are usually extremely well planned and, for the first time in recent history, non-combatant civilians are the primary target of violence (Winkates, 2006) â as opposed to the two World Wars, when professional soldiers and strategic buildings were usually the targets. This is highlighted by the number of attacks on military institutions in the period 2002â2011, which accounted for only 4 per cent of terrorist incidents (Institute for Economics and Peace, 2012).
The classic example of a modern-day terrorist event is the attacks of 11 September 2001 (9/11) in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. In these attacks, 19 terrorists hijacked four airliners and crashed them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington and a field in Pennsylvania. The 9/11 attacks were the largest human-made disaster on American soil, with approximately 3,000 individuals reported killed and many thousands more injured (DeLisi et al, 2003). The terrorists had deliberately set out to kill themselves and as many other non-combatant civilians as possible. The fear this act instilled in the American public, and the world, was immeasurable.
In the following year, 2002, the Indonesian island of Bali was targeted. At 11.08 pm on Saturday 12 October in Legian Street, Kuta, a popular bar, Paddy's, was targeted by a suicide bomber. Tourists and locals ran outside to escape the heat and turmoil that resulted in the explosion. At 11.17 pm a larger bomb secreted in a panel van outside the Sari club was detonated. The bombings resulted in a large fire, which engulfed approximately 200 metres of Legian Street. Many tourists and locals in the vicinity of Legian Street and inside the bar and club were killed and injured. The casualties amounted to 202 deceased and 325 injured (Yayasan IDEP, 2003).
In October 2005, Bali was again targeted by suicide bombers when terrorists exploded two bombs in Kuta and one in Jimbaran Bay, resulting in 23 fatalities (âAustralia's emergency responseâ, 2005). On both occasions, Australian tourists were among the fatalities. The attacks were perpetrated by suicide bombers who perfected the technique of quietly infiltrating deep into their enemiesâ territory without drawing attention to themselves, which is a technique that allows for low security risks (Ramasubramanian, 2004) for the terrorist embedded in the targeted community. The effect of these attacks on primary-level victims was extensive, both physically and psychologically.
The 9/11 attacks of 2001 and the London bombings in 2005 were also perpetrated by suicide attackers. Although such events are relatively small in number, suicide bombings have contributed to the fear and terror individuals and communities feel following terrorist attacks. Suicide attacks account for 48 per cent of the terror attack death statistics worldwide and have been termed the most aggressive form of terrorism (Pape, 2003). They are a difficult concept to understand as, according to Pastor (2004, p. 701), suicide terrorism âdefies a basic psychological drive â the need for self-preservationâ. Yet many terrorists are ready to sacrifice their own lives âin the process of destroying or attempting to destroy a target to advance a political goalâ (Jane's Intelligence review, cited in Winkates, 2006, p. 89), and as one terrorist dies another, it seems, is ready and willing to take their place.
The objectives of terrorism
Apart from killing mainly non-combatant civilians and causing general fear and unrest in the community, one of the primary aims of terrorism is to achieve an intense political objective (Ramsubramanian, 2004; Winkates, 2006). For example, on 11 March 2004 a series of ten terrorist bombs were detonated on early-morning rush-hour trains in Madrid, Spain. A total of 191 commuters were killed and 1,800 injured, and the incident was declared Europe's worst-ever terrorist attack (USA Today, 2007). The objective in this instance appeared to be political, as the bombings occurred just three days before the Spanish general election. At the election, the previously popular ruling conservative-leaning party was voted out of office. Connections appeared to have been made by the Spanish voters to the Aznar government's open support for the war in Iraq and the deployment of Spanish troops in Afghanistan (Powell, 2004). The Spanish Socialist Workersâ Party was brought to power with a pledge to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan, which they did shortly after winning office. It seemed the bombers had achieved their objective.
Terrorist attacks are not new to Spain, as the Basque separatist movement has been operating in the country since 1959 with the aim of forcing the government to allow separation of the greater Basque region. In 2009 it was suspected of planting a bomb which killed two Spanish policemen on the holiday island of Mallorca (Mielniezuk, 2009). Other countries have also endured long-standing disputes and terrorist attacks, and these will now be discussed.